Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But it does mean he's a crony capitalist who found a way to cut out the politicians, and it proves he has no populist intentions regardless of how many lies he tells.Paying off corrupt left wingers doesnt mean he is a left winger
Naw..I missed that one; got a link?oh they tried…don’t you remember? but they had no evidence to get an indictment …they knew that, but continued to harass
Mueller has probably amassed a million pages of evidence. How much of that have you read?
wait you really didn’t see that vance didn’t indict trump? like how he fought the case all the way to the SCOTUS to get his taxes then came up with nothing?Naw..I missed that one; got a link?
Who's Mark Pomerantz?
Ex-prosecutor says he believes Trump is 'guilty of numerous felony violations'
"A prosecutor who had been leading a criminal investigation into Donald Trump before quitting last month said in his resignation letter that he believes the former president is 'guilty of numerous felony violations' and he disagreed with the Manhattan district attorney's decision not to seek an indictment.
"In the letter, published Wednesday by The New York Times, Mark Pomerantz told District Attorney Alvin Bragg there was 'evidence sufficient to establish Mr. Trump's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt' of allegations he falsified financial statements to secure loans and burnish his image as a wealthy businessman.'"
2024?
He wasnt a politician at that time and is therefore irrelevent when it comes to "populism". An elite rich guy can still be a populist in politics.But it does mean he's a crony capitalist who found a way to cut out the politicians, and it proves he has no populist intentions regardless of how many lies he tells.
https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/reports/28252/the-global-rise-of-populism
Have you been in a coma?
The CIA told the FBI that it was fiction paid for indirectly by the Clinton People, before the FBI latched on to it.
Who told you that?The CIA told the FBI that it was fiction paid for indirectly by the Clinton People, before the FBI latched on to it.
Here's a clue for the MAGA morons:He wasnt a politician at that time and is therefore irrelevent when it comes to "populism". An elite rich guy can still be a populist in politics.
I dont give a shit about whats in a politicians heart, so long as he does things that i like.Here's a clue for the MAGA morons:
No billionaires are populists.
Cy Vance chose to retire and his successor, Alvin Bragg, chose to ignore recommendations to prosecute Trump for tax fraud. That led the the resignation of Mark Pomerantz who believed Trump was guilty of those charges beyond any reasonable doubt.wait you really didn’t see that vance didn’t indict trump? like how he fought the case all the way to the SCOTUS to get his taxes then came up with nothing?
Yea big deal, the Russians preferred a candidate that didn’t want to start WW3 with them.Published in January of 2017, how much of information made public by Mueller's investigation has buttressed or diminished the essence of Steele's original reporting?
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
"The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence.
"He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments.
"The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product...."
"With that in mind, we thought it would be worthwhile to look back at the dossier and to assess, to the extent possible, how the substance of Steele’s reporting holds up over time.
"In this effort, we considered only information in the public domain from trustworthy and official government sources, including documents released by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office in connection with the criminal cases brought against Paul Manafort, the 12 Russian intelligence officers, the Internet Research Agency trolling operation and associated entities, Michael Cohen, Michael Flynn and George Papadopoulos.
"We also considered the draft statement of offense released by author Jerome Corsi, a memorandum released by House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Ranking Member Adam Schiff related to the Carter Page FISA applications and admissions directly from certain speakers.
"These materials buttress some of Steele’s reporting, both specifically and thematically.
"The dossier holds up well over time, and none of it, to our knowledge, has been disproven."
hahaha there was no recommendations....there was a grand jury....they reviewed all the evidence, and all the begging from Vance and didn't indictCy Vance chose to retire and his successor, Alvin Bragg, chose to ignore recommendations to prosecute Trump for tax fraud. That led the the resignation of Mark Pomerantz who believed Trump was guilty of those charges beyond any reasonable doubt.
Well, other than now knowing it was completely bogus?Published in January of 2017, how much of information made public by Mueller's investigation has buttressed or diminished the essence of Steele's original reporting?
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
"The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence.
"He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments.
"The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product...."
"With that in mind, we thought it would be worthwhile to look back at the dossier and to assess, to the extent possible, how the substance of Steele’s reporting holds up over time.
"In this effort, we considered only information in the public domain from trustworthy and official government sources, including documents released by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office in connection with the criminal cases brought against Paul Manafort, the 12 Russian intelligence officers, the Internet Research Agency trolling operation and associated entities, Michael Cohen, Michael Flynn and George Papadopoulos.
"We also considered the draft statement of offense released by author Jerome Corsi, a memorandum released by House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Ranking Member Adam Schiff related to the Carter Page FISA applications and admissions directly from certain speakers.
"These materials buttress some of Steele’s reporting, both specifically and thematically.
"The dossier holds up well over time, and none of it, to our knowledge, has been disproven."
Who told you that?
Steele dossier - Wikipedia
"In October 2015, before the official start of the 2016 Republican primary campaign, the founders of Fusion GPS were seeking political work and wrote an email to 'a big conservative donor they knew who disliked Trump, [and] they were hired'.
"He arranged for them to use The Washington Free Beacon, an American conservative political journalism website, for their general opposition research on several Republican presidential candidates, including Trump.[48][49]
"It is primarily funded by Republican donor Paul Singer.[49] The Free Beacon and Singer were 'part of the conservative never-Trump movement'.[50]
"Although Singer was a big supporter of Marco Rubio, Rubio denied any involvement in Fusion GPS's initial research and hiring.[51"
Who told you that?
Here's a clue for the MAGA morons:
No billionaires are populists.
Got a link for that fantasy?hahaha there was no recommendations....there was a grand jury....they reviewed all the evidence, and all the begging from Vance and didn't indict
Holy Opposite Universe Batman!Published in January of 2017, how much of information made public by Mueller's investigation has buttressed or diminished the essence of Steele's original reporting?
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
"The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence.
"He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments.
"The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product...."
"With that in mind, we thought it would be worthwhile to look back at the dossier and to assess, to the extent possible, how the substance of Steele’s reporting holds up over time.
"In this effort, we considered only information in the public domain from trustworthy and official government sources, including documents released by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office in connection with the criminal cases brought against Paul Manafort, the 12 Russian intelligence officers, the Internet Research Agency trolling operation and associated entities, Michael Cohen, Michael Flynn and George Papadopoulos.
"We also considered the draft statement of offense released by author Jerome Corsi, a memorandum released by House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Ranking Member Adam Schiff related to the Carter Page FISA applications and admissions directly from certain speakers.
"These materials buttress some of Steele’s reporting, both specifically and thematically.
"The dossier holds up well over time, and none of it, to our knowledge, has been disproven."
Well, other than now knowing it was completely bogus?
