PLYMCO_PILGRIM
Gold Member
BWAHAHAHAHA
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGDnMPeX1YY&feature=channel[/ame]
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGDnMPeX1YY&feature=channel[/ame]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This just keeps getting worse for the conspiracy deniers by the minute - if the hackers changed the or altered the e-mail then more charges against them will be on the way!
East Anglia University Climate Change Email Controversy - ClimateGate Stolen Email and Global Warming - Popular Mechanics
There seem to be some evidence that the Emails were altered
" Furthermore, though CRU has confirmed that most of the e-mails are genuine, some of them could have been forged or altered"
This just keeps getting worse for the conspiracy deniers by the minute - if the hackers changed the or altered the e-mail then more charges against them will be on the way!
East Anglia University Climate Change Email Controversy - ClimateGate Stolen Email and Global Warming - Popular Mechanics
There seem to be some evidence that the Emails were altered
" Furthermore, though CRU has confirmed that most of the e-mails are genuine, some of them could have been forged or altered"
This just keeps getting worse for the conspiracy deniers by the minute - if the hackers changed the or altered the e-mail then more charges against them will be on the way!
East Anglia University Climate Change Email Controversy - ClimateGate Stolen Email and Global Warming - Popular Mechanics
There seem to be some evidence that the Emails were altered
" Furthermore, though CRU has confirmed that most of the e-mails are genuine, some of them could have been forged or altered"
AGW Cult members are hard to convince....This just keeps getting worse for the conspiracy deniers by the minute - if the hackers changed the or altered the e-mail then more charges against them will be on the way!
East Anglia University Climate Change Email Controversy - ClimateGate Stolen Email and Global Warming - Popular Mechanics
There seem to be some evidence that the Emails were altered
" Furthermore, though CRU has confirmed that most of the e-mails are genuine, some of them could have been forged or altered"
There is nothing in that article that states or implies that the emails were forged or altered. In fact, both CRU and the university have said they all appear to be genuine.
AGW Cult members are hard to convince....This just keeps getting worse for the conspiracy deniers by the minute - if the hackers changed the or altered the e-mail then more charges against them will be on the way!
East Anglia University Climate Change Email Controversy - ClimateGate Stolen Email and Global Warming - Popular Mechanics
There seem to be some evidence that the Emails were altered
" Furthermore, though CRU has confirmed that most of the e-mails are genuine, some of them could have been forged or altered"
There is nothing in that article that states or implies that the emails were forged or altered. In fact, both CRU and the university have said they all appear to be genuine.
When the world refuses to act upon the draconian schemes that the AGW Cultists seek, and then when the world doesn't end, then they might believe it.
Until then you are wasting bandwidth!
yeah I know....it's much easier to swallow that a vast majority of the worlds scientists are all in on a mass conspiracy that if revealed would ruin them and their lifetime work.
Where has anyone even intimated that this is a mass conspiracy?yeah I know....it's much easier to swallow that a vast majority of the worlds scientists are all in on a mass conspiracy that if revealed would ruin them and their lifetime work.
Where has anyone even intimated that this is a mass conspiracy?yeah I know....it's much easier to swallow that a vast majority of the worlds scientists are all in on a mass conspiracy that if revealed would ruin them and their lifetime work.
What this has been from the outset is a few of the inner circle fudging and faking the evidence that subsequent honest scienteists have based their further work upon.
Like I said in another thread, Typhoid Mary wasn't part of any conspiracy either.
I find that an interesting choice of likeness to Warmists. The more I think of it though, it's not totally accurate. After all, Typhoid Mary was a lone woman who a lone health official in NYC discovered to be the source of a Typhoid outbreak that just had no other commonalities. It was through his work, and (unfortunately) constant hounding of Mary that discovered that some people can become hosts and yet not have any symptoms of the disease. A hellish 'midas touch'.Where has anyone even intimated that this is a mass conspiracy?yeah I know....it's much easier to swallow that a vast majority of the worlds scientists are all in on a mass conspiracy that if revealed would ruin them and their lifetime work.
What this has been from the outset is a few of the inner circle fudging and faking the evidence, that subsequent honest scientists have based their further work upon.
Like I said in another thread, Typhoid Mary wasn't part of any conspiracy either.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
World Bank
African Development Bank (AFDB)
Asian Development Bank (ADB)
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB)
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)
UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO)
If negotiators reach an accord at the climate talks in Copenhagen it will entail profound shifts in energy production, dislocations in how and where people live, sweeping changes in agriculture and forestry and the creation of complex new markets in global warming pollution credits.
The short answer is trillions of dollars over the next few decades. It is a significant sum but a relatively small fraction of the worlds total economic output. In energy infrastructure alone, the transformational ambitions that delegates to the United Nations climate change conference are expected to set in the coming days will cost more than $10 trillion in additional investment from 2010 to 2030, according to a new estimate from the International Energy Agency.
Not allow poor countries to emit more than 1.44 tonnes of carbon per person by 2050, while allowing rich countries to emit 2.67 tonnes.
yeah I know....it's much easier to swallow that a vast majority of the worlds scientists are all in on a mass conspiracy that if revealed would ruin them and their lifetime work.
African experts on climate change and high-level representatives of AU member states have recommended Africa demand between 67 billion and 200 billion US dollars annually in compensation.
"Science" responds to Climategate
08 Dec 2009 04:29 pm
The response of the climate-science establishment to Climategate has been disappointing if predictable. The guild mentality has come to the fore. Campaigns are under way to defend the integrity of science from a scurrilous smear campaign. The message is simple: you are either with us or you are a barbarian.
The first line of response to the leaked or hacked emails, you recall, was to say that they showed science going on as usual--even science at its best, some argued. "Trick" did not mean trick; "hiding the decline" did not mean hiding the decline. These were innocent phrases torn out of context. As for the expostulations of harry_read_me, and discussing ways to punish or silence dissidents, and musing over the deletion of data that might be demanded under FOI requests, er, this is all just part of the healthy cut and thrust of normal scientific enquiry. We all have to let off steam now and then. No conspiracy. Nothing improper.
That did not work--too many of the emails speak for themselves--and the scandal refused to die down. The next line of response was to say that the emails involved just a few individuals, and implicate no more than a sliver of information about global warming. Even if you threw out everything the Climatic Research Unit had done, such is the weight of other research that nothing would change. (The newly empowered EPA administrator added a nice wrinkle last night on the PBS Newshour. The work in question was done abroad. Other research was done by Americans. So no cause for alarm. Well, no cause for lack of alarm, if you see what I mean.)
...
From a former 'warmer' that is disgusted by what has come to be:
"Science" responds to Climategate - Clive Crook
"Science" responds to Climategate
08 Dec 2009 04:29 pm
The response of the climate-science establishment to Climategate has been disappointing if predictable. The guild mentality has come to the fore. Campaigns are under way to defend the integrity of science from a scurrilous smear campaign. The message is simple: you are either with us or you are a barbarian.
The first line of response to the leaked or hacked emails, you recall, was to say that they showed science going on as usual--even science at its best, some argued. "Trick" did not mean trick; "hiding the decline" did not mean hiding the decline. These were innocent phrases torn out of context. As for the expostulations of harry_read_me, and discussing ways to punish or silence dissidents, and musing over the deletion of data that might be demanded under FOI requests, er, this is all just part of the healthy cut and thrust of normal scientific enquiry. We all have to let off steam now and then. No conspiracy. Nothing improper.
That did not work--too many of the emails speak for themselves--and the scandal refused to die down. The next line of response was to say that the emails involved just a few individuals, and implicate no more than a sliver of information about global warming. Even if you threw out everything the Climatic Research Unit had done, such is the weight of other research that nothing would change. (The newly empowered EPA administrator added a nice wrinkle last night on the PBS Newshour. The work in question was done abroad. Other research was done by Americans. So no cause for alarm. Well, no cause for lack of alarm, if you see what I mean.)
...
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said Tuesday that emails leaked from a British university have done nothing to undermine the United Nations' view that climate change is accelerating due to humans.