Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A consensus is not something that is willfully created. Scientists form opinions about new theories. The consensus appears when someone asks them what they all think and finds out that a majority like some theory or that they don't like some other theory.
How do we Know Human are Causing Climate Change?
The Sun causes climate change here. Go back to bed and try not to wake up stupid.www.usmessageboard.com
"For the umpteenth time, no consensus in science."
No such thing. You should really look at the definitionHow do we Know Human are Causing Climate Change?
The Sun causes climate change here. Go back to bed and try not to wake up stupid.
"For the umpteenth time, no consensus in science."
I gave you what the definition is, a theory.A consensus is not something that is willfully created. Scientists form opinions about new theories. The consensus appears when someone asks them what they all think and finds out that a majority like some theory or that they don't like some other theory.
Definition of what?I gave you what the definition is, a theory.
You should really look up the definition of consensus
That isn’t theoryDefinition of what?
CONSENSUS:
1
a
: general agreement : UNANIMITY
b
: the judgment arrived at by most of those concerned
2
: group solidarity in sentiment and belief
What's your point?
There isn’t, the point was they call consensus theory. It’s notDid you earlier claim there is no consensus in science? Not sure. Did you?
That is a fact. You dumb fkers say consensus is theory!How do we Know Human are Causing Climate Change?
The Sun causes climate change here. Go back to bed and try not to wake up stupid.
"For the umpteenth time, no consensus in science."
What you dummasses call consensus is theory. NopeDefinition of what
The claim that it would be flooded. Or that we would suffer "hypercanes". Have those claims ever appeared in peer reviewed science?
So I guess I can assume that none of the predictions you were guffawing about ever appeared in any peer reviewed publication. Got it.I've never been on the Everglades Parkway ... I hear tell that it's blocking the fresh water intrusion into the Everglades, and this is a horrible thing for the Everglades ...
Typhoon Tip is generally considered to be close to the frictional limit of the atmosphere ... as demonstrated by this being the strongest tropical cyclone ever recorded ... I don't know if we'll find textbook material in the scientific literature, at least not in English ...
The Saffir-Simpson scale only needs to go up to Category 5 ... tropical cyclones cover to much area to get any stronger ...
So I guess I can assume that none of the predictions you were guffawing about ever appeared in any peer reviewed publication. Got it.
You know perfectly well. The predictions that you claimed climate science had made: 'hypercanes' and the flooding of the Everglades Parkway. Would you like to see a quote from your post?Which predictions ... the ones covered in basic textbooks? ... this from someone who doesn't know a convergence zone from the pseudo-adiabatic process ... stupid ...
Scientists often form consensuses on the exact meanings of evidence, data, facts. Many scientists have no opinion on 'new' theories, until any new theory becomes a serious issue of concern. And it is rarely about 'liking' a theory.A consensus is not something that is willfully created. Scientists form opinions about new theories. The consensus appears when someone asks them what they all think and finds out that a majority like some theory or that they don't like some other theory.
you said there is consensus in science, and you have said there is none.No such thing. You should really look at the definition
are observations considered evidence?That is a fact. You dumb fkers say consensus is theory!
Yeah theory exists in science, but that’s not evidence
are observations considered evidence?
Nope, I never ever said that. I posted what a link says, not me, and in said link says consensus is a synonym for theory! Nope. Theory is theory consensus is stupidyou said there is consensus in science, and you have said there is none.
okay
If they support what you're trying to support.are observations considered evidence?
Okay..Depends.
How much was it "adjusted" decades or even centuries later?
