Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Better that than passing a moronic law which will drive up costs for everyone.
Doctors earn and deserve every penny they get.
It's hard and sometimes disgusting work and they should be very well compensated for it.
And anyone who thinks otherwise is just plain wrong.
Next up in the discourse that was never discussed in Obamacare is TORT REFORM.
Better that than passing a moronic law which will drive up costs for everyone.
running to fallacy already. you have no argument
Better that than passing a moronic law which will drive up costs for everyone.
running to fallacy already. you have no argument
You wouldn't recognize an argument if it slapped you on the ass and gave you a wedgie.
Doctors earn and deserve every penny they get.
It's hard and sometimes disgusting work and they should be very well compensated for it.
And anyone who thinks otherwise is just plain wrong.
Next up in the discourse that was never discussed in Obamacare is TORT REFORM.
By Tort Reform you mean putting a cap on a court ordered settlement?
OK then, what should the limit be for a doctor who fucks up?
Better that than passing a moronic law which will drive up costs for everyone.
"Approximately 75 percent of drug coverage is financed by the federal government and 25 percent by beneficiaries through monthly premiums, co-payments, co-insurance and deductibles. As opposed to traditional Medicare, in which the government directly pays providers for services, Part D coverage is privatized--meaning government tax-payer fund$ and contributions from beneficiaries are passed on to private insurers to manage benefits.
Medicare Part D has attracted substantial controversy from major health advocacy organizations, including the Commonwealth Fund, the Center for Medicare Rights and Families USA, as well as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the government organization responsible for administering government health benefits. Criticism centers on effects of the plan's privatization. Instead of the government negotiating prices with drug companies, price controls are left up to the market, which critics argue makes the prices and the program overall too expensive. There is also no standardization of coverage and benefits. Private insurers have created hundreds of different plans with different formularies, co-pays, premiums and deductibles, which critics argue confuse members in trying to choose a plan."
*****
"Here are some things that happened on the night the GOP pushed the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit through the House of Representatives:
Tom DeLay bribed Rep. Nick Smith to vote for the legislation, using the political future of Smith's son for leverage. DeLay was later reprimanded by the House Ethics Committee.
The leadership told Rep. Jim DeMint that they would cut off funding for his Senate race in South Carolina if he didn't vote for the bill.
The chief actuary of Medicare, Rick Foster, had scored the legislation as costing more than $500 billion. The Bush administration suppressed his report, in a move the Government Accounting Office later judged "illegal.
Rep. Jo Ann Emerson, a "no" vote, spent the night "hiding on the Democratic side of the floor, crouching down to avoid eye contact with the Republican search team."
Rep. Butch Otter, who provided one of the final votes after hours of arm-twisting from the Republican leadership, said, I thought there was a chance I would get sick on the floor.
Next up in the discourse that was never discussed in Obamacare is TORT REFORM.
By Tort Reform you mean putting a cap on a court ordered settlement?
OK then, what should the limit be for a doctor who fucks up?
How about making those with false claims pay for the entire court proceeding?
You would think a thread started by the boards clown would be funny, yet it's not...
Next up in the discourse that was never discussed in Obamacare is TORT REFORM.
By Tort Reform you mean putting a cap on a court ordered settlement?
OK then, what should the limit be for a doctor who fucks up?
How about making those with false claims pay for the entire court proceeding?
running to fallacy already. you have no argument
You wouldn't recognize an argument if it slapped you on the ass and gave you a wedgie.
and you come back with ad hominem
Better that than passing a moronic law which will drive up costs for everyone.
running to fallacy already. you have no argument
You wouldn't recognize an argument if it slapped you on the ass and gave you a wedgie.
running to fallacy already. you have no argument
You wouldn't recognize an argument if it slapped you on the ass and gave you a wedgie.
It's all in the misdirection...
surely someone can explain how tort reform is both constitutional and NOT a license for doctors to act as recklessly as they want?
surely someone can explain how tort reform is both constitutional and NOT a license for doctors to act as recklessly as they want?
You wouldn't recognize an argument if it slapped you on the ass and gave you a wedgie.
It's all in the misdirection...
indeed, boedeciaas deflection from the OP to obamacare is a misdirection