The Shape Of Things To Come

That means come to our nation.
Those who understand both the Constitution, and the Q'ran, and the ramifications of sharia, see the collision course right around the bend.

And far, far sooner if the Democrats win this election.






A case in point was a recent confrontation in France...

1. "....the result of the four-day police investigation into the fight at Sisco beach on Saturday 13 August.
Three Muslim brothers from the Lupino neighbourhood in Bastia and two villagers from Sisco had been arrested on Wednesday and held in detention, where they were interrogated about the incident.

2. ....three Muslim brothers arrived on the beach on Saturday with their female companions and attempted to "privatize" it. The Muslim women, contrary to initial press reports, were not wearing burkinis but were swimming in full Islamic dress.
['Privatize' meaning demand that all beach-goers conform to sharia.]


The first incidents broke out early in the day when the Muslims put up a no entry sign to keep people from coming on to the beach. A couple already on the beach were forced to leave, as were two young boys canoeing in the creek. Tourists, including a Belgian who took a photograph and local passers-by who got too close were insulted, threatened and pelted with stones.

A group of village teenagers then arrived on the beach as they usually did on a Saturday afternoon. At this point the situation deteriorated and conflicting versions were given to the investigators. One teenager claimed he was hit by one or more of the three Muslim males.


3. The father of the teenager was informed his son was being molested and when he arrived on the scene he too was beaten. Several witnesses indicated to the police that harpoons and a baseball bat were used in the attack.

Dozens of angry villagers then arrived on the beach and in turn physically attacked the Muslims, before the gendarmes arrived and stopped the fight.



4. . The three Muslim brothers aged around 30 and two villagers, a 50-year-old baker and a 21-year-old municipal employee, were interrogated on Wednesday evening. The two villagers were released and will appear in court on Thursday August 18 with the three Muslims, who were already known to the police, one of them for drug-dealing and resisting arrest.

..."on the one hand, there was a gangster-style attempt to take over the beach, on the other an overreaction on the part of the villagers.".... He insisted that the protagonists were neither Islamic radicals nor racists.


[One cannot fail to notice the typical announcements from authorities....common throughout western governments: equivalence, no matter what the causes.
The greatest crime is to appear to be Islamophobic.]



5. The prosecutor’s conclusions play down the role of Islamic radicalism in the affair, but the fact that the women were not wearing burkinis but full Islamic dress is immaterial. There was a deliberate attempt by the family to take over a public beach and prevent others from using it through verbal and physical violence.

There could not be a clearer demonstration that they are refusing to coexist with the local population and prefer to live apart. Such an attitude can only be driven by religious radicalism and hostility to France."
The Burkini Battle: What Really Happened in Corsica | Clarion Project



Quo vadis, western civilization?
Back to the seventh century????

You forgot to link the Democratic Party to this incident. Was Obama on scene and did he cast the first stone? Did he put up a Muslim only sign on the gate to the beach? It seems to me we've had worse in our country, a religious nut walked into a church and killed a doctor; another one bombed the Atlanta Olympics and later an abortion clinic. Sane people do not link these two deranged Christians with all of Christianity or the Democratic Party.

Shit happens, people like you cause shit to happen. Hate breeds hate, intolerance breeds intolerance, stupidity breeds more stupidity. You need to STFU and stop breeding.




"You forgot to link the Democratic Party to this incident."

Gads, you make this easy, you dunce.

a. "Immigraton To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program hasled to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart



And.....

b. "Politifact Says Trump Is Right: Hillary Clinton Supports ‘500% Increase in Syrian Refugees’
Politifact: Hillary Clinton for 500% Increase in Syrian Refugees



An immigrant who hates immigrants. Do the hokey pokey!!

 
8. Hmmm.....folks of the Muslim persuasion demanding that everyone submit to their proclivities?

And it is nothing new.


Early in the 19th century, Alexis deTocqueville anticipated, and discussed this exact problem.

Although Christianity in its many varieties was the religion of the original colonies, Christianity does not preach operational dominance over the body politic in America. Tocqueville compared this aspect to Islam:

“Mohammed professed to derive from Heaven, and has inserted in the Koran, not only religious doctrines, but political maxims, civil and criminal laws, and theories of science. The Gospel, on the contrary, speaks only of the general relations of men to God and to each other, beyond which it inculcates and imposes no point of faith. This alone, besides a thousand other reasons, would suffice to prove that the former of these religions will never long predominate in a cultivated and democratic age, while the latter is destined to retain its sway at these as at all other periods.”
Tocqueville, “Democracy in America,” vol.2, p. 23.



a."....consider this statement from an Iranian 11th-grade schoolbook, quoting the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini: “I am decisively announcing to the whole world that if the world devourers wish to stand against our religion, we will stand against their whole world and will not cease until the annihilation of all of them! Either we all become free or we will go to the greater freedom, which is martyrdom. Either we shake one another’s hands in joy at the victory of Islam in the world, or all of us will turn to eternal life and martyrdom. In both cases, victory and success are ours."
The Worst Foreign-Policy Blunder in American History



Liberals have been trained to eschew the values of our Founders.

Consider the OP, and the story of one case of Muslim religionists demanding compliance from everyone.....
...and the Democrat response: doubling down on herding more and more of said individuals into America.


Vote carefully.
 
That means come to our nation.
Those who understand both the Constitution, and the Q'ran, and the ramifications of sharia, see the collision course right around the bend.

And far, far sooner if the Democrats win this election.






A case in point was a recent confrontation in France...

1. "....the result of the four-day police investigation into the fight at Sisco beach on Saturday 13 August.
Three Muslim brothers from the Lupino neighbourhood in Bastia and two villagers from Sisco had been arrested on Wednesday and held in detention, where they were interrogated about the incident.

2. ....three Muslim brothers arrived on the beach on Saturday with their female companions and attempted to "privatize" it. The Muslim women, contrary to initial press reports, were not wearing burkinis but were swimming in full Islamic dress.
['Privatize' meaning demand that all beach-goers conform to sharia.]


The first incidents broke out early in the day when the Muslims put up a no entry sign to keep people from coming on to the beach. A couple already on the beach were forced to leave, as were two young boys canoeing in the creek. Tourists, including a Belgian who took a photograph and local passers-by who got too close were insulted, threatened and pelted with stones.

A group of village teenagers then arrived on the beach as they usually did on a Saturday afternoon. At this point the situation deteriorated and conflicting versions were given to the investigators. One teenager claimed he was hit by one or more of the three Muslim males.


3. The father of the teenager was informed his son was being molested and when he arrived on the scene he too was beaten. Several witnesses indicated to the police that harpoons and a baseball bat were used in the attack.

Dozens of angry villagers then arrived on the beach and in turn physically attacked the Muslims, before the gendarmes arrived and stopped the fight.



4. . The three Muslim brothers aged around 30 and two villagers, a 50-year-old baker and a 21-year-old municipal employee, were interrogated on Wednesday evening. The two villagers were released and will appear in court on Thursday August 18 with the three Muslims, who were already known to the police, one of them for drug-dealing and resisting arrest.

..."on the one hand, there was a gangster-style attempt to take over the beach, on the other an overreaction on the part of the villagers.".... He insisted that the protagonists were neither Islamic radicals nor racists.


[One cannot fail to notice the typical announcements from authorities....common throughout western governments: equivalence, no matter what the causes.
The greatest crime is to appear to be Islamophobic.]



5. The prosecutor’s conclusions play down the role of Islamic radicalism in the affair, but the fact that the women were not wearing burkinis but full Islamic dress is immaterial. There was a deliberate attempt by the family to take over a public beach and prevent others from using it through verbal and physical violence.

There could not be a clearer demonstration that they are refusing to coexist with the local population and prefer to live apart. Such an attitude can only be driven by religious radicalism and hostility to France."
The Burkini Battle: What Really Happened in Corsica | Clarion Project



Quo vadis, western civilization?
Back to the seventh century????
.
And far, far sooner if the Democrats win this election.


so wrong as usual, it is the pug's that cater to the religious ideology ...


the democrats understand the separation of church and state 1st Amendment and will shut down the muslims as they have recently the christian zealots today ... and will forever, god willing.

.
 
That means come to our nation.
Those who understand both the Constitution, and the Q'ran, and the ramifications of sharia, see the collision course right around the bend.

And far, far sooner if the Democrats win this election.






A case in point was a recent confrontation in France...

1. "....the result of the four-day police investigation into the fight at Sisco beach on Saturday 13 August.
Three Muslim brothers from the Lupino neighbourhood in Bastia and two villagers from Sisco had been arrested on Wednesday and held in detention, where they were interrogated about the incident.

2. ....three Muslim brothers arrived on the beach on Saturday with their female companions and attempted to "privatize" it. The Muslim women, contrary to initial press reports, were not wearing burkinis but were swimming in full Islamic dress.
['Privatize' meaning demand that all beach-goers conform to sharia.]


The first incidents broke out early in the day when the Muslims put up a no entry sign to keep people from coming on to the beach. A couple already on the beach were forced to leave, as were two young boys canoeing in the creek. Tourists, including a Belgian who took a photograph and local passers-by who got too close were insulted, threatened and pelted with stones.

A group of village teenagers then arrived on the beach as they usually did on a Saturday afternoon. At this point the situation deteriorated and conflicting versions were given to the investigators. One teenager claimed he was hit by one or more of the three Muslim males.


3. The father of the teenager was informed his son was being molested and when he arrived on the scene he too was beaten. Several witnesses indicated to the police that harpoons and a baseball bat were used in the attack.

Dozens of angry villagers then arrived on the beach and in turn physically attacked the Muslims, before the gendarmes arrived and stopped the fight.



4. . The three Muslim brothers aged around 30 and two villagers, a 50-year-old baker and a 21-year-old municipal employee, were interrogated on Wednesday evening. The two villagers were released and will appear in court on Thursday August 18 with the three Muslims, who were already known to the police, one of them for drug-dealing and resisting arrest.

..."on the one hand, there was a gangster-style attempt to take over the beach, on the other an overreaction on the part of the villagers.".... He insisted that the protagonists were neither Islamic radicals nor racists.


[One cannot fail to notice the typical announcements from authorities....common throughout western governments: equivalence, no matter what the causes.
The greatest crime is to appear to be Islamophobic.]



5. The prosecutor’s conclusions play down the role of Islamic radicalism in the affair, but the fact that the women were not wearing burkinis but full Islamic dress is immaterial. There was a deliberate attempt by the family to take over a public beach and prevent others from using it through verbal and physical violence.

There could not be a clearer demonstration that they are refusing to coexist with the local population and prefer to live apart. Such an attitude can only be driven by religious radicalism and hostility to France."
The Burkini Battle: What Really Happened in Corsica | Clarion Project



Quo vadis, western civilization?
Back to the seventh century????
.
And far, far sooner if the Democrats win this election.


so wrong as usual, it is the pug's that cater to the religious ideology ...


the democrats understand the separation of church and state 1st Amendment and will shut down the muslims as they have recently the christian zealots today ... and will forever, god willing.

.



Get your head out of the sand.


Democrats won't fight Islamists.....the two have far too much in common.

Neither allows free speech, and both require submission.

Stop being such a fool.
 
That means come to our nation.
Those who understand both the Constitution, and the Q'ran, and the ramifications of sharia, see the collision course right around the bend.

And far, far sooner if the Democrats win this election.






A case in point was a recent confrontation in France...

1. "....the result of the four-day police investigation into the fight at Sisco beach on Saturday 13 August.
Three Muslim brothers from the Lupino neighbourhood in Bastia and two villagers from Sisco had been arrested on Wednesday and held in detention, where they were interrogated about the incident.

2. ....three Muslim brothers arrived on the beach on Saturday with their female companions and attempted to "privatize" it. The Muslim women, contrary to initial press reports, were not wearing burkinis but were swimming in full Islamic dress.
['Privatize' meaning demand that all beach-goers conform to sharia.]


The first incidents broke out early in the day when the Muslims put up a no entry sign to keep people from coming on to the beach. A couple already on the beach were forced to leave, as were two young boys canoeing in the creek. Tourists, including a Belgian who took a photograph and local passers-by who got too close were insulted, threatened and pelted with stones.

A group of village teenagers then arrived on the beach as they usually did on a Saturday afternoon. At this point the situation deteriorated and conflicting versions were given to the investigators. One teenager claimed he was hit by one or more of the three Muslim males.


3. The father of the teenager was informed his son was being molested and when he arrived on the scene he too was beaten. Several witnesses indicated to the police that harpoons and a baseball bat were used in the attack.

Dozens of angry villagers then arrived on the beach and in turn physically attacked the Muslims, before the gendarmes arrived and stopped the fight.



4. . The three Muslim brothers aged around 30 and two villagers, a 50-year-old baker and a 21-year-old municipal employee, were interrogated on Wednesday evening. The two villagers were released and will appear in court on Thursday August 18 with the three Muslims, who were already known to the police, one of them for drug-dealing and resisting arrest.

..."on the one hand, there was a gangster-style attempt to take over the beach, on the other an overreaction on the part of the villagers.".... He insisted that the protagonists were neither Islamic radicals nor racists.


[One cannot fail to notice the typical announcements from authorities....common throughout western governments: equivalence, no matter what the causes.
The greatest crime is to appear to be Islamophobic.]



5. The prosecutor’s conclusions play down the role of Islamic radicalism in the affair, but the fact that the women were not wearing burkinis but full Islamic dress is immaterial. There was a deliberate attempt by the family to take over a public beach and prevent others from using it through verbal and physical violence.

There could not be a clearer demonstration that they are refusing to coexist with the local population and prefer to live apart. Such an attitude can only be driven by religious radicalism and hostility to France."
The Burkini Battle: What Really Happened in Corsica | Clarion Project



Quo vadis, western civilization?
Back to the seventh century????

You forgot to link the Democratic Party to this incident. Was Obama on scene and did he cast the first stone? Did he put up a Muslim only sign on the gate to the beach? It seems to me we've had worse in our country, a religious nut walked into a church and killed a doctor; another one bombed the Atlanta Olympics and later an abortion clinic. Sane people do not link these two deranged Christians with all of Christianity or the Democratic Party.

Shit happens, people like you cause shit to happen. Hate breeds hate, intolerance breeds intolerance, stupidity breeds more stupidity. You need to STFU and stop breeding.




"You forgot to link the Democratic Party to this incident."

Gads, you make this easy, you dunce.

a. "Immigraton To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program hasled to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart



And.....

b. "Politifact Says Trump Is Right: Hillary Clinton Supports ‘500% Increase in Syrian Refugees’
Politifact: Hillary Clinton for 500% Increase in Syrian Refugees



You reject the application of a refuge out of hate and fear - that does not fit well with our creed, the land of the free and home of the brace.

We allowed the Vietnam boat people into our nation, and most of the children of these refugees have assimilated well. It is a crime that Ryan and McConnell will not debate and send to the President comprehensive immigration reform. Potentially setting up a program of sponsors for these people you fear so much.


"You reject the application of a refuge out of hate and fear -"

Actually, you accept the Liberal's marching orders out of a lack of intellect.


The simple alternative is to build safe camps in the nations in question.
16kilis1-superJumbo.jpg

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/16/magazine/how-to-build-a-perfect-refugee-camp.html?_r=0


Now...answer my question:
.... weren't you surprised that, after the doctors made the intermastoid incision, and removed your brain- you were still able to post on the board?

Once again you cannot provide an intelligent response to my supposed errors of judgment, and once again you default to challenging my intelligence. Your use of logical fallacies has been pointed out to you by many others, and yet you continue to use them as if they are substantive. They are in more way, they are evidence you're too poorly educated, and maybe to stupid, to write anything else.
 
That means come to our nation.
Those who understand both the Constitution, and the Q'ran, and the ramifications of sharia, see the collision course right around the bend.

And far, far sooner if the Democrats win this election.






A case in point was a recent confrontation in France...

1. "....the result of the four-day police investigation into the fight at Sisco beach on Saturday 13 August.
Three Muslim brothers from the Lupino neighbourhood in Bastia and two villagers from Sisco had been arrested on Wednesday and held in detention, where they were interrogated about the incident.

2. ....three Muslim brothers arrived on the beach on Saturday with their female companions and attempted to "privatize" it. The Muslim women, contrary to initial press reports, were not wearing burkinis but were swimming in full Islamic dress.
['Privatize' meaning demand that all beach-goers conform to sharia.]


The first incidents broke out early in the day when the Muslims put up a no entry sign to keep people from coming on to the beach. A couple already on the beach were forced to leave, as were two young boys canoeing in the creek. Tourists, including a Belgian who took a photograph and local passers-by who got too close were insulted, threatened and pelted with stones.

A group of village teenagers then arrived on the beach as they usually did on a Saturday afternoon. At this point the situation deteriorated and conflicting versions were given to the investigators. One teenager claimed he was hit by one or more of the three Muslim males.


3. The father of the teenager was informed his son was being molested and when he arrived on the scene he too was beaten. Several witnesses indicated to the police that harpoons and a baseball bat were used in the attack.

Dozens of angry villagers then arrived on the beach and in turn physically attacked the Muslims, before the gendarmes arrived and stopped the fight.



4. . The three Muslim brothers aged around 30 and two villagers, a 50-year-old baker and a 21-year-old municipal employee, were interrogated on Wednesday evening. The two villagers were released and will appear in court on Thursday August 18 with the three Muslims, who were already known to the police, one of them for drug-dealing and resisting arrest.

..."on the one hand, there was a gangster-style attempt to take over the beach, on the other an overreaction on the part of the villagers.".... He insisted that the protagonists were neither Islamic radicals nor racists.


[One cannot fail to notice the typical announcements from authorities....common throughout western governments: equivalence, no matter what the causes.
The greatest crime is to appear to be Islamophobic.]



5. The prosecutor’s conclusions play down the role of Islamic radicalism in the affair, but the fact that the women were not wearing burkinis but full Islamic dress is immaterial. There was a deliberate attempt by the family to take over a public beach and prevent others from using it through verbal and physical violence.

There could not be a clearer demonstration that they are refusing to coexist with the local population and prefer to live apart. Such an attitude can only be driven by religious radicalism and hostility to France."
The Burkini Battle: What Really Happened in Corsica | Clarion Project



Quo vadis, western civilization?
Back to the seventh century????
.
And far, far sooner if the Democrats win this election.


so wrong as usual, it is the pug's that cater to the religious ideology ...


the democrats understand the separation of church and state 1st Amendment and will shut down the muslims as they have recently the christian zealots today ... and will forever, god willing.

.



Get your head out of the sand.


Democrats won't fight Islamists.....the two have far too much in common.

Neither allows free speech, and both require submission.

Stop being such a fool.

Take your own advice. BTW, once again you default to a personal attack, because it seems obvious that you lack the skills and/or intelligence to rebut the response of others.
 
8. Hmmm.....folks of the Muslim persuasion demanding that everyone submit to their proclivities?

And it is nothing new.


Early in the 19th century, Alexis deTocqueville anticipated, and discussed this exact problem.

Although Christianity in its many varieties was the religion of the original colonies, Christianity does not preach operational dominance over the body politic in America. Tocqueville compared this aspect to Islam:

“Mohammed professed to derive from Heaven, and has inserted in the Koran, not only religious doctrines, but political maxims, civil and criminal laws, and theories of science. The Gospel, on the contrary, speaks only of the general relations of men to God and to each other, beyond which it inculcates and imposes no point of faith. This alone, besides a thousand other reasons, would suffice to prove that the former of these religions will never long predominate in a cultivated and democratic age, while the latter is destined to retain its sway at these as at all other periods.”
Tocqueville, “Democracy in America,” vol.2, p. 23.



a."....consider this statement from an Iranian 11th-grade schoolbook, quoting the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini: “I am decisively announcing to the whole world that if the world devourers wish to stand against our religion, we will stand against their whole world and will not cease until the annihilation of all of them! Either we all become free or we will go to the greater freedom, which is martyrdom. Either we shake one another’s hands in joy at the victory of Islam in the world, or all of us will turn to eternal life and martyrdom. In both cases, victory and success are ours."
The Worst Foreign-Policy Blunder in American History



Liberals have been trained to eschew the values of our Founders.

Consider the OP, and the story of one case of Muslim religionists demanding compliance from everyone.....
...and the Democrat response: doubling down on herding more and more of said individuals into America.


Vote carefully.

And you demand that everyone agree with you, or they will suffer the wrath of the Narcissist, that is, being called stupid. You're too funny (as in very odd).
 
Get your head out of the sand.


Democrats won't fight Islamists.....the two have far too much in common.

Neither allows free speech, and both require submission.

Stop being such a fool.

frankly, Conservatives have more in common with the Islamists... you all hate the gays, the feminists, etc.

Still not a good reason for us to be sticking our dicks in that hornet's nest.
 
That means come to our nation.
Those who understand both the Constitution, and the Q'ran, and the ramifications of sharia, see the collision course right around the bend.

And far, far sooner if the Democrats win this election.






A case in point was a recent confrontation in France...

1. "....the result of the four-day police investigation into the fight at Sisco beach on Saturday 13 August.
Three Muslim brothers from the Lupino neighbourhood in Bastia and two villagers from Sisco had been arrested on Wednesday and held in detention, where they were interrogated about the incident.

2. ....three Muslim brothers arrived on the beach on Saturday with their female companions and attempted to "privatize" it. The Muslim women, contrary to initial press reports, were not wearing burkinis but were swimming in full Islamic dress.
['Privatize' meaning demand that all beach-goers conform to sharia.]


The first incidents broke out early in the day when the Muslims put up a no entry sign to keep people from coming on to the beach. A couple already on the beach were forced to leave, as were two young boys canoeing in the creek. Tourists, including a Belgian who took a photograph and local passers-by who got too close were insulted, threatened and pelted with stones.

A group of village teenagers then arrived on the beach as they usually did on a Saturday afternoon. At this point the situation deteriorated and conflicting versions were given to the investigators. One teenager claimed he was hit by one or more of the three Muslim males.


3. The father of the teenager was informed his son was being molested and when he arrived on the scene he too was beaten. Several witnesses indicated to the police that harpoons and a baseball bat were used in the attack.

Dozens of angry villagers then arrived on the beach and in turn physically attacked the Muslims, before the gendarmes arrived and stopped the fight.



4. . The three Muslim brothers aged around 30 and two villagers, a 50-year-old baker and a 21-year-old municipal employee, were interrogated on Wednesday evening. The two villagers were released and will appear in court on Thursday August 18 with the three Muslims, who were already known to the police, one of them for drug-dealing and resisting arrest.

..."on the one hand, there was a gangster-style attempt to take over the beach, on the other an overreaction on the part of the villagers.".... He insisted that the protagonists were neither Islamic radicals nor racists.


[One cannot fail to notice the typical announcements from authorities....common throughout western governments: equivalence, no matter what the causes.
The greatest crime is to appear to be Islamophobic.]



5. The prosecutor’s conclusions play down the role of Islamic radicalism in the affair, but the fact that the women were not wearing burkinis but full Islamic dress is immaterial. There was a deliberate attempt by the family to take over a public beach and prevent others from using it through verbal and physical violence.

There could not be a clearer demonstration that they are refusing to coexist with the local population and prefer to live apart. Such an attitude can only be driven by religious radicalism and hostility to France."
The Burkini Battle: What Really Happened in Corsica | Clarion Project



Quo vadis, western civilization?
Back to the seventh century????

You forgot to link the Democratic Party to this incident. Was Obama on scene and did he cast the first stone? Did he put up a Muslim only sign on the gate to the beach? It seems to me we've had worse in our country, a religious nut walked into a church and killed a doctor; another one bombed the Atlanta Olympics and later an abortion clinic. Sane people do not link these two deranged Christians with all of Christianity or the Democratic Party.

Shit happens, people like you cause shit to happen. Hate breeds hate, intolerance breeds intolerance, stupidity breeds more stupidity. You need to STFU and stop breeding.




"You forgot to link the Democratic Party to this incident."

Gads, you make this easy, you dunce.

a. "Immigraton To Swell Muslim Population to 6.2 Million
According to U.S. Census Data, the United States admits roughly 100,000 Muslim immigrants legally each year, representing the fastest growing block of immigration into the United States. Tennessee, in fact, is home to one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the country, causing thePresident to give a recent speech there in favor of expansive immigration.

This demographic change is entirely the product of legal admissions–that is, it is a formal policy of the federal government adopted by Congress.

Another major source of Middle Eastern immigration into the United States is done through our nation’s refugee program. Every year the United Stated admits 70,000 asylees and refugees.Arabic is the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4 percent of refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps.

The importation of Middle Eastern immigrants through the nation’s refugee program hasled to the development of pockets of radicalized communities throughout the United States." Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart



And.....

b. "Politifact Says Trump Is Right: Hillary Clinton Supports ‘500% Increase in Syrian Refugees’
Politifact: Hillary Clinton for 500% Increase in Syrian Refugees



You reject the application of a refuge out of hate and fear - that does not fit well with our creed, the land of the free and home of the brace.

We allowed the Vietnam boat people into our nation, and most of the children of these refugees have assimilated well. It is a crime that Ryan and McConnell will not debate and send to the President comprehensive immigration reform. Potentially setting up a program of sponsors for these people you fear so much.


"You reject the application of a refuge out of hate and fear -"

Actually, you accept the Liberal's marching orders out of a lack of intellect.


The simple alternative is to build safe camps in the nations in question.
16kilis1-superJumbo.jpg

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/16/magazine/how-to-build-a-perfect-refugee-camp.html?_r=0


Now...answer my question:
.... weren't you surprised that, after the doctors made the intermastoid incision, and removed your brain- you were still able to post on the board?

Once again you cannot provide an intelligent response to my supposed errors of judgment, and once again you default to challenging my intelligence. Your use of logical fallacies has been pointed out to you by many others, and yet you continue to use them as if they are substantive. They are in more way, they are evidence you're too poorly educated, and maybe to stupid, to write anything else.


"Once again you cannot provide an intelligent response to my supposed errors of judgment,..."

My answer....in picture form, was, as usual, brilliant,correct and astute.
Build 'em refugee camps in their own country.

As for you recognizing 'an intelligent response,' one would be likely to expect to find a differential calculus equation in a stone age cave drawing.
 
That means come to our nation.
Those who understand both the Constitution, and the Q'ran, and the ramifications of sharia, see the collision course right around the bend.

And far, far sooner if the Democrats win this election.






A case in point was a recent confrontation in France...

1. "....the result of the four-day police investigation into the fight at Sisco beach on Saturday 13 August.
Three Muslim brothers from the Lupino neighbourhood in Bastia and two villagers from Sisco had been arrested on Wednesday and held in detention, where they were interrogated about the incident.

2. ....three Muslim brothers arrived on the beach on Saturday with their female companions and attempted to "privatize" it. The Muslim women, contrary to initial press reports, were not wearing burkinis but were swimming in full Islamic dress.
['Privatize' meaning demand that all beach-goers conform to sharia.]


The first incidents broke out early in the day when the Muslims put up a no entry sign to keep people from coming on to the beach. A couple already on the beach were forced to leave, as were two young boys canoeing in the creek. Tourists, including a Belgian who took a photograph and local passers-by who got too close were insulted, threatened and pelted with stones.

A group of village teenagers then arrived on the beach as they usually did on a Saturday afternoon. At this point the situation deteriorated and conflicting versions were given to the investigators. One teenager claimed he was hit by one or more of the three Muslim males.


3. The father of the teenager was informed his son was being molested and when he arrived on the scene he too was beaten. Several witnesses indicated to the police that harpoons and a baseball bat were used in the attack.

Dozens of angry villagers then arrived on the beach and in turn physically attacked the Muslims, before the gendarmes arrived and stopped the fight.



4. . The three Muslim brothers aged around 30 and two villagers, a 50-year-old baker and a 21-year-old municipal employee, were interrogated on Wednesday evening. The two villagers were released and will appear in court on Thursday August 18 with the three Muslims, who were already known to the police, one of them for drug-dealing and resisting arrest.

..."on the one hand, there was a gangster-style attempt to take over the beach, on the other an overreaction on the part of the villagers.".... He insisted that the protagonists were neither Islamic radicals nor racists.


[One cannot fail to notice the typical announcements from authorities....common throughout western governments: equivalence, no matter what the causes.
The greatest crime is to appear to be Islamophobic.]



5. The prosecutor’s conclusions play down the role of Islamic radicalism in the affair, but the fact that the women were not wearing burkinis but full Islamic dress is immaterial. There was a deliberate attempt by the family to take over a public beach and prevent others from using it through verbal and physical violence.

There could not be a clearer demonstration that they are refusing to coexist with the local population and prefer to live apart. Such an attitude can only be driven by religious radicalism and hostility to France."
The Burkini Battle: What Really Happened in Corsica | Clarion Project



Quo vadis, western civilization?
Back to the seventh century????
.
And far, far sooner if the Democrats win this election.


so wrong as usual, it is the pug's that cater to the religious ideology ...


the democrats understand the separation of church and state 1st Amendment and will shut down the muslims as they have recently the christian zealots today ... and will forever, god willing.

.



Get your head out of the sand.


Democrats won't fight Islamists.....the two have far too much in common.

Neither allows free speech, and both require submission.

Stop being such a fool.

Take your own advice. BTW, once again you default to a personal attack, because it seems obvious that you lack the skills and/or intelligence to rebut the response of others.



I'd claim to have beaten you senseless...but, clearly, others have beaten me to it.
 
8. Hmmm.....folks of the Muslim persuasion demanding that everyone submit to their proclivities?

And it is nothing new.


Early in the 19th century, Alexis deTocqueville anticipated, and discussed this exact problem.

Although Christianity in its many varieties was the religion of the original colonies, Christianity does not preach operational dominance over the body politic in America. Tocqueville compared this aspect to Islam:

“Mohammed professed to derive from Heaven, and has inserted in the Koran, not only religious doctrines, but political maxims, civil and criminal laws, and theories of science. The Gospel, on the contrary, speaks only of the general relations of men to God and to each other, beyond which it inculcates and imposes no point of faith. This alone, besides a thousand other reasons, would suffice to prove that the former of these religions will never long predominate in a cultivated and democratic age, while the latter is destined to retain its sway at these as at all other periods.”
Tocqueville, “Democracy in America,” vol.2, p. 23.



a."....consider this statement from an Iranian 11th-grade schoolbook, quoting the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini: “I am decisively announcing to the whole world that if the world devourers wish to stand against our religion, we will stand against their whole world and will not cease until the annihilation of all of them! Either we all become free or we will go to the greater freedom, which is martyrdom. Either we shake one another’s hands in joy at the victory of Islam in the world, or all of us will turn to eternal life and martyrdom. In both cases, victory and success are ours."
The Worst Foreign-Policy Blunder in American History



Liberals have been trained to eschew the values of our Founders.

Consider the OP, and the story of one case of Muslim religionists demanding compliance from everyone.....
...and the Democrat response: doubling down on herding more and more of said individuals into America.


Vote carefully.

And you demand that everyone agree with you, or they will suffer the wrath of the Narcissist, that is, being called stupid. You're too funny (as in very odd).


"And you demand that everyone agree with you,..."

No I don't.
I always admit that I can't force you to be right.

Your problem?
If brains were dynamite, you wouldn't have enough to blow the kneecap off a flea.
 
Get your head out of the sand.


Democrats won't fight Islamists.....the two have far too much in common.

Neither allows free speech, and both require submission.

Stop being such a fool.

frankly, Conservatives have more in common with the Islamists... you all hate the gays, the feminists, etc.

Still not a good reason for us to be sticking our dicks in that hornet's nest.


Gays should certainly vote Republican...
The Democratic Party supports criminals and Islamic terrorists but has no sympathy for taxpayers…

1. Democrats love using the tax code to enact lots of special-interest goodies with absolutely no use to most gays, such as

a. Child tax credits

b. Tuition tax credits

c. Child-care credits

d. Education savings accounts

e. Student loans

f. The Family and Medical Leave Act

g. There is only one issue more important to Democrats than raising taxes, and that is keeping abortion legal at all stages of pregnancy. This is probably not a big issue for most gays.


2. We need to get a rule book from the Democrats [on gays]:

a. Boy Scouts: As gay as you want to be

b. Priests: No gays!

c. Democratic politicians: Proud gay Americans.

d. Republican politicians: Presumed guilty.

e. White House press corps: No gays, unless they hate Bush.

f. Active-duty U.S. military: As gay as possible.

g. Men who date Liza Minnelli: Di I have to draw you a picture, Miss Thing?
Coulter


In Islamic countries, gays are punished with death.

Consequently, the three most important issues for any sane gay person ought to be crime, taxes, and the war on Islamic fascists…Manifestly, Republican policies are more pro-gay than Democrat policies and we don’t make a sport of outing political opponents who happen to be gay.
 
I understand your jealousy....
But look at the bright side: your face is your fourtune- drug stores would pay you to stand in front and make people sick.

Naw, all the looks in my family went to my brother, the elephant man.

But you miss the irony of an immigrant whining about immigrants.

Gays should certainly vote Republican...
The Democratic Party supports criminals and Islamic terrorists but has no sympathy for taxpayers…

Yawn, can you even communicate like a fucking human being. I mean, do you number point shit when you talk to people in conversation, because it kind of comes off like you suffer from some kind of OCD.

2. We need to get a rule book from the Democrats [on gays]:


b. Priests: No gays!

g. Men who date Liza Minnelli: Di I have to draw you a picture, Miss Thing?
Coulter

Okay, the problem with priests wasn't that they had gays, it was that the had pedophiles. And then they spend millions of dollars hiding them and paying off the victims. I'm sorry you don't see the difference.
 
I understand your jealousy....
But look at the bright side: your face is your fourtune- drug stores would pay you to stand in front and make people sick.

Naw, all the looks in my family went to my brother, the elephant man.

But you miss the irony of an immigrant whining about immigrants.

Gays should certainly vote Republican...
The Democratic Party supports criminals and Islamic terrorists but has no sympathy for taxpayers…

Yawn, can you even communicate like a fucking human being. I mean, do you number point shit when you talk to people in conversation, because it kind of comes off like you suffer from some kind of OCD.

2. We need to get a rule book from the Democrats [on gays]:


b. Priests: No gays!

g. Men who date Liza Minnelli: Di I have to draw you a picture, Miss Thing?
Coulter

Okay, the problem with priests wasn't that they had gays, it was that the had pedophiles. And then they spend millions of dollars hiding them and paying off the victims. I'm sorry you don't see the difference.




Clean up your language and try again.
 
Clean up your language and try again.

I can always tell when the Mail Order Bride from Hell is losing an argument, it's when she starts whining about bad words.

They're just words, sweetie. Words can't hurt you.

Koreans are one of the most unabashedly racist peoples in the world. Do the math.

Actually, most Koreans I've known are really pretty decent people. PC is kind of messed up, though. I think she suffers from some sort of OCD.

More personal slight, and still no substance.

PC isn't here to have a discussion of substance. She's here to monologue with her specially prepared thesis for Talking Snake U.

For instance, she once tried to attribute a quote about a "holocaust" to Karl Marx. After she was shown from SEVERAL sources that her quote was fabricated, she just kept on and on with Points 5- 147 of her whacky thesis.
 

Forum List

Back
Top