This Guy Should Sue Hillary For Every Dime She Has

[Timmy]

The feds help to protect this turd . Since when do they allow a peep to cover from head to toe when being arrested ?

They kept him hidden from crazy ass Muslims who would off the douche .

 

[Dragonlady]

He went to jail for violating his probation. Pardon me if I don't shed any tears for a man that has an arrest record longer than The Song of Hiawatha.

I agree, but he might have a case of 'Slander' against Hillary, who threw him under a bus with her lies to save herself.

The elitist didn't think twice about sacrificing one of the 'deplorable' (someone with less money / status than her) to cover her ass. It was a perfect scapegoat - no one would care about or look twice at this guy...

First off, the movie was the cause of the protests in Egypt and elsewhere, so it was hardly a slander to say the attack in Benghazi was also part of the protests, and there were people in Benghazi who said they were protesting the film, but the terrorists used that cover to attack in a much more organized fashion than the protests that happened elsewhere.

 

[easyt65]

First off, the movie was the cause of the protests in Egypt and elsewhere,

1st off, you're WRONG! The CIA, the Obama administration, and even the State Department all stated they had known for MONTHS about the call for attacks on US Embassies and Facilities throughout the Middle East on the anniversary of 9/11. On 9/11/12 22 US facilities / embassies throughout the Middle East were SIMULTANEOUSLY attacked...as warned they would be.

FURTHERMORE, BOTH the State Department and the CIA acknowledged that they / the united States - the State Department - had been warned about the call from an Al Qaieda leader for the assassination of Stephens for the death of an Al Qaeida leader from Benghazi a month earlier, killed in an Obama drone strike! The Mayor of Benghazi is on records as having warned Stephens of this call to assassinate him.

(So WHY the HELL would the State Department pull 14 members of Stephens' Security Team AFTER 2 terrorist attacks on his compound, warning of an attack on 9/11/12, AND a plot to assassinate Stephens?!)

Libs like yourself, however, want to claim that the attack on 9/11/12 was NOT part of the Middle East-wide attack on US Embassies (22 simultaneous) and was NOT the assassination called for by an Al Qaeida leader....no, it was a sudden spur-of-the-moment 'protest' (that the FBI and people on the ground in Benghazi when the attack started said NEVER happened) that suddenly sprung up. ....because everyone knows that everyone in the Middle East have computers and spend most of their time surfing the internet for obscure, almost never-heard of, home movies that offend Allah (and why THAT movie that 'offends Allah' instead of all the other ones out there).

ONLY a Liberal would buy into the idea that the Benghazi attack was NOT part of the widely-known, extremely well-organized attack on US facilities / Embassies throughout the Middle East scheduled for the anniversary of 9/11 or part of the call to assassinate Stephens, that instead it was an UN-ORGANIZED, UN-SCHEDULED, 'just-happened' protest...where the people who just happened to show up just happened to pull ak-47s, rocket launchers, & grenades out of their ass - enough weapons and ammunition to sustain an attack on Stephen's compound for HOURS!

You just don't decide to go for a walk, or possibly walk over to the compound to protest, and decide to carry your ak-47 with 2 CASES of Amm or a rocket launcher with CASES of rockets.

The evidence that Libs pushing this 'protest' lie have no F*ING clue what they are talking about is overwhelming.

 

[Timmy]

First off, the movie was the cause of the protests in Egypt and elsewhere,

1st off, you're WRONG! The CIA, the Obama administration, and even the State Department all stated they had known for MONTHS about the call for attacks on US Embassies and Facilities throughout the Middle East on the anniversary of 9/11. On 9/11/12 22 US facilities / embassies throughout the Middle East were SIMULTANEOUSLY attacked...as warned they would be.

FURTHERMORE, BOTH the State Department and the CIA acknowledged that they / the united States - the State Department - had been warned about the call from an Al Qaieda leader for the assassination of Stephens for the death of an Al Qaeida leader from Benghazi a month earlier, killed in an Obama drone strike! The Mayor of Benghazi is on records as having warned Stephens of this call to assassinate him.

(So WHY the HELL would the State Department pull 14 members of Stephens' Security Team AFTER 2 terrorist attacks on his compound, warning of an attack on 9/11/12, AND a plot to assassinate Stephens?!)

Libs like yourself, however, want to claim that the attack on 9/11/12 was NOT part of the Middle East-wide attack on US Embassies (22 simultaneous) and was NOT the assassination called for by an Al Qaeida leader....no, it was a sudden spur-of-the-moment 'protest' (that the FBI and people on the ground in Benghazi when the attack started said NEVER happened) that suddenly sprung up. ....because everyone knows that everyone in the Middle East have computers and spend most of their time surfing the internet for obscure, almost never-heard of, home movies that offend Allah (and why THAT movie that 'offends Allah' instead of all the other ones out there).

ONLY a Liberal would buy into the idea that the Benghazi attack was NOT part of the widely-known, extremely well-organized attack on US facilities / Embassies throughout the Middle East scheduled for the anniversary of 9/11 or part of the call to assassinate Stephens, that instead it was an UN-ORGANIZED, UN-SCHEDULED, 'just-happened' protest...where the people who just happened to show up just happened to pull ak-47s, rocket launchers, & grenades out of their ass - enough weapons and ammunition to sustain an attack on Stephen's compound for HOURS!

You just don't decide to go for a walk, or possibly walk over to the compound to protest, and decide to carry your ak-47 with 2 CASES of Amm or a rocket launcher with CASES of rockets.

The evidence that Libs pushing this 'protest' lie have no F*ING clue what they are talking about is overwhelming.

You are right .

That's why security was focused on the embassy . Which is in TRIPOLI !


Every 9/11 has all our embassies on alert .

 

[westwall]

He went to jail for violating his probation. Pardon me if I don't shed any tears for a man that has an arrest record longer than The Song of Hiawatha.

Indeed he did. And he is a scumbag. However, the claim that his video was the cause of the attack is a provable lie, and the admin completely destroyed this mans life which is the definition of "cruel and unusual" punishment. They destroyed him for their political gain, so that makes them even worse scumbags. Don't you think?

 

[mudwhistle]

He went to jail for violating his probation. Pardon me if I don't shed any tears for a man that has an arrest record longer than The Song of Hiawatha.

Probation for what charges?

How is it that you are this ignorant of the facts, even 5 years later?

He was a con man and a meth cook.

This is your hero.

Yeah......and it seems anyone Obama or Hillary feel gets in their way becomes a member of the Basket of Deplorables.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

He went to jail for violating his probation. Pardon me if I don't shed any tears for a man that has an arrest record longer than The Song of Hiawatha.

Indeed he did. And he is a scumbag. However, the claim that his video was the cause of the attack is a provable lie, and the admin completely destroyed this mans life which is the definition of "cruel and unusual" punishment. They destroyed him for their political gain, so that makes them even worse scumbags. Don't you think?

Did the Obama administration force him to violate his parole?

What happened to "personal responsibility"?

What is "cruel and unusual" about being sent back to prison for violating parole?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

He went to jail for violating his probation. Pardon me if I don't shed any tears for a man that has an arrest record longer than The Song of Hiawatha.

Probation for what charges?

How is it that you are this ignorant of the facts, even 5 years later?

He was a con man and a meth cook.

This is your hero.

Yeah......and it seems anyone Obama or Hillary feel gets in their way becomes a member of the Basket of Deplorables.

You are welcome to shed all the tears you want for your poor little meth cook hero. But that says a lot more about you than it does Obama or Hillary.

 

[Rustic]

Four years after the deadly Benghazi terrorist attack Hillary Clinton is running for president and Nakoula Basseley Nakoula is broke, destitute and living in a homeless shelter.


Nakoula is the film maker Hillary falsely claimed was responsible for the 'violent protest' in Benghazi on 9/11/12. ... Except there was no 'violent' protest:

People on the ground in Benghazi during the attack said there was NEVER a protest.

The State Department Lead in Tripoli said there was NEVER a protest.

The CIA said there was never a sign of any protest.

The FBI said there was never a protest.

Hillary told a Turkish Ambassador in an e-mail, "We KNOW this was a terrorist attack - the video played no part in it."

Hillary told her daughter in an e-mail that it had been a terrorist attack and the video played no part.


PUBLICLY, however, Freedom-Loving Barry and Hillary condemned Nakoula for exercising his 1st Amendment Rights, falsely blamed HIM for the TERRORIST attack, APOLOGIZED to the world for an American exercising his 1st Amendment Right, and vowed to arrest him for doing so. ... AND THEY DID.

In fact, the FILMMAKER who was falsely arrested spent more time in jail than did the 'mastermind behind the Benghazi attacks' that Barry captured over a year later.

Now he is broke and lives in a homeless shelter while the corrupt dain bramaged bit@h is running for President.

"Nakoula's life was nothing more than collateral damage for the Obama-Hillary machine in their quest for power."

Coptic Filmmaker Blamed for Benghazi Attack Now Broke, Living in Homeless Shelter

It worked for the hildabeast, video no one saw - least of all no Muslims saw it...
It was a fairytail that it was the reason for the death of four Americans…

 

[Rustic]

The protest the film caused.

The anti-Islam-film riots: A timeline

Yes, the "Innocence of Muslims" video really did play role in the Benghazi attacks

The CIA was mistaken about the existence of protests earlier in the day, but not about the role of the video. David Kirkpatrick of the New York Times has written about this extensively, starting just a few weeksafter the attacks, and last December he put together a definitive account of what happened in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. Here's a piece:

The leader of Benghazi’s most overtly anti-Western militia, Ansar al-Shariah, boasted a few months before the attack that his fighters could “flatten” the American Mission. Surveillance of the American compound appears to have been underway at least 12 hours before the assault started.

The violence, though, also had spontaneous elements. Anger at the video motivated the initial attack. Dozens of people joined in, some of them provoked by the video and others responding to fast-spreading false rumors that guards inside the American compound had shot Libyan protesters. Looters and arsonists, without any sign of a plan, were the ones who ravaged the compound after the initial attack, according to more than a dozen Libyan witnesses as well as many American officials who have viewed the footage from security cameras.

....There is no doubt that anger over the video motivated many attackers. A Libyan journalist working for The New York Times was blocked from entering by the sentries outside, and he learned of the film from the fighters who stopped him. Other Libyan witnesses, too, said they received lectures from the attackers about the evil of the film and the virtue of defending the prophet.

Na, it had nothing to do with the protests and riots. First of all that video was done long before the protests and riots - it had hardly any views and it was not offensive to anybody but self-righteous fuck ups.

 

[mudwhistle]

He went to jail for violating his probation. Pardon me if I don't shed any tears for a man that has an arrest record longer than The Song of Hiawatha.

Probation for what charges?

How is it that you are this ignorant of the facts, even 5 years later?

He was a con man and a meth cook.

This is your hero.

Yeah......and it seems anyone Obama or Hillary feel gets in their way becomes a member of the Basket of Deplorables.

You are welcome to shed all the tears you want for your poor little meth cook hero. But that says a lot more about you than it does Obama or Hillary.

Yeah......meth cook......tell me another one. Like the time he kicked the neighbor's dog.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

He went to jail for violating his probation. Pardon me if I don't shed any tears for a man that has an arrest record longer than The Song of Hiawatha.

Probation for what charges?

How is it that you are this ignorant of the facts, even 5 years later?

He was a con man and a meth cook.

This is your hero.

Yeah......and it seems anyone Obama or Hillary feel gets in their way becomes a member of the Basket of Deplorables.

You are welcome to shed all the tears you want for your poor little meth cook hero. But that says a lot more about you than it does Obama or Hillary.

Yeah......meth cook......tell me another one. Like the time he kicked the neighbor's dog.

Still reveling in that ignorance, I see.

I hate to burst your comfortable little bubble, but he pled guilty to it.

 

[Rustic]

A Deadly Mix in Benghazi

Reports of the video were just beginning to spread on Sept. 9 when Mr. McFarland, then the officer normally in charge of politics and economics at the United States Embassy in Tripoli, had his meeting with the Benghazi militia leaders. Among them were some of the same men who had greeted Mr. Stevens when he arrived in Benghazi at the start of the revolt, including Mr. Gharabi, 39, a heavyset former Abu Salim inmate who ran a local sandwich truck before becoming the leader of the Rafallah al-Sehati. Another was Wissam bin Hamid, also 39, a slim and slightly hunched mechanic known for his skill with American cars who by then had become the leader of Libya Shield, considered one of the strongest militias in Libya.

In an interview, Mr. Gharabi said that he had known about the building rage in Egypt over the video, but that, “We did not know if it was going to reach us here.”
Mr. McFarland seemed most concerned about the big militia leaders. “'How do the revolutionaries feel about having relationships with Western countries? What is your opinion about the United States?'” the Americans asked, according to Mr. Gharabi. It was “an interrogation,” he said.

“We told them that we hoped that the countries which helped us during the war would now help us in development,” he said. “And America was at the top of the pyramid.”

But Mr. Gharabi and two other Libyan militia leaders present said separately that they tried to warn Mr. McFarland. “We told them, ‘Weapons are everywhere, in every home, and there is no real control,' ” Mr. Bin Hamid of Libya Shield said.

Mr. McFarland struggled to make sense of their contradictory signals. “The message was, ‘Don’t come here because there is no security, but come right away because we need you,' ” Mr. McFarland later told colleagues.

The militia leaders seemed unable to get their stories straight, his colleagues said, and the vague warnings amounted to a reminder of what the diplomats already knew: Post-revolutionary Benghazi was a dangerous place.

Around dusk, the Pan-Arab satellite networks began broadcasting footage of protesters breaching the walls of the American Embassy in Cairo, pulling down the American flag and running up the black banner of militant Islam. Young men around Benghazi began calling one another with the news, several said, and many learned of the video for the first time.

There is no doubt that anger over the video motivated many attackers. A Libyan journalist working for The New York Times was blocked from entering by the sentries outside, and he learned of the film from the fighters who stopped him. Other Libyan witnesses, too, said they received lectures from the attackers about the evil of the film and the virtue of defending the prophet.

Na, no Muslims seen the video.

 

[Rustic]

The protest the film caused.

The anti-Islam-film riots: A timeline

Yes, the "Innocence of Muslims" video really did play role in the Benghazi attacks

The CIA was mistaken about the existence of protests earlier in the day, but not about the role of the video. David Kirkpatrick of the New York Times has written about this extensively, starting just a few weeksafter the attacks, and last December he put together a definitive account of what happened in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. Here's a piece:

The leader of Benghazi’s most overtly anti-Western militia, Ansar al-Shariah, boasted a few months before the attack that his fighters could “flatten” the American Mission. Surveillance of the American compound appears to have been underway at least 12 hours before the assault started.

The violence, though, also had spontaneous elements. Anger at the video motivated the initial attack. Dozens of people joined in, some of them provoked by the video and others responding to fast-spreading false rumors that guards inside the American compound had shot Libyan protesters. Looters and arsonists, without any sign of a plan, were the ones who ravaged the compound after the initial attack, according to more than a dozen Libyan witnesses as well as many American officials who have viewed the footage from security cameras.

....There is no doubt that anger over the video motivated many attackers. A Libyan journalist working for The New York Times was blocked from entering by the sentries outside, and he learned of the film from the fighters who stopped him. Other Libyan witnesses, too, said they received lectures from the attackers about the evil of the film and the virtue of defending the prophet.

I'm sure you can find all kinds of evidence that proves it's okay to murder people over an insult.
And essentially, Obama thinks that freedom of speech shouldn't exist in America.

Nobody ever said it's okay to murder people.

Not only did the trailer cause riots in over 20 countries, but it was also the spark that led to the attack in Benghazi.

He's lucky some Muslim dirt-bag hasn't off'd him.
\
As far as the President:

I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video. And the answer is enshrined in our laws: Our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech.

Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense. Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. As President of our country and Commander-in-Chief of our military, I accept that people are going to call me awful things every day -- (laughter) -- and I will always defend their right to do so. (Applause.)

Americans have fought and died around the globe to protect the right of all people to express their views, even views that we profoundly disagree with. We do not do so because we support hateful speech, but because our founders understood that without such protections, the capacity of each individual to express their own views and practice their own faith may be threatened.

Remarks by the President to the UN General Assembly

Only a self-righteous cult of violent terrorists would be offended by a comedy like that...

 

[Rustic]

Four years after the deadly Benghazi terrorist attack Hillary Clinton is running for president and Nakoula Basseley Nakoula is broke, destitute and living in a homeless shelter.


Nakoula is the film maker Hillary falsely claimed was responsible for the 'violent protest' in Benghazi on 9/11/12. ... Except there was no 'violent' protest:

People on the ground in Benghazi during the attack said there was NEVER a protest.

The State Department Lead in Tripoli said there was NEVER a protest.

The CIA said there was never a sign of any protest.

The FBI said there was never a protest.

Hillary told a Turkish Ambassador in an e-mail, "We KNOW this was a terrorist attack - the video played no part in it."

Hillary told her daughter in an e-mail that it had been a terrorist attack and the video played no part.


PUBLICLY, however, Freedom-Loving Barry and Hillary condemned Nakoula for exercising his 1st Amendment Rights, falsely blamed HIM for the TERRORIST attack, APOLOGIZED to the world for an American exercising his 1st Amendment Right, and vowed to arrest him for doing so. ... AND THEY DID.

In fact, the FILMMAKER who was falsely arrested spent more time in jail than did the 'mastermind behind the Benghazi attacks' that Barry captured over a year later.

Now he is broke and lives in a homeless shelter while the corrupt dain bramaged bit@h is running for President.

"Nakoula's life was nothing more than collateral damage for the Obama-Hillary machine in their quest for power."

Coptic Filmmaker Blamed for Benghazi Attack Now Broke, Living in Homeless Shelter

And another victim comment suffering from OCDS (obsessive Clinton Derangement syndrome.)

No but there were 3 other U.S. Embassies that were raided, burned, trashed at the same time as Benghazi that was definitely a result of the VIDEO.

So the question is should he have to pay back the Taxpayers of this country because of his video? I think not because we do have freedom of speech in this country, and him being locked up for awhile, might just have also kept him ALIVE.

Only people that video would offend is a cult of Self Righteous terrorists, and no Muslims watch the video.

 

[Rustic]

Nakoula is a piece of shit who created a slanderous film deliberately intended to offend Muslims. He lied to the actors, and dubbed over their lines, putting their lives in danger without them being aware.

And when riots began happening all over the Middle East due to the video, an inconvenient FACT the Benghazi-heads have chosen to forget, Nakoula came out of hiding to broadcast another lie that the film was made by wealthy Israelis, thus putting the lives of even more innocent people in jeopardy.

The man is a fucking piece of shit, and anyone that tries to make him into some kind of fucking martyr is a goddam idiot.

You're goddam right this asshole deserves to be destitute. He deliberately tried to get innocent people killed.

What kind of Christian does something like that? Huh?

Shame on you rubes for idolizing this human garbage.


What's more, the FACT there were riots at our embassies in the Middle East due to that video means it was a reasonable assumption when the Benghazi consulate was attacked during that same period that it was also due to the video.

So you're saying that Islam terrorist have good reasons for killing people? Typical

 

[Rustic]

Leave it to the RWnuts to praise a man who incites Muslims to kill Americans.

Hahaha hahaha NY carb....still buys the video shit....Holy shit how can you be so fucking stupid....you need to donate your brain to science so we can see what stupidity looks like.

"On September 11, 2012, a series of protests and violent attacks began in response to a YouTube trailer for a film called Innocence of Muslims, considered blasphemous by many Muslims. The reactions began at the U.S. diplomatic mission in Cairo, Egypt, and quickly spread across the Muslim world to additional U.S. and other countries' diplomatic missions and other locations, with issues beyond the offense at the movie trailer becoming subjects of protest. In Cairo a group scaled the embassy wall and tore down the American flag to replace it with ablack Islamic flag.

On September 13, protests occurred at the U.S. embassy in Sana'a, Yemen, resulting in the deaths of four protesters and injuries to thirty-five protesters and guards. On September 14, the U.S. consulate in Chennai was attacked, resulting in injuries to twenty-five protesters.[14] Protesters in Tunis, Tunisia, climbed the U.S. embassy walls and set trees on fire. At least four people were killed and forty-six injured during protests in Tunis on September 15.[6] Further protests were held at U.S. diplomatic missions and other locations in the days following the initial attacks. Related protests and attacks resulted in numerous deaths and injuries across the Middle East, Africa, Pakistan and Afghanistan."

Reactions to Innocence of Muslims - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No one watched the video it had hardly any views, and only self-righteous cult of terrorists would be offended by it...

 

[Rustic]

Four years after the deadly Benghazi terrorist attack Hillary Clinton is running for president and Nakoula Basseley Nakoula is broke, destitute and living in a homeless shelter.


Nakoula is the film maker Hillary falsely claimed was responsible for the 'violent protest' in Benghazi on 9/11/12. ... Except there was no 'violent' protest:

People on the ground in Benghazi during the attack said there was NEVER a protest.

The State Department Lead in Tripoli said there was NEVER a protest.

The CIA said there was never a sign of any protest.

The FBI said there was never a protest.

Hillary told a Turkish Ambassador in an e-mail, "We KNOW this was a terrorist attack - the video played no part in it."

Hillary told her daughter in an e-mail that it had been a terrorist attack and the video played no part.


PUBLICLY, however, Freedom-Loving Barry and Hillary condemned Nakoula for exercising his 1st Amendment Rights, falsely blamed HIM for the TERRORIST attack, APOLOGIZED to the world for an American exercising his 1st Amendment Right, and vowed to arrest him for doing so. ... AND THEY DID.

In fact, the FILMMAKER who was falsely arrested spent more time in jail than did the 'mastermind behind the Benghazi attacks' that Barry captured over a year later.

Now he is broke and lives in a homeless shelter while the corrupt dain bramaged bit@h is running for President.

"Nakoula's life was nothing more than collateral damage for the Obama-Hillary machine in their quest for power."

Coptic Filmmaker Blamed for Benghazi Attack Now Broke, Living in Homeless Shelter

No but there were 3 other U.S. Embassies that were raided, burned, trashed at the same time as Benghazi that was definitely a result of the VIDEO.

So the question is should he have to pay back the Taxpayers of this country because of his video? I think not because we do have freedom of speech in this country, and him being locked up for awhile, might just have also kept him ALIVE.

Oh......so locking him up on trumped up charges and taking everything he has saved his life?

Cool.

Nevermind.

Like I said--he is responsible for getting 3 of our Embassies raided, we really don't know how many Muslims went running home grabbed a gun and started shooting at our soldiers over this video, but I am certain that probably happened also.

So just exactly how "innocent" is this guy? He probably WANTED to be put is a safe-secure place while it cooled down anyway.

So you think it's OK for Terrorists to kill innocent people doing their job? Typical

 

[Rustic]

Nakoula is a piece of shit who created a slanderous film deliberately intended to offend Muslims. He lied to the actors, and dubbed over their lines, putting their lives in danger without them being aware.

And when riots began happening all over the Middle East due to the video, an inconvenient FACT the Benghazi-heads have chosen to forget, Nakoula came out of hiding to broadcast another lie that the film was made by wealthy Israelis, thus putting the lives of even more innocent people in jeopardy.

The man is a fucking piece of shit, and anyone that tries to make him into some kind of fucking martyr is a goddam idiot.

The FACT there were riots at our embassies in the Middle East due to that video means it was a reasonable assumption when the Benghazi consulate was attacked during that same period that it was also due to the video.

Actually from what I saw, the video was poorly acted but pretty much accurate to what's going on in many countries in the Middle-East.

Accurate or not--you have to mindful of who we have over there (U.S. soldiers) and what the consequences of making such a video is going to do to their safety.

Except the video had nothing to do with the riots, No one watched the video least of all Muslims. And if they did and would be offended by it they're sorry sacks of shit. Furthermore if they were so offended by the video to drive them to kill innocent people they're evil sorry sacks of shit... Your appeasement knows no bounds.

 

[Rustic]

Nakoula is a piece of shit who created a slanderous film deliberately intended to offend Muslims. He lied to the actors, and dubbed over their lines, putting their lives in danger without them being aware.

And when riots began happening all over the Middle East due to the video, an inconvenient FACT the Benghazi-heads have chosen to forget, Nakoula came out of hiding to broadcast another lie that the film was made by wealthy Israelis, thus putting the lives of even more innocent people in jeopardy.

The man is a fucking piece of shit, and anyone that tries to make him into some kind of fucking martyr is a goddam idiot.

The FACT there were riots at our embassies in the Middle East due to that video means it was a reasonable assumption when the Benghazi consulate was attacked during that same period that it was also due to the video.

Actually from what I saw, the video was poorly acted but pretty much accurate to what's going on in many countries in the Middle-East.

The actors had no idea Nakoula changed their lines. He dubbed over their lines with inflammatory language, thus putting the actors' lives in danger, unbeknownst to them.

He also tried to get innocent Israelis killed.

The man is evil. Pure evil. Being dead broke is the LEAST of what he deserves for what he did.

And he dares to call himself a Christian.

He still doesn't realize the video had nothing to do with the riots…