This is why I love our first lady

[Pumpkin Row]

Prove it, Loo~

Prove it? Her kids exist... no like some imaginary bulge in her clothes. Jesus kid, have you had biology yet in school? Or is it true you are really some 40 year old man that gets off acting like a 14 year old girl on the internet?

They could be adopted. Show me that Michael is their mother~

No, you don't get how this works. You are saying she isn't a woman, YOU need to prove her kids aren't her's.

It's not up to me to prove a negative, it's up to you to prove a positive. Besides, I showed you a weird bulge in several shots, and her masculine chest. That's AT LEAST evidence that he MAY not be a female. If it's such an obvious thing, you should be able to at least show me they are somehow related.

You have to support your claim - that's a positive. You claim she's a man. You need to prove it and vague possibly photoshopped pictures aren't proof. Proving a negative is insisting that others prove she is NOT a man.

Michelle Obama likes to work out. That's well known. Here are some other women who like to work out. They have muscular shoulders too.

Proving she is a woman is also proving a positive.

I'm also referring to chest more than shoulders. Hence specifically saying chest.

 

[JQPublic1]

Yeah, because calling the First Lady a man is the height of intellectual discourse.

You have no leg to stand on, clown shoes. It's time to give up.

At what age do women develop giant bulges between their legs, then? Oh, and I suppose it's totally normal to have the same chest as your husband, as well. Or maybe he's more muscular than Barry.

I'm sure you're really excited about being able to post all your troll pictures, but you're just proving my point.

Thanks for doubling down, clown shoes. Maybe next year you'll be able to sit at the adult table.

Then explain the bulge and her figure. Go for it. Put your money where your mouth is... if you even have any~

You won't, of course, you'll keep resorting to calling me 'clown shoes' as if calling names is somehow profound and enforces how 'mature' you can be whilst 'calling out trolls' while actually being one yourself. This is your chance to prove me wrong, it may never present itself again~

Come on, Doc, show us that you're not just a 6 year old with a hammer.

How about the fact she gave birth... and I'm sorry that's a FACT not some theory about a "bulge" in her clothes saying she is a dude.

Prove it, Loo~

All one has to do is find the original photos which don't show the bulges. Photo shopping photos is easy.

 

[Lewdog]

Prove it? Her kids exist... no like some imaginary bulge in her clothes. Jesus kid, have you had biology yet in school? Or is it true you are really some 40 year old man that gets off acting like a 14 year old girl on the internet?

They could be adopted. Show me that Michael is their mother~

No, you don't get how this works. You are saying she isn't a woman, YOU need to prove her kids aren't her's.

It's not up to me to prove a negative, it's up to you to prove a positive. Besides, I showed you a weird bulge in several shots, and her masculine chest. That's AT LEAST evidence that he MAY not be a female. If it's such an obvious thing, you should be able to at least show me they are somehow related.

No... you don't understand how this works. She says she is a woman. Her husband says she is a woman. All the people of the world with more than a 50 IQ say she is a woman. She has had kids... her birth certificate says she is a woman. You provide a couple pictures and state she is a man. It is NOT up to others to prove you are wrong, you need to provide PROOF she isn't a woman.

Someone stated you are a 40 year old man acting like a 14 year old girl on here. Prove they are wrong. See how that works?

I already showed you bulges. If you're going to say that's what his birth certificate says, you should be prepared to show it to me.

If you really think I'm that mature, I'll just take that as a compliment~
I have been told that I'm more mature than most people my age.

No, a bulge under clothes could be ANYTHING. do you have pictures of her penis if she is a man?

No, it isn't saying you sound mature... it is saying that you are some weirdo old dud that wants to act like a young girl on a forum.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

At what age do women develop giant bulges between their legs, then? Oh, and I suppose it's totally normal to have the same chest as your husband, as well. Or maybe he's more muscular than Barry.

I'm sure you're really excited about being able to post all your troll pictures, but you're just proving my point.

Thanks for doubling down, clown shoes. Maybe next year you'll be able to sit at the adult table.

Then explain the bulge and her figure. Go for it. Put your money where your mouth is... if you even have any~

You won't, of course, you'll keep resorting to calling me 'clown shoes' as if calling names is somehow profound and enforces how 'mature' you can be whilst 'calling out trolls' while actually being one yourself. This is your chance to prove me wrong, it may never present itself again~

Come on, Doc, show us that you're not just a 6 year old with a hammer.

How about the fact she gave birth... and I'm sorry that's a FACT not some theory about a "bulge" in her clothes saying she is a dude.

Prove it, Loo~

All one has to do is find the original photos which don't show the bulges. Photo shopping photos is easy.

Then do it.

 

[Coyote]

You are a frigging NUT, Your imagination has turned to abject lunacy! Bye

In other words "I have no evidence, Lady Row, and I cannot dispute anything you have said!".

We don't need to supply "evidence" to dispute your moronic trolling, clown shoes. The evidence is right there in every one of your posts

If you want people to take you seriously, you have to earn it.

"I don't have to back up my claims with evidence"

Every Democrat ever. Thanks, I needed an example. Funny that you're calling what I'm doing trolling when every post you make can be summed up that way. Everyone can see through your projection easily.

Yeah, because calling the First Lady a man is the height of intellectual discourse.

You have no leg to stand on, clown shoes. It's time to give up.

At what age do women develop giant bulges between their legs, then? Oh, and I suppose it's totally normal to have the same chest as your husband, as well. Or maybe he's more muscular than Barry.

Ain't photoshopping great? So much hate. Wonder how she managed to have two daughters that look a lot like her and Barak then?

Ellen should feel bad for photo shopping her live video.

There's nothing to see there

Seems kind of perverted for someone to focus on her crotch.

 

[Lewdog]

Prove it? Her kids exist... no like some imaginary bulge in her clothes. Jesus kid, have you had biology yet in school? Or is it true you are really some 40 year old man that gets off acting like a 14 year old girl on the internet?

They could be adopted. Show me that Michael is their mother~

No, you don't get how this works. You are saying she isn't a woman, YOU need to prove her kids aren't her's.

It's not up to me to prove a negative, it's up to you to prove a positive. Besides, I showed you a weird bulge in several shots, and her masculine chest. That's AT LEAST evidence that he MAY not be a female. If it's such an obvious thing, you should be able to at least show me they are somehow related.

You have to support your claim - that's a positive. You claim she's a man. You need to prove it and vague possibly photoshopped pictures aren't proof. Proving a negative is insisting that others prove she is NOT a man.

Michelle Obama likes to work out. That's well known. Here are some other women who like to work out. They have muscular shoulders too.

Proving she is a woman is also proving a positive.

I'm also referring to chest more than shoulders. Hence specifically saying chest.

No, people don't have to prove common sense things. If you want to prove something that is not readily believed, you must provide proof.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

They could be adopted. Show me that Michael is their mother~

No, you don't get how this works. You are saying she isn't a woman, YOU need to prove her kids aren't her's.

It's not up to me to prove a negative, it's up to you to prove a positive. Besides, I showed you a weird bulge in several shots, and her masculine chest. That's AT LEAST evidence that he MAY not be a female. If it's such an obvious thing, you should be able to at least show me they are somehow related.

No... you don't understand how this works. She says she is a woman. Her husband says she is a woman. All the people of the world with more than a 50 IQ say she is a woman. She has had kids... her birth certificate says she is a woman. You provide a couple pictures and state she is a man. It is NOT up to others to prove you are wrong, you need to provide PROOF she isn't a woman.

Someone stated you are a 40 year old man acting like a 14 year old girl on here. Prove they are wrong. See how that works?

I already showed you bulges. If you're going to say that's what his birth certificate says, you should be prepared to show it to me.

If you really think I'm that mature, I'll just take that as a compliment~
I have been told that I'm more mature than most people my age.

No, a bulge under clothes could be ANYTHING. do you have pictures of her penis if she is a man?

No, it isn't saying you sound mature... it is saying that you are some weirdo old dud that wants to act like a young girl on a forum.

I don't think most people stick pictures of their dong on the internet, especially if they're masquerading as a woman.

If you have reason to believe I'm 40 years old, then it must be my maturity, as there's literally nothing else to go by. Therefor, thank you, I do try to be mature<3

 

[Pumpkin Row]

In other words "I have no evidence, Lady Row, and I cannot dispute anything you have said!".
"I don't have to back up my claims with evidence"

Every Democrat ever. Thanks, I needed an example. Funny that you're calling what I'm doing trolling when every post you make can be summed up that way. Everyone can see through your projection easily.

Yeah, because calling the First Lady a man is the height of intellectual discourse.

You have no leg to stand on, clown shoes. It's time to give up.

At what age do women develop giant bulges between their legs, then? Oh, and I suppose it's totally normal to have the same chest as your husband, as well. Or maybe he's more muscular than Barry.

Ain't photoshopping great? So much hate. Wonder how she managed to have two daughters that look a lot like her and Barak then?

Ellen should feel bad for photo shopping her live video.

There's nothing to see there

Seems kind of perverted for someone to focus on her crotch.

There's a bulge there, but you're right, I don't actually see why anyone would focus on his crotch.

 

[Papageorgio]

How about the fact she gave birth... and I'm sorry that's a FACT not some theory about a "bulge" in her clothes saying she is a dude.

Prove it, Loo~

Prove it? Her kids exist... no like some imaginary bulge in her clothes. Jesus kid, have you had biology yet in school? Or is it true you are really some 40 year old man that gets off acting like a 14 year old girl on the internet?

They could be adopted. Show me that Michael is their mother~

No, you don't get how this works. You are saying she isn't a woman, YOU need to prove her kids aren't her's.

It's not up to me to prove a negative, it's up to you to prove a positive. Besides, I showed you a weird bulge in several shots, and her masculine chest. That's AT LEAST evidence that he MAY not be a female. If it's such an obvious thing, you should be able to at least show me they are somehow related.

You are going off the deep end. She had her kids, unless you can prove definitively that she is a man, not some photoshopped crap you pull off of right nut sites, she is a women. She handled being the Presidents wife with grace and dignity. She took care of her children and loved them. If any of what you say is true, then someone would have spilled the beans by now.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

They could be adopted. Show me that Michael is their mother~

No, you don't get how this works. You are saying she isn't a woman, YOU need to prove her kids aren't her's.

It's not up to me to prove a negative, it's up to you to prove a positive. Besides, I showed you a weird bulge in several shots, and her masculine chest. That's AT LEAST evidence that he MAY not be a female. If it's such an obvious thing, you should be able to at least show me they are somehow related.

You have to support your claim - that's a positive. You claim she's a man. You need to prove it and vague possibly photoshopped pictures aren't proof. Proving a negative is insisting that others prove she is NOT a man.

Michelle Obama likes to work out. That's well known. Here are some other women who like to work out. They have muscular shoulders too.

Proving she is a woman is also proving a positive.

I'm also referring to chest more than shoulders. Hence specifically saying chest.

No, people don't have to prove common sense things. If you want to prove something that is not readily believed, you must provide proof.

Common sense is a fallacy in and of itself. What's thought to be common sense can easily be false. For example, people thinking the world was flat. Most people at the time thought that, despite it being false, and probably considered it common sense.

On the other hand, common sense proven true, would be something like Socialism being known not to work, and a few nutjobs thinking that system actually works~

 

[Lewdog]

No, you don't get how this works. You are saying she isn't a woman, YOU need to prove her kids aren't her's.

It's not up to me to prove a negative, it's up to you to prove a positive. Besides, I showed you a weird bulge in several shots, and her masculine chest. That's AT LEAST evidence that he MAY not be a female. If it's such an obvious thing, you should be able to at least show me they are somehow related.

No... you don't understand how this works. She says she is a woman. Her husband says she is a woman. All the people of the world with more than a 50 IQ say she is a woman. She has had kids... her birth certificate says she is a woman. You provide a couple pictures and state she is a man. It is NOT up to others to prove you are wrong, you need to provide PROOF she isn't a woman.

Someone stated you are a 40 year old man acting like a 14 year old girl on here. Prove they are wrong. See how that works?

I already showed you bulges. If you're going to say that's what his birth certificate says, you should be prepared to show it to me.

If you really think I'm that mature, I'll just take that as a compliment~
I have been told that I'm more mature than most people my age.

No, a bulge under clothes could be ANYTHING. do you have pictures of her penis if she is a man?

No, it isn't saying you sound mature... it is saying that you are some weirdo old dud that wants to act like a young girl on a forum.

I don't think most people stick pictures of their dong on the internet, especially if they're masquerading as a woman.

If you have reason to believe I'm 40 years old, then it must be my maturity, as there's literally nothing else to go by. Therefor, thank you, I do try to be mature<3

Sorry, but you need to provide proof.

Kid (or whatever you are), you're hopeless.

 

[JQPublic1]

I don't respect because she's the presidents wife, but because I genuinely like her. And I certainly don't think she's a man. She's earned my respect and admiration.

For what exactly? He hasn't accomplished ANYTHING, not one thing.

she is a great role model. Married to the same man , never had a child out of wedlock, accomplished lawyer, friendly and outgoing, advocate for health, good looking, good mother, upholds Christian values, high morals, bane of racist bigots like YOU by taking the high road. That is why people love her.

Of course he's married to the same man and has had no children, he never got the operation, and gay people make up roughly 4%(?) of the population.

"You don't like someone who happens to be black, therefor you're racist by default". You don't seem to understand that people of color aren't above criticism, and when said criticism is given that doesn't mean it's because of their skin color. In fact, I don't even think about their skin color, I think only of their deeds and misdeeds. I think the person throwing the word racist around due to ONLY seeing skin color is the one who's racist. Maybe you should ignore skin color as well? Never too late to stop being a step behind.

what is it about Michelle you hate? Let's take a look at your laundry list of hate and get to the bottom of your psychosis.

She hates America and White folks for a starter.

Who told you that?

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Prove it, Loo~

Prove it? Her kids exist... no like some imaginary bulge in her clothes. Jesus kid, have you had biology yet in school? Or is it true you are really some 40 year old man that gets off acting like a 14 year old girl on the internet?

They could be adopted. Show me that Michael is their mother~

No, you don't get how this works. You are saying she isn't a woman, YOU need to prove her kids aren't her's.

It's not up to me to prove a negative, it's up to you to prove a positive. Besides, I showed you a weird bulge in several shots, and her masculine chest. That's AT LEAST evidence that he MAY not be a female. If it's such an obvious thing, you should be able to at least show me they are somehow related.

You are going off the deep end. She had her kids, unless you can prove definitively that she is a man, not some photoshopped crap you pull off of right nut sites, she is a women. She handled being the Presidents wife with grace and dignity. She took care of her children and loved them. If any of what you say is true, then someone would have spilled the beans by now.

What makes you think I ever wasn't off the deep end? Maybe I was born there?

More seriously, though, those images weren't photoshopped, they're both stills from videos.

 

[Lewdog]

No, you don't get how this works. You are saying she isn't a woman, YOU need to prove her kids aren't her's.

It's not up to me to prove a negative, it's up to you to prove a positive. Besides, I showed you a weird bulge in several shots, and her masculine chest. That's AT LEAST evidence that he MAY not be a female. If it's such an obvious thing, you should be able to at least show me they are somehow related.

You have to support your claim - that's a positive. You claim she's a man. You need to prove it and vague possibly photoshopped pictures aren't proof. Proving a negative is insisting that others prove she is NOT a man.

Michelle Obama likes to work out. That's well known. Here are some other women who like to work out. They have muscular shoulders too.

Proving she is a woman is also proving a positive.

I'm also referring to chest more than shoulders. Hence specifically saying chest.

No, people don't have to prove common sense things. If you want to prove something that is not readily believed, you must provide proof.

Common sense is a fallacy in and of itself. What's thought to be common sense can easily be false. For example, people thinking the world was flat. Most people at the time thought that, despite it being false, and probably considered it common sense.

On the other hand, common sense proven true, would be something like Socialism being known not to work, and a few nutjobs thinking that system actually works~

No, common sense is if someone has two kids, they are a woman, because men can't have kids. It's common sense and a biological fact. You must prove all that is fake and she is indeed a man, and some bulges in clothes in pictures is not proof. You've jumped the shark.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

It's not up to me to prove a negative, it's up to you to prove a positive. Besides, I showed you a weird bulge in several shots, and her masculine chest. That's AT LEAST evidence that he MAY not be a female. If it's such an obvious thing, you should be able to at least show me they are somehow related.

You have to support your claim - that's a positive. You claim she's a man. You need to prove it and vague possibly photoshopped pictures aren't proof. Proving a negative is insisting that others prove she is NOT a man.

Michelle Obama likes to work out. That's well known. Here are some other women who like to work out. They have muscular shoulders too.

Proving she is a woman is also proving a positive.

I'm also referring to chest more than shoulders. Hence specifically saying chest.

No, people don't have to prove common sense things. If you want to prove something that is not readily believed, you must provide proof.

Common sense is a fallacy in and of itself. What's thought to be common sense can easily be false. For example, people thinking the world was flat. Most people at the time thought that, despite it being false, and probably considered it common sense.

On the other hand, common sense proven true, would be something like Socialism being known not to work, and a few nutjobs thinking that system actually works~

No, common sense is if someone has two kids, they are a woman, because men can't have kids. It's common sense and a biological fact. You must prove all that is fake and she is indeed a man, and some bulges in clothes in pictures is not proof. You've jumped the shark.

On the other hand, what makes you think it's true? You've seen absolutely no evidence, you just know people told you that. Do you just instantly believe what you're told with no evidence? Would you have believed the earth is flat because 'a majority' told you so?

 

[Lewdog]

You have to support your claim - that's a positive. You claim she's a man. You need to prove it and vague possibly photoshopped pictures aren't proof. Proving a negative is insisting that others prove she is NOT a man.

Michelle Obama likes to work out. That's well known. Here are some other women who like to work out. They have muscular shoulders too.

Proving she is a woman is also proving a positive.

I'm also referring to chest more than shoulders. Hence specifically saying chest.

No, people don't have to prove common sense things. If you want to prove something that is not readily believed, you must provide proof.

Common sense is a fallacy in and of itself. What's thought to be common sense can easily be false. For example, people thinking the world was flat. Most people at the time thought that, despite it being false, and probably considered it common sense.

On the other hand, common sense proven true, would be something like Socialism being known not to work, and a few nutjobs thinking that system actually works~

No, common sense is if someone has two kids, they are a woman, because men can't have kids. It's common sense and a biological fact. You must prove all that is fake and she is indeed a man, and some bulges in clothes in pictures is not proof. You've jumped the shark.

On the other hand, what makes you think it's true? You've seen absolutely no evidence, you just know people told you that. Do you just instantly believe what you're told with no evidence? Would you have believed the earth is flat because 'a majority' told you so?

You realize that is a logical fallacy right? Or not. Comparing flat Earth theory before people had the ability to see that the Earth isn't flat, with proving the First Lady is a woman that had kids... you are ridiculous. Go spend the rest of Christmas with your father... maybe he'll rub some good sense off onto you. You need it.

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Proving she is a woman is also proving a positive.

I'm also referring to chest more than shoulders. Hence specifically saying chest.

No, people don't have to prove common sense things. If you want to prove something that is not readily believed, you must provide proof.

Common sense is a fallacy in and of itself. What's thought to be common sense can easily be false. For example, people thinking the world was flat. Most people at the time thought that, despite it being false, and probably considered it common sense.

On the other hand, common sense proven true, would be something like Socialism being known not to work, and a few nutjobs thinking that system actually works~

No, common sense is if someone has two kids, they are a woman, because men can't have kids. It's common sense and a biological fact. You must prove all that is fake and she is indeed a man, and some bulges in clothes in pictures is not proof. You've jumped the shark.

On the other hand, what makes you think it's true? You've seen absolutely no evidence, you just know people told you that. Do you just instantly believe what you're told with no evidence? Would you have believed the earth is flat because 'a majority' told you so?

You realize that is a logical fallacy right? Or not. Comparing flat Earth theory before people had the ability to see that the Earth isn't flat, with proving the First Lady is a woman that had kids... you are ridiculous. Go spend the rest of Christmas with your father... maybe he'll rub some good sense off onto you. You need it.

I don't see how. Neither can be confirmed as there's no evidence to support it(Or WAS no evidence to support it). Can you show me his birth certificate? Hmm?

 

[Lewdog]

No, people don't have to prove common sense things. If you want to prove something that is not readily believed, you must provide proof.

Common sense is a fallacy in and of itself. What's thought to be common sense can easily be false. For example, people thinking the world was flat. Most people at the time thought that, despite it being false, and probably considered it common sense.

On the other hand, common sense proven true, would be something like Socialism being known not to work, and a few nutjobs thinking that system actually works~

No, common sense is if someone has two kids, they are a woman, because men can't have kids. It's common sense and a biological fact. You must prove all that is fake and she is indeed a man, and some bulges in clothes in pictures is not proof. You've jumped the shark.

On the other hand, what makes you think it's true? You've seen absolutely no evidence, you just know people told you that. Do you just instantly believe what you're told with no evidence? Would you have believed the earth is flat because 'a majority' told you so?

You realize that is a logical fallacy right? Or not. Comparing flat Earth theory before people had the ability to see that the Earth isn't flat, with proving the First Lady is a woman that had kids... you are ridiculous. Go spend the rest of Christmas with your father... maybe he'll rub some good sense off onto you. You need it.

I don't see how. Neither can be confirmed as there's no evidence to support it(Or WAS no evidence to support it). Can you show me his birth certificate? Hmm?

How many people put copies of their birth certificates on the internet? Ok, I'm done with you. You can go on with your ignorance. Whehter you are 14 or 40, you are a petulant, disrespectful child.

 

[rightwinger]

They could be adopted. Show me that Michael is their mother~

No, you don't get how this works. You are saying she isn't a woman, YOU need to prove her kids aren't her's.

It's not up to me to prove a negative, it's up to you to prove a positive. Besides, I showed you a weird bulge in several shots, and her masculine chest. That's AT LEAST evidence that he MAY not be a female. If it's such an obvious thing, you should be able to at least show me they are somehow related.

No... you don't understand how this works. She says she is a woman. Her husband says she is a woman. All the people of the world with more than a 50 IQ say she is a woman. She has had kids... her birth certificate says she is a woman. You provide a couple pictures and state she is a man. It is NOT up to others to prove you are wrong, you need to provide PROOF she isn't a woman.

Someone stated you are a 40 year old man acting like a 14 year old girl on here. Prove they are wrong. See how that works?

I already showed you bulges. If you're going to say that's what his birth certificate says, you should be prepared to show it to me.

If you really think I'm that mature, I'll just take that as a compliment~
I have been told that I'm more mature than most people my age.

No, a bulge under clothes could be ANYTHING. do you have pictures of her penis if she is a man?

No, it isn't saying you sound mature... it is saying that you are some weirdo old dud that wants to act like a young girl on a forum.

If she has a bulge...it would be evident in EVERY picture

Not just the ones conservatives photoshop

 

[Pumpkin Row]

Common sense is a fallacy in and of itself. What's thought to be common sense can easily be false. For example, people thinking the world was flat. Most people at the time thought that, despite it being false, and probably considered it common sense.

On the other hand, common sense proven true, would be something like Socialism being known not to work, and a few nutjobs thinking that system actually works~

No, common sense is if someone has two kids, they are a woman, because men can't have kids. It's common sense and a biological fact. You must prove all that is fake and she is indeed a man, and some bulges in clothes in pictures is not proof. You've jumped the shark.

On the other hand, what makes you think it's true? You've seen absolutely no evidence, you just know people told you that. Do you just instantly believe what you're told with no evidence? Would you have believed the earth is flat because 'a majority' told you so?

You realize that is a logical fallacy right? Or not. Comparing flat Earth theory before people had the ability to see that the Earth isn't flat, with proving the First Lady is a woman that had kids... you are ridiculous. Go spend the rest of Christmas with your father... maybe he'll rub some good sense off onto you. You need it.

I don't see how. Neither can be confirmed as there's no evidence to support it(Or WAS no evidence to support it). Can you show me his birth certificate? Hmm?

How many people put copies of their birth certificates on the internet? Ok, I'm done with you. You can go on with your ignorance. Whehter you are 14 or 40, you are a petulant, disrespectful child.

I don't know, I've never bothered to check. Do you~?

Have a Merry Christmas~<3