There is no evidence Joe Biden took a bribe.

[Rumpole]

Sure. The fbi even admits it. But you ignore that because you are a fascist boot licker.

You talk shit, but you don't prove shit. Put up or shut up.

 

[Rumpole]

There are 17 tapes that prove it.

They don't prove shit.

There are the multiple shell companies

Shell LLCs are legal entities, and there are numerous legit reasons to establish them, and, as such
are not prima facie evidence of wrongdoing. You'll need corroborative evidence to prove the allegation.

that were set up to launder the cash (a favored mafia tactic), and the dozens of suspicious activity reports.

Speculation without substantiation.

But hey, xiden could shoot someone right in front of you, and you would see nothing.

Right, cultist?

incompetent retort; weasel words have no argumentative value.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

No circles here, Dude. Saw two or three testify before congress under oath, for openers....................

No, you did not see anyone testyify with evidence to support their claims. They are like all of you: claims, no evidenc.

 

[konradv]

Then you have intentionally avoided it.

And yet you refuse to enlighten us! Is that because the clip has gone the way of the phantom whistleblowers? I would think you couldn’t wait to show us up.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

westwall's issue is that he has no evidence.

 

[Leo123]

Incompetent rebuttal; ' you're wrong' arguments are not arguments, nor are ad homs.

AP articles with no proof are also not arguments.

 

[Toro]

Hey, rube MAGA Orange Cultists

Put up or STFU

Because pretty much everything you say in a court of law has been rejected.

 

[westwall]

They don't prove shit.

Shell LLCs are legal entities, and there are numerous legit reasons to establish them, and, as such
are not prima facie evidence of wrongdoing. You'll need corroborative evidence to prove the allegation.

Speculation without substantiation.

incompetent retort; weasel words have no argumentative value.

What product do those shell companies produce? Go ahead, tell us. If they are legit, they produce something.

So, what is it?

 

[westwall]

And yet you refuse to enlighten us! Is that because the clip has gone the way of the phantom whistleblowers? I would think you couldn’t wait to show us up.

DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUR

Like I said, you have to willfully ignore it.

 

[konradv]

DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUR

Like I said, you have to willfully ignore it.

No, I meant the parts before and after the cherry-picked 24 sec clip. Those others are just people giving their opinions. Real evidence requires the real deal. Try again.

 

[westwall]

No, I meant the parts before and after the cherry-picked 24 sec clip. Those others are just people giving their opinions. Real evidence requires the real deal. Try again.

I presented you the links. Go fetch.

 

[konradv]

I presented you the links. Go fetch.

Not doing your homework, C student.

 

[Jim H - VA USA]

These numbers are upper middle class numbers. If Biden was this corrupt guy you keep claiming.......


1. He wouldn't have allowed US Attorney David Weiss, assigned by Bill Barr to investigate Joe's son, Hunter, he wouldn't have allowed the investigation to continue, noting that no indictments have come for fore.

2. The numbers would be lot bigger for a man of his stature. In today's word of the rich, Biden's numbers are chump change.

3. You'd have hard evidence by now, and there just isn't any. Yes, circumstantial evidence warrants query, but nothing more than that.

Thanks, but this is just the tip of the iceberg. Biden's biggest crimes are not likely to be reported on his 1040 form.

And we all know by now that the FBI, IRS etc. are providing cover for the Biden's by slow-walking everything.

 

[Couchpotato]

Well, as any self-respecting couch potato ought to know that, in the court of law, yes,
but in the court of public opinion, anything goes.

You set the standard not me.

 

[konradv]

Thanks, but this is just the tip of the iceberg. Biden's biggest crimes are not likely to be reported on his 1040 form.

And we all know by now that the FBI, IRS etc. are providing cover for the Biden's by slow-walking everything.

So will we get to see Biden’s 1040? That would be refreshing, actually seeing a president’s tax returns! That hasn’t happened in awhile. Thank you Joe, for making American sane again. MASA!!!

 

[Couchpotato]

They don't prove shit.

How do you know what they do or don’t prove?

Shell LLCs are legal entities, and there are numerous legit reasons to establish them, and, as such
are not prima facie evidence of wrongdoing. You'll need corroborative evidence to prove the allegation.

And just as many illegit Reasons.

Speculation without substantiation.

Something people like you know a lot about.

incompetent retort; weasel words have no argumentative value.

 

[Rumpole]

How do you know what they do or don’t prove?

Okay CP, timestamp the parts in the tape that prove it, or provide transcripts.
You're making the claim, the onus is on you to prove it.

And just as many illegit Reasons.

Unless you have corroboration to an allegation, you have nothing.

Something people like you know a lot about.

I know what weasel words are. But, for your edification:

 

[Rumpole]

So will we get to see Biden’s 1040? That would be refreshing, actually seeing a president’s tax returns! That hasn’t happened in awhile. Thank you Joe, for making American sane again. MASA!!!

All of Biden's tax returns are published. The President and Vice President release their 2022 tax returns | The White House

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Just like a demented Nazicrat toddler.............."I didn't see it, so it didn't happen".

Tell us about the Trump indictment, dope.

 

[Rumpole]

DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUR

Like I said, you have to willfully ignore it.

I can listen to about 5 minutes of it. Ted Cruz makes a total ass out himself, I mean the stench of self righteous indignant pontificating is rancid as is his rambling on making wild accusations based on a 1023 form which merely is a form the FBI uses to note what someone says, the words of a Russian who could easily have an agenda, yet he's satisfied it's conclusive. Since anyone can say anything, the form is not proof of squat, yet, in Cruz's mind, he's assuming it is. Since he is a lawyer, he must know better, but he's not interested in facts, he's interested in impressing the camera. This is the worst kind of politicking, and you suck it up. My gawd you guys are such fools.

The other three videos are off topic, about FISA.


Show me some evidence, for jeezus fuck sakes. Don't you know what evidence is?