- Oct 6, 2008
- 125,094
- 60,648
Sound like a plan???
1.Seems to me to be a good value to be the foundation of a society.
I bet most would agreeā¦..yet, there is some sort of cognitive disconnect, ācause there are lots of folks who consider themselves bright, and goodā¦..who vote for Democrats/Progressives, correctly described as the party of death....and the weak are no concern of theirs.
None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).
They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.
They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
WaPo wrote about someone I assume is a Democrat lawyer, who said we should simply let old folks die:
āScott McMillan had had it with being cooped up, with the whole country being closed, with the collapsing market and the isolation, the constant worry and the politicians who didnāt take the coronavirus seriously when they could have.
On Sunday night, McMillan, a 56-year-old lawyer in La Mesa, Calif., near San Diego, saw President Trumpās tweet about how āWE CANNOT LET THE CURE BE WORSE THAN THE PROBLEM ITSELF.ā The lawyer took to Twitter to add his own two cents:
āThe fundamental problem is whether we are going to tank the entire economy to save 2.5% of the population which is (1) generally expensive to maintain, and (2) not productive.ā https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...a3581e-6e11-11ea-b148-e4ce3fbd85b5_story.html
That's the elderly he'd push into the oven.
Sounds a lot like Zeke Emmanuel, Obama's assistant for ObamaCare.
Hereās another Democratā¦ āRhode Island Public School Teacher Offers to Pay for Someone With Coronavirus to Cough on President Trumpā
Rhode Island Public School Teacher Offers to Pay for Someone With Coronavirus to Cough on President Trump
2. There are those who have the gift of optimismā¦.I donāt belong to that categoryā¦..who think that this pandemic may change societyās view of human life.
āThe Death of Death Culture, Or Just a Hiatus?
The Death of Death Culture, Or Just a Hiatus?
āIf thereās something positive to come out of the COVID-19 pandemic, perhaps itās a turning point in the national discussion over the value of human life. This would be a marked change from recent years in our national dialogue and politics, to be sure. Individual lives and their value have been treated as very much ānone of our businessā until recently.
When Obamacare was being debated in 2009, President Obama held a televised town hall on ABC News. A woman rose to tell the president a story of her 105-year-old mother who, at age 100 was initially denied a life-sustaining pacemaker. After a second opinion, the womanās mother received the surgery that successfully kept her alive five more years.
President Obamaās response?
"Look, the first thing for all of us to understand is that we actually have some -- some choices to make about how we want to deal with our own end-of-life careā¦we as a culture and as a society [can start] to make better decisionsā¦at least we can let doctors know and your mom know that, you know what? Maybe this isn't going to help. Maybe you're better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller."
Those five years were invaluable to a family, but to the government they were too expensive.
Can you imagine anyone in government or on TV saying āpeople live and people die,ā or ātake a pill,ā or āhave a nice day, we canāt do anythingā in the midst of todayās news?
Of course not.ā
When one views the list of demands that Pelosi and Clyburn made when they were holding up the coronavirus aid to Americans, itās clear where Democrat priorities lie.
Maybe theyāll see the lightā¦ā¦
1.Seems to me to be a good value to be the foundation of a society.
I bet most would agreeā¦..yet, there is some sort of cognitive disconnect, ācause there are lots of folks who consider themselves bright, and goodā¦..who vote for Democrats/Progressives, correctly described as the party of death....and the weak are no concern of theirs.
None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).
They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.
They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
WaPo wrote about someone I assume is a Democrat lawyer, who said we should simply let old folks die:
āScott McMillan had had it with being cooped up, with the whole country being closed, with the collapsing market and the isolation, the constant worry and the politicians who didnāt take the coronavirus seriously when they could have.
On Sunday night, McMillan, a 56-year-old lawyer in La Mesa, Calif., near San Diego, saw President Trumpās tweet about how āWE CANNOT LET THE CURE BE WORSE THAN THE PROBLEM ITSELF.ā The lawyer took to Twitter to add his own two cents:
āThe fundamental problem is whether we are going to tank the entire economy to save 2.5% of the population which is (1) generally expensive to maintain, and (2) not productive.ā https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...a3581e-6e11-11ea-b148-e4ce3fbd85b5_story.html
That's the elderly he'd push into the oven.
Sounds a lot like Zeke Emmanuel, Obama's assistant for ObamaCare.
Hereās another Democratā¦ āRhode Island Public School Teacher Offers to Pay for Someone With Coronavirus to Cough on President Trumpā
Rhode Island Public School Teacher Offers to Pay for Someone With Coronavirus to Cough on President Trump
2. There are those who have the gift of optimismā¦.I donāt belong to that categoryā¦..who think that this pandemic may change societyās view of human life.
āThe Death of Death Culture, Or Just a Hiatus?
The Death of Death Culture, Or Just a Hiatus?
āIf thereās something positive to come out of the COVID-19 pandemic, perhaps itās a turning point in the national discussion over the value of human life. This would be a marked change from recent years in our national dialogue and politics, to be sure. Individual lives and their value have been treated as very much ānone of our businessā until recently.
When Obamacare was being debated in 2009, President Obama held a televised town hall on ABC News. A woman rose to tell the president a story of her 105-year-old mother who, at age 100 was initially denied a life-sustaining pacemaker. After a second opinion, the womanās mother received the surgery that successfully kept her alive five more years.
President Obamaās response?
"Look, the first thing for all of us to understand is that we actually have some -- some choices to make about how we want to deal with our own end-of-life careā¦we as a culture and as a society [can start] to make better decisionsā¦at least we can let doctors know and your mom know that, you know what? Maybe this isn't going to help. Maybe you're better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller."
Those five years were invaluable to a family, but to the government they were too expensive.
Can you imagine anyone in government or on TV saying āpeople live and people die,ā or ātake a pill,ā or āhave a nice day, we canāt do anythingā in the midst of todayās news?
Of course not.ā
When one views the list of demands that Pelosi and Clyburn made when they were holding up the coronavirus aid to Americans, itās clear where Democrat priorities lie.
Maybe theyāll see the lightā¦ā¦