This 9/11 never forget ISLAM IS OUR ENEMY

[Lastamender]

Really? How many articles have you written?
Revisionist crap to demonize Western civilization. Tripe.

Shakespeare was a revisionist? I dont think he even like Black people.

I did not say that. Why do you have to make crap up? You have derailed the thread already.

You just said something was revisionist crap that Shakespeare wrote. BTW. Check out St Maurice. another Christian Moor.

No, I said the reasons given to explain what he(Shakespeare) wrote are total bullshit.

Youre getting distracted. The point was that the Moors were Black and most whites in europe used the term to describe Africans. i wasnt asking your opinion on what he meant to do to the audience by using a Black guy.

No, your are distracted. Islam is the enemy of anything not Islamic. Pick up a Koran and read it.

 

[Asclepias]

Shakespeare was a revisionist? I dont think he even like Black people.

I did not say that. Why do you have to make crap up? You have derailed the thread already.

You just said something was revisionist crap that Shakespeare wrote. BTW. Check out St Maurice. another Christian Moor.

No, I said the reasons given to explain what he(Shakespeare) wrote are total bullshit.

Youre getting distracted. The point was that the Moors were Black and most whites in europe used the term to describe Africans. i wasnt asking your opinion on what he meant to do to the audience by using a Black guy.

No, your are distracted. Islam is the enemy of anything not Islamic. Pick up a Koran and read it.

Already did read it plus I was actually a muslim at one point. Not to mention I have a muslim that lives next door to me from Pakistan. So far he hasnt chopped my head off for being a non Islamic.

 

[irosie91]

Actually the Islamic invasions caused the Dark Ages

Really, the Romans and the Greeks lived in caves. You really are stupid.

No they didnt live in caves. Their societies collapsed because they were new to civilization and unable to maintain it on their own. I'm talking about the europeans that were left after the collapse that were regressing back to cave man status.

There societies collapsed because they lost the will to fight. Funny how it works that way. You are helping no one but Islam. That makes you a dhimmi and a scumbag. Enjoy.

Their societies collapsed because they were dumb. The Islamic invasions didnt come until later Once they did come though they brought education and even allowed different religions. Did you know that some of the Moors were Christian?

depends on how you define "moors" ---commonly MOORS are considered arab muslims who invaded the
Iberian Penninsula. Arabs had been trading in sub-Saharan slaves for at least 2000 years
before the rapist of Arabia was born and----somewhat genetically mixed with subsaharan blacks
ABEDIN There were Christians in the lands that became "arab" by conquest and they spoke
various languages INCLUDING that which became the lingua franca of the area----to wit Arabic .
Today Christians living in Iraq and Syria etc also speak Arabic but lots use ARAMAIC or some
other related language in their religious writings. The ALLOWING DIFFERENT RELIGIONS----
included a treaty known as the PACT OF OMAR------in which persons of other religions were treated
as conquered inferious peoples -----forced to pay tribute and to live under various levels of oppression----
sheesh butterfly------GET AN EDUCATION As to the unfortunates KNOWN to have sub-Saharan ancestry----
they were looked down upon as INFERIOR--------and still are in the shariah shit hole YEMEN------also in muslim
controlled areas of SUDAN

I am defining Moors like the whites of europe did. You should read this book by a white german guy. Arabs were orginally Black people. Now they are mixed.

https://www.amazon.ca/Ancient-Black-Hebrews-Arabs/dp/1490339221&tag=

depends on how you define ARAB people. ARAB was not a PEOPLE 2000 years
ago There was no ethnic and racial group called "ARAB"

 

[irosie91]

I did not say that. Why do you have to make crap up? You have derailed the thread already.

You just said something was revisionist crap that Shakespeare wrote. BTW. Check out St Maurice. another Christian Moor.

No, I said the reasons given to explain what he(Shakespeare) wrote are total bullshit.

Youre getting distracted. The point was that the Moors were Black and most whites in europe used the term to describe Africans. i wasnt asking your opinion on what he meant to do to the audience by using a Black guy.

No, your are distracted. Islam is the enemy of anything not Islamic. Pick up a Koran and read it.

Already did read it plus I was actually a muslim at one point. Not to mention I have a muslim that lives next door to me from Pakistan. So far he hasnt chopped my head off for being a non Islamic.

I have had lots of Pakistani colleagues, friends and----"clients" -----try not to tell your Pakistani friend that he is BLACK----and
if his wife has a baby ----BE SURE TO COMMENT ON THE CHILD's FAIR skin-------especially if the child is a girl

 

[Asclepias]

Actually the Islamic invasions caused the Dark Ages

No they didnt live in caves. Their societies collapsed because they were new to civilization and unable to maintain it on their own. I'm talking about the europeans that were left after the collapse that were regressing back to cave man status.

There societies collapsed because they lost the will to fight. Funny how it works that way. You are helping no one but Islam. That makes you a dhimmi and a scumbag. Enjoy.

Their societies collapsed because they were dumb. The Islamic invasions didnt come until later Once they did come though they brought education and even allowed different religions. Did you know that some of the Moors were Christian?

Did you know words like Moors and Turks are used to avoid the use of Muslim or Islamic because of the terror and inhumanity associated with those groups? The slave trade by the Moors sending a steady stream of mostly female slaves back to Muslim lands. And the Turks and the many genocides starting with the Greeks living in Turkey to the Armenians.

That is history. "Whitewashing" should repel a racist like yourself. Turns out you like it.

Moor has nothing to do being a Muslim.or Islamic. It simply meant "Black" There were plenty of Christian Moors. Go visit Germany so you can be educated. They have statues of them all over the place.

so? I grew up in a town full of the descendants of SCANDANAVIAN FARMERS -----and germans and some
scots and a few Brits---------When Italians started showing up they were consider -------COLORED. People with REAL
BLACK HAIR-------were looked upon with SUSPICION. I have brown eyes-------blue was the NORMAL COLOR

What do you mean by so? I think its very relevant they used the term Moor to describe Black people since thats exactly what the term meant when it was originated.

 

[Asclepias]

You just said something was revisionist crap that Shakespeare wrote. BTW. Check out St Maurice. another Christian Moor.

No, I said the reasons given to explain what he(Shakespeare) wrote are total bullshit.

Youre getting distracted. The point was that the Moors were Black and most whites in europe used the term to describe Africans. i wasnt asking your opinion on what he meant to do to the audience by using a Black guy.

No, your are distracted. Islam is the enemy of anything not Islamic. Pick up a Koran and read it.

Already did read it plus I was actually a muslim at one point. Not to mention I have a muslim that lives next door to me from Pakistan. So far he hasnt chopped my head off for being a non Islamic.

I have had lots of Pakistani colleagues, friends and----"clients" -----try not to tell your Pakistani friend that he is BLACK----and
if his wife has a baby ----BE SURE TO COMMENT ON THE CHILD's FAIR skin-------especially if the child is a girl

This guy and his family are actually darker than I am. We have had long discussions about the influence of African blood in the genetics of the people in India and Pakistan.

 

[jillian]

Not radical Islam, but Islam itself is our enemy. We need to never forget this and we need to eradicate Islam!


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

soooooo... is Christianity our enemy because a white Christian terrorist ran his car into a group of people protesting against Nazis?

since 9/11 how many people were killed on American soil by white Christian terrorists and how many by muslim terrorists?

thanks in advance.

 

[irosie91]

Actually the Islamic invasions caused the Dark Ages
There societies collapsed because they lost the will to fight. Funny how it works that way. You are helping no one but Islam. That makes you a dhimmi and a scumbag. Enjoy.

Their societies collapsed because they were dumb. The Islamic invasions didnt come until later Once they did come though they brought education and even allowed different religions. Did you know that some of the Moors were Christian?

Did you know words like Moors and Turks are used to avoid the use of Muslim or Islamic because of the terror and inhumanity associated with those groups? The slave trade by the Moors sending a steady stream of mostly female slaves back to Muslim lands. And the Turks and the many genocides starting with the Greeks living in Turkey to the Armenians.

That is history. "Whitewashing" should repel a racist like yourself. Turns out you like it.

Moor has nothing to do being a Muslim.or Islamic. It simply meant "Black" There were plenty of Christian Moors. Go visit Germany so you can be educated. They have statues of them all over the place.

so? I grew up in a town full of the descendants of SCANDANAVIAN FARMERS -----and germans and some
scots and a few Brits---------When Italians started showing up they were consider -------COLORED. People with REAL
BLACK HAIR-------were looked upon with SUSPICION. I have brown eyes-------blue was the NORMAL COLOR

What do you mean by so? I think its very relevant they used the term Moor to describe Black people since thats exactly what the term meant when it was originated.

In describing persons-----who is called "BLACK" is a highly variable situation------especially historically. Today----the word
"black" is used to describe persons that anthropologists term-- of the NEGROID race------which is people who originated from
sub-Saharan people-------Physiologically------such people are described as having dark skin, relative to caucasions ---they are
less "hairy" have broad flat noses and eye sockets which are more shallow than caucasion eye sockets. Typically the
hair of a sub-Saharan is ELLIPTICAL in cross examination-------and non negroid hair is rounder. The differences in shape result
in gossly visible differences in texture

 

[Asclepias]

Their societies collapsed because they were dumb. The Islamic invasions didnt come until later Once they did come though they brought education and even allowed different religions. Did you know that some of the Moors were Christian?

Did you know words like Moors and Turks are used to avoid the use of Muslim or Islamic because of the terror and inhumanity associated with those groups? The slave trade by the Moors sending a steady stream of mostly female slaves back to Muslim lands. And the Turks and the many genocides starting with the Greeks living in Turkey to the Armenians.

That is history. "Whitewashing" should repel a racist like yourself. Turns out you like it.

Moor has nothing to do being a Muslim.or Islamic. It simply meant "Black" There were plenty of Christian Moors. Go visit Germany so you can be educated. They have statues of them all over the place.

so? I grew up in a town full of the descendants of SCANDANAVIAN FARMERS -----and germans and some
scots and a few Brits---------When Italians started showing up they were consider -------COLORED. People with REAL
BLACK HAIR-------were looked upon with SUSPICION. I have brown eyes-------blue was the NORMAL COLOR

What do you mean by so? I think its very relevant they used the term Moor to describe Black people since thats exactly what the term meant when it was originated.

In describing persons-----who is called "BLACK" is a highly variable situation------especially historically. Today----the word
"black" is used to describe persons that anthropologists term-- of the NEGROID race------which is people who originated from
sub-Saharan people-------Physiologically------such people are described as having dark skin, relative to caucasions ---they are
less "hairy" have broad flat noses and eye sockets which are more shallow than caucasion eye sockets. Typically the
hair of a sub-Saharan is ELLIPTICAL in cross examination-------and non negroid hair is rounder. The differences in shape result
in gossly visible differences in texture

How do they explain the presence of "sub-saharan" people in north Africa even prior to the Sahara being a desert?

 

[irosie91]

No, I said the reasons given to explain what he(Shakespeare) wrote are total bullshit.

Youre getting distracted. The point was that the Moors were Black and most whites in europe used the term to describe Africans. i wasnt asking your opinion on what he meant to do to the audience by using a Black guy.

No, your are distracted. Islam is the enemy of anything not Islamic. Pick up a Koran and read it.

Already did read it plus I was actually a muslim at one point. Not to mention I have a muslim that lives next door to me from Pakistan. So far he hasnt chopped my head off for being a non Islamic.

I have had lots of Pakistani colleagues, friends and----"clients" -----try not to tell your Pakistani friend that he is BLACK----and
if his wife has a baby ----BE SURE TO COMMENT ON THE CHILD's FAIR skin-------especially if the child is a girl

This guy and his family are actually darker than I am. We have had long discussions about the influence of African blood in the genetics of the people in India and Pakistan.

color of skin not much of a genetic marker in the human species--------The darkest persons of the INDUS valley are DRAVIDIANS----
and have no genetic link to sub-Saharan Africans. Check his hair and your hair and under a simple lite microscope-----WAY DIFFERENT

 

[irosie91]

Did you know words like Moors and Turks are used to avoid the use of Muslim or Islamic because of the terror and inhumanity associated with those groups? The slave trade by the Moors sending a steady stream of mostly female slaves back to Muslim lands. And the Turks and the many genocides starting with the Greeks living in Turkey to the Armenians.

That is history. "Whitewashing" should repel a racist like yourself. Turns out you like it.

Moor has nothing to do being a Muslim.or Islamic. It simply meant "Black" There were plenty of Christian Moors. Go visit Germany so you can be educated. They have statues of them all over the place.

so? I grew up in a town full of the descendants of SCANDANAVIAN FARMERS -----and germans and some
scots and a few Brits---------When Italians started showing up they were consider -------COLORED. People with REAL
BLACK HAIR-------were looked upon with SUSPICION. I have brown eyes-------blue was the NORMAL COLOR

What do you mean by so? I think its very relevant they used the term Moor to describe Black people since thats exactly what the term meant when it was originated.

In describing persons-----who is called "BLACK" is a highly variable situation------especially historically. Today----the word
"black" is used to describe persons that anthropologists term-- of the NEGROID race------which is people who originated from
sub-Saharan people-------Physiologically------such people are described as having dark skin, relative to caucasions ---they are
less "hairy" have broad flat noses and eye sockets which are more shallow than caucasion eye sockets. Typically the
hair of a sub-Saharan is ELLIPTICAL in cross examination-------and non negroid hair is rounder. The differences in shape result
in gossly visible differences in texture

How do they explain the presence of "sub-saharan" people in north Africa even prior to the Sahara being a desert?

people have been MOVING AROUND for a very long time------long distance travel was common ----especially for
young males for-------a very long time------like MILENNIA------when the male of the species stumbles upon a female
of the species---------COPULATION 'happens' ------------so it is written in the talmud

 

[Asclepias]

Youre getting distracted. The point was that the Moors were Black and most whites in europe used the term to describe Africans. i wasnt asking your opinion on what he meant to do to the audience by using a Black guy.

No, your are distracted. Islam is the enemy of anything not Islamic. Pick up a Koran and read it.

Already did read it plus I was actually a muslim at one point. Not to mention I have a muslim that lives next door to me from Pakistan. So far he hasnt chopped my head off for being a non Islamic.

I have had lots of Pakistani colleagues, friends and----"clients" -----try not to tell your Pakistani friend that he is BLACK----and
if his wife has a baby ----BE SURE TO COMMENT ON THE CHILD's FAIR skin-------especially if the child is a girl

This guy and his family are actually darker than I am. We have had long discussions about the influence of African blood in the genetics of the people in India and Pakistan.

color of skin not much of a genetic marker in the human species--------The darkest persons of the INDUS valley are DRAVIDIANS----
and have no genetic link to sub-Saharan Africans. Check his hair and your hair and under a simple lite microscope-----WAY DIFFERENT

Actually the Dravidians do have a genetic link back to sub-Saharan Africans. Also you do realize that there are several places in India named after Black Africans right?

My hair is drastically different from my youngest daughters hair too. I dont get your point?

 

[Asclepias]

Moor has nothing to do being a Muslim.or Islamic. It simply meant "Black" There were plenty of Christian Moors. Go visit Germany so you can be educated. They have statues of them all over the place.

so? I grew up in a town full of the descendants of SCANDANAVIAN FARMERS -----and germans and some
scots and a few Brits---------When Italians started showing up they were consider -------COLORED. People with REAL
BLACK HAIR-------were looked upon with SUSPICION. I have brown eyes-------blue was the NORMAL COLOR

What do you mean by so? I think its very relevant they used the term Moor to describe Black people since thats exactly what the term meant when it was originated.

In describing persons-----who is called "BLACK" is a highly variable situation------especially historically. Today----the word
"black" is used to describe persons that anthropologists term-- of the NEGROID race------which is people who originated from
sub-Saharan people-------Physiologically------such people are described as having dark skin, relative to caucasions ---they are
less "hairy" have broad flat noses and eye sockets which are more shallow than caucasion eye sockets. Typically the
hair of a sub-Saharan is ELLIPTICAL in cross examination-------and non negroid hair is rounder. The differences in shape result
in gossly visible differences in texture

How do they explain the presence of "sub-saharan" people in north Africa even prior to the Sahara being a desert?

people have been MOVING AROUND for a very long time------long distance travel was common ----especially for
young males for-------a very long time------like MILENNIA------when the male of the species stumbles upon a female
of the species---------COPULATION 'happens' ------------so it is written in the talmud

I agree. I'm just wondering why you guys make the distinction between sub-saharan Blacks and north African Blacks when its clear they were both present in north Africa long before the Sahara became a desert. there is a reason the Greeks called the middle east and India "Africa".

 

[irosie91]

No, your are distracted. Islam is the enemy of anything not Islamic. Pick up a Koran and read it.

Already did read it plus I was actually a muslim at one point. Not to mention I have a muslim that lives next door to me from Pakistan. So far he hasnt chopped my head off for being a non Islamic.

I have had lots of Pakistani colleagues, friends and----"clients" -----try not to tell your Pakistani friend that he is BLACK----and
if his wife has a baby ----BE SURE TO COMMENT ON THE CHILD's FAIR skin-------especially if the child is a girl

This guy and his family are actually darker than I am. We have had long discussions about the influence of African blood in the genetics of the people in India and Pakistan.

color of skin not much of a genetic marker in the human species--------The darkest persons of the INDUS valley are DRAVIDIANS----
and have no genetic link to sub-Saharan Africans. Check his hair and your hair and under a simple lite microscope-----WAY DIFFERENT

Actually the Dravidians do have a genetic link back to sub-Saharan Africans. Also you do realize that there are several places in India named after Black Africans right?

My hair is drastically different from my youngest daughters hair too. I dont get your point?

your comment is idiotic------the HUMAN SPECIES was wandering over the face of the earth long before it developed written languages.
ALL humans are linked genetically-------the issue you seem to obsess over is ------WHO IS GENETICALLY SMARTER------you do not like
the NO DIFFERENCE reality because you YEARN for racial superiority

 

[Asclepias]

Already did read it plus I was actually a muslim at one point. Not to mention I have a muslim that lives next door to me from Pakistan. So far he hasnt chopped my head off for being a non Islamic.

I have had lots of Pakistani colleagues, friends and----"clients" -----try not to tell your Pakistani friend that he is BLACK----and
if his wife has a baby ----BE SURE TO COMMENT ON THE CHILD's FAIR skin-------especially if the child is a girl

This guy and his family are actually darker than I am. We have had long discussions about the influence of African blood in the genetics of the people in India and Pakistan.

color of skin not much of a genetic marker in the human species--------The darkest persons of the INDUS valley are DRAVIDIANS----
and have no genetic link to sub-Saharan Africans. Check his hair and your hair and under a simple lite microscope-----WAY DIFFERENT

Actually the Dravidians do have a genetic link back to sub-Saharan Africans. Also you do realize that there are several places in India named after Black Africans right?

My hair is drastically different from my youngest daughters hair too. I dont get your point?

your comment is idiotic------the HUMAN SPECIES was wandering over the face of the earth long before it developed written languages.
ALL humans are linked genetically-------the issue you seem to obsess over is ------WHO IS GENETICALLY SMARTER------you do not like
the NO DIFFERENCE reality because you YEARN for racial superiority

That human species were Black people. Thats the reason all humans are linked genetically. However, the Dravidians have an even more recent connection to Africa. I dont obsess over who is genetically smarter. I just look at historical facts and ask why whites had to be taught civilization not once but twice and all others had no such issues.

 

[irosie91]

I have had lots of Pakistani colleagues, friends and----"clients" -----try not to tell your Pakistani friend that he is BLACK----and
if his wife has a baby ----BE SURE TO COMMENT ON THE CHILD's FAIR skin-------especially if the child is a girl

This guy and his family are actually darker than I am. We have had long discussions about the influence of African blood in the genetics of the people in India and Pakistan.

color of skin not much of a genetic marker in the human species--------The darkest persons of the INDUS valley are DRAVIDIANS----
and have no genetic link to sub-Saharan Africans. Check his hair and your hair and under a simple lite microscope-----WAY DIFFERENT

Actually the Dravidians do have a genetic link back to sub-Saharan Africans. Also you do realize that there are several places in India named after Black Africans right?

My hair is drastically different from my youngest daughters hair too. I dont get your point?

your comment is idiotic------the HUMAN SPECIES was wandering over the face of the earth long before it developed written languages.
ALL humans are linked genetically-------the issue you seem to obsess over is ------WHO IS GENETICALLY SMARTER------you do not like
the NO DIFFERENCE reality because you YEARN for racial superiority

That human species were Black people. Thats the reason all humans are linked genetically. However, the Dravidians have an even more recent connection to Africa. I dont obsess over who is genetically smarter. I just look at historical facts and ask why whites had to be taught civilization not once but twice and all others had no such issues.[/QUOTE

you are looking up your blastopore--------you are an error of embryogenesis-----fixated in gastrulation

 

[Lastamender]

I have had lots of Pakistani colleagues, friends and----"clients" -----try not to tell your Pakistani friend that he is BLACK----and
if his wife has a baby ----BE SURE TO COMMENT ON THE CHILD's FAIR skin-------especially if the child is a girl

This guy and his family are actually darker than I am. We have had long discussions about the influence of African blood in the genetics of the people in India and Pakistan.

color of skin not much of a genetic marker in the human species--------The darkest persons of the INDUS valley are DRAVIDIANS----
and have no genetic link to sub-Saharan Africans. Check his hair and your hair and under a simple lite microscope-----WAY DIFFERENT

Actually the Dravidians do have a genetic link back to sub-Saharan Africans. Also you do realize that there are several places in India named after Black Africans right?

My hair is drastically different from my youngest daughters hair too. I dont get your point?

your comment is idiotic------the HUMAN SPECIES was wandering over the face of the earth long before it developed written languages.
ALL humans are linked genetically-------the issue you seem to obsess over is ------WHO IS GENETICALLY SMARTER------you do not like
the NO DIFFERENCE reality because you YEARN for racial superiority

That human species were Black people. Thats the reason all humans are linked genetically. However, the Dravidians have an even more recent connection to Africa. I dont obsess over who is genetically smarter. I just look at historical facts and ask why whites had to be taught civilization not once but twice and all others had no such issues.

If you call living under Sharia a civilization you are an idiot.

 

[Asclepias]

This guy and his family are actually darker than I am. We have had long discussions about the influence of African blood in the genetics of the people in India and Pakistan.

color of skin not much of a genetic marker in the human species--------The darkest persons of the INDUS valley are DRAVIDIANS----
and have no genetic link to sub-Saharan Africans. Check his hair and your hair and under a simple lite microscope-----WAY DIFFERENT

Actually the Dravidians do have a genetic link back to sub-Saharan Africans. Also you do realize that there are several places in India named after Black Africans right?

My hair is drastically different from my youngest daughters hair too. I dont get your point?

your comment is idiotic------the HUMAN SPECIES was wandering over the face of the earth long before it developed written languages.
ALL humans are linked genetically-------the issue you seem to obsess over is ------WHO IS GENETICALLY SMARTER------you do not like
the NO DIFFERENCE reality because you YEARN for racial superiority

That human species were Black people. Thats the reason all humans are linked genetically. However, the Dravidians have an even more recent connection to Africa. I dont obsess over who is genetically smarter. I just look at historical facts and ask why whites had to be taught civilization not once but twice and all others had no such issues.

If you call living under Sharia a civilization you are an idiot.

If you think living under Sharia is not a civilization then you are more poorly educated than i originally thought. Nice deflection though.

 

[irosie91]

color of skin not much of a genetic marker in the human species--------The darkest persons of the INDUS valley are DRAVIDIANS----
and have no genetic link to sub-Saharan Africans. Check his hair and your hair and under a simple lite microscope-----WAY DIFFERENT

Actually the Dravidians do have a genetic link back to sub-Saharan Africans. Also you do realize that there are several places in India named after Black Africans right?

My hair is drastically different from my youngest daughters hair too. I dont get your point?

your comment is idiotic------the HUMAN SPECIES was wandering over the face of the earth long before it developed written languages.
ALL humans are linked genetically-------the issue you seem to obsess over is ------WHO IS GENETICALLY SMARTER------you do not like
the NO DIFFERENCE reality because you YEARN for racial superiority

That human species were Black people. Thats the reason all humans are linked genetically. However, the Dravidians have an even more recent connection to Africa. I dont obsess over who is genetically smarter. I just look at historical facts and ask why whites had to be taught civilization not once but twice and all others had no such issues.

If you call living under Sharia a civilization you are an idiot.

If you think living under Sharia is not a civilization then you are more poorly educated than i originally thought. Nice deflection though.

fine ----then you support chattel slavery-----still practiced under the "civilization" which is shariah------and its STOCK IN TRADE from the time
the people now called "arabs" infected the Arabian peninsula and branched out thru sudan and nubia and marched their human wares as far as
the eastern most reaches of the Persian empire and all the way to the slave ships of Amsterdam ---in recent history------you have an interesting
concept of the DEVELOPEMENT OF CIVILIZATION. Some time ago I became interested in the word which in English is
ISHMAELITE------since muhummad decided that HE was an ISHMAELITE--------I asked hubby what the word---mentioned in the bible---
MEANT To whom did it refer? He described its use. It shows up in the Talmud --and other classical writing LOTS----and
refers to persons who build no permanent homes, are always illiterate and "criminal" in that they engage in what we (here in the west---
in English literature), call HIGHWAYMEN) to wit---dangerous, illiterate people out in the byways. They were hazard of travel-----UNCIVILIZED
PEOPLE----who make a living kidnapping and selling human beans--------mostly subsaharans. They sold them as far as INDIA-----The greeks
used them too in ancient times.

 

[Asclepias]

Actually the Dravidians do have a genetic link back to sub-Saharan Africans. Also you do realize that there are several places in India named after Black Africans right?

My hair is drastically different from my youngest daughters hair too. I dont get your point?

your comment is idiotic------the HUMAN SPECIES was wandering over the face of the earth long before it developed written languages.
ALL humans are linked genetically-------the issue you seem to obsess over is ------WHO IS GENETICALLY SMARTER------you do not like
the NO DIFFERENCE reality because you YEARN for racial superiority

That human species were Black people. Thats the reason all humans are linked genetically. However, the Dravidians have an even more recent connection to Africa. I dont obsess over who is genetically smarter. I just look at historical facts and ask why whites had to be taught civilization not once but twice and all others had no such issues.

If you call living under Sharia a civilization you are an idiot.

If you think living under Sharia is not a civilization then you are more poorly educated than i originally thought. Nice deflection though.

fine ----then you support chattel slavery-----still practiced under the "civilization" which is shariah------and its STOCK IN TRADE from the time
the people now called "arabs" infected the Arabian peninsula and branched out thru sudan and nubia and marched their human wares as far as
the eastern most reaches of the Persian empire and all the way to the slave ships of Amsterdam ---in recent history------you have an interesting
concept of the DEVELOPEMENT OF CIVILIZATION. Some time ago I became interested in the word which in English is
ISHMAELITE------since muhummad decided that HE was an ISHMAELITE--------I asked hubby what the word---mentioned in the bible---
MEANT To whom did it refer? He described its use. It shows up in the Talmud --and other classical writing LOTS----and
refers to persons who build no permanent homes, are always illiterate and "criminal" in that they engage in what we (here in the west---
in English literature), call HIGHWAYMEN) to wit---dangerous, illiterate people out in the byways. They were hazard of travel-----UNCIVILIZED
PEOPLE----who make a living kidnapping and selling human beans--------mostly subsaharans. They sold them as far as INDIA-----The greeks
used them too in ancient times.

I support chattel slavery because Sharia is an example of a civilization? Did you forget to take your meds or did you bump your head? There was no such thing as chattel slavery until whites practiced it here in the Americas.