ThoughtCrimes
Old Navy Vet
You got yours answers but you're too fucking stupid to accept reality and unwilling to admit to the truth.
In your dreams you are that all knowing!! Find the Article, Section and Clause in the Constitution that any of the several States is permitted to conduct the powers of the public purse! Do you even know what the functions of the First and Second Bank were and what their charter from the Congress entailed? How could a State perform those functions when they have NEVER been a part of the Federal (FEDERALISM) government and would be dealing with TREASURY MONIES!!!! Reconcile that with the power as set out in the Constitution given you claim to so very Constitutionally astute!
Don't dance around it with a bullshit dodge...post the Article, Section and Clause in the Constitution with an explanation of how a State or States could perform direct transaction with the US Treasury and how the Executive and Legislative branches would yield their Constitutional powers to a State or States or even interface in a manner which wouldn't conflict with the separation of powers doctrine! I just can't wait for your response!
Right, the bank was so vital to the country congress didn't renew its charter in 1811. And what happened, nothing.
Thanks for finally waving the white flag.
You obviously were not able to find the Article, Section and Clause in the Constitution with an explanation of how a State or States could perform direct transaction with the US Treasury and how the Executive and Legislative branches would yield their Constitutional powers to a State or States or even interface in a manner which wouldn't conflict with the separation of powers doctrine! I guess you're all hat and no cattle when it comes to your knowledge of the constitution in spite of your boast!
BTW, the 1811 date was the year the charter of the First Bank expired. The charter of the Second Bank expired in 1836 because President Jackson vetoed the legislation to extend its charter. You obviously forgot that McCulloch v. Maryland revolved around the creation of the Second Bank in 1816! I guess you missed that when you "read" the opinion.
Have a nice day!
Hey dummy, the First National Band was a private bank. The feds only held a 20% equity in it, and they bought that on credit given by the bank over a 10 year period. How could they possibly allow a private bank to have direct transactions with the treasury? Also how could the government possibly continue to conduct financial transactions when congress closed the bank? Come on hero, tell me again of the mythical necessity of a National Bank.[/QUOTE
Was it? What does that have to do with the price of spuds? I guess your mind went walk about again.
THE FIRST BANK OF THE UNITED STATES was never part of the discussion in the first place IDIOT! You brought it up, DUMMY! Again, the discussion revolved around the McCulloch v. Maryland and the finding that the State trying to collect taxes from the SECOND BANK was unconstitutional. You keep jumping off to other subjects to cover your errors and abject ignorance!
Did you find the Article, Section and Clause in the Constitution you boasted you knew of and I didn't? Fuck no, so you instead you dance and deflect to cover your IGNORANCE and faulty claim! Like I said, all hat and no cattle, Tex!
Hey dummy, the concept is the same, there is no need for national banks, history proves it. If the bank is not needed to fulfill the requirement of an enumerated power, it's unconstitutional, so yes the State had every right to tax it as a private corporation.
BTW the Second Nation Banks charter was also NOT renewed by congress and the country survived just fine, once again it was NOT a necessary and proper use of any enumerated power.
You fucking FOOL! I have NEVER claimed there existed any need for a National bank. That concept that you keep trying to paint me with is a contrivance in your mind alone, as a device to shift the narrative.
SCOTUS said you are dead fucking wrong about a State's authority to tax a Federal entity. If you don't comprehend that take it up the Supremes and tell them they fucked up...I'm sure they'll listen to your "vast constitutional knowledge", change their ways and correct their error you noted in McCulloch v. Maryland. Hey, maybe you can get placed on the High Court as a Constitutional Guide to keep the justices on the straight and narrow. You could become famous as the Supreme Ass!
You're wrong AGAIN about the Second Bank, and I can't believe the bullshit you wrote about it! You idiotically claim, "BTW the Second Nation Banks charter was also NOT renewed by congress and the country survived just fine, once again it was NOT a necessary and proper use of any enumerated power."
Congress passed a bill to renew the charter of the Second Bank, but President Jackson vetoed the bill in 1832. So you are dead fucking wrong on that point. Also, in McCulloch v. Maryland (1816) the Supremes ruled the Second Bank Constitutional under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8, Clause 18. So besides being totally WRONG AGAIN, you obviously lied about reading the entire opinion in McCulloch since that fact appears in both the Syllabus and the Opinion, you lying piece of crap!
You are one really dishonest piece of shit!