Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another liberal lie: "every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually an angry white male".That's not evidence, that's "cultural diversity".
BTW, guess what happens to the US number when we subtract gang-related murders out of the equation?
Then why is it every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually an angry white male? It would seem that if Angry White Males were inclined to be mass shooters, Europe would be flooded with them.
If you really had any integrity, you'd have said "every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually a mentally disturbed male", but you don't. You're too busy pressing an anti-Constitutional, anti-gun political agenda.
Wong again, moron.Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn, ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz................
And as we all know, gun violence never occurs outside "gun free zones".
Mass shootings don't...mass shooters choose gun free zones......thugs look for their thug victims.....
There’s also no ‘evidence’ that mass shooters make a ‘decision’ to commit their crimes in ‘gun free zones’; indeed, most have no idea they're committing crimes in such a ‘zone.’
And again: citizens often carry concealed firearms wherever they so desire, including venues where guns ‘aren’t allowed.’
What part of concealed carry do you not understand – they’re carrying guns concealed, no one knows they have guns, including anyone who is supposed to ‘enforce’ a ‘no gun’ policy.
So the Liberal concept of a gun free zone really means nothing? Just another example of how the left comes up with an idea then blames someone else when their lack of thinking fucks up.
"So the Liberal concept of a gun free zone really means nothing?"
Nah, that's your argument, that they're so meaningless there should be none. Oddly though, your "conservative" congress members go to work in a gun free zone all day long. And even the NRA won't allow you to carry just anyolewhere at their corporate headquarters either.
No, actually, they don't......they have armed security all around them and the biggest gun grabbers also have private security that we pay for.
Another liberal lie: "every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually an angry white male".That's not evidence, that's "cultural diversity".
BTW, guess what happens to the US number when we subtract gang-related murders out of the equation?
Then why is it every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually an angry white male? It would seem that if Angry White Males were inclined to be mass shooters, Europe would be flooded with them.
If you really had any integrity, you'd have said "every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually a mentally disturbed male", but you don't. You're too busy pressing an anti-Constitutional, anti-gun political agenda.
And they forget the long island shooter, the virginia tech shooter, the D.C snipers, the Fort HOod shooter, the San Bernadino shooters...the Draw Mohammed shooters..........and on and on...in fact the greatests mass shooter was in South Korea.......
And the most recent mass shooter in Australia was a Chinese foriegn exchange student.
Well that certainly sums up the modern Liberal view of our Constitution. Thanks for clarifying.Fuck the constitution.....
Most all of these mass shootings happen in so called "gun free" zones...Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn, ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz................
And as we all know, gun violence never occurs outside "gun free zones".
If We can't count on criminals paying heed to a sign, what kind a banana republic do we live in!!! Lol
You really ought to get out of your moms basement more. Dumbass
I know what a liberal should be; our Founders showed us. A "modern liberal", is a strong authoritarian who, like Napoleon in Orwell's "Animal Farm" rewriting the Seven Commandments, believes our Constitution needs to be "modernized" with most, if not all, power given to the Federal government.Well that certainly sums up the modern Liberal view of our Constitution. Thanks for clarifying.Fuck the constitution.....
I'm not sure what a liberal is, but hell, neither are you, you just "know" it's a pejorative to be hissed at anyone who ever disagreed with you on anything even one upon a time.
Have you been working on that in your moms basement??Most all of these mass shootings happen in so called "gun free" zones...Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn, ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz................
And as we all know, gun violence never occurs outside "gun free zones".
If We can't count on criminals paying heed to a sign, what kind a banana republic do we live in!!! Lol
You really ought to get out of your moms basement more. Dumbass
"We can't count on criminals paying heed to a sign, what kind a banana republic do we live in!!!"
The typical kind, where all societal wealth has been redistributed to the very top, the police force is militarized; the notion of democracy is nothing but an illusion. and there's low level chaos and violence (gun and otherwise) in the streets with fanatics like you focusing all your attention, as programmed, onto society's scape goats which allows the aristocracy free reign to continue the wealth extraction.
Do you seriously believe Bill Clinton was not an adulterer and sexual harasser? Do you believe Paula Jones fabricated the story and that Bill Clinton is completely innocent of wrong doing?
Yes, the gun store was in the wrong. Bushmaster, not at all.
Another liberal lie: "every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually an angry white male".
If you really had any integrity, you'd have said "every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually a mentally disturbed male", but you don't. You're too busy pressing an anti-Constitutional, anti-gun political agenda.
Agreed on the store, but what did Bushmaster do wrong except for manufacturing a very good, legal tool?
1) Awesome. I have a degree in Behavioral Psychology and and a Masters in International Relations. Does this mean you will STFU whenever I speak on these or related issues? Do you see how argumentum ad verecundiam can backfire on you?
2) Of course you don't. Like Fenton Lum, you don't give a fuck about the Constitution even though you, supposedly, swore an oath to support and defend it. This makes you a liar.....but you and I already knew that, didn't we?
Interesting to see your support for weenie-waggers, but not unsurprising....But assuming it is, again? So what. She saw a dick. She knows what a dick looks like.
Nice theory. Now prove it. Let's not forget, you're the "Paula Jones" in this instance and Bushmaster is "Bill Clinton".Bushmaster picked that store as an authorized dealer, knowing they were irresponsible
Fascinating. So you didn't take one of these oaths at least once?:What I swore an oath to was the country, not a flawed piece of paper. The Constitution is not a suicide pact, a wise man said once.
Now you are either lying about your service or lying about your knowledge of weapons.....Does it make sense today? to give a battlefield grade weapon to a guy like Joker Holmes who wants to kill people because they were watching a Batman movie? (Weren't they being punished enough for just having to watch the movie?)
He's a child molester/rapist... End of story. LolDo you seriously believe Bill Clinton was not an adulterer and sexual harasser? Do you believe Paula Jones fabricated the story and that Bill Clinton is completely innocent of wrong doing?
Here's what I think.
I think Clinton is an adulterer. that isn't a crime. It's an issue between him and his wife.
What he did to Paula Jones, if true, didn't constitute sexual harassment because 1) He wasn't her direct supervisor and 2) there is no evidence that she suffered any negative effects from refusing his advances. She wasn't fired, demoted, denied promotions. The worst thing she claimed was that they put her off away from the other workers, but that was because she spent too much time talking and not enough working. This is why Judge Weber Wright threw out the lawsuit.
I'm not sure what happened in that room, because the only witnesses are Jones and clinton. I do know that the Arkansas troopers who guarded Clinton said that Jones exclaimed "The governor wants me to be his girlfriend", which would imply that the encounter wasn't unpleasant for her.
But assuming it is, again? So what. She saw a dick. She knows what a dick looks like.
This coming from someone who thinks that an ar15 is a military grade weapon, it's just a sporting rifle. DumbassYes, the gun store was in the wrong. Bushmaster, not at all.
Bushmaster picked that store as an authorized dealer, knowing they were irresponsible.
Another liberal lie: "every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually an angry white male".
If you really had any integrity, you'd have said "every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually a mentally disturbed male", but you don't. You're too busy pressing an anti-Constitutional, anti-gun political agenda.
Uh, no. You see, when a black person commits a crime, it's because he's a criminal. We don't brook any excuses like poverty or addiction. But when a Roof or Holmes or a Lanza goes on a shooting spree, we say, "Oh, the poor dear must be mentally disturbed!"
Agreed on the store, but what did Bushmaster do wrong except for manufacturing a very good, legal tool?
Made it too easy for people like John Mohammed and Adam Lanza to get them.
1) Awesome. I have a degree in Behavioral Psychology and and a Masters in International Relations. Does this mean you will STFU whenever I speak on these or related issues? Do you see how argumentum ad verecundiam can backfire on you?
Well, you see, my degree comes from one of those commie liberal universities where they aren't right with Jesus and actually teach facts, not fairy tales.
2) Of course you don't. Like Fenton Lum, you don't give a fuck about the Constitution even though you, supposedly, swore an oath to support and defend it. This makes you a liar.....but you and I already knew that, didn't we?
What I swore an oath to was the country, not a flawed piece of paper. The Constitution is not a suicide pact, a wise man said once.
I will even go so far as to say in 1787, a citizen militia even made sense. Most of the population lived on farms, you still had lots of wild animals and Native Americans who weren't hip on the whole "being genocided" thing, and people needed them some guns.
Does it make sense today? to give a battlefield grade weapon to a guy like Joker Holmes who wants to kill people because they were watching a Batman movie? (Weren't they being punished enough for just having to watch the movie?)
Oh, dick tiny, the thing was, this guy was a proud gun owner who was able to walk into a gun store in Minnesota and buy a gun,
and then proceeded to kill two people who did something to offend him.
This two things we'll find out about this guy.
1) Everyone in his life knew he was nuts.
2) He was able to purchase a gun legally.
Another liberal lie: "every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually an angry white male".That's not evidence, that's "cultural diversity".
BTW, guess what happens to the US number when we subtract gang-related murders out of the equation?
Then why is it every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually an angry white male? It would seem that if Angry White Males were inclined to be mass shooters, Europe would be flooded with them.
If you really had any integrity, you'd have said "every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually a mentally disturbed male", but you don't. You're too busy pressing an anti-Constitutional, anti-gun political agenda.
And they forget the long island shooter, the virginia tech shooter, the D.C snipers, the Fort HOod shooter, the San Bernadino shooters...the Draw Mohammed shooters..........and on and on...in fact the greatests mass shooter was in South Korea.......
And the most recent mass shooter in Australia was a Chinese foriegn exchange student.
Were these all in your "gun free" zones?
Do you seriously believe Bill Clinton was not an adulterer and sexual harasser? Do you believe Paula Jones fabricated the story and that Bill Clinton is completely innocent of wrong doing?
Here's what I think.
I think Clinton is an adulterer. that isn't a crime. It's an issue between him and his wife.
What he did to Paula Jones, if true, didn't constitute sexual harassment because 1) He wasn't her direct supervisor and 2) there is no evidence that she suffered any negative effects from refusing his advances. She wasn't fired, demoted, denied promotions. The worst thing she claimed was that they put her off away from the other workers, but that was because she spent too much time talking and not enough working. This is why Judge Weber Wright threw out the lawsuit.
I'm not sure what happened in that room, because the only witnesses are Jones and clinton. I do know that the Arkansas troopers who guarded Clinton said that Jones exclaimed "The governor wants me to be his girlfriend", which would imply that the encounter wasn't unpleasant for her.
But assuming it is, again? So what. She saw a dick. She knows what a dick looks like.
I know what a liberal should be; our Founders showed us. A "modern liberal", is a strong authoritarian who, like Napoleon in Orwell's "Animal Farm" rewriting the Seven Commandments, believes our Constitution needs to be "modernized" with most, if not all, power given to the Federal government.Well that certainly sums up the modern Liberal view of our Constitution. Thanks for clarifying.Fuck the constitution.....
I'm not sure what a liberal is, but hell, neither are you, you just "know" it's a pejorative to be hissed at anyone who ever disagreed with you on anything even one upon a time.
You are already on record saying "Fuck the Constitution", so you epitomize the "modern liberal".
Have you been working on that in your moms basement??Most all of these mass shootings happen in so called "gun free" zones...Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn, ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz................
And as we all know, gun violence never occurs outside "gun free zones".
If We can't count on criminals paying heed to a sign, what kind a banana republic do we live in!!! Lol
You really ought to get out of your moms basement more. Dumbass
"We can't count on criminals paying heed to a sign, what kind a banana republic do we live in!!!"
The typical kind, where all societal wealth has been redistributed to the very top, the police force is militarized; the notion of democracy is nothing but an illusion. and there's low level chaos and violence (gun and otherwise) in the streets with fanatics like you focusing all your attention, as programmed, onto society's scape goats which allows the aristocracy free reign to continue the wealth extraction.
Now go hide...
Another liberal lie: "every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually an angry white male".That's not evidence, that's "cultural diversity".
BTW, guess what happens to the US number when we subtract gang-related murders out of the equation?
Then why is it every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually an angry white male? It would seem that if Angry White Males were inclined to be mass shooters, Europe would be flooded with them.
If you really had any integrity, you'd have said "every time we find one of these mass shooters, it's usually a mentally disturbed male", but you don't. You're too busy pressing an anti-Constitutional, anti-gun political agenda.
And they forget the long island shooter, the virginia tech shooter, the D.C snipers, the Fort HOod shooter, the San Bernadino shooters...the Draw Mohammed shooters..........and on and on...in fact the greatests mass shooter was in South Korea.......
And the most recent mass shooter in Australia was a Chinese foriegn exchange student.
Were these all in your "gun free" zones?
Yes.......all of them.
