There is no controversy over Babbett

Status
Not open for further replies.

why yes ... yes you are.

you don't think that video exists? or the one where the basket dwelling trump humping insurrectionist was going thru the halls calling out pelosi'd name - specifically ...in a very intimidating & sick way? lol ... they exist alright.

has fox, newsmax, AONN or RT shown that?

doubtful.
If you think what you see on Fake News CNN is real then you are delusional.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!! duuuuuuuuuude......... i i don't watch CNN - or MSNBC.

i don't even have cable - so yer wrong right outa the gate. those videos are there- unedited, anytime you wanna actually research them. youtube is chock full of videos. they ALL can't be doctored. or stay the poorly educated trump humper that donny counts on & loves you long time for your ignorant loyalty.



Not just the places you listed but videos of the violence have been posted on this board countless times. I have posted some of them.

The problem is that the reader has to actually click on the video and watch it to get the information.

As I've been saying for years, you can post link after link. Video after video. Photo after photo.

The far right will never click the link, watch the video or view the photo.

It's a waste of time to provide any honest facts to far right wing trump people.
You mean, like the videos we post of murderous BLM thugs carrying guns, and matches, and big screen tvs.....
Compared to the videos you show of election protestors carrying flags??? Those honest facts?
And they've been arrested if caught...how about this guy? ‘Boogaloo Boi’ charged in fire of Minneapolis police precinct during George Floyd protest
 

why yes ... yes you are.

you don't think that video exists? or the one where the basket dwelling trump humping insurrectionist was going thru the halls calling out pelosi'd name - specifically ...in a very intimidating & sick way? lol ... they exist alright.

has fox, newsmax, AONN or RT shown that?

doubtful.
If you think what you see on Fake News CNN is real then you are delusional.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!! duuuuuuuuuude......... i i don't watch CNN - or MSNBC.

i don't even have cable - so yer wrong right outa the gate. those videos are there- unedited, anytime you wanna actually research them. youtube is chock full of videos. they ALL can't be doctored. or stay the poorly educated trump humper that donny counts on & loves you long time for your ignorant loyalty.



Not just the places you listed but videos of the violence have been posted on this board countless times. I have posted some of them.

The problem is that the reader has to actually click on the video and watch it to get the information.

As I've been saying for years, you can post link after link. Video after video. Photo after photo.

The far right will never click the link, watch the video or view the photo.

It's a waste of time to provide any honest facts to far right wing trump people.
You mean, like the videos we post of murderous BLM thugs carrying guns, and matches, and big screen tvs.....
Compared to the videos you show of election protestors carrying flags??? Those honest facts?
^ The Winner of this debate.
 
Bottom line, an unarmed woman being moved along by the crowd should not have been shot. I can only coclude it was murder for intimidation. Cold blooded and planned.
A woman, who's "armed" status was unknown to the police, was part of a mob who had bashed open a window and were forcing their way into a chamber where people were being protected.

You seem to miss that part.
You seem to miss there was just no reason to shoot her, period. You are condoning murder.
When should they shoot someone? When they are already overrun and the situation is out of control, and the mob has their hands on the remaining congressman? Just curious.
It was nowhere near out of control. There were a lot of armed police there. Why wasn't anyone else shot. Some people did much worse.

Murder for intimidation purposes and sending a message Trump supporters are not equal under the law. Open season.

It was nowhere NEAR out of control? Did you not see all the video footage and damage? How they overran police and beat them? That this particular part of the mob had smashed open the windows in an effort to get through?

Get real? They were so "in control" they were frantically calling for help.

As to why they didn't shoot more, it's because we are not China. Police are shoot people in riots or demonstrations as a last resort. Surely you have noticed this over the past year. This occassion was no different.
I'm of the opinion that this first and only shot pretty much took the fight out of the rest of the mob.
They vast vast majority were not fighting. Were there FBI agents in those videos? Do you think the FBI would point them out?
"They [sic] vast majority were not fighting." That's nice.....they weren't arrested or shot then. And as for your FBI lunacies, you sure are easily manipulated by lil'tucker, aren't you?
Why was a unarmed woman shot and no one else if things were as bad as you murder condoning assholes contend?
Who else attempted to climb oven the police barricade with lawmakers still inside the House chamber?
She had not made it over and she was shot anyway. I see. There was no reason whatsoever to shoot her. Thanks for confirming that.
 

why yes ... yes you are.

you don't think that video exists? or the one where the basket dwelling trump humping insurrectionist was going thru the halls calling out pelosi'd name - specifically ...in a very intimidating & sick way? lol ... they exist alright.

has fox, newsmax, AONN or RT shown that?

doubtful.
If you think what you see on Fake News CNN is real then you are delusional.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!! duuuuuuuuuude......... i i don't watch CNN - or MSNBC.

i don't even have cable - so yer wrong right outa the gate. those videos are there- unedited, anytime you wanna actually research them. youtube is chock full of videos. they ALL can't be doctored. or stay the poorly educated trump humper that donny counts on & loves you long time for your ignorant loyalty.



Not just the places you listed but videos of the violence have been posted on this board countless times. I have posted some of them.

The problem is that the reader has to actually click on the video and watch it to get the information.

As I've been saying for years, you can post link after link. Video after video. Photo after photo.

The far right will never click the link, watch the video or view the photo.

It's a waste of time to provide any honest facts to far right wing trump people.
You mean, like the videos we post of murderous BLM thugs carrying guns, and matches, and big screen tvs.....
Compared to the videos you show of election protestors carrying flags??? Those honest facts?
And they've been arrested if caught...how about this guy? ‘Boogaloo Boi’ charged in fire of Minneapolis police precinct during George Floyd protest
We can't have anyone objecting to burning and looting but shooting an unarmed woman is OK.
 

What controversy? Babbett was a domestic terrorist bent on Trump inspired insurrection and the violent overthrow of the United States. She got just what she deserved for attempting, with her cohorts, to break into the inner sanctum of the Capital.

She deserved on mercy, and got none. Good riddance!
Let’s say Ashli was a black woman. If the police killed this unarmed protester who never threatened anyone instead of arresting her you’d be outraged!

What was Ashli’s crime? Trespassing? Getting too close to all those corrupt politicians?
 

why yes ... yes you are.

you don't think that video exists? or the one where the basket dwelling trump humping insurrectionist was going thru the halls calling out pelosi'd name - specifically ...in a very intimidating & sick way? lol ... they exist alright.

has fox, newsmax, AONN or RT shown that?

doubtful.
If you think what you see on Fake News CNN is real then you are delusional.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!! duuuuuuuuuude......... i i don't watch CNN - or MSNBC.

i don't even have cable - so yer wrong right outa the gate. those videos are there- unedited, anytime you wanna actually research them. youtube is chock full of videos. they ALL can't be doctored. or stay the poorly educated trump humper that donny counts on & loves you long time for your ignorant loyalty.



Not just the places you listed but videos of the violence have been posted on this board countless times. I have posted some of them.

The problem is that the reader has to actually click on the video and watch it to get the information.

As I've been saying for years, you can post link after link. Video after video. Photo after photo.

The far right will never click the link, watch the video or view the photo.

It's a waste of time to provide any honest facts to far right wing trump people.
You mean, like the videos we post of murderous BLM thugs carrying guns, and matches, and big screen tvs.....
Compared to the videos you show of election protestors carrying flags??? Those honest facts?
And they've been arrested if caught...how about this guy? ‘Boogaloo Boi’ charged in fire of Minneapolis police precinct during George Floyd protest
We can't have anyone objecting to burning and looting but shooting an unarmed woman is OK.
"We can't have anyone objecting to burning and looting".............. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: We know you don't see it or hear it unless your orange cult feeds it to you.

30JUN21!!!
 

What controversy? Babbett was a domestic terrorist bent on Trump inspired insurrection and the violent overthrow of the United States. She got just what she deserved for attempting, with her cohorts, to break into the inner sanctum of the Capital.

She deserved on mercy, and got none. Good riddance!
Let’s say Ashli was a black woman. If the police killed this unarmed protester who never threatened anyone instead of arresting her you’d be outraged!

What was Ashli’s crime? Trespassing? Getting too close to all those corrupt politicians?
The funny thing is.....she wasn't black....in fact, how many black people were there as thuggish insurrectionists? Lots more black people DEFENDING our Congress that day. How Ironic for the Right.
 
Bottom line, an unarmed woman being moved along by the crowd should not have been shot. I can only coclude it was murder for intimidation. Cold blooded and planned.
A woman, who's "armed" status was unknown to the police, was part of a mob who had bashed open a window and were forcing their way into a chamber where people were being protected.

You seem to miss that part.
You seem to miss there was just no reason to shoot her, period. You are condoning murder.
When should they shoot someone? When they are already overrun and the situation is out of control, and the mob has their hands on the remaining congressman? Just curious.
It was nowhere near out of control. There were a lot of armed police there. Why wasn't anyone else shot. Some people did much worse.

Murder for intimidation purposes and sending a message Trump supporters are not equal under the law. Open season.

It was nowhere NEAR out of control? Did you not see all the video footage and damage? How they overran police and beat them? That this particular part of the mob had smashed open the windows in an effort to get through?

Get real? They were so "in control" they were frantically calling for help.

As to why they didn't shoot more, it's because we are not China. Police are shoot people in riots or demonstrations as a last resort. Surely you have noticed this over the past year. This occassion was no different.
I'm of the opinion that this first and only shot pretty much took the fight out of the rest of the mob.
They vast vast majority were not fighting. Were there FBI agents in those videos? Do you think the FBI would point them out?
"They [sic] vast majority were not fighting." That's nice.....they weren't arrested or shot then. And as for your FBI lunacies, you sure are easily manipulated by lil'tucker, aren't you?
Why was a unarmed woman shot and no one else if things were as bad as you murder condoning assholes contend?
Who else attempted to climb oven the police barricade with lawmakers still inside the House chamber?
She had not made it over and she was shot anyway. I see. There was no reason whatsoever to shoot her. Thanks for confirming that.
LOLOL

Dumbfuck, the only reason she was unsuccessful of making it over the police barricade is because the cop shot her. It wasn't for lack of trying.
 

why yes ... yes you are.

you don't think that video exists? or the one where the basket dwelling trump humping insurrectionist was going thru the halls calling out pelosi'd name - specifically ...in a very intimidating & sick way? lol ... they exist alright.

has fox, newsmax, AONN or RT shown that?

doubtful.
If you think what you see on Fake News CNN is real then you are delusional.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!! duuuuuuuuuude......... i i don't watch CNN - or MSNBC.

i don't even have cable - so yer wrong right outa the gate. those videos are there- unedited, anytime you wanna actually research them. youtube is chock full of videos. they ALL can't be doctored. or stay the poorly educated trump humper that donny counts on & loves you long time for your ignorant loyalty.



Not just the places you listed but videos of the violence have been posted on this board countless times. I have posted some of them.

The problem is that the reader has to actually click on the video and watch it to get the information.

As I've been saying for years, you can post link after link. Video after video. Photo after photo.

The far right will never click the link, watch the video or view the photo.

It's a waste of time to provide any honest facts to far right wing trump people.
You mean, like the videos we post of murderous BLM thugs carrying guns, and matches, and big screen tvs.....
Compared to the videos you show of election protestors carrying flags??? Those honest facts?
And they've been arrested if caught...how about this guy? ‘Boogaloo Boi’ charged in fire of Minneapolis police precinct during George Floyd protest
We can't have anyone objecting to burning and looting but shooting an unarmed woman is OK.
"We can't have anyone objecting to burning and looting".............. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: We know you don't see it or hear it unless your orange cult feeds it to you.

30JUN21!!!
The Feds do not. They drop the charges, condone murder, and persecute people because of their politics.
 

What controversy? Babbett was a domestic terrorist bent on Trump inspired insurrection and the violent overthrow of the United States. She got just what she deserved for attempting, with her cohorts, to break into the inner sanctum of the Capital.

She deserved on mercy, and got none. Good riddance!
Let’s say Ashli was a black woman. If the police killed this unarmed protester who never threatened anyone instead of arresting her you’d be outraged!

What was Ashli’s crime? Trespassing? Getting too close to all those corrupt politicians?
More like...

Obstruction of an Official Proceeding; Civil Disorder; Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building or Grounds; Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds; Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building; Parading, Demonstrating, or Picketing in a Capitol Building; Aiding and Abetting
 
Bottom line, an unarmed woman being moved along by the crowd should not have been shot. I can only coclude it was murder for intimidation. Cold blooded and planned.
A woman, who's "armed" status was unknown to the police, was part of a mob who had bashed open a window and were forcing their way into a chamber where people were being protected.

You seem to miss that part.
You seem to miss there was just no reason to shoot her, period. You are condoning murder.
When should they shoot someone? When they are already overrun and the situation is out of control, and the mob has their hands on the remaining congressman? Just curious.
It was nowhere near out of control. There were a lot of armed police there. Why wasn't anyone else shot. Some people did much worse.

Murder for intimidation purposes and sending a message Trump supporters are not equal under the law. Open season.

It was nowhere NEAR out of control? Did you not see all the video footage and damage? How they overran police and beat them? That this particular part of the mob had smashed open the windows in an effort to get through?

Get real? They were so "in control" they were frantically calling for help.

As to why they didn't shoot more, it's because we are not China. Police are shoot people in riots or demonstrations as a last resort. Surely you have noticed this over the past year. This occassion was no different.
I'm of the opinion that this first and only shot pretty much took the fight out of the rest of the mob.
They vast vast majority were not fighting. Were there FBI agents in those videos? Do you think the FBI would point them out?
"They [sic] vast majority were not fighting." That's nice.....they weren't arrested or shot then. And as for your FBI lunacies, you sure are easily manipulated by lil'tucker, aren't you?
Why was a unarmed woman shot and no one else if things were as bad as you murder condoning assholes contend?
Who else attempted to climb oven the police barricade with lawmakers still inside the House chamber?
She had not made it over and she was shot anyway. I see. There was no reason whatsoever to shoot her. Thanks for confirming that.
LOLOL

Dumbfuck, the only reason she was unsuccessful of making it over the police barricade is because the cop shot her. It wasn't for lack of trying.
She was shot for no reason. Nothing will ever change that fact. What we have here are a bunch of traitorous asskissers insisting they are right. That does not make you right. You and others condone murder and decent people would not piss in your asshole if your guts were on fire. So you know. Deal with the scum you have become.

I will never let you forget.
 
Bottom line, an unarmed woman being moved along by the crowd should not have been shot. I can only coclude it was murder for intimidation. Cold blooded and planned.
A woman, who's "armed" status was unknown to the police, was part of a mob who had bashed open a window and were forcing their way into a chamber where people were being protected.

You seem to miss that part.
You seem to miss there was just no reason to shoot her, period. You are condoning murder.
When should they shoot someone? When they are already overrun and the situation is out of control, and the mob has their hands on the remaining congressman? Just curious.
It was nowhere near out of control. There were a lot of armed police there. Why wasn't anyone else shot. Some people did much worse.

Murder for intimidation purposes and sending a message Trump supporters are not equal under the law. Open season.

It was nowhere NEAR out of control? Did you not see all the video footage and damage? How they overran police and beat them? That this particular part of the mob had smashed open the windows in an effort to get through?

Get real? They were so "in control" they were frantically calling for help.

As to why they didn't shoot more, it's because we are not China. Police are shoot people in riots or demonstrations as a last resort. Surely you have noticed this over the past year. This occassion was no different.
I'm of the opinion that this first and only shot pretty much took the fight out of the rest of the mob.
They vast vast majority were not fighting. Were there FBI agents in those videos? Do you think the FBI would point them out?
"They [sic] vast majority were not fighting." That's nice.....they weren't arrested or shot then. And as for your FBI lunacies, you sure are easily manipulated by lil'tucker, aren't you?
Why was a unarmed woman shot and no one else if things were as bad as you murder condoning assholes contend?
Who else attempted to climb oven the police barricade with lawmakers still inside the House chamber?
She had not made it over and she was shot anyway. I see. There was no reason whatsoever to shoot her. Thanks for confirming that.
LOLOL

Dumbfuck, the only reason she was unsuccessful of making it over the police barricade is because the cop shot her. It wasn't for lack of trying.
She was shot for no reason. Nothing will ever change that fact. What we have here are a bunch of traitorous asskissers insisting they are right. That does not make you right. You and others condone murder and decent people would not piss in your asshole if your guts were on fire. So you know. Deal with the scum you have become.
As always, you prove to be insane. :cuckoo:

Of course there was justifiable cause to shoot her.
 
Babbett was a domestic terrorist. She got just what she deserved

Any pig slop degenerate asshole like you who would call a fine, patriotic woman who served her country a terrorist deserving a horrible murder and death for simply walking into her Capitol unarmed, unviolent, claiming she somehow intended the "violent overthrow of the government" with nothing more than her bare hands and a red ball cap is a filthy, degenerate, ignorant pustule piece of filth. Remember this when your time comes, you'll regret what you said today at the moment your time comes, Ashli will be there as well looking on.


View attachment 502908

she was a trump humping Qanon freak that threatened the lives of congress.

nothing more.
She was an unarmed woman who threatened no one.

she was right at the door participating in the break down to the only barrier to the last protection of the house chambers - where congress was hiding. there was no reason to believe she wasn't strapped - either with a weapon, bomb or both.

stop it, cause you lost this debate just as hard as donny losing the election.
Ummmm...cops aren't allowed to assume that someone has a weapon when not only is there no weapon but nothing that even looks like a weapon. She had 3 secret service cops in front of her, that the shooter hid from when he snuck up on the side to shoot her, two regular cops to the Left of her that in front of the door and moved to the side, and 4 cops behind her less than 8 feet away from her when the murderer shot her------notice that none of the other 9 cops shot her or anyone else?






It's so funny to watch these assholes twist themselves in knots trying justify her murder, while claiming cops have no right to protect themselves from violent criminals.
I

What controversy? Babbett was a domestic terrorist bent on Trump inspired insurrection and the violent overthrow of the United States. She got just what she deserved for attempting, with her cohorts, to break into the inner sanctum of the Capital.

She deserved on mercy, and got none. Good riddance!
Let’s say Ashli was a black woman. If the police killed this unarmed protester who never threatened anyone instead of arresting her you’d be outraged!

What was Ashli’s crime? Trespassing? Getting too close to all those corrupt politicians?
The funny thing is.....she wasn't black....in fact, how many black people were there as thuggish insurrectionists? Lots more black people DEFENDING our Congress that day. How Ironic for the Right.
Defending our CORRUPT congress? Thats not a good thing.
 
Bottom line, an unarmed woman being moved along by the crowd should not have been shot. I can only coclude it was murder for intimidation. Cold blooded and planned.
A woman, who's "armed" status was unknown to the police, was part of a mob who had bashed open a window and were forcing their way into a chamber where people were being protected.

You seem to miss that part.
You seem to miss there was just no reason to shoot her, period. You are condoning murder.
When should they shoot someone? When they are already overrun and the situation is out of control, and the mob has their hands on the remaining congressman? Just curious.
It was nowhere near out of control. There were a lot of armed police there. Why wasn't anyone else shot. Some people did much worse.

Murder for intimidation purposes and sending a message Trump supporters are not equal under the law. Open season.

It was nowhere NEAR out of control? Did you not see all the video footage and damage? How they overran police and beat them? That this particular part of the mob had smashed open the windows in an effort to get through?

Get real? They were so "in control" they were frantically calling for help.

As to why they didn't shoot more, it's because we are not China. Police are shoot people in riots or demonstrations as a last resort. Surely you have noticed this over the past year. This occassion was no different.
I'm of the opinion that this first and only shot pretty much took the fight out of the rest of the mob.
They vast vast majority were not fighting. Were there FBI agents in those videos? Do you think the FBI would point them out?
"They [sic] vast majority were not fighting." That's nice.....they weren't arrested or shot then. And as for your FBI lunacies, you sure are easily manipulated by lil'tucker, aren't you?
Why was a unarmed woman shot and no one else if things were as bad as you murder condoning assholes contend?
Who else attempted to climb oven the police barricade with lawmakers still inside the House chamber?
She had not made it over and she was shot anyway. I see. There was no reason whatsoever to shoot her. Thanks for confirming that.
LOLOL

Dumbfuck, the only reason she was unsuccessful of making it over the police barricade is because the cop shot her. It wasn't for lack of trying.
She was shot for no reason. Nothing will ever change that fact. What we have here are a bunch of traitorous asskissers insisting they are right. That does not make you right. You and others condone murder and decent people would not piss in your asshole if your guts were on fire. So you know. Deal with the scum you have become.

I will never let you forget.
"She was shot for no reason"................. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: Did you just pull a muscle?
 
Bottom line, an unarmed woman being moved along by the crowd should not have been shot. I can only coclude it was murder for intimidation. Cold blooded and planned.
A woman, who's "armed" status was unknown to the police, was part of a mob who had bashed open a window and were forcing their way into a chamber where people were being protected.

You seem to miss that part.
You seem to miss there was just no reason to shoot her, period. You are condoning murder.
When should they shoot someone? When they are already overrun and the situation is out of control, and the mob has their hands on the remaining congressman? Just curious.
It was nowhere near out of control. There were a lot of armed police there. Why wasn't anyone else shot. Some people did much worse.

Murder for intimidation purposes and sending a message Trump supporters are not equal under the law. Open season.

It was nowhere NEAR out of control? Did you not see all the video footage and damage? How they overran police and beat them? That this particular part of the mob had smashed open the windows in an effort to get through?

Get real? They were so "in control" they were frantically calling for help.

As to why they didn't shoot more, it's because we are not China. Police are shoot people in riots or demonstrations as a last resort. Surely you have noticed this over the past year. This occassion was no different.
I'm of the opinion that this first and only shot pretty much took the fight out of the rest of the mob.
They vast vast majority were not fighting. Were there FBI agents in those videos? Do you think the FBI would point them out?
"They [sic] vast majority were not fighting." That's nice.....they weren't arrested or shot then. And as for your FBI lunacies, you sure are easily manipulated by lil'tucker, aren't you?
Why was a unarmed woman shot and no one else if things were as bad as you murder condoning assholes contend?
Who else attempted to climb oven the police barricade with lawmakers still inside the House chamber?
She had not made it over and she was shot anyway. I see. There was no reason whatsoever to shoot her. Thanks for confirming that.
LOLOL

Dumbfuck, the only reason she was unsuccessful of making it over the police barricade is because the cop shot her. It wasn't for lack of trying.
She was shot for no reason. Nothing will ever change that fact. What we have here are a bunch of traitorous asskissers insisting they are right. That does not make you right. You and others condone murder and decent people would not piss in your asshole if your guts were on fire. So you know. Deal with the scum you have become.
As always, you prove to be insane. :cuckoo:

Of course there was justifiable cause to shoot her.
You have never proven anything. I do not see you starting now, scumbag.
 
Bottom line, an unarmed woman being moved along by the crowd should not have been shot. I can only coclude it was murder for intimidation. Cold blooded and planned.
A woman, who's "armed" status was unknown to the police, was part of a mob who had bashed open a window and were forcing their way into a chamber where people were being protected.

You seem to miss that part.
You seem to miss there was just no reason to shoot her, period. You are condoning murder.
When should they shoot someone? When they are already overrun and the situation is out of control, and the mob has their hands on the remaining congressman? Just curious.
It was nowhere near out of control. There were a lot of armed police there. Why wasn't anyone else shot. Some people did much worse.

Murder for intimidation purposes and sending a message Trump supporters are not equal under the law. Open season.

It was nowhere NEAR out of control? Did you not see all the video footage and damage? How they overran police and beat them? That this particular part of the mob had smashed open the windows in an effort to get through?

Get real? They were so "in control" they were frantically calling for help.

As to why they didn't shoot more, it's because we are not China. Police are shoot people in riots or demonstrations as a last resort. Surely you have noticed this over the past year. This occassion was no different.
I'm of the opinion that this first and only shot pretty much took the fight out of the rest of the mob.
They vast vast majority were not fighting. Were there FBI agents in those videos? Do you think the FBI would point them out?
"They [sic] vast majority were not fighting." That's nice.....they weren't arrested or shot then. And as for your FBI lunacies, you sure are easily manipulated by lil'tucker, aren't you?
Why was a unarmed woman shot and no one else if things were as bad as you murder condoning assholes contend?
Who else attempted to climb oven the police barricade with lawmakers still inside the House chamber?
She had not made it over and she was shot anyway. I see. There was no reason whatsoever to shoot her. Thanks for confirming that.
LOLOL

Dumbfuck, the only reason she was unsuccessful of making it over the police barricade is because the cop shot her. It wasn't for lack of trying.
She was shot for no reason. Nothing will ever change that fact. What we have here are a bunch of traitorous asskissers insisting they are right. That does not make you right. You and others condone murder and decent people would not piss in your asshole if your guts were on fire. So you know. Deal with the scum you have become.
As always, you prove to be insane. :cuckoo:

Of course there was justifiable cause to shoot her.
You have never proven anything. I do not see you starting now, scumbag.
LOLOL

You're insane, TootieFrootie. Batshit level.

 
Certain criminal acts bring with them presumptions, such as the perpetrator of the crime being armed and dangerous,

And those occupants inside the area or building being broken into, allowed to use deadly force in order to repel the invasion.
There is no presumption of weaponry.
it’s reported, not presumed
Someone invading a home or dwelling by force, is by legal presumption, treated as if they are armed and dangerous, for the purpose of determining the legitimacy of using deadly force against them.

At the capitol the crowd broke the window of door in order to effect entry, and upon a member of the crowd effecting actual entry, met the criteria to use deadly force to repel the entry.
Incorrect. In a commercial or public building there is no presumption of weaponry until it is visually identified.. Trespass does not equal armed and dangerous . Your idea that they make their best guess based on circumstance is ludicrous
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top