NightFox
Wildling
- Jul 20, 2013
- 11,549
- 3,219
That's why there's a question mark there, it was a request for clarification to make sure that I understood the point you were trying to express correctly.If it is such a "deal" businesses wouldn't move but apparently you didn't get the memo to the effect that for profit businesses are in business to make money NOT fulfill some esoteric patriotic "duty", businesses make money by providing an attractive value proposition to consumers which not only benefits the businesses but also benefits consumers and enriches society as a whole.
Make the business climate more business friendly (lower taxes and less regulatory costs) and you'll attract business and thus benefit domestic society, make the climate business hostile and you'll drive businesses away and thus damage domestic society.
It's called a cost-benefit analysis and it's pretty simple to understand once you get past all the idiotic anti-capitalism, anti-business rhetoric spouted by asshole politicians trying to sucker the public into voting for them.
I understand how business works. My beef is with the model they've chosen.
Everybody pays, that's how it works. That's how it's always worked. Lowering taxes to a non existant level to give a private enterprise more profit is not the answer. What's the benefit to America of doing so?
Err..um... probably something to do with the fact that businesses derive profit by making society richer, take a look around you, would you be poorer or richer without private enterprise? If you take away more money from private enterprise and hand it over to politicians and bureaucrats do you think that is going to make society richer than say leaving that money in the hands of entrepreneurs to produce goods and services that society wants and needs? Do you think government is more efficient and less prone to waste, fraud and abuse than private enterprise?
The fact of the matter is that more the money that is extracted from the productive economy by government the less efficient our economy becomes and thus we get more unemployment, less wage growth and higher prices at reduced quality.
At what point does it matter? Personally I don't care if a business is considered or considers itself an "American" enterprise, what I'm concerned with as a consumer is the value proposition that it offers and whether or not that value proposition offers me the consumer a profitable exchange (i.e. that business is offering me a good or service that is worth more to ME than the price asked).At what point do we consider these as no longer American enterprises?
How did you come to that conclusion? Businesses pay all sorts of taxes to local, state and federal government ABOVE AND BEYOND just federal income taxes not to mention that they have to bear an enormous cost due to regulations. If you want to increase the cost of doing business in the United States you're going to have to resign yourself to the fact that business are going to continue to seek greener pastures overseas because in today's hyper-competitive global economy that's what they need to do to survive and prosper.They want the benefits of the availability of capital, infrastructure, markets, security, etc without paying the dues to be in the club.
Err..um... probably something to do with the fact that businesses derive profit by making society richer, take a look around you, would you be poorer or richer without private enterprise?
So full of shit. That makes no sense at all. Pfizer enriches no one but themselves.
Pfizer's CEO Faces The Drug Pricing Firestorm
So your theory is that Pfizer produces nothing that consumers willingly buy at the price Pfizer offers it at?
That's not what I said or responded to.
So nobody is forced to buy what Pfizer is offering thus consumers are demonstrating that what Pfizer is offering is worth the price they are asking for in exchange for it, which indicates that those consumers feel that the Pfizer's products are worth more to them than the price asked, thus the consumers of Pfizers products end up being RICHER due to their voluntary exchange with Pfizer." willingly buy"
Yes because people have unlimited choices when a lifesaving drug is required from the only manufacturer of that drug.
The other point that you seem to be missing is that nobody is stopping competitors from offering alternatives to Pfizer's products, well except for government bureaucrats and politicians engaging in typical gub'mint sponsored cronyism that is.