These are the allegations in the Joe Biden impeachment inquiry

[Dante Reawakened]

House Republican Report Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by President Biden​

After months of investigation and many public accusations of corruption against Mr. Biden and his family, the first report of the premier House G.O.P. inquiry showed no proof of such misconduct.

1): the Republicans conceded that they had yet to find evidence of a specific corrupt action Mr. Biden took in office in connection with any of the business deals his son entered into. Instead, their presentation underscored how little headway top G.O.P. lawmakers have made in finding clear evidence of questionable transactions they can tie to Mr. Biden, their chief political rival.


2): Federal prosecutors have examined Hunter Biden’s international business activities as part of a criminal investigation. But the only charges they are considering, according to people familiar with the case, are unrelated to his work abroad. They include tax charges related to his failure to file his tax returns over several years, and a charge of lying about his drug use on a federal form he filled out to purchase a handgun.

Presidents’ families have long made money off the family name.​

the end, Better Call Durham

 

[Winco]

The "nO eViDEnCe!" crowd can ignore this.

Abuse of power, obstruction and corruption.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announced the House is launching an impeachment inquiry of President Joe Biden, citing at least six separate allegations that led to the decision.

First, he cited the House Oversight Committee’s findings that Biden “did lie to the American people about his own knowledge of his family’s foreign business dealings.”

Second, McCarthy also cited bank records that show “nearly $20 million in payments were directed to the Biden family members and associates through various shell companies.”

Third, McCarthy also said the Treasury Department has “more than 150 transactions involving the Biden family and other business associates that were flagged as suspicious activity by U.S. banks.”

Fourth, McCarthy cited an FBI informant who alleged that the president and his son both received bribes of $5 million each.

Fifth, McCarthy cited Biden using “his official office to coordinate with Hunter Biden’s business partners about Hunter’s role in Burisma Ukrainian energy company,” referring to recent revelations from Hunter Biden’s laptop that then-Vice President Biden used private or alias accounts to send government information to Hunter.

Finally, McCarthy said — likely in reference to the Justice Department’s handling of its investigation of Hunter Biden, “Despite the serious allegations, it appears that the president’s family has been offered special treatment by Biden’s own administration — treatment that [they] not otherwise would have received if they were not related to the President.”

McCarthy Lays Out Evidence in Decision to Launch Biden Impeachment Inquiry

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy announced the House is launching an impeachment inquiry of President Joe Biden, citing at least six allegations.

www.breitbart.com

Yup, we need to get rid of corrupt politicians.

 

[mudwhistle]

MAGAts want Americans still dying in Afghanistan.

Nope.
Obama got us back into Afghanistan.
I thought is was really stupid.

What we wanted was for a full withdrawal.....not this crap they pulled twice in Iraq and Afghanistan of leaving billions of dollars of weapons and equipment behind for our enemies to use against us.

 

[Foxfyre]

Yes. That's why I said to prove it.

Not a single person on this message board has either the knowledge or resources to prove anything about anything.

Even the House judiciary committee will have an uphill battle in building a concrete case because Biden's DOJ will hide, withhold, slow walk, etc. evidence as they have continuously done and whatever evidence is presented will either not be reported at all or will be distorted by a MSM that is nothing more than a Democrat propaganda machine.

At least in the Clinton impeachment, real crimes were shown to have been committed as confirmed by the NY Superior Court who held him in contempt for perjury, by SCOTUS who revoked his privileges to plead before the high court and the Arkansas Bar who revoked his license and disbarred him.

The House Judiciary Committee serves as the investigator in an impeachment inquiry. If they have concrete evidence of crimes it then goes to the House that acts as a large grand jury. If the House votes Biden committed high crimes and misdemeanors it then goes to the Senate for trial.

 

[JoeB131]

Surely you're aware that he was prosecuted over perjury. You're not really this ignorant, are you?

70% of people at the time thought the impeachment was bullshit, and even voted Republicans out of office over it.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Another Archer or Gaul Luft maybe. It's possible. lol

“Are you aware of any wrongdoing by Vice President Biden?” Mr. Archer’s lawyer asked him at one point during the closed-door testimony before the House oversight committee, a transcript of which was released on Thursday.

“No, I’m not aware of any,” Mr. Archer replied.

House Democrats released an interview Mr. Parnas conducted with Mykola Zlochevsky during his investigation in which the Burisma co-founder wrote in all caps:

“NO ONE FROM BURISMA EVER HAD ANY CONTACTS WITH VP BIDEN OR PEOPLE WORKING FOR HIM DURING HUNTER BIDEN’S ENGAGEMENT.”

 

[mudwhistle]

House Republican Report Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by President Biden​

After months of investigation and many public accusations of corruption against Mr. Biden and his family, the first report of the premier House G.O.P. inquiry showed no proof of such misconduct.

1): the Republicans conceded that they had yet to find evidence of a specific corrupt action Mr. Biden took in office in connection with any of the business deals his son entered into. Instead, their presentation underscored how little headway top G.O.P. lawmakers have made in finding clear evidence of questionable transactions they can tie to Mr. Biden, their chief political rival.


2): Federal prosecutors have examined Hunter Biden’s international business activities as part of a criminal investigation. But the only charges they are considering, according to people familiar with the case, are unrelated to his work abroad. They include tax charges related to his failure to file his tax returns over several years, and a charge of lying about his drug use on a federal form he filled out to purchase a handgun.

Presidents’ families have long made money off the family name.​

the end, Better Call Durham
View attachment 828579

Weird how you don't have a link to this rubbish.

 

[JoeB131]

You have said there were no payments just like he did
Now it’s down to legality and not whether or not it happened

I think you are confused.

No one disputed that Hunter's company received money for services rendered in consulting and corporate governance.

What is in dispute - what you guys can't prove - is that any of that money went to the President.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

Surely you're aware that he was prosecuted over perjury. You're not really this ignorant, are you?

Fact: Bill Clinton was never prosecuted for perjury

 

[Foxfyre]

They now have the means to follow the money.

Maybe. Depends on how efficient and prepared the Deep State is. You know they'll get as little help from the DOJ as is possible.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

They now have the means to follow the money.

really?

They already have. No ties to Joe Biden

the end

 

[Arlette]

“Are you aware of any wrongdoing by Vice President Biden?” Mr. Archer’s lawyer asked him at one point during the closed-door testimony before the House oversight committee, a transcript of which was released on Thursday.

“No, I’m not aware of any,” Mr. Archer replied.

House Democrats released an interview Mr. Parnas conducted with Mykola Zlochevsky during his investigation in which the Burisma co-founder wrote in all caps:

“NO ONE FROM BURISMA EVER HAD ANY CONTACTS WITH VP BIDEN OR PEOPLE WORKING FOR HIM DURING HUNTER BIDEN’S ENGAGEMENT.”

They don't have a paper trail linking Biden to money.

 

[JoeB131]

Bull shit.

The MRAPs were $600k a piece and Humvees were the best vehicles we had.

I drove a humvee for a couple of years, I hated them

And they'd have provided no protection against small arms fire or an IED, which is why the Army replaced them with the overpriced MRAP's. And now the MRAP are being phased out.

MRAPs On the Way Out - USNI News

On Monday the Pentagon ceased production of the Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle (MRAP), perhaps the most iconic acquisition program of the past ten years. The trucks were designed and built in response to the urgent need to protect service members in Iraq from the pervasive improvised...

news.usni.org

On Monday the Pentagon ceased production of the Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle (MRAP), perhaps the most iconic acquisition program of the past ten years. The trucks were designed and built in response to the urgent need to protect service members in Iraq from the pervasive improvised explosive device (IED) threat. The vehicle went through five different iterations and the production lines produced 27,740 trucks. The total price tag came to $47.7 billion. For all the investment, what are we left with?

The vehicle may be of use to the U.S. Army, but there is little place for the armored monstrosities in the Marine Corps. They are too heavy to be practical on the Navy’s amphibious warships. Marine Corps and Navy leaders rightly are concerned about the weight of the Marine Air-Ground Task Force, so the weight issue is a red line for integrating the trucks into permanent service. Any MRAPs remaining on the Marine Corps rolls will most likely be stripped of their radios and mothballed.

There are other issues outside of shipping. The weight and high center of gravity make MRAPs prone to rollovers. It makes a poor command-and-control platform as the radios are located at the rear of the vehicle. The vehicle commander has to station someone at the radios and then yell at that person to switch channels for him. This is aggravating if you need to be able to call in supporting arms from multiple agencies. In most other military vehicles, the radios are located where the vehicle commander can manipulate them himself. The MRAP is not designed to carry cargo, so its utility as a logistics platform is zero.

 

[Foxfyre]

Fact: Bill Clinton was never prosecuted for perjury

A New York Judge, SCOTUS, and the Arkansas Bar all disagree with you.

 

[JoeB131]

The impeachment inquiry has nothing to do with Hunter. It's focused on financial crimes committed by Joe Biden.

Actually, a legal impeachment inquiry has to be authorized by the full house, but Kevin doesn't have the votes for that, so he's trying to pull an end run around the process.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

I think you are confused.

No one disputed that Hunter's company received money for services rendered in consulting and corporate governance.

What is in dispute - what you guys can't prove - is that any of that money went to the President.

Because Joe Biden never was involved in Hunter's dealings

House Democrats released an interview Mr. Parnas conducted with Mykola Zlochevsky during his investigation in which the Burisma co-founder wrote in all caps: “NO ONE FROM BURISMA EVER HAD ANY CONTACTS WITH VP BIDEN OR PEOPLE WORKING FOR HIM DURING HUNTER BIDEN’S ENGAGEMENT.”

 

[Crepitus]

These are the allegations in the Joe Biden impeachment inquiry​

Whatever spineless Kevin could think up on the spur of the moment.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

A New York Judge, SCOTUS, and the Arkansas Bar all disagree with you.

Bill Clinton was never prosecuted for perjury.

You cannot find one credible link that makes that claim, because it is not true. Bill Clinton was not prosecuted for perjury.

 

[Arlette]

They now have the means to follow the money.

lol
Who told you that?

 

[mudwhistle]

“Are you aware of any wrongdoing by Vice President Biden?” Mr. Archer’s lawyer asked him at one point during the closed-door testimony before the House oversight committee, a transcript of which was released on Thursday.

“No, I’m not aware of any,” Mr. Archer replied.

House Democrats released an interview Mr. Parnas conducted with Mykola Zlochevsky during his investigation in which the Burisma co-founder wrote in all caps:

“NO ONE FROM BURISMA EVER HAD ANY CONTACTS WITH VP BIDEN OR PEOPLE WORKING FOR HIM DURING HUNTER BIDEN’S ENGAGEMENT.”

Yes....a denial is all you libs need.

A denial equals total debunking.

Who cares that they have the goods on this mother fucker.

All you needed was one denial......and that's it. Game over.