Zone1 The White Affirmative Action Program

[IM2]

You are owed nothing more than what Whites are owed.
There is some equity for you.

No, we are owed reparations for human rights violations caused by this government.

But if you want to talk about what the government gave whites, we are owed at least 500,000 per black family. Thats the equivalent cost of the free land whites got. We can split another trillion for the New Deal and Servicemens Readjustment Act. But if you want to use that sad sorry weak dodge of that being in the past, then we can split at least 16 trillion in lost income and economic development from 2000 until this second. Your opinion really lacks the information necessary to argue with me.

 

[Meister]

No, we are owed reparations for human rights violations caused by this government.

But if you want to talk about what the government gave whites, we are owed at least 500,000 per black family. Thats the equivalent cost of the free land whites got. We can split another trillion for the New Deal and Servicemens Readjustment Act. But if you want to use that sad sorry weak dodge of that being in the past, then we can split at least 16 trillion in lost income and economic development from 2000 until this second. Your opinion really lacks the information necessary to argue with me.

Stop living in history, you weren't around.
Lost income and economic development? Not buying in on that no matter what you cherry pick

 

[BackAgain]

The fairy tale many whites tell about how whites have accomplished things in America is just not true. Whites have been provided direct economic stimulus from the government on several occasions while others were denied. Whites of all ethnicities and faiths have received such help from the government. For now 246 years, America has operated a system of white favoritism. Even programs that were designed to create equal opportunities for all non whites, such as AA, have benefitted whites. This is the cold, hard, documented, inconvenient truth and in 2022 and beyond it's time to face this truth.

Repeating your silly and false claim in large font and in bold typeset does nothing to make it any less silly or any less false.

 

[IM2]

Repeating your silly and false claim in large font and in bold typeset does nothing to make it any less silly or any less false.

Repeating your silly denial doesn't change the fact that what I said is true.

 

[Lisa558]

Yada. Yada. Yada.


No Lusa, zone 1 protects you. Because the filth you post can't be called what it is. And stop lying about me being in the past. Your posts show that there are people with the same problem living right now. Whites have got AA for 246 years. My college entrance scores on the ACT was in the top 15 percentile of the country. I no doubt scored higher than you. If anyone has been given anything because of their race, it's you. And your sex. You are part of the group who has benefitted the most from AA. The job you got, is probably due to AA. The black favoritism you talk about doesn't exist. And if you think so, buy an afro wig, get some tan in a can and try to live 2 years before you quit.

Oh….so posting the truth about the bias toward black applicants is “filth” in your mind? You need help. Is that how black activists are going to get whites who speak out against racist admissions practices to STFU? Good luck with that.

I say you are incorrect because you are. Your parents got things my parents couldn't because of their race, and my parents did not play when it came to us and school. Everything you say is wrong and your opinion is based in something I'm not allowed to say in zone one no matter how overt you are in expressing it. You are full of malarkey, your arguments ate based in delusion, not fact. You've been shown the facts. Accept that your opinion is wrong.

Blah, blah, blah. I just told you that my parents faced obstacles - and HORRORS - that your parents did not.

You are unbelievably arrogant. I worked in admissions and saw the hoops they leaped through to justify the pro-black bias. And yet you, who never worked in the field, demand that I accept that *I* am wrong? You are the one who is wrong.

 

[BackAgain]

Repeating your silly denial doesn't change the fact that what I said is true.

But, of course, what you said wasn’t and isn’t true.

Ergo it’s not a “fact.”

Your assertion is just another false claim from a tired old dishonest racist.

 

[Lisa558]

Stop living in history, you weren't around.
Lost income and economic development? Not buying in on that no matter what you cherry pick

Did you catch the amount of money that IM2 wants his family, and all black families, for whites to fork over? He’s talking about well over $1 million each.

And that’s what all the anti-white racism is for, at the core. The libs want whites to be so self-loathing for what they themselves never did to blacks living today, who in turn never experienced it, that they will sell their homes and move into hovels, and empty their bank accounts, to give hostile, entitled blacks like IM2 a million bucks.

(Did you catch my earlier thread about how I was refused service at McDonalds, in a very black/Latino neighborhood, for being white? That is how bad it’s gotten is some areas.)

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

White have received Affirmative Action since America has been a colony. Uneducated white peasants were given jobs and citizenship over Africans who were rulers of kingdoms. All kinds of standards have been lowered or altered for whites to get to where they are today.

In 1618, the Virginia colony passed "the Great Charter of privileges, orders, and laws." Among these laws was a provision that any person who settled in Virginia or paid for the transportation of another person to settle in Virginia would get fifty acres of land per person. “The right to receive fifty acres per person, or per head, was called a headright.” It got even better for colonists as those who “imported” slaves also got fifty acres per slave. The practice was continued by the government of Virginia, for 161 years, ending in 1779. Headrights were not only limited to Virginia. The headright system was used in all the original thirteen colonies. Headrights were the first of many government handouts of free stuff or guarantees providing whites with economic development assistance.

It continued with this:

The Three-Fifths Compromise is found in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution. It says: “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other Persons.”

And with this:

The Naturalization Act of 1790 states: “any alien, being a free white person,” could apply for citizenship, so long as they lived in the United States for at least two years and in the state where the application was filed for at least one year. This law allowed “children of citizens of the United States that may be born … out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as natural-born citizens.” Please notice the first seven words. Only whites were entitled to be citizens of this country.

And with this:

One of the greatest miscarriages of justice in this nation’s history was a direct rebuttal to the claim that all men are created equal called Dred Scott v. Sandford. I am not going into all the particulars of this case. The court’s opinion says all you need to know. “A black man has no rights a white man is bound to respect.” The result of Dred Scott v. Sandford was that whites were given rights and status blacks were denied.Or- Affirmative Action.

And with this:

Anti-literacy Laws in the United States Once Prevented Blacks from Getting an Education

(NO OTHER RACE WAS DENIED THE RIGHT TO READ)

Passed in 1862, the Homestead Acts gave away 246 million acres of land. To qualify for Homestead land, a person had to be a citizen of the United States, and blacks were not given citizenship until 1866.

And this:

"After the Civil War ended in 1865, some states passed black codes that severely limited the rights of Black people, many of whom had been enslaved. These codes limited what jobs African Americans could hold, and their ability to leave a job once hired. Some states also restricted the kind of property Black people could own. The Reconstruction Act of 1867 weakened the effect of the Black codes by requiring all states to uphold equal protection under the 14th Amendment, particularly by enabling Black men to vote. (U.S. law prevented women of any race from voting in federal elections until 1920.)

During Reconstruction, many Black men participated in politics by voting and by holding office. Reconstruction officially ended in 1877, and southern states then enacted more discriminatory laws. Efforts to enforce white supremacy by legislation increased, and African Americans tried to assert their rights through legal challenges. However, this effort led to a disappointing result in 1896, when the Supreme Court ruled, in Plessy v. Ferguson, that so-called “separate but equal” facilities—including public transport and schools—were constitutional. From this time until the Civil Rights Act of 1964, discrimination and segregation were legal and enforceable."

July 9, 2018 was the 150th anniversary of the 14th Amendment, which purported to grant African Americans the rights and responsibilities of full citizenship, among other things. American history shows that people who are equal on paper can be unequal in practice—especially with regards to the right to bear arms.

On April 16, 1895, the United States Supreme Court rendered another one of the sorriest decisions in American history. It is known as Plessy vs. Ferguson. From this decision came the principle of separate but equal.

And this:

The National Housing Act was passed by Congress and signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1934.29 This law created the Federal Housing Administration or the FHA. The National Housing Act is the policy that may have had the most impact on wealth accumulation in modern America.

Between 1934 and 1968, the FHA implemented and put into practice a policy that still negatively impacts communities today.30 The FHA Underwriting Manual set the guidelines real estate agents used to assess home values in American neighborhoods. This manual promoted racist real estate practices. It was done by defending racially restrictive covenants and segregated communities. Due to this manual, the FHA established a neighborhood grading system based purely on false racist perceptions.

Redlining was the name of that grading system. My point here is the FHA was a government agency whose policies specifically provided whites with opportunities to increase wealth through homeownership. The formation of the FHA and its guaranteed loan program only worked to increase white advantage. “Of the $120 billion worth of new housing subsidized by the government between 1934 and 1962, less than 2 percent went to nonwhite families.”

"The racial-exclusion clauses in deeds were not only recommended by the federal government, but in some cases required as a condition of Federal Housing Administration and Veterans Administration subsidies for the creation of all-white suburbs, like Levittown in New York state. And federal and state courts, in violation of their constitutional obligations, enforced those deed clauses by ordering the eviction of African Americans who bought homes where the deeds barred them from doing so."

And this:

The Social Security Act of 1935 created the Social Security program, state unemployment insurance, and assistance to single women with children.Today, most Americans love the program. However, when the act was signed, the law excluded occupations mainly done by blacks. When President Roosevelt signed the law, approximately two-thirds of the blacks in America were ineligible. For years, most blacks were excluded from social security savings and could not get unemployment.

And this:

Title 4 or IV of the social security act of 1935 provided grants to states as Aid To Dependent Children. Eventually the name of the program was changed to Aid to Families with Dependent Children. This was welfare, folks. Assistance for single moms with children and no daddy at home. In 1935. Blacks were excluded.

And this:

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 created the minimum wage and time and a half overtime pay for working over forty hours a week. Child labor was eliminated by this act. All these were good things, but… In every law that was passed as part of The New Deal, Roosevelt had to compromise with southern representatives to get the votes he needed. In the case of the FLSA, due to pressure from southern congress members, he decided that industries would be excluded from the regulations where the majority of workers were black. Because of this, blacks were paid less than the minimum wage.

And this:

On June 22, 1944, President Roosevelt signed the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act, better known as the G.I. Bill.38 This law provided benefits for veterans returning from World War Two. This act included funds for college tuition, low-cost home loans, and unemployment insurance. As in every other program during this time, southern members of Congress fought the passage of these laws unless there were provisions that limited access to blacks.

Over one million returning black soldiers were unable to get GI benefits. My father was one of those soldiers.


Headrights, Headrights (VA-NOTES)

What was the Headright System? Headright System History & Significance | What was the Headright System? - Video & Lesson Transcript | Study.com

Williams, T. (2000). The Homestead Act: A major asset-building policy in American history (CSD Working Paper No. 00-9). St. Louis, MO: Washington University, Center for Social Development. Pg.11 The Homestead Act: A Major Asset-Building Policy in American History
Freedmen's Bureau Act, Freedmen's Bureau Act, March 3, 1865 | The Freedmen's Bureau Online

Anti-literacy Laws in the United States Once Prevented Blacks from Getting an Education - TalkAfricana​

talkafricana.com

The Black Codes and Jim Crow Laws | National Geographic Society​

After the United States Civil War, state governments that had been part of the Confederacy tried to limit the voting rights of Black citizens and prevent contact between Black and white citizens in public places.

education.nationalgeographic.org

The Unequal History of African American Gun Rights​

When it comes to firearms, some Americans are more equal than others.

www.topic.com

James Chen, National Housing Act, Updated Sep 3, 2019, What Is the National Housing Act?

Alexis C. Madrigal, The Racist Housing Policy That Made Your Neighborhood, The Atlantic, May 22, 2014, The Racist Housing Policy That Made Your Neighborhood

Segregation has been embraced, mandated, and maintained in the United States by law and policy — here's how​

A conversation with author Richard Rothstein on the laws and policies that prevent Black and white Americans from living in integrated neighborhoods.

www.businessinsider.com

PBS, Race-The Power of An Illusion, Uncle Sam Lends A Hand, Did the Government Racialize Housing and Wealth? RACE - The Power of an Illusion . Go Deeper | PBS

The Social Security Act of 1935, Social Security History

Larry DeWitt, The Decision to Exclude Agricultural and Domestic Workers from the 1935 Social Security Act, Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 70, No. 4, 2010

Brad Plumer, A second look at Social Security’s racist origins, Washington Post, June 3, 2013, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...cond-look-at-social-securitys-racist-origins/

Linda Gordon and Felice Batlan, The Legal History of the Aid to Dependent Children Program, Aid To Dependent Children: The Legal History

Johnathan Grossman, Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938: Maximum Struggle for a Minimum Wage, U.S. Department of Labor, Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938: Maximum Struggle for a Minimum Wage | U.S. Department of Labor

Servicemen’s Readjustment Act (G.I. Bill), Servicemen's Readjustment Act (1944) Facts - G.I. Bill for Veterans

Erin Blakemore, How the GI Bill's Promise Was Denied to a Million Black WWII Veterans, How the GI Bill's Promise Was Denied to a Million Black WWII Veterans, June 21, 2019

Brandon Weber, How African American WWII Veterans Were Scorned By the G.I. Bill, The Progressive, November 10, 2017, How African American WWII Veterans Were Scorned By the G.I. Bill
Sally Kohn, Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone, Time, JUNE 17, 2013, Affirmative Action Has Helped White Women More Than Anyone.

Fact Sheet: Affirmative Action and What It Means for Women, July 1, 2000, The National Womens Law Center, https://nwlc.org/resources/affirmative-action-and-what-it-means-women/

Tim Wise, Is Sisterhood Conditional?: White Women and the Rollback of Affirmative Action, September 23, 1998, Is Sisterhood Conditional?: White Women and the Rollback of Affirmative Action

Victoria M. Massie, White women benefit most from affirmative action — and are among its fiercest opponents, White women benefit most from affirmative action — and are among its fiercest opponents

Cry more

 

[MizMolly]

The fairy tale many whites tell about how whites have accomplished things in America is just not true. Whites have been provided direct economic stimulus from the government on several occasions while others were denied. Whites of all ethnicities and faiths have received such help from the government. For now 246 years, America has operated a system of white favoritism. Even programs that were designed to create equal opportunities for all non whites, such as AA, have benefitted whites. This is the cold, hard, documented, inconvenient truth and in 2022 and beyond it's time to face this truth.

We have been provided NOTHING. What stimulus was provided?

 

[MizMolly]

No, we are owed reparations for human rights violations caused by this government.

But if you want to talk about what the government gave whites, we are owed at least 500,000 per black family. Thats the equivalent cost of the free land whites got. We can split another trillion for the New Deal and Servicemens Readjustment Act. But if you want to use that sad sorry weak dodge of that being in the past, then we can split at least 16 trillion in lost income and economic development from 2000 until this second. Your opinion really lacks the information necessary to argue with me.

What about white families that didn’t get squat from the government?

 

[Orangecat]

That excuse is dead. Whites have gotten Affirmative Action for all 246 years America has been in existence. That tired tactic you tried doesn't seem to apply when you guys talk about returning t some mythical past. So it doesn't now.

Do you ever get tired of whining? It certainly gets tedious watching it every day.

 

[Orangecat]

You are owed nothing more than what Whites are owed.

IOW, nothing.

 

[Friends]

What matters is not what happened to blacks one or two centuries ago. What matters is what has not happened to them ever. The process of human evolution has not prepared most Negroes for the requirements of civilization. Characteristics that enabled their ancestors to thrive in sub Saharan Africa cause many of them to earn felony convictions in civilized countries.

 

[Friends]

Whites owe blacks nothing. They owe us for the benefits of living in a civilization vastly superior to what they are capable of creating and maintaining on their own.

 

[IM2]

Do you ever get tired of whining? It certainly gets tedious watching it every day.

You guys are whining. Not me.

“The spectacle of members of a racial demographic that comprises 75% of the nation’s populace and dominates both the political and economic spheres whining that they are oppressed is pathetic.”
-white USMB member 2021

 

[IM2]

Stop living in history, you weren't around.
Lost income and economic development? Not buying in on that no matter what you cherry pick

Were you around for the ratification of the constitution?

That happened in 1787. It impacts us today.

So just drop that stupid tactic, it doesn't work.

And what YOU don't buy don't matter.

Just grow up and understand that you have benefitted from the largest Affirmative action and social engineering program perhaps in world history. And it's documented.

 

[IM2]

Did you catch the amount of money that IM2 wants his family, and all black families, for whites to fork over? He’s talking about well over $1 million each.

And that’s what all the anti-white racism is for, at the core. The libs want whites to be so self-loathing for what they themselves never did to blacks living today, who in turn never experienced it, that they will sell their homes and move into hovels, and empty their bank accounts, to give hostile, entitled blacks like IM2 a million bucks.

(Did you catch my earlier thread about how I was refused service at McDonalds, in a very black/Latino neighborhood, for being white? That is how bad it’s gotten is some areas.)

I think your existence proves that blacks today live with the same stuff. The government created the policies. Blacks paid for things whites have today. Blacks fought and died for the Affirmative action you recieved. My father took a bullet saving your father from hitler, came back here to watch your father get things he was denied. And if I can't say you post anti black racism,then you best follow the rules.

 

[IM2]

Cry more

Face your dependence on the government tit.

 

[IM2]

But, of course, what you said wasn’t and isn’t true.

Ergo it’s not a “fact.”

Your assertion is just another false claim from a tired old dishonest racist.

The problem with your comment is that I posted documented policies. So what I said is true.

Ergo it is a fact.

 

[IM2]

Oh….so posting the truth about the bias toward black applicants is “filth” in your mind? You need help. Is that how black activists are going to get whites who speak out against racist admissions practices to STFU? Good luck with that.



Blah, blah, blah. I just told you that my parents faced obstacles - and HORRORS - that your parents did not.

You are unbelievably arrogant. I worked in admissions and saw the hoops they leaped through to justify the pro-black bias. And yet you, who never worked in the field, demand that I accept that *I* am wrong? You are the one who is wrong.

Your parents benefitted from being white. Full stop. You have been shown what admissions does and your argument is about SAT scores which don't seem to matter all that much to real admissions offices. We all know why you try this and you need to seek professional help for your condition. . Your arrogance in assuming every black person gets in college because standards are lowered is just a lie. I don't care where you say you worked. You can't even name the college.