The Right To Bear Arms

EBKdnqwWkAAIXiu.jpg
Only the unorganized militia complains about gun control.

Only lame bots make insane posts about nothing.
 
The right to bear arms also includes RESPONSIBILITY.

Any functional idiot can be quickly taught to fire a gun and hit a cardboard box - but there's much more to it than that if an armed citizen pulls a gun in a violent shootout like in El Paso. How are police supposed to know the difference between the armed citizen and the terrorist?
 
The right to bear arms also includes RESPONSIBILITY.

Any functional idiot can be quickly taught to fire a gun and hit a cardboard box - but there's much more to it than that if an armed citizen pulls a gun in a violent shootout like in El Paso. How are police supposed to know the difference between the armed citizen and the terrorist?

One guy shooting at the crowd=terrorist

Crowd shooting at one guy=armed citizens
 
The right to bear arms also includes RESPONSIBILITY.

Any functional idiot can be quickly taught to fire a gun and hit a cardboard box - but there's much more to it than that if an armed citizen pulls a gun in a violent shootout like in El Paso. How are police supposed to know the difference between the armed citizen and the terrorist?

One guy shooting at the crowd=terrorist

Crowd shooting at one guy=armed citizens

A shootout? Wow!
 
We have a Second Amendment. Why do we have security problems in our free States?

No one takes the left seriously about gun control.
Our Second Amendment is express not implied.

It sure is, and expressly guarantees the right to bear arms.
Only the unorganized militia complain about gun control laws.

Only you are so consistently incoherent and dogmatic.
 
We have a Second Amendment. Why do we have security problems in our free States?

No one takes the left seriously about gun control.
Our Second Amendment is express not implied.

It sure is, and expressly guarantees the right to bear arms.
Only the unorganized militia complain about gun control laws.

Only you are so consistently incoherent and dogmatic.
Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment.
 
The right to bear arms also includes RESPONSIBILITY.

Any functional idiot can be quickly taught to fire a gun and hit a cardboard box - but there's much more to it than that if an armed citizen pulls a gun in a violent shootout like in El Paso. How are police supposed to know the difference between the armed citizen and the terrorist?

One guy shooting at the crowd=terrorist

Crowd shooting at one guy=armed citizens

Thanks for showing you don't have a clue.
 
No one takes the left seriously about gun control.
Our Second Amendment is express not implied.

It sure is, and expressly guarantees the right to bear arms.
Only the unorganized militia complain about gun control laws.

Only you are so consistently incoherent and dogmatic.
Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment.

As do individuals.
 
Our Second Amendment is express not implied.

It sure is, and expressly guarantees the right to bear arms.
Only the unorganized militia complain about gun control laws.

Only you are so consistently incoherent and dogmatic.
Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment.

As do individuals.
Only the unorganized militia complains about gun control laws.
 
No one takes the left seriously about gun control.
Our Second Amendment is express not implied.

It sure is, and expressly guarantees the right to bear arms.
Only the unorganized militia complain about gun control laws.

Only you are so consistently incoherent and dogmatic.
Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment.

If you look at who the founders considered the well regulated militia, it was essentially everyone.
Each state words it slightly differently, but there were no police or any standing army back then, so the unorganized militia had to do everything, when needed. The tradition was the shotgun over the mantel. Good for pirates, bandits, gangs, bears, coyotes, natives, snakes, rabid dogs, etc.

By the way, the phrase "well regulated" means well practiced, as in regular digestion, a well regulated clock, etc.
 
It sure is, and expressly guarantees the right to bear arms.
Only the unorganized militia complain about gun control laws.

Only you are so consistently incoherent and dogmatic.
Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment.

As do individuals.
Only the unorganized militia complains about gun control laws.

Which is supposed to be everyone.
 
ECNJ9yQX4AYuHyy.jpg


Don't be a Dick. Ban assault weapons and pass universal background checks!


There is no such thing as an assault weapon.
In the revolutionary war, blunderbusses were used as assault weapons, (also called coach guns).
In the civil war, a pair of pistols was used as assault weapons by cavalry.
In the first world war, it was the pump, trench, shotgun.
In WWII it was carbines.

There days, all weapons used as assault weapons are full auto.
No firearm sold to civilians are full auto.

If you think you need universal background checks to prevent sales over the internet or at gun shows, you would be completely wrong.
Gun shows and internet sales have always required background checks in the last 20 years.

So if someone threatens your sister and she asks to borrow a gun for protection, according to you she should have to pay $20 for a background check and wait a week? That makes no sense at all.
Criminals are never going to bother with background checks, because they already intend to violate crimes with far greater penalties.
Background checks only keep the honest disarmed.
 
ECNJ9yQX4AYuHyy.jpg


Don't be a Dick. Ban assault weapons and pass universal background checks!


There is no such thing as an assault weapon.
In the revolutionary war, blunderbusses were used as assault weapons, (also called coach guns).
In the civil war, a pair of pistols was used as assault weapons by cavalry.
In the first world war, it was the pump, trench, shotgun.
In WWII it was carbines.

There days, all weapons used as assault weapons are full auto.
No firearm sold to civilians are full auto.

If you think you need universal background checks to prevent sales over the internet or at gun shows, you would be completely wrong.
Gun shows and internet sales have always required background checks in the last 20 years.

So if someone threatens your sister and she asks to borrow a gun for protection, according to you she should have to pay $20 for a background check and wait a week? That makes no sense at all.
Criminals are never going to bother with background checks, because they already intend to violate crimes with far greater penalties.
Background checks only keep the honest disarmed.

An assault weapon is any weapon that makes a gun nut feel like Rambo - especially with high-capacity magazines. Except for police - all magazines should be limited to no more than 5 rounds. No one goes on a shooting rampage with single-shot weapons. Don't be a Dick.
 
Our Second Amendment is express not implied.

It sure is, and expressly guarantees the right to bear arms.
Only the unorganized militia complain about gun control laws.

Only you are so consistently incoherent and dogmatic.
Well regulated militia have literal recourse to our Second Amendment.

If you look at who the founders considered the well regulated militia, it was essentially everyone.
Each state words it slightly differently, but there were no police or any standing army back then, so the unorganized militia had to do everything, when needed. The tradition was the shotgun over the mantel. Good for pirates, bandits, gangs, bears, coyotes, natives, snakes, rabid dogs, etc.

By the way, the phrase "well regulated" means well practiced, as in regular digestion, a well regulated clock, etc.
lol. no, it doesn't. you are either unorganized or well regulated and Organized.
 

Forum List

Back
Top