There is something seriously warped about this Duggar statement

No it's not ok but it also is a long way from rape.

That's how I interpreted that statement anyway.
Rape, sexual-assault, or sexual-harassment is A Okay..........if you're a Democrat trying to get back into the WhiteHouse.

17154341-mmmain.jpg

The feminazi's will even offer up their minions for blow jobs :)
 
The parents didn't think it was okay either. They sent Josh out of the home to get therapy.

Look at Ravi distorting the truth once again. Shocking.


But that is a lie.

He never got therapy, and when pressed, the mother admitted it was a lie.

He was sent to a friend of the family, who is also a cop, who made sure to bury the police record. This was ONE FULL YEAR afterCONE FULL YEAR. He helped that cop put some roofs on houses for a couple of months. Shortly afterward, that cop was arrested for Kiddie Porn and is now serving a FIFTY SIX year sentence for his crime. So, that's the kind of "therapy" that Josh Duggar got. So, imagine this: a young teenager, caught playing with four of his sisters' pussies, ends up shacking up with a dude who is watching and distributing kiddie porn. What a fucking winning combination.

It's sick.

Are there no Righties here who cannot see how sick this is? Stop fucking making excuses and accept that the Duggars are really, really, really bad apples. They pulled the wool over an adoring public that allowed them to live a multi-millionaire lifestyle, based on clean christian virture.

Bwahahahaha!

Yep. You distorting the truth because you hate Christians is sick. Please stop.
That is not a distortion. It is fact and has been reported many, many times over the last two weeks. Go enlighten yourself over this before sticking your foot in your mouth again.

I would like to see a credible link where it is stated that "caught playing with four of his sisters' pussies" is stated and where they got that information.

Me too. But don't hold your breath. I'm still waiting for him to tell me how everyone found out about this if Josh didn't confess.
 
Really, you want a name after all the venting you've done about victim's rights?

In other words you made that up.

Why do you want to know the victim's name?

Why are you lying?

Are you really this desperate to know her name? Why were you venting about the victims previously not having anonymity? Why do you keep vacillating?

Spin spin spin

Aren't you dizzy yet?
 
In other words you made that up.

Why do you want to know the victim's name?

Why are you lying?

Are you really this desperate to know her name? Why were you venting about the victims previously not having anonymity? Why do you keep vacillating?

Spin spin spin

Aren't you dizzy yet?

Not really...watching you gyrating around the truth is mildly amusing... Yet expected.
 
Why do you want to know the victim's name?

Why are you lying?

Are you really this desperate to know her name? Why were you venting about the victims previously not having anonymity? Why do you keep vacillating?

Spin spin spin

Aren't you dizzy yet?

Not really...watching you gyrating around the truth is mildly amusing... Yet expected.

Was that you looking into my window? Hmm!
 
Why are you lying?

Are you really this desperate to know her name? Why were you venting about the victims previously not having anonymity? Why do you keep vacillating?

Spin spin spin

Aren't you dizzy yet?

Not really...watching you gyrating around the truth is mildly amusing... Yet expected.

Was that you looking into my window? Hmm!

Still no victim statement huh?
 
Are you really this desperate to know her name? Why were you venting about the victims previously not having anonymity? Why do you keep vacillating?

Spin spin spin

Aren't you dizzy yet?

Not really...watching you gyrating around the truth is mildly amusing... Yet expected.

Was that you looking into my window? Hmm!

Still no victim statement huh?

The only victim statements they can find are the ones in which the sisters say that they feel far more victimized by the sensationalized press coverage than by whatever their brother did. So, they won't post anything.
 
Are you really this desperate to know her name? Why were you venting about the victims previously not having anonymity? Why do you keep vacillating?

Spin spin spin

Aren't you dizzy yet?

Not really...watching you gyrating around the truth is mildly amusing... Yet expected.

Was that you looking into my window? Hmm!

Still no victim statement huh?

Do you know how to place your fingers on the keyboard and Google?
You certainly are not embarrassed to display your duplicitous personality.
 
Spin spin spin

Aren't you dizzy yet?

Not really...watching you gyrating around the truth is mildly amusing... Yet expected.

Was that you looking into my window? Hmm!

Still no victim statement huh?

The only victim statements they can find are the ones in which the sisters say that they feel far more victimized by the sensationalized press coverage than by whatever their brother did. So, they won't post anything.

Yep. It's fun watching them squirm because they can't though.
 
Aren't you dizzy yet?

Not really...watching you gyrating around the truth is mildly amusing... Yet expected.

Was that you looking into my window? Hmm!

Still no victim statement huh?

The only victim statements they can find are the ones in which the sisters say that they feel far more victimized by the sensationalized press coverage than by whatever their brother did. So, they won't post anything.

Yep. It's fun watching them squirm because they can't though.

It's fun watching them squirm, but they can't. Do you speak English?
 
This family doesn't allow "frontal hugs"?????

Babies, toddlers, preteens, kids NEED hugs and by forbidding this casual, nonsexual touching..... well those stupid parents were setting up a situation where just about any kid would look for answers to simple, basic questions. All kids get curious and find ways to get educated. Whether that be by copping a feel or looking at National Geographic or the internet, kids will find a way to learn.

I doubt he's the only child from that family who crossed that curious line but stopped short of sexually assaulting someone in a traumatizing manner.

Especially in a house that is built on having babies which means SEX?
 
"And he made some bad choices, but, really, the extent of it was mild – inappropriate touching on fully clothed victims, most of it while [the] girls were sleeping.”

wtf? It's okay to inappropriately touch children if they are sleeping?

wtf? Where does it say it is OK in that statement?
"The extent of it was mild"

That phrase does not say or mean it was OK, merely that it could have been a lot worse.
 
"And he made some bad choices, but, really, the extent of it was mild – inappropriate touching on fully clothed victims, most of it while [the] girls were sleeping.”

wtf? It's okay to inappropriately touch children if they are sleeping?

wtf? Where does it say it is OK in that statement?
"The extent of it was mild"

That phrase does not say or mean it was OK, merely that it could have been a lot worse.
Right, so according to them, no big deal since they slept through it.
 
"And he made some bad choices, but, really, the extent of it was mild – inappropriate touching on fully clothed victims, most of it while [the] girls were sleeping.”

wtf? It's okay to inappropriately touch children if they are sleeping?

wtf? Where does it say it is OK in that statement?
"The extent of it was mild"

That phrase does not say or mean it was OK, merely that it could have been a lot worse.
Right, so according to them, no big deal since they slept through it.


Oh, surely that makes everything just hunky-dory!
 
"And he made some bad choices, but, really, the extent of it was mild – inappropriate touching on fully clothed victims, most of it while [the] girls were sleeping.”

wtf? It's okay to inappropriately touch children if they are sleeping?

wtf? Where does it say it is OK in that statement?
"The extent of it was mild"

That phrase does not say or mean it was OK, merely that it could have been a lot worse.
Right, so according to them, no big deal since they slept through it.


Oh, surely that makes everything just hunky-dory!

I think we should make sure those girls are thoroughly humiliated and the world reminded on a daily basis that they were felt up by their brother 12 years ago. Don't you agree?
 
"And he made some bad choices, but, really, the extent of it was mild – inappropriate touching on fully clothed victims, most of it while [the] girls were sleeping.”

wtf? It's okay to inappropriately touch children if they are sleeping?

wtf? Where does it say it is OK in that statement?
"The extent of it was mild"

That phrase does not say or mean it was OK, merely that it could have been a lot worse.
Right, so according to them, no big deal since they slept through it.

Is English your first language? It is obvious that comprehension is not.
 
"And he made some bad choices, but, really, the extent of it was mild – inappropriate touching on fully clothed victims, most of it while [the] girls were sleeping.”

wtf? It's okay to inappropriately touch children if they are sleeping?

I see that you started yet another outrage thread about Girls Creator and open Lesbian Leena Dunham molesting her 1 year old sister..

Oh wait - it's more Duggar bashing - Leena may have used her hands to open the vagina of a one year old, but she hates men and Christians, so it doesn't count...
 
Not there it's not....and creepy to use that as an excuse, I agree.

Queen Victoria had nothing on you Khmer Rouge members.

You never answered, would you kill him for touching his sister? He was sent to counseling - what do you of the Gestapo suggest for a pubescent teen boy who touches a girl?

NOW I do admit that what Josh Duggar did was disgusting;

{
The passages cited include one that describes an incident when Dunham was seven and her sister was one and playing on the driveway. Dunham writes that “curiosity got the best” of her and she opened her sister’s vagina only to call for her mother when she found the toddler had “six or seven pebbles in there”.

“My mother didn’t bother asking why I had opened Grace’s vagina,” Dunham wrote. “This was within the spectrum of things that I did.”

In another passage that has attracted critics she describes trying to persuade her sister to “kiss her on the lips for five seconds” by offering gifts of sweets or coins. “Basically, anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl, I was trying,” wrote Dunham.}

Fucking pervert.

OH WAIT, that's Leena Dunham, leftist and Lesbian - so it's just natural curiosity..

Lena Dunham apologises after critics accuse her of sexually molesting sister Culture The Guardian

Funny how you Khmer Rouge prudes aren't making a fuss about that...
 
Right, so according to them, no big deal since they slept through it.

Time to bring back chastity belts, yes Rati?

Josh Duggar was the first child in the whole of human history to be curious about the "bits" of the other sex.

You prudes are right to want to burn him at the stake.... Sexual curiosity MUST be suppressed and repressed in all cases.
 

Forum List

Back
Top