Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's correct.The people of America, who elected him, four times...Wait....who said that?
Mussolini?
Hitler?
Stalin?
You might want to incorporate this into what passed for thinking from you, Uncle Leftie....
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.
The 1st Amendment doesn't mandate an unbiased press. It protects a biased press.
Spoken like a true Liberal.
What Obama has done to the DoJ is proof that he never belonged as the leader of the American nation.
"John Christian Adams... is an American attorney and former United States Department of Justice official who has accused the department of racial bias in many affairs, ...."
J. Christian Adams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
8. J. Christian Adams, in his best seller, "Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department," wrote the following:
" I testified under oath that pervasive and open hostility exists within the Justice Department towards race-neutral enforcement of voting rights laws….the Justice Department’s unwillingness to enforce voting laws equally and in a racially fair way.
Patriots of all races gave their lives to enshrine racial equality in this country, via the 14th and 15th Amendments and then during the Civil Rights movement. The beneficiaries of these sacrifices should not be limited, either. The Department should undergo a searching examination as to why they are unwilling to enforce voting laws in a racially fair fashion and change course.
Inside and outside the DOJ, some will snicker at the notion that the provisions of Section 5 should be used to protect whites and Asians when they are in the minority in a covered jurisdiction. Please snicker so the rest of America can hear you. It’s time you engage the debate, or else you are about to lose it badly without ever having spoken up."
PJ Media
From someone who completely ignores what George Bush did to the DOJ you should change your name to Politically Clueless
Why don't you look into the U.S. Attorney firings to start, or the Military Commissions Act, or the attempted appointment of Harriet Meyers to the Supreme Court or NSA warrantless wiretapping or the Unilateral Executive doctrine, asserting the right to open U.S. Mail, the attempt to appoint U.S. Attorneys without Senate confirmation, Seriously, if you want to examine someone messing with our justice systems, start there.
The pledge, written for flag day, by a Christian Socialist...The Pledge of AllegianceI pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Well...maybe not... "all" as in ALL!
9. “Under the Obama administration, Loretta King, acting Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, has returned to the Clinton-era policy of hiring in the Voting Section only those who have liberal ideological or partisan backgrounds. She has made prior employment with left-wing advocacy groups a uniquely qualifying factor in hiring decisions – even for volunteers.
Only leftists need apply to enforce federal election laws.
The Voting Section at DOJ has seen a hiring blitz of lawyers from SEIU, Advancement Project, MALDEF, and NAACP as well as lawyers who provided pro bono representation to Guantanamo detainees. A lawsuit filed by the Pajamas Media website against Holder’s Justice Department forced the department to hand over the resumes of 16 new hires to the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division. There is not a single lawyer with a non-ideological or conservative background.” http://capitalresearch.org/2011/09/the-left’s-army-of-election-law-“experts”-they-are-getting-ready-for-the-2012-election/
What Obama has done to the DoJ is proof that he never belonged as the leader of the American nation.
"John Christian Adams... is an American attorney and former United States Department of Justice official who has accused the department of racial bias in many affairs, ...."
J. Christian Adams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
8. J. Christian Adams, in his best seller, "Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department," wrote the following:
" I testified under oath that pervasive and open hostility exists within the Justice Department towards race-neutral enforcement of voting rights laws….the Justice Department’s unwillingness to enforce voting laws equally and in a racially fair way.
Patriots of all races gave their lives to enshrine racial equality in this country, via the 14th and 15th Amendments and then during the Civil Rights movement. The beneficiaries of these sacrifices should not be limited, either. The Department should undergo a searching examination as to why they are unwilling to enforce voting laws in a racially fair fashion and change course.
Inside and outside the DOJ, some will snicker at the notion that the provisions of Section 5 should be used to protect whites and Asians when they are in the minority in a covered jurisdiction. Please snicker so the rest of America can hear you. It’s time you engage the debate, or else you are about to lose it badly without ever having spoken up."
PJ Media
From someone who completely ignores what George Bush did to the DOJ you should change your name to Politically Clueless
Why don't you look into the U.S. Attorney firings to start, or the Military Commissions Act, or the attempted appointment of Harriet Meyers to the Supreme Court or NSA warrantless wiretapping or the Unilateral Executive doctrine, asserting the right to open U.S. Mail, the attempt to appoint U.S. Attorneys without Senate confirmation, Seriously, if you want to examine someone messing with our justice systems, start there.
Are you serious???
Clinton fired 93 US Attorneys to hire liberals.
"Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007"
Nets Ignored Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007
The pledge, written for flag day, by a Christian Socialist...The Pledge of AllegianceI pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Well...maybe not... "all" as in ALL!
9. “Under the Obama administration, Loretta King, acting Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, has returned to the Clinton-era policy of hiring in the Voting Section only those who have liberal ideological or partisan backgrounds. She has made prior employment with left-wing advocacy groups a uniquely qualifying factor in hiring decisions – even for volunteers.
Only leftists need apply to enforce federal election laws.
The Voting Section at DOJ has seen a hiring blitz of lawyers from SEIU, Advancement Project, MALDEF, and NAACP as well as lawyers who provided pro bono representation to Guantanamo detainees. A lawsuit filed by the Pajamas Media website against Holder’s Justice Department forced the department to hand over the resumes of 16 new hires to the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division. There is not a single lawyer with a non-ideological or conservative background.” http://capitalresearch.org/2011/09/the-left’s-army-of-election-law-“experts”-they-are-getting-ready-for-the-2012-election/
You don't believe in justice for all, so why are you asking if I do? And I do BTW, liberty and justice for all. That includes Muslims and Faggots.The pledge, written for flag day, by a Christian Socialist...The Pledge of AllegianceI pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Well...maybe not... "all" as in ALL!
9. “Under the Obama administration, Loretta King, acting Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, has returned to the Clinton-era policy of hiring in the Voting Section only those who have liberal ideological or partisan backgrounds. She has made prior employment with left-wing advocacy groups a uniquely qualifying factor in hiring decisions – even for volunteers.
Only leftists need apply to enforce federal election laws.
The Voting Section at DOJ has seen a hiring blitz of lawyers from SEIU, Advancement Project, MALDEF, and NAACP as well as lawyers who provided pro bono representation to Guantanamo detainees. A lawsuit filed by the Pajamas Media website against Holder’s Justice Department forced the department to hand over the resumes of 16 new hires to the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division. There is not a single lawyer with a non-ideological or conservative background.” http://capitalresearch.org/2011/09/the-left’s-army-of-election-law-“experts”-they-are-getting-ready-for-the-2012-election/
Are you posting in opposition to "justice for all"????
What the heck is wrong with you?
What Obama has done to the DoJ is proof that he never belonged as the leader of the American nation.
"John Christian Adams... is an American attorney and former United States Department of Justice official who has accused the department of racial bias in many affairs, ...."
J. Christian Adams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
8. J. Christian Adams, in his best seller, "Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department," wrote the following:
" I testified under oath that pervasive and open hostility exists within the Justice Department towards race-neutral enforcement of voting rights laws….the Justice Department’s unwillingness to enforce voting laws equally and in a racially fair way.
Patriots of all races gave their lives to enshrine racial equality in this country, via the 14th and 15th Amendments and then during the Civil Rights movement. The beneficiaries of these sacrifices should not be limited, either. The Department should undergo a searching examination as to why they are unwilling to enforce voting laws in a racially fair fashion and change course.
Inside and outside the DOJ, some will snicker at the notion that the provisions of Section 5 should be used to protect whites and Asians when they are in the minority in a covered jurisdiction. Please snicker so the rest of America can hear you. It’s time you engage the debate, or else you are about to lose it badly without ever having spoken up."
PJ Media
From someone who completely ignores what George Bush did to the DOJ you should change your name to Politically Clueless
Why don't you look into the U.S. Attorney firings to start, or the Military Commissions Act, or the attempted appointment of Harriet Meyers to the Supreme Court or NSA warrantless wiretapping or the Unilateral Executive doctrine, asserting the right to open U.S. Mail, the attempt to appoint U.S. Attorneys without Senate confirmation, Seriously, if you want to examine someone messing with our justice systems, start there.
Are you serious???
Clinton fired 93 US Attorneys to hire liberals.
"Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007"
Nets Ignored Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007
Yes, a president starts with his own U.S. Attorney's, Bush fired 93 in 2001. The point and difference was that Bush politicized the U.S. Attorney's office when he tried to fill the office with compliant hacks that would target Democrats.
You don't believe in justice for all, so why are you asking if I do? And I do BTW, liberty and justice for all. That includes Muslims and Faggots.The pledge, written for flag day, by a Christian Socialist...The Pledge of AllegianceI pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Well...maybe not... "all" as in ALL!
9. “Under the Obama administration, Loretta King, acting Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, has returned to the Clinton-era policy of hiring in the Voting Section only those who have liberal ideological or partisan backgrounds. She has made prior employment with left-wing advocacy groups a uniquely qualifying factor in hiring decisions – even for volunteers.
Only leftists need apply to enforce federal election laws.
The Voting Section at DOJ has seen a hiring blitz of lawyers from SEIU, Advancement Project, MALDEF, and NAACP as well as lawyers who provided pro bono representation to Guantanamo detainees. A lawsuit filed by the Pajamas Media website against Holder’s Justice Department forced the department to hand over the resumes of 16 new hires to the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division. There is not a single lawyer with a non-ideological or conservative background.” http://capitalresearch.org/2011/09/the-left’s-army-of-election-law-“experts”-they-are-getting-ready-for-the-2012-election/
Are you posting in opposition to "justice for all"????
What the heck is wrong with you?
"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
If only he could see us now, he'd throw this in the garbage.
What Obama has done to the DoJ is proof that he never belonged as the leader of the American nation.
"John Christian Adams... is an American attorney and former United States Department of Justice official who has accused the department of racial bias in many affairs, ...."
J. Christian Adams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
8. J. Christian Adams, in his best seller, "Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department," wrote the following:
" I testified under oath that pervasive and open hostility exists within the Justice Department towards race-neutral enforcement of voting rights laws….the Justice Department’s unwillingness to enforce voting laws equally and in a racially fair way.
Patriots of all races gave their lives to enshrine racial equality in this country, via the 14th and 15th Amendments and then during the Civil Rights movement. The beneficiaries of these sacrifices should not be limited, either. The Department should undergo a searching examination as to why they are unwilling to enforce voting laws in a racially fair fashion and change course.
Inside and outside the DOJ, some will snicker at the notion that the provisions of Section 5 should be used to protect whites and Asians when they are in the minority in a covered jurisdiction. Please snicker so the rest of America can hear you. It’s time you engage the debate, or else you are about to lose it badly without ever having spoken up."
PJ Media
From someone who completely ignores what George Bush did to the DOJ you should change your name to Politically Clueless
Why don't you look into the U.S. Attorney firings to start, or the Military Commissions Act, or the attempted appointment of Harriet Meyers to the Supreme Court or NSA warrantless wiretapping or the Unilateral Executive doctrine, asserting the right to open U.S. Mail, the attempt to appoint U.S. Attorneys without Senate confirmation, Seriously, if you want to examine someone messing with our justice systems, start there.
Are you serious???
Clinton fired 93 US Attorneys to hire liberals.
"Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007"
Nets Ignored Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007
Yes, a president starts with his own U.S. Attorney's, Bush fired 93 in 2001. The point and difference was that Bush politicized the U.S. Attorney's office when he tried to fill the office with compliant hacks that would target Democrats.
Let's remind all that you brought up the firing of US Attorneys, suggesting some soert of outrage....
...and now you're justifying it.
I bet that sometimes even you question your sanity....and I bet, sometimes it replies.
What Obama has done to the DoJ is proof that he never belonged as the leader of the American nation.
"John Christian Adams... is an American attorney and former United States Department of Justice official who has accused the department of racial bias in many affairs, ...."
J. Christian Adams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
8. J. Christian Adams, in his best seller, "Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department," wrote the following:
" I testified under oath that pervasive and open hostility exists within the Justice Department towards race-neutral enforcement of voting rights laws….the Justice Department’s unwillingness to enforce voting laws equally and in a racially fair way.
Patriots of all races gave their lives to enshrine racial equality in this country, via the 14th and 15th Amendments and then during the Civil Rights movement. The beneficiaries of these sacrifices should not be limited, either. The Department should undergo a searching examination as to why they are unwilling to enforce voting laws in a racially fair fashion and change course.
Inside and outside the DOJ, some will snicker at the notion that the provisions of Section 5 should be used to protect whites and Asians when they are in the minority in a covered jurisdiction. Please snicker so the rest of America can hear you. It’s time you engage the debate, or else you are about to lose it badly without ever having spoken up."
PJ Media
From someone who completely ignores what George Bush did to the DOJ you should change your name to Politically Clueless
Why don't you look into the U.S. Attorney firings to start, or the Military Commissions Act, or the attempted appointment of Harriet Meyers to the Supreme Court or NSA warrantless wiretapping or the Unilateral Executive doctrine, asserting the right to open U.S. Mail, the attempt to appoint U.S. Attorneys without Senate confirmation, Seriously, if you want to examine someone messing with our justice systems, start there.
Are you serious???
Clinton fired 93 US Attorneys to hire liberals.
"Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007"
Nets Ignored Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007
Yes, a president starts with his own U.S. Attorney's, Bush fired 93 in 2001. The point and difference was that Bush politicized the U.S. Attorney's office when he tried to fill the office with compliant hacks that would target Democrats.
Let's remind all that you brought up the firing of US Attorneys, suggesting some soert of outrage....
...and now you're justifying it.
I bet that sometimes even you question your sanity....and I bet, sometimes it replies.
Your flip answers merely means you have no response. Which all of us have gotten to know and love because it means you've run out of gas. Time to run along until you can think up a new line of attack.
From someone who completely ignores what George Bush did to the DOJ you should change your name to Politically Clueless
Why don't you look into the U.S. Attorney firings to start, or the Military Commissions Act, or the attempted appointment of Harriet Meyers to the Supreme Court or NSA warrantless wiretapping or the Unilateral Executive doctrine, asserting the right to open U.S. Mail, the attempt to appoint U.S. Attorneys without Senate confirmation, Seriously, if you want to examine someone messing with our justice systems, start there.
Are you serious???
Clinton fired 93 US Attorneys to hire liberals.
"Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007"
Nets Ignored Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007
Yes, a president starts with his own U.S. Attorney's, Bush fired 93 in 2001. The point and difference was that Bush politicized the U.S. Attorney's office when he tried to fill the office with compliant hacks that would target Democrats.
Let's remind all that you brought up the firing of US Attorneys, suggesting some soert of outrage....
...and now you're justifying it.
I bet that sometimes even you question your sanity....and I bet, sometimes it replies.
Your flip answers merely means you have no response. Which all of us have gotten to know and love because it means you've run out of gas. Time to run along until you can think up a new line of attack.
The term 'flip' is appropriate in light of....
"Let's remind all that you brought up the firing of US Attorneys, suggesting some sort of outrage....
...and now you're justifying it."
Are you serious???
Clinton fired 93 US Attorneys to hire liberals.
"Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007"
Nets Ignored Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007
Yes, a president starts with his own U.S. Attorney's, Bush fired 93 in 2001. The point and difference was that Bush politicized the U.S. Attorney's office when he tried to fill the office with compliant hacks that would target Democrats.
Let's remind all that you brought up the firing of US Attorneys, suggesting some soert of outrage....
...and now you're justifying it.
I bet that sometimes even you question your sanity....and I bet, sometimes it replies.
Your flip answers merely means you have no response. Which all of us have gotten to know and love because it means you've run out of gas. Time to run along until you can think up a new line of attack.
The term 'flip' is appropriate in light of....
"Let's remind all that you brought up the firing of US Attorneys, suggesting some sort of outrage....
...and now you're justifying it."
Again you're deflecting. I brought up a small sampling of abuse by the Bush Administration and you haven't answered to a single charge.
If you believe in justice for all that's very good, and liberal, and it includes criminals, gays, and Muslims. And like most here I don't worry about what you say, it's just cutting and pasting and you call everyone by names you don't understand and can't support.You don't believe in justice for all, so why are you asking if I do? And I do BTW, liberty and justice for all. That includes Muslims and Faggots.The pledge, written for flag day, by a Christian Socialist...The Pledge of AllegianceI pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Well...maybe not... "all" as in ALL!
9. “Under the Obama administration, Loretta King, acting Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, has returned to the Clinton-era policy of hiring in the Voting Section only those who have liberal ideological or partisan backgrounds. She has made prior employment with left-wing advocacy groups a uniquely qualifying factor in hiring decisions – even for volunteers.
Only leftists need apply to enforce federal election laws.
The Voting Section at DOJ has seen a hiring blitz of lawyers from SEIU, Advancement Project, MALDEF, and NAACP as well as lawyers who provided pro bono representation to Guantanamo detainees. A lawsuit filed by the Pajamas Media website against Holder’s Justice Department forced the department to hand over the resumes of 16 new hires to the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division. There is not a single lawyer with a non-ideological or conservative background.” http://capitalresearch.org/2011/09/the-left’s-army-of-election-law-“experts”-they-are-getting-ready-for-the-2012-election/
Are you posting in opposition to "justice for all"????
What the heck is wrong with you?
"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
If only he could see us now, he'd throw this in the garbage.
"You don't believe in justice for all,..."
I would demand you provide any post of my to validate that, but I've shown you lying so many times, in this thread alone...it would be like gilding the lily.
I haven't reversed course, you have. The fun thing about debating you is that I have seen people like you before but I always had to pay admission first.
If you believe in justice for all that's very good, and liberal, and it includes criminals, gays, and Muslims. And like most here I don't worry about what you say, it's just cutting and pasting and you call everyone by names you don't understand and can't support.You don't believe in justice for all, so why are you asking if I do? And I do BTW, liberty and justice for all. That includes Muslims and Faggots.The pledge, written for flag day, by a Christian Socialist...The Pledge of AllegianceI pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Well...maybe not... "all" as in ALL!
9. “Under the Obama administration, Loretta King, acting Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, has returned to the Clinton-era policy of hiring in the Voting Section only those who have liberal ideological or partisan backgrounds. She has made prior employment with left-wing advocacy groups a uniquely qualifying factor in hiring decisions – even for volunteers.
Only leftists need apply to enforce federal election laws.
The Voting Section at DOJ has seen a hiring blitz of lawyers from SEIU, Advancement Project, MALDEF, and NAACP as well as lawyers who provided pro bono representation to Guantanamo detainees. A lawsuit filed by the Pajamas Media website against Holder’s Justice Department forced the department to hand over the resumes of 16 new hires to the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division. There is not a single lawyer with a non-ideological or conservative background.” http://capitalresearch.org/2011/09/the-left’s-army-of-election-law-“experts”-they-are-getting-ready-for-the-2012-election/
Are you posting in opposition to "justice for all"????
What the heck is wrong with you?
"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
If only he could see us now, he'd throw this in the garbage.
"You don't believe in justice for all,..."
I would demand you provide any post of my to validate that, but I've shown you lying so many times, in this thread alone...it would be like gilding the lily.
What Obama has done to the DoJ is proof that he never belonged as the leader of the American nation.
"John Christian Adams... is an American attorney and former United States Department of Justice official who has accused the department of racial bias in many affairs, ...."
J. Christian Adams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
8. J. Christian Adams, in his best seller, "Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department," wrote the following:
" I testified under oath that pervasive and open hostility exists within the Justice Department towards race-neutral enforcement of voting rights laws….the Justice Department’s unwillingness to enforce voting laws equally and in a racially fair way.
Patriots of all races gave their lives to enshrine racial equality in this country, via the 14th and 15th Amendments and then during the Civil Rights movement. The beneficiaries of these sacrifices should not be limited, either. The Department should undergo a searching examination as to why they are unwilling to enforce voting laws in a racially fair fashion and change course.
Inside and outside the DOJ, some will snicker at the notion that the provisions of Section 5 should be used to protect whites and Asians when they are in the minority in a covered jurisdiction. Please snicker so the rest of America can hear you. It’s time you engage the debate, or else you are about to lose it badly without ever having spoken up."
PJ Media
From someone who completely ignores what George Bush did to the DOJ you should change your name to Politically Clueless
Why don't you look into the U.S. Attorney firings to start, or the Military Commissions Act, or the attempted appointment of Harriet Meyers to the Supreme Court or NSA warrantless wiretapping or the Unilateral Executive doctrine, asserting the right to open U.S. Mail, the attempt to appoint U.S. Attorneys without Senate confirmation, Seriously, if you want to examine someone messing with our justice systems, start there.
Are you serious???
Clinton fired 93 US Attorneys to hire liberals.
"Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007"
Nets Ignored Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007
Liberals also support our Constitutional Republic and rule of law.I'm being entirely accurate. You are a fascist, and not even an American in name only.
As to the above, total nonsense, as usual.
Quite the pattern we are setting.....
You attempt to lie, I reveal same.
OK....let's do that:
...let's smack you in the kisser one more time:
I stated, correctly, that communism, socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Progressivism...are all 'fruit of the same poison tree.'
Deny it?
Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:
Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....
1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life
9. Which restricts free speech and thought?
10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”
And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.
Nazism
Communism
Socialism
Fascism
Progressivism
Liberalism
How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.
In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.
Don't ever change.
Liberals support a democratically elected government carrying out the will of the People.
Since when?
That's correct, and it's been much better, for nearly everyone.The Supreme Court was cowed....and America has never been the same since.
So it's good that we don't have a separation of powers??????
Gads.....are you so dumb that you don't realize you've proven everything I claim about you Liberals/socialists/communists/Progressives/Nazis/fascists?????
Folks are gonna think I have you on retainer.
As I pointed out, we do have separation of powers and have never had a dictatorship.
