The truth about the Bhengazi report by David French...democrats don't care...

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
112,236
52,460
And here we have it..."power" over all........and nothing will stand in the way of democrats gaining and keeping power.......

The Benghazi Debacle Should Have Ended Hillary Clinton’s Career

This is an extraordinary response to a report that comprehensively details one of the most shameful episodes in recent American diplomatic and military history. Clinton’s State Department failed to adequately protect its diplomats in Libya, with the Obama administration so intent on avoiding “boots on the ground” in the aftermath of its Libyan air war that it left Americans dangerously exposed even as the jihadist threat was plainly and clearly ramping up.

The report details at least ten previous terror attacks in Benghazi, including two IED attacks on the American compound, yet the State Department had decreased its security there in the months before Ambassador Chris Stevens and four others were killed. Obama’s Pentagon failed to mobilize assets to protect those same Americans even as they endured an hours-long assault on September 11, 2012.

One of the most painful elements of the report is its description of exactly how difficult it was for the Pentagon to ramp up even the quick-strike elements of the most powerful military in the history of the world.


Fighters were in one location, tankers in another. Ground assets were in one place, air transport in another. It took hours for clear commands from the White House and Pentagon to filter sufficiently far down the ranks to spur actual military activity.


Then, confronted with the damage afterward, the administration lied, repeatedly. Of that there can no longer be any reasonable doubt.

The report lays out in excruciating detail the contrast between the administration’s private and public statements about the attack: The private statements consistently attributed the Benghazi attack to terrorists while the public statements either directly blamed an anti-Islamic YouTube video for causing the violence or conflated the Benghazi attack with a protest at the Egyptian embassy that did appear to be connected to the video.


At the beginning of the article David French asks....

Do failures and lies matter any longer? If you are a prominent Democratic politician, what exactly is the level of wrongdoing that will end your career?

And the answers are ...

1) if you are a democrat...no.

2) There is no level of crime or corruption that will bring a democrat down when they are in a position to appoint Supreme Court Justices and destroy the enemies of the democrats, namely, other Americans....

 
Last edited:
And the truth...

So here we are. The presumptive Democratic nominee for president is largely responsible for one of the great foreign-policy disasters of the last eight years and unquestionably responsible for helping mislead the public, yet in the media calculus of our time the Benghazi report is a “win,” because it merely confirms failures we already knew about. And everyone knows that old failures are no failures at all.
 
And the truth...

So here we are. The presumptive Democratic nominee for president is largely responsible for one of the great foreign-policy disasters of the last eight years and unquestionably responsible for helping mislead the public, yet in the media calculus of our time the Benghazi report is a “win,” because it merely confirms failures we already knew about. And everyone knows that old failures are no failures at all.

How many people lost their jobs over

9/11

Failure to get Usama

No trace of WMDs in Iraqnam

?


Roughly.....
 
And the truth...

So here we are. The presumptive Democratic nominee for president is largely responsible for one of the great foreign-policy disasters of the last eight years and unquestionably responsible for helping mislead the public, yet in the media calculus of our time the Benghazi report is a “win,” because it merely confirms failures we already knew about. And everyone knows that old failures are no failures at all.

How many people lost their jobs over

9/11

Failure to get Usama

No trace of WMDs in Iraqnam

?


Roughly.....

Don't forget the Beirut Barracks Bombing.
 
And the truth...

So here we are. The presumptive Democratic nominee for president is largely responsible for one of the great foreign-policy disasters of the last eight years and unquestionably responsible for helping mislead the public, yet in the media calculus of our time the Benghazi report is a “win,” because it merely confirms failures we already knew about. And everyone knows that old failures are no failures at all.

How many people lost their jobs over

9/11

Failure to get Usama

No trace of WMDs in Iraqnam

?


Roughly.....

Don't forget the Beirut Barracks Bombing.

Tru dat
 
And the truth...

So here we are. The presumptive Democratic nominee for president is largely responsible for one of the great foreign-policy disasters of the last eight years and unquestionably responsible for helping mislead the public, yet in the media calculus of our time the Benghazi report is a “win,” because it merely confirms failures we already knew about. And everyone knows that old failures are no failures at all.

How many people lost their jobs over

9/11

Failure to get Usama

No trace of WMDs in Iraqnam

?


Roughly.....


Clinton's people were out of office already on 9/11....since they allowed it to happen....

osama....Bush put in place all the intelligence and military assets...and even then obama hesitated for months before he said they could kill him.....

And the New York times said they found WMDs in Iraq....just last year....you should ask them...
 
And the truth...

So here we are. The presumptive Democratic nominee for president is largely responsible for one of the great foreign-policy disasters of the last eight years and unquestionably responsible for helping mislead the public, yet in the media calculus of our time the Benghazi report is a “win,” because it merely confirms failures we already knew about. And everyone knows that old failures are no failures at all.

How many people lost their jobs over

9/11

Failure to get Usama

No trace of WMDs in Iraqnam

?


Roughly.....


Yeah...about those WMDs in Iraq..the New York Times found them...

BOMBSHELL: New York Times Reports WMDs WERE Found in Iraq! - The Political Insider


The New York Times
shockingly admitted in an explosive front page report that thousands of WMDs were found in Iraq since the start of the war:

From 2004 to 2011, American and American-trained Iraqi troops repeatedly encountered, and on at least six occasions were wounded by, chemical weapons remaining from years earlier in Saddam Hussein’s rule.

In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

So, now it needs to be repeated millions of times: there WERE WMDs found in Iraq! But of course The Times couldn’t admit that their discovery vindicates President Bush. Instead they claim that these WMDs don’t count and that an active WMD program was the only rationale for the Iraq War:



Read more: BOMBSHELL: New York Times Reports WMDs WERE Found in Iraq! - The Political Insider
 
And the truth...

So here we are. The presumptive Democratic nominee for president is largely responsible for one of the great foreign-policy disasters of the last eight years and unquestionably responsible for helping mislead the public, yet in the media calculus of our time the Benghazi report is a “win,” because it merely confirms failures we already knew about. And everyone knows that old failures are no failures at all.

How many people lost their jobs over

9/11

Failure to get Usama

No trace of WMDs in Iraqnam

?


Roughly.....

Looks like we have found some common ground.,...9/11/01 was a false flag event and bin laden was a CIA asset until the day he died on December 13th, 2001....his CIA name was Tim Osman and of course the war in Iraq was all about stealing resources but USA.INC started doing that in earnest in 1953 when they backed a coup de 'etat of Iran's duly elected leader when he nationalized their oil and that was a big "no no". So, for the last 63 years, USA.INC has been flexing it's muscle on theird world countries that have resources that the globalists wish to control all while we wave and salute the flag...it is to weep. USA.INC has never spread freedom or democracy...not ever.

BTW, Benghazi was about arming their mercenaries with weapons in order to fight a proxy war with Syria so they could install another puppet that would benefit the globalists that run this (snicker) "republic". Syria has no central bank that is controlled by the globalists and they have oil...therefor they must be taken over. The Clinton crime family is thicker than thieves with the Bush crime family and all the other globalists. Hitlery and Bill hobnob with the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, have a seat on the CFR and Tri-Lateral Commission, etc, etc.... Hitlery was promised the job of CEO back for 2016 at the Bilderburg meeting in Chantilly, Virginia in June of 2008 if she would drop out...and what do ya know? Two days later she does....what are the odds? Hitlery doesn't give a shit about anybody but herself but she will win and nothing will change for the better....you can bank on that. She will simply be the face of the franchise that is USA.INC that is actually owned by the IMF....good times and let freedom ring! (snicker)
 
And the truth...

So here we are. The presumptive Democratic nominee for president is largely responsible for one of the great foreign-policy disasters of the last eight years and unquestionably responsible for helping mislead the public, yet in the media calculus of our time the Benghazi report is a “win,” because it merely confirms failures we already knew about. And everyone knows that old failures are no failures at all.

How many people lost their jobs over

9/11

Failure to get Usama

No trace of WMDs in Iraqnam

?


Roughly.....


Yeah...about those WMDs in Iraq..the New York Times found them...

BOMBSHELL: New York Times Reports WMDs WERE Found in Iraq! - The Political Insider


The New York Times
shockingly admitted in an explosive front page report that thousands of WMDs were found in Iraq since the start of the war:

From 2004 to 2011, American and American-trained Iraqi troops repeatedly encountered, and on at least six occasions were wounded by, chemical weapons remaining from years earlier in Saddam Hussein’s rule.

In all, American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials, and heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

So, now it needs to be repeated millions of times: there WERE WMDs found in Iraq! But of course The Times couldn’t admit that their discovery vindicates President Bush. Instead they claim that these WMDs don’t count and that an active WMD program was the only rationale for the Iraq War:



Read more: BOMBSHELL: New York Times Reports WMDs WERE Found in Iraq! - The Political Insider
from years earlier in Saddam Hussein’s rule

These would be the remnants of the arsenal Saddam accumulated with the help of Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush....

You REALLY don't want to go there!
 
Crooked Hillary is absolutely the most corrupt, incompetent and dishonest person to ever be a major candidate for President.

It would seem to me that if nothing else these stupid immoral Moon Bats would have at least the common decency to dump the bitch after hearing that she lied to the American people and the families of the Benghazi victims. Disregarding all her other lies and failures that by itself should have done it.

Of course the Moon Bats voted for Obama so you know they are not exactly the best and the brightest and have no intellectual or moral foundation.
 
Last edited:
Crooked Hillary is absolutely the most corrupt, incompetent, dishonest person to ever be a major candidate for President.

It would seem to me that if nothing else these stupid immoral Moon Bats would have at least the common decency to dump the bitch after hearing that she lied to the American people and the families of the Benghazi victims. Disregarding all her other lies and failures that by itself should have done it.

Of course the Moon Bats voted for Obama so you know they are not exactly the best and the brightest and have no intellectual or moral foundation.


You're a dumbass, sir.
 
They could care less. Theyd vote for mao or hitler or pol pot if it had a d in front of it. Just shows how far this party has plunged into the abyss.
 
And here we have it..."power" over all........and nothing will stand in the way of democrats gaining and keeping power.......

The Benghazi Debacle Should Have Ended Hillary Clinton’s Career

This is an extraordinary response to a report that comprehensively details one of the most shameful episodes in recent American diplomatic and military history. Clinton’s State Department failed to adequately protect its diplomats in Libya, with the Obama administration so intent on avoiding “boots on the ground” in the aftermath of its Libyan air war that it left Americans dangerously exposed even as the jihadist threat was plainly and clearly ramping up.

The report details at least ten previous terror attacks in Benghazi, including two IED attacks on the American compound, yet the State Department had decreased its security there in the months before Ambassador Chris Stevens and four others were killed. Obama’s Pentagon failed to mobilize assets to protect those same Americans even as they endured an hours-long assault on September 11, 2012.

One of the most painful elements of the report is its description of exactly how difficult it was for the Pentagon to ramp up even the quick-strike elements of the most powerful military in the history of the world.


Fighters were in one location, tankers in another. Ground assets were in one place, air transport in another. It took hours for clear commands from the White House and Pentagon to filter sufficiently far down the ranks to spur actual military activity.


Then, confronted with the damage afterward, the administration lied, repeatedly. Of that there can no longer be any reasonable doubt.

The report lays out in excruciating detail the contrast between the administration’s private and public statements about the attack: The private statements consistently attributed the Benghazi attack to terrorists while the public statements either directly blamed an anti-Islamic YouTube video for causing the violence or conflated the Benghazi attack with a protest at the Egyptian embassy that did appear to be connected to the video.


At the beginning of the article David French asks....

Do failures and lies matter any longer? If you are a prominent Democratic politician, what exactly is the level of wrongdoing that will end your career?

And the answers are ...

1) if you are a democrat...no.

2) There is no level of crime or corruption that will bring a democrat down when they are in a position to appoint Supreme Court Justices and destroy the enemies of the democrats, namely, other Americans....


We lost 240 U.S. Marines under the Reagan administration in an attack on our embassy in Lebanon, and it certainly did not ruin Ronald Reagan's career. This resulted in one investigation.

Here is a list of all other U.S. Embassies that have been attacked under EVERY administration.
US Embassy Attacks And Bombings: A Recent History

Under G.W. Bush we lost 60 lives in 13 attacks on several U.S Embassies during his tenure and it didn't cost him his political career. Investigations??? None that I know of.
None

The REPUBLICAN committee who has investigated Benghazi EIGHT times now, and after wasting millions of taxpayer dollars in their witch hunt-on Hillary Clinton--for their dog & pony shows--came up with NOTHING.

And if that doesn't piss you off, nothing will.

ufonotcomingback.jpg


hillbenghazi_590_356.jpg

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html?_r=0
 
Last edited:
And the truth...

So here we are. The presumptive Democratic nominee for president is largely responsible for one of the great foreign-policy disasters of the last eight years and unquestionably responsible for helping mislead the public, yet in the media calculus of our time the Benghazi report is a “win,” because it merely confirms failures we already knew about. And everyone knows that old failures are no failures at all.

How many people lost their jobs over

9/11

Failure to get Usama

No trace of WMDs in Iraqnam

?


Roughly.....


Clinton's people were out of office already on 9/11....since they allowed it to happen....

osama....Bush put in place all the intelligence and military assets...and even then obama hesitated for months before he said they could kill him.....

And the New York times said they found WMDs in Iraq....just last year....you should ask them...


And let us not forget that Clinton had a chance to kill Bin Laden - and chose not to. So, in reality, 9/11 is on that assholes head.
 

Read more: BOMBSHELL: New York Times Reports WMDs WERE Found in Iraq! - The Political Insider

from years earlier in Saddam Hussein’s rule

These would be the remnants of the arsenal Saddam accumulated with the help of Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush....

You REALLY don't want to go there!
Sometimes I can't tell the difference between the two brothers Saddam Hussein and Barack Hussein, they could be related being they were both rulers as well as blamed Bush. Bush started something he couldn't finish, the Hussein brothers Saddam and Barack tore their country apart because of Bush. So, yeah, you can say it's the Bush's fault for causing two Hussein's to rise to power in Iraq and America. Now, the rise of a semi black Muslim, mixed with white from his mother and raised Islam from his father running America, woke a sleeping race which produced Trump. If Trump is a semi racist, then America allowed it to continue, just as they permitted a semi Muslim, a semi sexual harasser, a semi feminist, a semi socialist, to run and rule.
 
And the truth...

So here we are. The presumptive Democratic nominee for president is largely responsible for one of the great foreign-policy disasters of the last eight years and unquestionably responsible for helping mislead the public, yet in the media calculus of our time the Benghazi report is a “win,” because it merely confirms failures we already knew about. And everyone knows that old failures are no failures at all.

How many people lost their jobs over

9/11

Failure to get Usama

No trace of WMDs in Iraqnam

?


Roughly.....


Clinton's people were out of office already on 9/11....since they allowed it to happen....

osama....Bush put in place all the intelligence and military assets...and even then obama hesitated for months before he said they could kill him.....

And the New York times said they found WMDs in Iraq....just last year....you should ask them...


And let us not forget that Clinton had a chance to kill Bin Laden - and chose not to. So, in reality, 9/11 is on that assholes head.

You're full of shit there too. If not for Hillary Clinton, Osama Bin Laden would be alive and well today. It was she that put the pressure on Barack Obama to do the hit, while all others including Joe Biden said no.

Leon Panetta speaks very highly of her tenure as Secretary of State, and so do many Republicans.
Republicans Have Praised Hillary Clinton’s Secretary Of State Tenure
 

Forum List

Back
Top