The Second Amendment is the answer.

[Pete7469]

How many times has it been used to stop an out of control government so far in comparison with all the mass shootings?

My God....

You were not just "dropped on your head as a baby".

Someone grabbed you by the legs and used you to destroy a concrete driveway...

Try not putting the cart before the horse imbecile, no government has gotten out of control when the people were armed you fucking retard. Ask the goddamned soviets who got their asses kicked by a bunch of fucking rock farmers and sheep shaggers in Afghanistan.

I'll even give you an off the wall hypothetical...

Lets say your meat puppet faggot messiah waved his magic dildo, and all privately held guns disappeared in the US in 2009.

Since I have a grasp on reality, and I know people living in primitive conditions in Peshawar and the jungles of Mindanao hand craft all sorts of fully automatic weapons with tools a pawn shop would refuse to take for any price. Considering the amount of good tools and knowledge of metallurgy just about any mechanic has in his garage, let alone the thousands of hobbyists and gunsmiths in Texas alone the country would be flush with guns within weeks. Your meat puppet faggot would lose feeling in it's arm flailing away with that magic dildo and the guns would keep coming back.

The reason parasites like you will never establish your globalist nanny state is because of Armed Americans and you can't do a allah dammed thing about it.

Now go get that retroactive self abortion so that you can finally achieve the only thing you will ever achieve, conversion to fertilizer.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Meanwhile back in reality, other developed nations need no such brazenly stupid ideas as yours. They have common sense gun measures and as a result….they have far less gun violence.

Along with more tyranny and fascism

It is no coincidence that the UK banned guns and knives and is now locking people up for wrong speak and thought crimes

Does the UK have the 1st Amendment?

What it doesnt have is a ban on guns and knives.

Yes it does

Links you thick fucker,

Like the link about dancula you ignored?

Too late you already admitted it on other threads so stop lying

 

[Lakhota]

Naturally I see the bed wetters dancing in the blood of the dead, gleeful to have yet more horrific murder scenes left behind by some psychopath who happened to use a gun.

They only thing they will ever parrot as a "solution" is the dogma they've been fed about "common sense gun control", which is both nonsense and a lie. They attempt to ridicule the common sense that bad guys with guns are stopped by good guys with guns. Every time you mix the two, the incident is drastically altered. Unfortunately the good guy doesn't always win, but if they at least get to interfere innocent defenseless people get away.

The problem is the fact that there are so fucking many innocent defenseless sheep. The 2nd Amendment provides the citizens protection from government so that they can never be disarmed. The Constitution mandates the government is supposed to enlist all able bodied citizens, train and drill them to be able to perform minimal duties in protecting the nation from all enemies, foreign and domestic. It is yet another function government has failed to perform, and it is a deliberate part of the leftist agenda to weaken our nation.

Would anyone disagree that an individual that takes it upon themselves to commit mass murder is a domestic enemy? If even half our nation's people were properly trained in high school to FIGHT WITH A GUN before graduation, there would be a whole lot less of these psychopaths walking into "gun free" areas free to slaughter sheep, and there would be shit load less sheep.

That's common sense.


.

Other than the police - no citizen with a gun stepped forward to stop the carnage in El Paso and Dayton. Why not? Where were all the brave NRA gun nutters?

 

[Dick Foster]

you should get a license if you want to own a gun, my friends

its like owning a car

states that have done that have seen dramatic drops in gun violence. that's the solution!

get to work, Moscow Mitch. GET STEPPIN!

BULLSHIT!

 

[candycorn]

Naturally I see the bed wetters dancing in the blood of the dead, gleeful to have yet more horrific murder scenes left behind by some psychopath who happened to use a gun.

They only thing they will ever parrot as a "solution" is the dogma they've been fed about "common sense gun control", which is both nonsense and a lie. They attempt to ridicule the common sense that bad guys with guns are stopped by good guys with guns. Every time you mix the two, the incident is drastically altered. Unfortunately the good guy doesn't always win, but if they at least get to interfere innocent defenseless people get away.

The problem is the fact that there are so fucking many innocent defenseless sheep. The 2nd Amendment provides the citizens protection from government so that they can never be disarmed. The Constitution mandates the government is supposed to enlist all able bodied citizens, train and drill them to be able to perform minimal duties in protecting the nation from all enemies, foreign and domestic. It is yet another function government has failed to perform, and it is a deliberate part of the leftist agenda to weaken our nation.

Would anyone disagree that an individual that takes it upon themselves to commit mass murder is a domestic enemy? If even half our nation's people were properly trained in high school to FIGHT WITH A GUN before graduation, there would be a whole lot less of these psychopaths walking into "gun free" areas free to slaughter sheep, and there would be shit load less sheep.

That's common sense.


.

Meanwhile back in reality, other developed nations need no such brazenly stupid ideas as yours. They have common sense gun measures and as a result….they have far less gun violence.

Like Switzerland for example. That backwards little
nation that has military assault weapons stashed in half the closets in the country?
I'm still waiting for the mass shootings and waves of gun violence to sweep their nation and take out half the population.
If your ligic bears any truth at all, it just has to happen any day now. Till then, maybe you'd do well to button up.
In the meantime get your dumb ass down to a local range and learn to shoot.

Also..enlighten us on the restrictions that go along with that gun owernship….would you?

I’m betting not.

Checkmate.

 

[Pete7469]

That’s rightwing idiocy – as ignorant as it is wrong.

There is nothing in Second Amendment case law supporting insurrectionist nonsense.

No one is arguing that there is you parasite. Except that many of the founders can be quoted as supporting the concept.

“What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.”
– Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787

The Second Amendment codifies an individual right to posses a firearm pursuant to lawful self-defense – not ‘overthrow’ a government incorrectly perceived to have become ‘tyrannical.’

At least you've admitted the 2A "codifies an individual right to posses a firearm pursuant to lawful self-defense" most of your bed wetter peers reject that and will be here shortly to call you a racist...

I jest of course, you and your peers deliberately reject or ignore information all the time.

The Second Amendment doesn’t ‘trump’ the First – it doesn’t abridge the right of the people to petition the government for a redress of grievances through the political or judicial process; it doesn’t authorize a minority of the people to take up arms against a government lawfully put into place reflecting the will of a majority of the people absent the consent of the majority of the people.

Again... No one is stating there is, or the Whiskey Rebellion would have ended much differently. However, it did protect the rights of black people to fend off democrat police wearing stupid costumes in the middle of the night in the 1870's through the 1960's when the black panthers began patrolling their own neighborhoods with long guns.

It was not the intent of the Framers to amend the Constitution to allow the destruction of the Republic they had just created.

There is no ‘leftist agenda’ to ‘weaken’ or nation – that’s a ridiculous lie.

Bullshit

Cloward–Piven strategy - Wikipedia

https://restoring-america.com/Documents/THE NAKED COMMUNIST GOALS WITH NOTES.pdf

And the ‘good guys with guns’ canard is baseless nonsense – there is no objective, documented evidence in support of the idea that citizens carrying concealed firearms act as a deterrent to crime or otherwise stop mass shooting incidents.

I don't even need a link for this asinine parroted talking point.

Just a few people near the door of that Walmart who saw a fucking lunatic with an AK walk in and open up would have stopped any further violence in it's tracks. It's not even worth the effort I put in this far.


.

 

[Tax Man]

That’s rightwing idiocy – as ignorant as it is wrong.

There is nothing in Second Amendment case law supporting insurrectionist nonsense.

No one is arguing that there is you parasite. Except that many of the founders can be quoted as supporting the concept.

“What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.”
– Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787

The Second Amendment codifies an individual right to posses a firearm pursuant to lawful self-defense – not ‘overthrow’ a government incorrectly perceived to have become ‘tyrannical.’

At least you've admitted the 2A "codifies an individual right to posses a firearm pursuant to lawful self-defense" most of your bed wetter peers reject that and will be here shortly to call you a racist...

I jest of course, you and your peers deliberately reject or ignore information all the time.

The Second Amendment doesn’t ‘trump’ the First – it doesn’t abridge the right of the people to petition the government for a redress of grievances through the political or judicial process; it doesn’t authorize a minority of the people to take up arms against a government lawfully put into place reflecting the will of a majority of the people absent the consent of the majority of the people.

Again... No one is stating there is, or the Whiskey Rebellion would have ended much differently. However, it did protect the rights of black people to fend off democrat police wearing stupid costumes in the middle of the night in the 1870's through the 1960's when the black panthers began patrolling their own neighborhoods with long guns.

It was not the intent of the Framers to amend the Constitution to allow the destruction of the Republic they had just created.

There is no ‘leftist agenda’ to ‘weaken’ or nation – that’s a ridiculous lie.

Bullshit

Cloward–Piven strategy - Wikipedia

https://restoring-america.com/Documents/THE NAKED COMMUNIST GOALS WITH NOTES.pdf

And the ‘good guys with guns’ canard is baseless nonsense – there is no objective, documented evidence in support of the idea that citizens carrying concealed firearms act as a deterrent to crime or otherwise stop mass shooting incidents.

I don't even need a link for this asinine parroted talking point.

Just a few people near the door of that Walmart who saw a fucking lunatic with an AK walk in and open up would have stopped any further violence in it's tracks. It's not even worth the effort I put in this far.


.

As the founding fathers cannot give you a lesson in reality or even help you understand the changes in life and living situations that nullify some of the second. I have yet to hear take all the weapons only military assault like ones.

 

[Agit8r]

"The Second Amendment is the solution" to this administration.

 

[wamose]

"The Second Amendment is the solution" to this administration.

Now there's some mental instability. You need to be watched and never allowed to have a gun. Now for a real possible solution. We should allow qualified people to own assault weapons but their use must be restricted to a licenses shooting range. Furthermore, the gun must be stored at the range and never allowed to be taken out. Then everyone gets what they want. Viva Trump. KAG

 

[Agit8r]

"The Second Amendment is the solution" to this administration.

Now there's some mental instability. You need to be watched and never allowed to have a gun. Now for a real possible solution. We should allow qualified people to own assault weapons but their use must be restricted to a licenses shooting range. Furthermore, the gun must be stored at the range and never allowed to be taken out. Then everyone gets what they want. Viva Trump. KAG

The government isn't going to implement that. Fascism relies on the Freikorps to do their bidding. And this fascist administration is following that pattern completely.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Naturally I see the bed wetters dancing in the blood of the dead, gleeful to have yet more horrific murder scenes left behind by some psychopath who happened to use a gun.

They only thing they will ever parrot as a "solution" is the dogma they've been fed about "common sense gun control", which is both nonsense and a lie. They attempt to ridicule the common sense that bad guys with guns are stopped by good guys with guns. Every time you mix the two, the incident is drastically altered. Unfortunately the good guy doesn't always win, but if they at least get to interfere innocent defenseless people get away.

The problem is the fact that there are so fucking many innocent defenseless sheep. The 2nd Amendment provides the citizens protection from government so that they can never be disarmed. The Constitution mandates the government is supposed to enlist all able bodied citizens, train and drill them to be able to perform minimal duties in protecting the nation from all enemies, foreign and domestic. It is yet another function government has failed to perform, and it is a deliberate part of the leftist agenda to weaken our nation.

Would anyone disagree that an individual that takes it upon themselves to commit mass murder is a domestic enemy? If even half our nation's people were properly trained in high school to FIGHT WITH A GUN before graduation, there would be a whole lot less of these psychopaths walking into "gun free" areas free to slaughter sheep, and there would be shit load less sheep.

That's common sense.


.

Meanwhile back in reality, other developed nations need no such brazenly stupid ideas as yours. They have common sense gun measures and as a result….they have far less gun violence.

But, only here, can we have that freedom. This is the ONLY nation on earth that values the right.

Why ruin it for us? You should go live where they don't value the right. You would be much happier.

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Naturally I see the bed wetters dancing in the blood of the dead, gleeful to have yet more horrific murder scenes left behind by some psychopath who happened to use a gun.

They only thing they will ever parrot as a "solution" is the dogma they've been fed about "common sense gun control", which is both nonsense and a lie. They attempt to ridicule the common sense that bad guys with guns are stopped by good guys with guns. Every time you mix the two, the incident is drastically altered. Unfortunately the good guy doesn't always win, but if they at least get to interfere innocent defenseless people get away.

The problem is the fact that there are so fucking many innocent defenseless sheep. The 2nd Amendment provides the citizens protection from government so that they can never be disarmed. The Constitution mandates the government is supposed to enlist all able bodied citizens, train and drill them to be able to perform minimal duties in protecting the nation from all enemies, foreign and domestic. It is yet another function government has failed to perform, and it is a deliberate part of the leftist agenda to weaken our nation.

Would anyone disagree that an individual that takes it upon themselves to commit mass murder is a domestic enemy? If even half our nation's people were properly trained in high school to FIGHT WITH A GUN before graduation, there would be a whole lot less of these psychopaths walking into "gun free" areas free to slaughter sheep, and there would be shit load less sheep.

That's common sense.


.

At the Dayton shooting there were armed guards that killed the shooter in less than a minute and kept him from getting inside the bar.

Even a good guy with a gun and training cannot stop them from happening all the time, just limit the carnage.

True, but would you rather depend on that protection and be a potential meat target, or would you rather shoot back?

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Naturally I see the bed wetters dancing in the blood of the dead, gleeful to have yet more horrific murder scenes left behind by some psychopath who happened to use a gun.

They only thing they will ever parrot as a "solution" is the dogma they've been fed about "common sense gun control", which is both nonsense and a lie. They attempt to ridicule the common sense that bad guys with guns are stopped by good guys with guns. Every time you mix the two, the incident is drastically altered. Unfortunately the good guy doesn't always win, but if they at least get to interfere innocent defenseless people get away.

The problem is the fact that there are so fucking many innocent defenseless sheep. The 2nd Amendment provides the citizens protection from government so that they can never be disarmed. The Constitution mandates the government is supposed to enlist all able bodied citizens, train and drill them to be able to perform minimal duties in protecting the nation from all enemies, foreign and domestic. It is yet another function government has failed to perform, and it is a deliberate part of the leftist agenda to weaken our nation.

Would anyone disagree that an individual that takes it upon themselves to commit mass murder is a domestic enemy? If even half our nation's people were properly trained in high school to FIGHT WITH A GUN before graduation, there would be a whole lot less of these psychopaths walking into "gun free" areas free to slaughter sheep, and there would be shit load less sheep.

That's common sense.


.

Other than the police - no citizen with a gun stepped forward to stop the carnage in El Paso and Dayton. Why not? Where were all the brave NRA gun nutters?

I know this answer will sound dull, but the question is retarded, so here goes:

Because no citizen in the Walmart in El Paso or at the Dayton shooting happened to be armed.

There aren't that many citizens who bother to arm themselves.

That is the problem.

Did you just prove the OP to be true?

.

 

[Rigby5]

Naturally I see the bed wetters dancing in the blood of the dead, gleeful to have yet more horrific murder scenes left behind by some psychopath who happened to use a gun.

They only thing they will ever parrot as a "solution" is the dogma they've been fed about "common sense gun control", which is both nonsense and a lie. They attempt to ridicule the common sense that bad guys with guns are stopped by good guys with guns. Every time you mix the two, the incident is drastically altered. Unfortunately the good guy doesn't always win, but if they at least get to interfere innocent defenseless people get away.

The problem is the fact that there are so fucking many innocent defenseless sheep. The 2nd Amendment provides the citizens protection from government so that they can never be disarmed. The Constitution mandates the government is supposed to enlist all able bodied citizens, train and drill them to be able to perform minimal duties in protecting the nation from all enemies, foreign and domestic. It is yet another function government has failed to perform, and it is a deliberate part of the leftist agenda to weaken our nation.

Would anyone disagree that an individual that takes it upon themselves to commit mass murder is a domestic enemy? If even half our nation's people were properly trained in high school to FIGHT WITH A GUN before graduation, there would be a whole lot less of these psychopaths walking into "gun free" areas free to slaughter sheep, and there would be shit load less sheep.

That's common sense.


.

Other than the police - no citizen with a gun stepped forward to stop the carnage in El Paso and Dayton. Why not? Where were all the brave NRA gun nutters?

That is silly because there are so many laws making it almost impossible for average citizens to be armed.
You can't be within 1000' or a school, can't go to a Post Office, are not allowed in bars or many stores, etc.

 

[Rigby5]

"The Second Amendment is the solution" to this administration.

Now there's some mental instability. You need to be watched and never allowed to have a gun. Now for a real possible solution. We should allow qualified people to own assault weapons but their use must be restricted to a licenses shooting range. Furthermore, the gun must be stored at the range and never allowed to be taken out. Then everyone gets what they want. Viva Trump. KAG

Makes no sense.
When you need a firearm is at home if a criminal attacks, or at home if the government goes corrupt.

 

[Rigby5]

you should get a license if you want to own a gun, my friends

its like owning a car

states that have done that have seen dramatic drops in gun violence. that's the solution!

get to work, Moscow Mitch. GET STEPPIN!

That makes no sense at all.
If you get a license, you are not going to be any more or less likely to shoot someone.
And if you intent to shoot someone, you are not going to be more or less likely to do it whether or not you can get a license.
Almost all guns in the country are from the War On Drugs.
By making drugs illegal, they become more valuable.
That tempts too many poor people.
They then must get guns, since they can't use banks or call the police for protection.
And turf wars are the major cause of murders now, just as they were with Prohibition of Alcohol.

There is no state that ever saw a drop in gun violence from mandating licensing.

 

[Agit8r]

"The Second Amendment is the solution" to this administration.

Now there's some mental instability. You need to be watched and never allowed to have a gun. Now for a real possible solution. We should allow qualified people to own assault weapons but their use must be restricted to a licenses shooting range. Furthermore, the gun must be stored at the range and never allowed to be taken out. Then everyone gets what they want. Viva Trump. KAG

Makes no sense.
When you need a firearm is at home if a criminal attacks, or at home if the government goes corrupt.

I believe the term we used to hear was "democracy insurance"