Their Blood Is On the Hands of All Illegal Drug Users

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Reefer Madness?

You potheads are so cutting-edge. Get out of the 1960's and progress a little.

The commentary in these threads make it clear that Reefer Madness fanaticism is alive and well. Consider the fact that marijuana was decriminalized in New York City (and elsewhere) throughout the '60s and '70s. Possession of less than 27 grams (one ounce) was a summons offense with a $25 fine as penalty -- but unless one distributed to minors, engaged in public use, or trafficked in large quantities the police just didn't bother with marijuana. In fact, if one were arrested for some felony or misdemeanor and was in possession of less than one ounce of marijuana, the marijuana was held in his/her personal property and returned with any other items of property. It was no big deal -- and real crime was way down because the police were focused on it.

That's the way it was in back then. Compare that with today and tell us it's not Reefer Madness all over again -- if not worse.

Reefer Madness was rooted in ignorance.
You current potheads refuse to acknowledge the empirical and instead keep falling back on ancient bullshit like it's so contemporary.

Reefer Madness was rooted in hysterical fear- just like your fears.

Prohibition taught those who have read history that Prohibition results in:
a) more deaths from illegal drug use
b) more violent deaths from black market activity
c) the enrichment of organized crime.

Why exactly do you support pot prohibition when you know it has resulted in all of the same things?

Do you inject shellfish into people who have shellfish allergies or penicillin into those who are allergic to penicillin?
Why are you pot advocates so abjectly stupid?

And by 'abjectly stupid' you mean we are not ignorant and frightened like you are.

Why are you so terrified to answer the question?

Prohibition taught those who have read history that Prohibition results in:
a) more deaths from illegal drug use
b) more violent deaths from black market activity
c) the enrichment of organized crime.

Why exactly do you support pot prohibition when you know it has resulted in all of the same things?

You are ignorant and stupid. Pot is a debilitating substance for some people. Why do you believe it is OK to subject people to that pain?

 

[Harry Dresden]

Reefer Madness?

You potheads are so cutting-edge. Get out of the 1960's and progress a little.

The commentary in these threads make it clear that Reefer Madness fanaticism is alive and well. Consider the fact that marijuana was decriminalized in New York City (and elsewhere) throughout the '60s and '70s. Possession of less than 27 grams (one ounce) was a summons offense with a $25 fine as penalty -- but unless one distributed to minors, engaged in public use, or trafficked in large quantities the police just didn't bother with marijuana. In fact, if one were arrested for some felony or misdemeanor and was in possession of less than one ounce of marijuana, the marijuana was held in his/her personal property and returned with any other items of property. It was no big deal -- and real crime was way down because the police were focused on it.

That's the way it was in back then. Compare that with today and tell us it's not Reefer Madness all over again -- if not worse.

Reefer Madness was rooted in ignorance.
You current potheads refuse to acknowledge the empirical and instead keep falling back on ancient bullshit like it's so contemporary.

Reefer Madness was rooted in hysterical fear- just like your fears.

Prohibition taught those who have read history that Prohibition results in:
a) more deaths from illegal drug use
b) more violent deaths from black market activity
c) the enrichment of organized crime.

Why exactly do you support pot prohibition when you know it has resulted in all of the same things?

Do you inject shellfish into people who have shellfish allergies or penicillin into those who are allergic to penicillin?
Why are you pot advocates so abjectly stupid?

you and people like you are pretty abjectly stupid yourselves...and you dont inject pot into people....

 

[Harry Dresden]

The commentary in these threads make it clear that Reefer Madness fanaticism is alive and well. Consider the fact that marijuana was decriminalized in New York City (and elsewhere) throughout the '60s and '70s. Possession of less than 27 grams (one ounce) was a summons offense with a $25 fine as penalty -- but unless one distributed to minors, engaged in public use, or trafficked in large quantities the police just didn't bother with marijuana. In fact, if one were arrested for some felony or misdemeanor and was in possession of less than one ounce of marijuana, the marijuana was held in his/her personal property and returned with any other items of property. It was no big deal -- and real crime was way down because the police were focused on it.

That's the way it was in back then. Compare that with today and tell us it's not Reefer Madness all over again -- if not worse.

Reefer Madness was rooted in ignorance.
You current potheads refuse to acknowledge the empirical and instead keep falling back on ancient bullshit like it's so contemporary.

Reefer Madness was rooted in hysterical fear- just like your fears.

Prohibition taught those who have read history that Prohibition results in:
a) more deaths from illegal drug use
b) more violent deaths from black market activity
c) the enrichment of organized crime.

Why exactly do you support pot prohibition when you know it has resulted in all of the same things?

Do you inject shellfish into people who have shellfish allergies or penicillin into those who are allergic to penicillin?
Why are you pot advocates so abjectly stupid?

And by 'abjectly stupid' you mean we are not ignorant and frightened like you are.

Why are you so terrified to answer the question?

Prohibition taught those who have read history that Prohibition results in:
a) more deaths from illegal drug use
b) more violent deaths from black market activity
c) the enrichment of organized crime.

Why exactly do you support pot prohibition when you know it has resulted in all of the same things?

You are ignorant and stupid. Pot is a debilitating substance for some people. Why do you believe it is OK to subject people to that pain?

Pot is a debilitating substance for some people.
so is sugar and salt,yet they add it to many foods......Why do you believe it is OK to subject people to that pain?.....

 

[deannalw]

Women are legally allowed to smoke as much pot as they want... it's THEIR body!
Right?

 

[MikeK]

You are ignorant and stupid. Pot is a debilitating substance for some people. Why do you believe it is OK to subject people to that pain?

". . . for some people."

The same may be said for peanuts, msg (seasoning), shellfish, gluten and many other very ordinary substances. But where marijuana is concerned I've known many people who enjoy it but I've never met anyone who suffers the slightest negative effect from it.

What "pain" are you talking about? I'm becoming rather curious about your environment. You're bothered by pot smoke and you know people who are "debilitated" by pot. Where do you live?

 

[deannalw]

The commentary in these threads make it clear that Reefer Madness fanaticism is alive and well. Consider the fact that marijuana was decriminalized in New York City (and elsewhere) throughout the '60s and '70s. Possession of less than 27 grams (one ounce) was a summons offense with a $25 fine as penalty -- but unless one distributed to minors, engaged in public use, or trafficked in large quantities the police just didn't bother with marijuana. In fact, if one were arrested for some felony or misdemeanor and was in possession of less than one ounce of marijuana, the marijuana was held in his/her personal property and returned with any other items of property. It was no big deal -- and real crime was way down because the police were focused on it.

That's the way it was in back then. Compare that with today and tell us it's not Reefer Madness all over again -- if not worse.

Reefer Madness was rooted in ignorance.
You current potheads refuse to acknowledge the empirical and instead keep falling back on ancient bullshit like it's so contemporary.

Reefer Madness was rooted in hysterical fear- just like your fears.

Prohibition taught those who have read history that Prohibition results in:
a) more deaths from illegal drug use
b) more violent deaths from black market activity
c) the enrichment of organized crime.

Why exactly do you support pot prohibition when you know it has resulted in all of the same things?

Do you inject shellfish into people who have shellfish allergies or penicillin into those who are allergic to penicillin?
Why are you pot advocates so abjectly stupid?

And by 'abjectly stupid' you mean we are not ignorant and frightened like you are.

Why are you so terrified to answer the question?

Prohibition taught those who have read history that Prohibition results in:
a) more deaths from illegal drug use
b) more violent deaths from black market activity
c) the enrichment of organized crime.

Why exactly do you support pot prohibition when you know it has resulted in all of the same things?

You are ignorant and stupid. Pot is a debilitating substance for some people. Why do you believe it is OK to subject people to that pain?

Those folks shouldn't smoke pot

 

[deannalw]

Reefer Madness?

You potheads are so cutting-edge. Get out of the 1960's and progress a little.

The commentary in these threads make it clear that Reefer Madness fanaticism is alive and well. Consider the fact that marijuana was decriminalized in New York City (and elsewhere) throughout the '60s and '70s. Possession of less than 27 grams (one ounce) was a summons offense with a $25 fine as penalty -- but unless one distributed to minors, engaged in public use, or trafficked in large quantities the police just didn't bother with marijuana. In fact, if one were arrested for some felony or misdemeanor and was in possession of less than one ounce of marijuana, the marijuana was held in his/her personal property and returned with any other items of property. It was no big deal -- and real crime was way down because the police were focused on it.

That's the way it was in back then. Compare that with today and tell us it's not Reefer Madness all over again -- if not worse.

Reefer Madness was rooted in ignorance.
You current potheads refuse to acknowledge the empirical and instead keep falling back on ancient bullshit like it's so contemporary.

Reefer Madness was rooted in hysterical fear- just like your fears.

Prohibition taught those who have read history that Prohibition results in:
a) more deaths from illegal drug use
b) more violent deaths from black market activity
c) the enrichment of organized crime.

Why exactly do you support pot prohibition when you know it has resulted in all of the same things?

Do you inject shellfish into people who have shellfish allergies or penicillin into those who are allergic to penicillin?
Why are you pot advocates so abjectly stupid?

you and people like you are pretty abjectly stupid yourselves...and you dont inject pot into people....

Shotgun?

 

[Syriusly]

The commentary in these threads make it clear that Reefer Madness fanaticism is alive and well. Consider the fact that marijuana was decriminalized in New York City (and elsewhere) throughout the '60s and '70s. Possession of less than 27 grams (one ounce) was a summons offense with a $25 fine as penalty -- but unless one distributed to minors, engaged in public use, or trafficked in large quantities the police just didn't bother with marijuana. In fact, if one were arrested for some felony or misdemeanor and was in possession of less than one ounce of marijuana, the marijuana was held in his/her personal property and returned with any other items of property. It was no big deal -- and real crime was way down because the police were focused on it.

That's the way it was in back then. Compare that with today and tell us it's not Reefer Madness all over again -- if not worse.

Reefer Madness was rooted in ignorance.
You current potheads refuse to acknowledge the empirical and instead keep falling back on ancient bullshit like it's so contemporary.

Reefer Madness was rooted in hysterical fear- just like your fears.

Prohibition taught those who have read history that Prohibition results in:
a) more deaths from illegal drug use
b) more violent deaths from black market activity
c) the enrichment of organized crime.

Why exactly do you support pot prohibition when you know it has resulted in all of the same things?

Do you inject shellfish into people who have shellfish allergies or penicillin into those who are allergic to penicillin?
Why are you pot advocates so abjectly stupid?

And by 'abjectly stupid' you mean we are not ignorant and frightened like you are.

Why are you so terrified to answer the question?

Prohibition taught those who have read history that Prohibition results in:
a) more deaths from illegal drug use
b) more violent deaths from black market activity
c) the enrichment of organized crime.

Why exactly do you support pot prohibition when you know it has resulted in all of the same things?

You are ignorant and stupid. Pot is a debilitating substance for some people. Why do you believe it is OK to subject people to that pain?

Why are you so determined to be ignorant and stupid?

Why are you so terrified to answer the question?

Prohibition taught those who have read history that Prohibition results in:
a) more deaths from illegal drug use
b) more violent deaths from black market activity
c) the enrichment of organized crime.

Why exactly do you support pot prohibition when you know it has resulted in all of the same things?

 

[MikeK]

Reefer Madness was rooted in ignorance.
You current potheads refuse to acknowledge the empirical and instead keep falling back on ancient bullshit like it's so contemporary.

Reefer Madness was rooted in hysterical fear- just like your fears.

Prohibition taught those who have read history that Prohibition results in:
a) more deaths from illegal drug use
b) more violent deaths from black market activity
c) the enrichment of organized crime.

Why exactly do you support pot prohibition when you know it has resulted in all of the same things?

Do you inject shellfish into people who have shellfish allergies or penicillin into those who are allergic to penicillin?
Why are you pot advocates so abjectly stupid?

And by 'abjectly stupid' you mean we are not ignorant and frightened like you are.

Why are you so terrified to answer the question?

Prohibition taught those who have read history that Prohibition results in:
a) more deaths from illegal drug use
b) more violent deaths from black market activity
c) the enrichment of organized crime.

Why exactly do you support pot prohibition when you know it has resulted in all of the same things?

You are ignorant and stupid. Pot is a debilitating substance for some people. Why do you believe it is OK to subject people to that pain?

Why are you so determined to be ignorant and stupid?

Why are you so terrified to answer the question?

Prohibition taught those who have read history that Prohibition results in:
a) more deaths from illegal drug use
b) more violent deaths from black market activity
c) the enrichment of organized crime.

Why exactly do you support pot prohibition when you know it has resulted in all of the same things?

The obvious answer to that question is fanaticism consequent to gradual brainwash.

Resistance to relentless, long-term brainwash effort requires innate pre-conscious reasoning ability. The advertising industry makes substantial use of this awareness by focusing on repetitive inundation with the objective of having their messages retained by as many subjects with high-level reasoning skills as possible.

Those who lack adequate pre-conscious reasoning abilities are vulnerable to the influence of anti-marijuana brainwash strategies -- the Reefer Madness effect.

 

[waltky]

166 bodies found in mass grave in Veracruz state...

Mass graves with at least 166 bodies found in eastern Mexico
September 6, 2018 - The bodies of at least 166 people have been found in the Mexican state of Veracruz, prosecutors said on Thursday, the latest in a string of grim discoveries made in the eastern region in recent years.

State attorney general Jorge Winckler told a news conference investigators discovered the bodies in 32 graves in the central part of the state after an Aug. 8 tip from an unidentified person that they had been dumped there. “After 30 days of work, the human remains of at least 166 people have been found, that is the minimum number of individuals identified on the basis of skulls that have been discovered in 32 different parts of the search area,” the state attorney general’s office said in a statement. Veracruz has long been racked by violent crime and is an important trafficking route for drug gangs moving narcotics north towards the U.S. border.

Lawlessness in Veracruz spiked under former governor Javier Duarte, who governed the Gulf coast state for President Enrique Pena Nieto’s Institutional Revolutionary Party until 2016. Duarte is in jail awaiting trial on allegations of involvement with organised crime and siphoning off millions of dollars during his tenure. He denies any wrongdoing. Winckler did not reveal the precise location of the graves, citing the safety of personnel still working at the site. “Aside from human remains, we have found more than 200 items of clothing, 114 pieces of identification, as well as different accessories and personal items,” he said.

Analysis of the remains indicated the bodies had probably been there for at least two years, he said. Winckler called on residents whose family members have disappeared to come forward to have DNA tests performed in the hope shedding light on the identity of the remains. In March 2017, Winckler announced the discovery of more than 250 skulls in unmarked graves in the state. There were more than 30,000 murders across Mexico last year, the highest in records going back to 1997, as rival drug gangs splintered into smaller, more blood-thirsty groups following more than a decade of a military-led campaign to battle the cartels.

EU executive to propose new measures to deter migrants

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Whoopee! 166 illegals we don't have to educate, incarcerate or medicate. Good news.