This is Why Trump Will Get Slaughtered in November

Trump and his supporters are hemorrhaging Hispanics like they did blacks 40 years ago. They can't lose 80% of Hispanics and win a national election. They are too big a constituency and in swing states like Nevada that will also cost them House and Senate seats.

In a head-to-head general election match-up with Donald Trump, Nevada Latino voters would choose Hillary Clinton by a 76-13 margin. Bernie Sanders, who lost in the February caucus to Clinton, actually fared even better in 82-9 over trump.

The poll found Trump was the top reason Latinos will vote in the 2016 election.

"Trump has increased the enthusiasm for turning out to vote to stop his potential presidency," said Dr. David Damore, Sr. Analyst, Latino Decisions.

Hispanic voters heavily favor Democratic candidates, so if the presidential race ends up being close, the left lean by Latinos could be the difference maker.

"If you're seeing 75-80 percent of the vote going towards the Democrats, it makes it very, very difficult for the Republicans to get anywhere in the margins they're going to need," Damore said

Pollsters set out to survey Latino voters
It's funny that for some odd reason, you don't hear the media talking about how trump has the 2nd highest unfavorability rating for any presidential candidate in the past 40 years. 67% of the people view trump unfavorably, trump is second to only David duke (former KKK leader) whose unfavorability rating was only 2 PTs higher at 69%.

But I garuntee you'll hear the media talk about that as soon as the republican convention is over if he secures the nomination. If trump is the nominee, Clinton is the next president.
 
The Republican-led Congress most certainly does and they found nothing incriminating on Hillary.

Because they are so politically biased and because they found nothing incriminating, they opened a second investigation. Still nothing.

For that same reason, they launched a third investigation. Then a fourth and a fifth and a sixth and a seventh and an eighth investigation.

The first seven concluded and found nothing incriminating. Some of them even included testimony from the very heroes of Benghazi of whom you speak.

The eighth investigation is still ongoing and given how the lead Republican in that investigation has already confessed he started it up for political reasons, you can be certain they will release their findings before the election should Hillary be nominated.

You are in love with Hillary; therefore, your vision is skewed.
I'll take the word of the brave men who were actually in Benghazi .
I'll bet you believe the attack was the result of a video.
You putz. I'm not taking Hillary's word for it.

I'm taking the word of seven Republican-led investigations comprised of those who wanted to nail her in a coffin the most -- and even they could find nothing incriminating.

Oftentimes, a code of silence is issued.
BOMBSHELL: New email shows Pentagon tried to send ...


pssssst ... your "new" email is from 2015 ... not so new, and you're not so smart.

Oh, so you were in Benghazi when the attack happened?

nope and neither were you, so STFU.

I read the date on your article ... try it sometime ya big dummy.
 
Trump and his supporters are hemorrhaging Hispanics like they did blacks 40 years ago. They can't lose 80% of Hispanics and win a national election. They are too big a constituency and in swing states like Nevada that will also cost them House and Senate seats.

In a head-to-head general election match-up with Donald Trump, Nevada Latino voters would choose Hillary Clinton by a 76-13 margin. Bernie Sanders, who lost in the February caucus to Clinton, actually fared even better in 82-9 over trump.

The poll found Trump was the top reason Latinos will vote in the 2016 election.

"Trump has increased the enthusiasm for turning out to vote to stop his potential presidency," said Dr. David Damore, Sr. Analyst, Latino Decisions.

Hispanic voters heavily favor Democratic candidates, so if the presidential race ends up being close, the left lean by Latinos could be the difference maker.

"If you're seeing 75-80 percent of the vote going towards the Democrats, it makes it very, very difficult for the Republicans to get anywhere in the margins they're going to need," Damore said

Pollsters set out to survey Latino voters
Let's see now...ever since Trump declared, the MSM has been wrong about him. They said over and over he would fizzle out or quit, but he hasn't.

If it comes down to Trump v Cankles, Trump should win big. There is no worst candidate for POTUS than Mrs. BJ...but in the Age of Ignorance (aka Liberalism), a disgusting lying corrupt opportunist can win the WH...See Obama.
Trump looses UTAH (traditional red state) to Clinton. He has an unfavorability rating of 67%!!! Outside of his staunch supporters everyone else DOES NOT LIKE HIM, and views him as the joke he is. Trump supporters are worse than Obama supporters. What sort of brazen, outspoken, arrogant things he can say are going to make up for that 10% deficit he has against Clinton (who is a terrible candidate herself)??? By the way, the stupid arrogant things he says are why there is 67% of Americans who do not like him at all.
 
Hey Trump, You Goofy Poltroon, If Being a woman is such an advantage in a presidential race how come we've never had a female major party nominee for president ever.
 
If you listened to Bobby Knight today, you will get why Trump will kick hillarys ass in November. It will be Trump against the Washington establishment. Slam dunk.
 
If you listened to Bobby Knight today, you will get why Trump will kick hillarys ass in November. It will be Trump against the Washington establishment. Slam dunk.

Trump and his outlaws are the minority in Washington, not the majority.

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
 
And here is a reason he could win.

In a recent poll only 39% of women care who gets elected.

Now remember, women don't like Hillary or Trump, so they may not vote for Trump, but they aren't likely to go out of their way to vote for Hillary either.

Hillary has to have the woman vote to win.

In a recent poll, Hillary is leading Trump by 10% amongst married women, a group Romney won.

That spells disaster for the GOP.

so?

So married women usually vote Republican.

If the GOP lose married women badly, they are going to get crushed.

Not all Married Women vote Republican. Republican Married Women vote Republican.

Typically the married women married to men vote republican.

Incorrect.

Married Republican Women Vote Republican.

Married Democrat Women Vote Democrat.

There is empirical data to suggest otherwise.
 
If you listened to Bobby Knight today, you will get why Trump will kick hillarys ass in November. It will be Trump against the Washington establishment. Slam dunk.
bob-knight-o.gif
Bobby Knight
Charles_Manson_expressions.gif
 
The Republican-led Congress most certainly does and they found nothing incriminating on Hillary.

Because they are so politically biased and because they found nothing incriminating, they opened a second investigation. Still nothing.

For that same reason, they launched a third investigation. Then a fourth and a fifth and a sixth and a seventh and an eighth investigation.

The first seven concluded and found nothing incriminating. Some of them even included testimony from the very heroes of Benghazi of whom you speak.

The eighth investigation is still ongoing and given how the lead Republican in that investigation has already confessed he started it up for political reasons, you can be certain they will release their findings before the election should Hillary be nominated.

You are in love with Hillary; therefore, your vision is skewed.
I'll take the word of the brave men who were actually in Benghazi .
I'll bet you believe the attack was the result of a video.
You putz. I'm not taking Hillary's word for it.

I'm taking the word of seven Republican-led investigations comprised of those who wanted to nail her in a coffin the most -- and even they could find nothing incriminating.

Oftentimes, a code of silence is issued.
BOMBSHELL: New email shows Pentagon tried to send ...


pssssst ... your "new" email is from 2015 ... not so new, and you're not so smart.

Oh, so you were in Benghazi when the attack happened?

Were you?
 
But only conservatives believe their ridiculous lies and fallacies.

A majority of the voters have rejected the right’s lies, finding them baseless and without merit.

The ‘Benghazi’ debacle alone convinced a majority of Americans as to the propensity of most republicans to lie, and to doubt the veracity of what most conservatives say.

The heroes of Benghazi have no political affiliation.
The Republican-led Congress most certainly does and they found nothing incriminating on Hillary.

Because they are so politically biased and because they found nothing incriminating, they opened a second investigation. Still nothing.

For that same reason, they launched a third investigation. Then a fourth and a fifth and a sixth and a seventh and an eighth investigation.

The first seven concluded and found nothing incriminating. Some of them even included testimony from the very heroes of Benghazi of whom you speak.

The eighth investigation is still ongoing and given how the lead Republican in that investigation has already confessed he started it up for political reasons, you can be certain they will release their findings before the election should Hillary be nominated.

You are in love with Hillary; therefore, your vision is skewed.
I'll take the word of the brave men who were actually in Benghazi .
I'll bet you believe the attack was the result of a video.
You putz. I'm not taking Hillary's word for it.

I'm taking the word of seven Republican-led investigations comprised of those who wanted to nail her in a coffin the most -- and even they could find nothing incriminating.

Oftentimes, a code of silence is issued.
BOMBSHELL: New email shows Pentagon tried to send ...

Hardly a reliable site.
 
If you listened to Bobby Knight today, you will get why Trump will kick hillarys ass in November. It will be Trump against the Washington establishment. Slam dunk.
How many polls does trump beat Hilary in??? And before you say "polls don't really matter", Trump likes to spout out that he beats Hilary in the polls. So there's been about 50 different polls done, so in how many of those does trump beat Hilary?

I think Americans care about Bobby knights opinion, just as much as they do ja rule's opinion...which isn't very much
 
If you listened to Bobby Knight today, you will get why Trump will kick hillarys ass in November. It will be Trump against the Washington establishment. Slam dunk.
How many polls does trump beat Hilary in??? And before you say "polls don't really matter", Trump likes to spout out that he beats Hilary in the polls. So there's been about 50 different polls done, so in how many of those does trump beat Hilary?
Hillary hasn't taken her beating yet. Too early to poll that matchup.
 
If you listened to Bobby Knight today, you will get why Trump will kick hillarys ass in November. It will be Trump against the Washington establishment. Slam dunk.
How many polls does trump beat Hilary in??? And before you say "polls don't really matter", Trump likes to spout out that he beats Hilary in the polls. So there's been about 50 different polls done, so in how many of those does trump beat Hilary?
Hillary hasn't taken her beating yet. Too early to poll that matchup.
Well trump himself saying that he beats her right now....so how many polls does trump beat Hilary in??? What polls is he referring too? Out of the 50 or so, how many of those polls does he win?? It is one of his selling points
 
Hardly a reliable site.
Right-Wing Media Echo Conservative Group's Lie That New Email Contradicts Administration's Benghazi Testimony

Right-wing media are repeating the false claim that a Defense Department email sent to Hillary Clinton's deputy chief of staff showing U.S. military forces were ready to "move to Benghazi" the night of the September 11, 2012 attacks contradicts former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta's testimony about the attacks. In fact, the congressional testimony that conservatives claim the email contradicts shows that military forces were deployed that night.

Conservative Activist Group Released New State Department Email, Claiming It Contradicts Administration Official's Benghazi Testimony

Pentagon Timeline Of Benghazi Attack Shows That Military Forces Were Deployed To Assist, But Could Not Reach The Location In Time. A January 23, 2013 article on CNN.com posted the Pentagon's official timeline of the Benghazi attack, which shows that military forces were deployed after the attack began, but could not reach Benghazi in time to assist during the attack:

September 11 (Events are listed using the time in Benghazi)

9:42 p.m. -- Armed men begin their assault on the U.S. Consulate.

9:59 p.m. -- A surveillance drone is directed to fly over the U.S. compound, but it is unarmed.

10:32 p.m. -- The Office of the Secretary Defense and the Joint Staff are notified of the attack by the National Military Command Center at the Pentagon. "The information is quickly passed to Secretary Panetta and General Dempsey."

11 p.m. -- Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey meet with President Obama at the White House where they discuss the unfolding situation and how to respond. The meeting had been previously scheduled.

11:10 p.m. -- The surveillance drone arrives over the Benghazi facility.

11:30 p.m. -- All surviving U.S. personnel are evacuated from the consulate. U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and State Department computer expert Sean Smith were killed in the initial assault.

September 12

Midnight to 2 a.m. -- Panetta and other senior leaders discuss possible options for further violence if it were to break out. Panetta gives verbal orders for Marine anti-terrorist teams from Rota, Spain, to prepare to deploy to Tripoli and Benghazi. Panetta also orders a special operations force team training in Croatia and an additional special operations force team in the United States to prepare to deploy to a staging base in southern Italy.

1:30 a.m. -- A six-man security team from the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli arrives in Benghazi.

2:39 a.m. to 2:53 a.m. -- The National Military Command Center gives formal authorization for the deployment of the two special operations force teams from Croatia and the United States.

5:15 a.m. -- Attackers launch assault on a second U.S. facility in Benghazi. Two former U.S. Navy SEALs acting as security contractors are killed. They are identified as Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

6:05 a.m. -- A C-17 aircraft in Germany is told to prepare to deploy to Libya to evacuate the consulate personnel.

7:40 a.m. -- The first wave of Americans are evacuated to Tripoli via airplane.

10 a.m. -- A second group, including those killed in the attack, are flown to Tripoli.

2:15 p.m. -- The C-17 departs from Germany for the flight to Tripoli.

7:17 p.m. -- The C-17 leaves Tripoli with the American consulate personnel and the bodies of Stevens, Smith, Woods and Doherty.

7:57 p.m. -- The U.S. special operations force team based in Croatia arrives at a staging base in Italy.

8:56 p.m. -- One of the Marine anti-terrorist teams from Spain arrives in Tripoli.

9:28 p.m. -- The U.S.-based special operations force team arrives at its staging base in Italy. [CNN.com, 1/23/13]

 

Forum List

Back
Top