TyroneSlothrop
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #61
You do not see those overzealous students killing people or assaulting people in that video....you do not see them appearing on media being praised for what they did in the video...........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's an example of the ridiculous hyperbole and demagoguery common to many on the right.
If anyone wonders why there are so many shootings going on our college campuses.....just watch this video.
The left created these idiots.....now they have to deal with them.
If anyone wonders why there are so many shootings going on our college campuses.....just watch this video.
The left created these idiots.....now they have to deal with them.
Monsters?
Have you always been such a drama queen
Aw, did someone threaten to take your teddy bear away?Refer to last night's debate if you really want to see the kind of monsters our colleges are producing.
The Right wing created these two murderous Monsters...
You are a mental case of canned Right wing shit..The Right wing created these two murderous Monsters...
only two? shall i bring up the many lefttards who massacred hundreds? i shall not, if you have one tiny shred of intelligence you know whom they are.
You are a mental case of canned Right wing shit..The Right wing created these two murderous Monsters...
only two? shall i bring up the many lefttards who massacred hundreds? i shall not, if you have one tiny shred of intelligence you know whom they are.
CNN reported:
A new intelligence assessment, circulated by the Department of Homeland Security this month and reviewed by CNN, focuses on the domestic terror threat from right-wing sovereign citizen extremists and comes as the Obama administration holds a White House conference to focus efforts to fight violent extremism.
Some federal and local law enforcement groups view the domestic terror threat from sovereign citizen groups as equal to — and in some cases greater than — the threat from foreign Islamic terror groups, such as ISIS, that garner more public attention.”
.
Wrong.The constitution does not cover interactions between citizensIt's a public university, they are in a public space, and he is a member of the press. He DOES HAVE A RIGHT to take their picutres.If anyone wonders why there are so many shootings going on our college campuses.....just watch this video.
The left created these idiots.....now they have to deal with them.
Not seeing a problem here. It's common fucking etiquette, you don't take people's picture without their permission. This guy was asked NOT to take the pictures of these students, and he kept insisting that he had a right to.
Of course, the constitution doesn't matter to you anyway, so pointing that out to you is pointless.
Actually considering the professor was part of this, and she is an agent of a public university, her actions are covered by the 1st amendment.
and my response was to Joe, who said the reporter had no right to take the pictures, which is wrong. He has every right to take pictures in a public space of a public university, of people protesting in public.
You are just changing the subject ....those attacks on 9 11 were not made by leftist student...the left does not and did not condone the 9 11 attacks...you are just conflating Leftist with Terrorist...you know what that makes youBut of course, the last two major terror attacks on the US were done by Muslims so naturally the left wing makes enemies of "right wing" fringe groups. Yeppers, deflection pure and simple.
The constitution does not cover interactions between citizensIt's a public university, they are in a public space, and he is a member of the press. He DOES HAVE A RIGHT to take their picutres.If anyone wonders why there are so many shootings going on our college campuses.....just watch this video.
The left created these idiots.....now they have to deal with them.
Not seeing a problem here. It's common fucking etiquette, you don't take people's picture without their permission. This guy was asked NOT to take the pictures of these students, and he kept insisting that he had a right to.
Of course, the constitution doesn't matter to you anyway, so pointing that out to you is pointless.
Actually considering the professor was part of this, and she is an agent of a public university, her actions are covered by the 1st amendment.
and my response was to Joe, who said the reporter had no right to take the pictures, which is wrong. He has every right to take pictures in a public space of a public university, of people protesting in public.
No they do not. First amendment covers what action the government can take against citizens
A reporter can be told you do not want your picture taken. If he does it anyway, he can be screamed at
Sounds like someone trying to save their job....maybe she doesn't have tenure?
.
What does this prove? Either side can point to two people and claim they are murderous examples of the left or right.The Right wing created these two murderous Monsters...they are yours
DHS intelligence report warns of domestic right-wing terror ..
If anyone wonders why there are so many shootings going on our college campuses.....just watch this video.
The left created these idiots.....now they have to deal with them.
Wrong.The constitution does not cover interactions between citizensIt's a public university, they are in a public space, and he is a member of the press. He DOES HAVE A RIGHT to take their picutres.If anyone wonders why there are so many shootings going on our college campuses.....just watch this video.
The left created these idiots.....now they have to deal with them.
Not seeing a problem here. It's common fucking etiquette, you don't take people's picture without their permission. This guy was asked NOT to take the pictures of these students, and he kept insisting that he had a right to.
Of course, the constitution doesn't matter to you anyway, so pointing that out to you is pointless.
Actually considering the professor was part of this, and she is an agent of a public university, her actions are covered by the 1st amendment.
and my response was to Joe, who said the reporter had no right to take the pictures, which is wrong. He has every right to take pictures in a public space of a public university, of people protesting in public.
Her actions were in no way official university policy with regard to media access, there are no First Amendment 'issues' in play.
Your position is partisan and subjective, predicated solely on your unwarranted hostility toward 'liberals,' and the professor and students whom you incorrectly perceive to be 'liberal,' as well as your unjustified contempt for the students, their protest, and the reasons for their protest.
"resigns"...right...Sounds like someone trying to save their job....maybe she doesn't have tenure?
.
She was trying to save her job by resigning from her job
University of Missouri Professor Melissa Click Resigns
"This Is The Kind Of Monsters That Our Colleges Are Producing"
This fails as a composition fallacy.
It's an example of the ridiculous hyperbole and demagoguery common to many on the right.