🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

The Rise of Intolerant Liberals

cons far out give to charity. Libs only care about themselves.

That's why they want government to take care of the poor, it relieves them of guilt. If we relied on them, the poor would go hungry.
If the poor would get off their couches and get to work, they wouldn't be hungry.

That is the sad excuse that Republicans give, that the poor are just lazy and don't want to work. And, then, they call themselves Christian.


Jesus, on the poor:
Mark 14:7
"For you always have the poor with you, and whenever you wish you can do good to them; but you do not always have Me.


The fact of the matter, which most conservatives are ignorant about, is that studies have been done, and what you and other conservatives claim is so far from the truth that there must be another reason for your reluctance to have welfare, something called "greediness".



But the paper shouldn’t be taken at face value because the authors’ abundant caveats show that their study measures neither the reality of poverty in America, nor that of the public programs designed to fight it.

Tanner and Hughes acknowledge that “surveys of welfare recipients consistently show their desire for a job.” They acknowledge that a significant share of those receiving public benefits are working – Walmart employees, for example, famouslyrely on public assistance to get by, meaning that taxpayers effectively subsidize the Walton family’s vast fortunes. And they note that programs like TANF are time-limited – to a maximum of 60 months except in most cases.

They also acknowledge the central flaw in their conclusion: in real life the “typical” family in their study doesn’t come close to receiving the maximum benefit from every single program for which they’re eligible. But here the authors’ caveat doesn’t go far enough. Due largely to the fact that eligibility requirements have already become harder to overcome, these programs are helping fewer poor families get by. In 2009, around three out of four poor families with kids weren’t getting any TANF benefits. At the height of the economic crash, about 25 percent of those eligible for food stamps weren’t receiving them; during better times, that number hovers around 40 percent. And as the CATO study concedes, six out of seven poor families aren’t getting housing assistance.


Think Tank Report Says Poor Americans Have It Too Good | BillMoyers.com
You leftists are wrong yet again. How many times do I have to keep explaining this to you braindead marxists?
Jesus did indeed want to feed the poor, but not from legislation. But from free will. You leftist clowns say killing unborn babies is cool, but if you decide not to kill them, then it's up to us to take care of them. Hypocrites!
As a conservative, middle-class, working taxpayer, I give freely to charities when I can. Once you Dims mandate that I give to charities of your choosing, it's no longer a charity. It's theft.
So hear this you pos leftist freeloaders:
KISS MY ASS.
 
Good. Finally. Now what about the people who simply don't know? What about the dispersal? Ever hear of the Lost Tribes of Israel? Even Christ spoke of them.

What does it matter? The fact that they call themselves Jews, and are considered Jews is what is being discussed here....not who you think is a "true" Jew by your perceived definition.

Here:

Jewish Facts From Portland: How Jews Came From Tribe of Judah, Benjamin and Levi
Good. Finally. Now what about the people who simply don't know? What about the dispersal? Ever hear of the Lost Tribes of Israel? Even Christ spoke of them.

What does it matter? The fact that they call themselves Jews, and are considered Jews is what is being discussed here....not who you think is a "true" Jew by your perceived definition.

Here:

Jewish Facts From Portland: How Jews Came From Tribe of Judah, Benjamin and Levi

You keep missing the point. You keep giving me information on how the word "Jew" came about, and who the true "Jews" were based on the fact that the other 10 tribes were dissolved, but that doesn't explain or disregard that today, many call themselves "Jews" and are classified as "Jews" that are not descendants of Judah or Benjamin. The United States census doesn't check to make sure they are descendants of Judah, Benjamin or Levi, and they are still considered Jews. That you claim they are not "true" Jews is of no consequence in this argument here.

In other words you simply will not accept the truth of the matter. I am a Seminole. Were I to embrace and accept Judaism, I would still be a Seminole. I would not be a Jew.
 
cons far out give to charity. Libs only care about themselves.

That's why they want government to take care of the poor, it relieves them of guilt. If we relied on them, the poor would go hungry.
If the poor would get off their couches and get to work, they wouldn't be hungry.

That is the sad excuse that Republicans give, that the poor are just lazy and don't want to work. And, then, they call themselves Christian.


Jesus, on the poor:
Mark 14:7
"For you always have the poor with you, and whenever you wish you can do good to them; but you do not always have Me.


The fact of the matter, which most conservatives are ignorant about, is that studies have been done, and what you and other conservatives claim is so far from the truth that there must be another reason for your reluctance to have welfare, something called "greediness".



But the paper shouldn’t be taken at face value because the authors’ abundant caveats show that their study measures neither the reality of poverty in America, nor that of the public programs designed to fight it.

Tanner and Hughes acknowledge that “surveys of welfare recipients consistently show their desire for a job.” They acknowledge that a significant share of those receiving public benefits are working – Walmart employees, for example, famouslyrely on public assistance to get by, meaning that taxpayers effectively subsidize the Walton family’s vast fortunes. And they note that programs like TANF are time-limited – to a maximum of 60 months except in most cases.

They also acknowledge the central flaw in their conclusion: in real life the “typical” family in their study doesn’t come close to receiving the maximum benefit from every single program for which they’re eligible. But here the authors’ caveat doesn’t go far enough. Due largely to the fact that eligibility requirements have already become harder to overcome, these programs are helping fewer poor families get by. In 2009, around three out of four poor families with kids weren’t getting any TANF benefits. At the height of the economic crash, about 25 percent of those eligible for food stamps weren’t receiving them; during better times, that number hovers around 40 percent. And as the CATO study concedes, six out of seven poor families aren’t getting housing assistance.


Think Tank Report Says Poor Americans Have It Too Good | BillMoyers.com
You leftists are wrong yet again. How many times do I have to keep explaining this to you braindead marxists?
Jesus did indeed want to feed the poor, but not from legislation. But from free will. You leftist clowns say killing unborn babies is cool, but if you decide not to kill them, then it's up to us to take care of them. Hypocrites!
As a conservative, middle-class, working taxpayer, I give freely to charities when I can. Once you Dims mandate that I give to charities of your choosing, it's no longer a charity. It's theft.
So hear this you pos leftist freeloaders:
KISS MY ASS.

You greedy conservatives, please quote the scripture where Jesus said it had to be done from "free will" and not legislation. The fact that I don't "whine" about some of my tax money going to feed the poor is a sign of my "free will", idiot.....while, you, on the other side, want it to be voluntary, so you can squelch on it.

And you can Kiss your own Ass....your head is already so far into your ass, it shouldn't be too hard for you.
 
You leftists are wrong yet again. How many times do I have to keep explaining this to you braindead marxists?
Jesus did indeed want to feed the poor, but not from legislation. But from free will.

Has anyone ever revealed to you the dimension of stupid you inhabit? Let me help you goofy

I recall Jesus's famous words "Render to Caesar what is Caesar except if Caesar designs programs to help the poor...in that case its up to you my followers to denigrate the poor and deny Caesar any programs to help the poor" Jesus was pretty specific about that ...Do Not let the Government help the poor
12745832_1119358298094633_5427687013553543509_n.jpg
12744055_1111710122182791_4834629133869781164_n.jpg
 
cons far out give to charity. Libs only care about themselves.

That's why they want government to take care of the poor, it relieves them of guilt. If we relied on them, the poor would go hungry.
If the poor would get off their couches and get to work, they wouldn't be hungry.

That is the sad excuse that Republicans give, that the poor are just lazy and don't want to work. And, then, they call themselves Christian.


Jesus, on the poor:
Mark 14:7
"For you always have the poor with you, and whenever you wish you can do good to them; but you do not always have Me.


The fact of the matter, which most conservatives are ignorant about, is that studies have been done, and what you and other conservatives claim is so far from the truth that there must be another reason for your reluctance to have welfare, something called "greediness".



But the paper shouldn’t be taken at face value because the authors’ abundant caveats show that their study measures neither the reality of poverty in America, nor that of the public programs designed to fight it.

Tanner and Hughes acknowledge that “surveys of welfare recipients consistently show their desire for a job.” They acknowledge that a significant share of those receiving public benefits are working – Walmart employees, for example, famouslyrely on public assistance to get by, meaning that taxpayers effectively subsidize the Walton family’s vast fortunes. And they note that programs like TANF are time-limited – to a maximum of 60 months except in most cases.

They also acknowledge the central flaw in their conclusion: in real life the “typical” family in their study doesn’t come close to receiving the maximum benefit from every single program for which they’re eligible. But here the authors’ caveat doesn’t go far enough. Due largely to the fact that eligibility requirements have already become harder to overcome, these programs are helping fewer poor families get by. In 2009, around three out of four poor families with kids weren’t getting any TANF benefits. At the height of the economic crash, about 25 percent of those eligible for food stamps weren’t receiving them; during better times, that number hovers around 40 percent. And as the CATO study concedes, six out of seven poor families aren’t getting housing assistance.


Think Tank Report Says Poor Americans Have It Too Good | BillMoyers.com
You leftists are wrong yet again. How many times do I have to keep explaining this to you braindead marxists?
Jesus did indeed want to feed the poor, but not from legislation. But from free will. You leftist clowns say killing unborn babies is cool, but if you decide not to kill them, then it's up to us to take care of them. Hypocrites!
As a conservative, middle-class, working taxpayer, I give freely to charities when I can. Once you Dims mandate that I give to charities of your choosing, it's no longer a charity. It's theft.
So hear this you pos leftist freeloaders:
KISS MY ASS.

You greedy conservatives, please quote the scripture where Jesus said it had to be done from "free will" and not legislation. The fact that I don't "whine" about some of my tax money going to feed the poor is a sign of my "free will", idiot.....while, you, on the other side, want it to be voluntary, so you can squelch on it.

And you can Kiss your own Ass....your head is already so far into your ass, it shouldn't be too hard for you.
Jesus didn't legislate - FOOL. He taught. You leftists don't believe in Jesus Christ or the Bible anyway, so stop it. Start quoting Rachel Maddow or Barry "The Blamer" Obama, people you fools can more closely associate with.
Your Takers make me sick.
 
The fact of the matter, which most conservatives are ignorant about, is that studies have been done, and what you and other conservatives claim is so far from the truth that there must be another reason for your reluctance to have welfare, something called "greediness".

Greed is about desiring to take what does not rightfully belong to you, to be used in the manner that you choose rather than in the manner that its rightful owner would choose. It is ironic that those on the wrong are so fond of accusing those on the right of “greed”, when it is the wrong-wing policies that are based entirely on greed.
 
Liberals are not tolerant of those that don't agree with their ideology. They go after women, gays, hispanics, blacks and on and on, that disagree with their views.


Er, I think you might be a mite confused.......you whine about my snark, which was a response to your snark, and then claim that I shouldn't complain about snark when I never did, other than to point out that you snarked first????

Your leaders want to do "ultra sounds" on women who want abortions, who, by the way, are legal, and ultra sounds not necessary, you want to defund Planned Parenthood, which, by the way, gives poor women medical assistance, and you want women to pay for contraceptives, while men get Viagra free, and you claim that we go after women?

You are totally clueless.
 
Greed is about desiring to take what does not rightfully belong to you, to be used in the manner that you choose rather than in the manner that its rightful owner would choose. It is ironic that those on the wrong are so fond of accusing those on the right of “greed”, when it is the wrong-wing policies that are based entirely on greed.
I do not want my money going to the Pentagon for permanent war but you do LOL why ...because you a right wing stooge...is the money going to the Pentagon being stolen from its rightful owners ?
 
The fact of the matter, which most conservatives are ignorant about, is that studies have been done, and what you and other conservatives claim is so far from the truth that there must be another reason for your reluctance to have welfare, something called "greediness".

Greed is about desiring to take what does not rightfully belong to you, to be used in the manner that you choose rather than in the manner that its rightful owner would choose. It is ironic that those on the wrong are so fond of accusing those on the right of “greed”, when it is the wrong-wing policies that are based entirely on greed.


Bwahahaha....that is a new take. We don't mind paying taxes and our tax money being used for the poor and needy, but we are the ones that are greedy?

That is what I call "stretchingggggggggggggggggggg" - another conservative lame excuse! Tax money, once in the hands of government, does not rightfully belong to you....another one of your erroneous beliefs!
 
Is Obamacare being reported as a tax by the federal government? The Supreme Court declared it a tax.
 
Your Takers make me sick.
I am glad you are sick asshole ...Jesus did not say "stop the Government from helping the poor"
I didn't say he did shitforbrains.
yes you did eater of shit ...you just do not like how stupid it exposes you as being..fuck you right wing pussy
Man, the title of this thread suits you perfect. You Takers are getting a little pesky. It's not my fault that you clowns have lost your way, and will soon lose the presidency. Hell, you might even have to get a job.
 
So is that your way of saying you were wrong to make a claim that Jews can only come from Judah and Benjamin? Because your responses seem to go off in another direction and don't seem to address the point at hand.

No. That is my belief. Not only is it my belief but the belief of many other Christians. We fully grasp the fact that there remains many folks who don't realize they are descended from one or more of the lost tribes of Israel. These people were taken captive and dispersed. They cover the nations of the world. They are likened to the stars in the sky and the sand of the seashore.

But that is an erroneous belief. There is no Bible verse that claims that to be called a Jew you must be a descendant of Judah or Benjamin. That may have been where the term originated, but now, Jews don't necessarily have to come from Judah or Benjamin as you claim.

The following wiki data shows that many call themselves Jews that are not direct descendants of Judah or Benjamin....but rather of Joseph (Tribe of Israel) and his sons...so, I don't think your claim is correct. And then, there is Ruth, the Moabite, who converted to Judaism.

The Tribe of Joseph was one of the Tribes of Israel. Since Ephraim and Manasseh (often called the "two half-tribes of Joseph") together traditionally constituted the tribe of Joseph, it was often not listed as one of the tribes, in favour of Ephraim and Manasseh being listed in its place; consequently it was often termed the House of Joseph.

According to the Torah, the tribe consisted of descendants of Joseph, a son of Jacob and Rachel,


and many Persian Jews claim to be descendants of Ephraim.

Many Samaritans claim descent from the grandchildren of Joseph under four main septs, his grandsons Danfi, Tsedakah, Mafraj and Sarawi [1] In northeast India, the Mizo Jews claim descent from Manasseh,


Tribe of Joseph - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pure gibberish you c/p straw man/woman! You're very silly....bible-thumping political nobody - Shillary Clinton

Says the ignoramus who has not intelligent reply.....your butt hurt is showing big time!

Referring to intelligence? Holy smokes..... You can't even compose a proper sentence and you're going to refer to intelligence in an attempt to make a moot point? Wow!.....you are a fucking genius....asswipe...

Then another asslick goes on a tirade against Jews? Pitiful and shows how unintelligent you and your club friends really are.....pitiful. Start an intelligent thread and you're off......>>>>>>>>GO>:>>>>>>

All you dumbass can do is whine about what someone posts by using ad hominem and not giving intelligent rebuttal and then you complain that I can't make a proper sentence? All you are doing is name-calling and criticizing my response to someone else, without offering a counter and you want to be considered "intelligent"........bwahahaha calling you an idiot would be an insult to all the stupid people.

Please don't let your mind wander......it's way too small to be outside by itself, retarded asswipe.
 
Man, the title of this thread suits you perfect. You Takers are getting a little pesky. It's not my fault that you clowns have lost your way, and will soon lose the presidency. Hell, you might even have to get a job.
Oh oh I think we are getting close to that Right wing moment when you all declare"you have kicked liberal ass all over the board" Lol
 
Your Takers make me sick.
I am glad you are sick asshole ...Jesus did not say "stop the Government from helping the poor"
I didn't say he did shitforbrains.


Bwahahaha....you don't even know what you say. You claimed that Jesus didn't want the government (legislation) to feed the poor.....that's the same thing, just said differently.....so, you're not that familiar with the English language? If you and your moron peers want English to be the official language, you better hurry and start learning it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top