The two faces of Trump and his Cult

[Ame®icano]

Inside Biden's fiery speech and his decision to confront Trump's danger head on

It was only a little more than a month ago when President Joe Biden, asked about another head-shaking revelation regarding his predecessor, seemed to balk at a mere mention of the man.

www.cnn.com

The Trump Cult party loves to accuse Democrats of being obsessed over the January 6 insurrection, to the harm of the country.

But, they forget how they obsessed, FOR YEARS, over Benghazi and their failed efforts to nail Hillary Clinton. Benghazi was an unfortunate pin prick of history while the Trump led January 6 Insurrection nearly overthrew the Constitution of the United States of America.

There is NO comparison! Bigly!!!

"CNN"

"Insurection"

LOL

 

[jbrownson0831]

Biden said in his speech, ""For the first time in our history, a President had not just lost an election. He tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power as a violent mob reached the Capitol,"

HOW?

The "violent," mob, one it was in the capitol, which, we now know, folks in control of the grounds and the capitol, purposely made security lax, and let them in for optics. . . thus? HOW? How was Trump going to prevent the transfer of power at that point?

How was he going to do this if Pence was not on board?

. . . and even if Pence was on board? EVEN THEN? It still seems a specious proposition that he only could control the parliamentary procedure to just overrule procedure, there would be serious violence.

I just can't believe how little critical thinking folks are using. . .

It boggles that mind how easily folks are gas-lit.

Biden just needed to evacuate his pelosi that current Depends was finished anyway.

 

[Ame®icano]

Biden just needed to evacuate his pelosi that current Depends was finished anyway.

Only leftists are able to decipher this.

 

[jbrownson0831]

Only leftists are able to decipher this.

Very easily.

 

[MisterBeale]

STATEMENT: "Hillary was guilty in the Benghazi debacle"

RESPONSE: Bullshit. Seven Million Dollars and 33 hearings came to a nothing burger. Stop with the Big Lie, it has no traction and no probative evidence to even suggest HRC was guilty.

Not in post #14. Even there nothing about running guns was noted.

Seymour M. Hersh · The Red Line and the Rat Line: Erdoğan and the Syrian rebels

The full extent of US co-operation with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar in assisting the rebel opposition in Syria has...

www.lrb.co.uk

". . . The operation had not been disclosed at the time it was set up to the congressional intelligence committees and the congressional leadership, as required by law since the 1970s. The involvement of MI6 enabled the CIA to evade the law by classifying the mission as a liaison operation. The former intelligence official explained that for years there has been a recognised exception in the law that permits the CIA not to report liaison activity to Congress, which would otherwise be owed a finding. (All proposed CIA covert operations must be described in a written document, known as a ‘finding’, submitted to the senior leadership of Congress for approval.) Distribution of the annex was limited to the staff aides who wrote the report and to the eight ranking members of Congress – the Democratic and Republican leaders of the House and Senate, and the Democratic and Republicans leaders on the House and Senate intelligence committees. This hardly constituted a genuine attempt at oversight: the eight leaders are not known to gather together to raise questions or discuss the secret information they receive.

The annex didn’t tell the whole story of what happened in Benghazi before the attack, nor did it explain why the American consulate was attacked. ‘The consulate’s only mission was to provide cover for the moving of arms,’ the former intelligence official, who has read the annex, said. ‘It had no real political role.’

Washington abruptly ended the CIA’s role in the transfer of arms from Libya after the attack on the consulate, but the rat line kept going. ‘The United States was no longer in control of what the Turks were relaying to the jihadists,’ the former intelligence official said. Within weeks, as many as forty portable surface-to-air missile launchers, commonly known as manpads, were in the hands of Syrian rebels. On 28 November 2012, Joby Warrick of the Washington Post reported that the previous day rebels near Aleppo had used what was almost certainly a manpad to shoot down a Syrian transport helicopter. ‘The Obama administration,’ Warrick wrote, ‘has steadfastly opposed arming Syrian opposition forces with such missiles, warning that the weapons could fall into the hands of terrorists and be used to shoot down commercial aircraft.’ Two Middle Eastern intelligence officials fingered Qatar as the source, and a former US intelligence analyst speculated that the manpads could have been obtained from Syrian military outposts overrun by the rebels. There was no indication that the rebels’ possession of manpads was likely the unintended consequence of a covert US programme that was no longer under US control.. . ."

 

[Vrenn]

She could have prevented it by not running arms out of the country.

It's been over 30 years and you still haven't been able to pin even one of your lies. Please go back and work on the earlier ones. Making up new lies doesn't do a damned thing. Hillary is history and, as I said, it's been 30 years. Please stop being a Rumpster Traitor Terrorist.

 

[MisterBeale]

‘I’ll never concede’: Trump speech incites mob at Capitol

Trump continued to ratchet up pressure on Vice President Mike Pence, who is tasked with presiding over the final certification by Congress.

www.tampabay.com

Trump still hasn't conceded.

Is it your contention that he is still president then?

 

[pknopp]

It's been over 30 years and you still haven't been able to pin even one of your lies. Please go back and work on the earlier ones. Making up new lies doesn't do a damned thing. Hillary is history and, as I said, it's been 30 years. Please stop being a Rumpster Traitor Terrorist.

There is no question that we were running arms out of Syria. That is no lie.

 

[toobfreak]

The two faces of Trump and his Cult​

Take your pick, Astroshit. You can kiss either one. MAGA is coming to steam roll over you bigly either way.

 

[MisterBeale]

He couldn't without having Pence onboard. And there's no disputing the fact that he's witnessed attempting to get Pence onboard.
Pence took the threat seriously and ran for his life.

it never was a serious threat as is being attempted to portray.

So then?

Since we know that the Obama admin had the Deep State, in conjunction with our allies, illegally running guns to Syrian rebels, w/o authorization of Congress, which caused the death of Americans, and, by your own admission, the propaganda on America's new channels, and by the DNC, is all lies. . .

then this statement;

But, they forget how they obsessed, FOR YEARS, over Benghazi and their failed efforts to nail Hillary Clinton. Benghazi was an unfortunate pin prick of history while the Trump led January 6 Insurrection nearly overthrew the Constitution of the United States of America.

There is NO comparison! Bigly!!!

Really should put this thread in the badlands, because it is false hyperbole and a lie, correct?

 

[the other mike]

It used to be, whenever I saw an OP started with a source used such as Gateway, HuffPo, MotherJones, Breitbart, etc. I would show less interest. . . now? It seems CNN and WaPo have sort of entered into that category.

It's called reading between the lies.
You must be an amateur if you're just now onto CNN and Washington Post.

 

[Oddball]

Inside Biden's fiery speech and his decision to confront Trump's danger head on

It was only a little more than a month ago when President Joe Biden, asked about another head-shaking revelation regarding his predecessor, seemed to balk at a mere mention of the man.

www.cnn.com

The Trump Cult party loves to accuse Democrats of being obsessed over the January 6 insurrection, to the harm of the country.

But, they forget how they obsessed, FOR YEARS, over Benghazi and their failed efforts to nail Hillary Clinton. Benghazi was an unfortunate pin prick of history while the Trump led January 6 Insurrection nearly overthrew the Constitution of the United States of America.

There is NO comparison! Bigly!!!

Whataboutism isn't an argument.

 

[Vrenn]

There is no question that we were running arms out of Syria. That is no lie.

It is when you say it. Say it over and over and it's still going to be a lie.

 

[Burgermeister]

Great, now I have to recall that dirty lying administration and their ridiculous inflammatory video excuse.

 

[pknopp]

It is when you say it. Say it over and over and it's still going to be a lie.

The Benghazi outrage we actually should be talking about

I bet you still believe it was about a video.

 

[BertramN]

Inside Biden's fiery speech and his decision to confront Trump's danger head on

It was only a little more than a month ago when President Joe Biden, asked about another head-shaking revelation regarding his predecessor, seemed to balk at a mere mention of the man.

www.cnn.com

The Trump Cult party loves to accuse Democrats of being obsessed over the January 6 insurrection, to the harm of the country.

But, they forget how they obsessed, FOR YEARS, over Benghazi and their failed efforts to nail Hillary Clinton. Benghazi was an unfortunate pin prick of history while the Trump led January 6 Insurrection nearly overthrew the Constitution of the United States of America.

There is NO comparison! Bigly!!!

In the alternate reality of the trump Nazis, all historic events are rewritten to support the narrative most beneficial to the situation of the moment. Facts are fluid and their flights of fantasies are truth.




.

 

[Vrenn]

The Benghazi outrage we actually should be talking about

I bet you still believe it was about a video.

You have nothing left to say without your failed repeating of the same lies. You have a nice life.

 

[surada]

Hillary was guilty in the Benghazi debacle. Your overall point may be legit but all it shows is that both major parties are pretty despicable.

Nope. Congress voted against all security funding for US embassies except for Afghanistan and Baghdad.

 

[surada]

She could have prevented it by not running arms out of the country.

The Annex was a listening post. Trying to identify the Eastern tribes that might support a return to the idris constitution.

 

[pknopp]

Nope. Congress voted against all security funding for US embassies except for Afghanistan and Baghdad.

The problem was running arms out of Libya. Congress never voted on that.