Tightening The Noose On Liberty

[NYcarbineer]

3. How has this Liberal/Democrat administration corrupted the Department of Justice, so as to keep their party in power?

" One lesson to draw from all this is that personnel is policy. If you examine the resumés of people hired into the DOJ beginning in 2009, you will find that the governing credential of new hires was a history of support for left-leaning causes or membership in leftist organizations. By the time of the 2012 election, it was considered unremarkable for DOJ lawyers to display political posters on their office walls, and even outside their offices—something inimical to the spirit and mission of the Department of Justice."
Justice and the Obama Justice Department - Imprimis | Hillsdale College

Elections have consequences.

You didn't see Bush nominating any liberal judges for the Supreme Court did you?

And we don't see you complaining about that.

 

[NYcarbineer]

As posted in the OP, the Progressive/Liberal Democrats who run the country do so with a jaundiced view of governance, and of justice.

But not without a motive.....the self-same motive that caused a racist party, and the racist LBJ to provide a public relations mirage:


Without the black vote, the Democrat Party is doomed.


4. "On the national level, Democrats typically get around 90 percent of the black vote, even when a black man isn’t running for president as a Democrat. Al Gore got 92 percent of the black vote in 2000; John Kerry got 88 percent in 2004. These percentages aren’t just impressive; for Democrats, they’re imperative. Since 1980, the percentage of white votes received by the Democrats’ candidate for president has usually hovered around 39 percent. Unless Democrats maintain a vise grip on at least 90 percent of the black vote, the party’s presidential prospects usually fade to oblivion."
Blacks, Democrats, and Republicans | National Review Online



5. The Democrats have used the Department of Justice to make certain that blacks know who their masters are....and to keep them in the fold.

And they even overstep by oppressing the very black voters that keep them in power!!!

"Justice concludes black voters need Democratic Party
KINSTON, N.C. | Voters in this small city decided overwhelmingly last year to do away with the party affiliation of candidates in local elections, but the Obama administration recently overruled the electorate and decided that equal rights for black voters cannot be achieved without the Democratic Party.

The Justice Department’s ruling, ... went so far as to say partisan elections are needed so that black voters can elect their “candidates of choice” - identified by the department as those who are Democrats and almost exclusively black.

.... he city cannot get rid of party affiliations for local elections because that would violate black voters’ right to elect the candidates they want." Justice concludes bl

As posted in the OP, the Progressive/Liberal Democrats who run the country do so with a jaundiced view of governance, and of justice.

But not without a motive.....the self-same motive that caused a racist party, and the racist LBJ to provide a public relations mirage:


Without the black vote, the Democrat Party is doomed.


4. "On the national level, Democrats typically get around 90 percent of the black vote, even when a black man isn’t running for president as a Democrat. Al Gore got 92 percent of the black vote in 2000; John Kerry got 88 percent in 2004. These percentages aren’t just impressive; for Democrats, they’re imperative. Since 1980, the percentage of white votes received by the Democrats’ candidate for president has usually hovered around 39 percent. Unless Democrats maintain a vise grip on at least 90 percent of the black vote, the party’s presidential prospects usually fade to oblivion."

Blacks, Democrats, and Republicans | National Review Online



5. The Democrats have used the Department of Justice to make certain that blacks know who their masters are....and to keep them in the fold.

And they even overstep by oppressing the very black voters that keep them in power!!!

"Justice concludes black voters need Democratic Party
KINSTON, N.C. | Voters in this small city decided overwhelmingly last year to do away with the party affiliation of candidates in local elections, but the Obama administration recently overruled the electorate and decided that equal rights for black voters cannot be achieved without the Democratic Party.

The Justice Department’s ruling, ... went so far as to say partisan elections are needed so that black voters can elect their “candidates of choice” - identified by the department as those who are Democrats and almost exclusively black.

.... he city cannot get rid of party affiliations for local elections because that would violate black voters’ right to elect the candidates they want." Justice concludes black voters need Democratic Party - Washington Times


Kinston, North Carolina is a majority black town....it had voted to leave off party designations......But the Obama DoJ order: make sure blacks know who the Democrats are, so they vote for 'em!

ack voters need Democratic Party - Washington Times


Kinston, North Carolina is a majority black town....it had voted to leave off party designations......But the Obama DoJ order: make sure blacks know who the Democrats are, so they vote for 'em!

Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. In their version of the Constitution no one would have any rights at all. It would be dog eat dog since can't see beyond their own needs and those close to them.

"Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. "


'Tis a consummation. Devoutly to be wished.'
Hamlet


I glow with pride!

Pride in fascists is to be expected. Carry on...

Try to be more accurate.

Fascism, like communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, and Progressivism, are all permutations of the same worldview.

Yours.

You're becoming repetitive. Wrong and repetitive.

Now, get this straight: I'm never wrong.
I thought I was once, but I was mistaken.

You're 'clever' cliche actually proves you've been wrong.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. In their version of the Constitution no one would have any rights at all. It would be dog eat dog since can't see beyond their own needs and those close to them.

"Wilson wouldn't say that today with people like her around. "


'Tis a consummation. Devoutly to be wished.'
Hamlet


I glow with pride!

Pride in fascists is to be expected. Carry on...

Try to be more accurate.

Fascism, like communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, and Progressivism, are all permutations of the same worldview.

Yours.

I'm being entirely accurate. You are a fascist, and not even an American in name only.

As to the above, total nonsense, as usual.

Quite the pattern we are setting.....

You attempt to lie, I reveal same.

OK....let's do that:

...let's smack you in the kisser one more time:
I stated, correctly, that communism, socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Progressivism...are all 'fruit of the same poison tree.'

Deny it?

Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:


Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life

9. Which restricts free speech and thought?

10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.

Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.


In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.


Don't ever change.

American conservatives are at the forefront of defending religious freedom for Muslims?

Are you sure about that?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Good thing none of the Liberals tried to deny that Liberals/Progressives/Democrats are champions of the criminals....


Today:

"NYC to Do Away With Bail for Non-Violent Suspects
The $18 million city plan, detailed to the AP ahead of the announcement today, allows judges beginning next year to replace bail for low-risk defendants with supervision options including daily check-ins, text-message reminders, and required drug or behavioral therapy. Bail has long been criticized by inmate advocates for unfairly targeting poor people. And reforms were recommended by a mayoral task force...."
NYC to Do Away With Bail for Non-Violent Suspects


The result of NYC electing a Communist/Liberal/Democrat mayor.

More justice for the poor? No wonder you hate it...

No justice for the victim?
No wonder you oppose it.

Locking the innocent until proven guilty up isn't justice for the victim, it's injustice for the still considered innocent. In your fascist world that is a bad thing.

Victim calls police.
Police discretion....decide to arrest.

Liberals nod to culprit...and say 'be sure to come back for a trial.'


Bail is based on two factors:
a. seriousness of the crime
b. judges prediction that the arrestee will return for trial.


Liberal are both allies of the criminal, and certifiably insane.
True story.

Liberals stand up for justice. Conservatives stand up for imprisonment.

Imprisonment for criminals!!

Right you are!!



Too bad Liberals don't....and therefore increase the danger to innocent Americans.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Just more of your fascism, criminals having no rights. In your world it's rights for you but not the other guy...

Hmmmm......you seem to be hedging your bet....my slapping you around has had an effect, Uncle Leftie.

So....you aren't really denying "It must be said that Obama is not the first Liberal/Progressive/Democrat to champion the criminal rather than the law-abiding citizen."

I'll put you in the 'could be' column.
Good enough.

Good thing none of the Liberals tried to deny that Liberals/Progressives/Democrats are champions of the criminals....


Today:

"NYC to Do Away With Bail for Non-Violent Suspects
The $18 million city plan, detailed to the AP ahead of the announcement today, allows judges beginning next year to replace bail for low-risk defendants with supervision options including daily check-ins, text-message reminders, and required drug or behavioral therapy. Bail has long been criticized by inmate advocates for unfairly targeting poor people. And reforms were recommended by a mayoral task force...."
NYC to Do Away With Bail for Non-Violent Suspects


The result of NYC electing a Communist/Liberal/Democrat mayor.

The result of NYC electing a Communist/Liberal/Democrat mayor.

No. The result of serious systemic flaws that lead to the failure of the system for some involved in it.

Three Years on Rikers Without Trial - The New Yorker

"...flaws that lead to the failure of the system for some involved in it."

The criminals.

Just as I stated.

Would I be correct in guessing that you were an Obama voter?

You would be correct in responding to the point I made rather than attempting to deflect from the issue you brought to the forum.

So....you don't want to admit that you are a doctrinaire Liberal and Obama supporter?

Your reticence is fully understandable....it is certainly an embarrassment.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Just more of your fascism, criminals having no rights. In your world it's rights for you but not the other guy...

Hmmmm......you seem to be hedging your bet....my slapping you around has had an effect, Uncle Leftie.

So....you aren't really denying "It must be said that Obama is not the first Liberal/Progressive/Democrat to champion the criminal rather than the law-abiding citizen."

I'll put you in the 'could be' column.
Good enough.

Good thing none of the Liberals tried to deny that Liberals/Progressives/Democrats are champions of the criminals....


Today:

"NYC to Do Away With Bail for Non-Violent Suspects
The $18 million city plan, detailed to the AP ahead of the announcement today, allows judges beginning next year to replace bail for low-risk defendants with supervision options including daily check-ins, text-message reminders, and required drug or behavioral therapy. Bail has long been criticized by inmate advocates for unfairly targeting poor people. And reforms were recommended by a mayoral task force...."
NYC to Do Away With Bail for Non-Violent Suspects


The result of NYC electing a Communist/Liberal/Democrat mayor.

More justice for the poor? No wonder you hate it...

No justice for the victim?
No wonder you oppose it.

Justice comes after a conviction. Not before.

Bail requirement insures a trial.

You mean you don't understand that???

You must be a Liberal, huh?

 

[nuhuh]

More justice for the poor? No wonder you hate it...

No justice for the victim?
No wonder you oppose it.

Locking the innocent until proven guilty up isn't justice for the victim, it's injustice for the still considered innocent. In your fascist world that is a bad thing.

Victim calls police.
Police discretion....decide to arrest.

Liberals nod to culprit...and say 'be sure to come back for a trial.'


Bail is based on two factors:
a. seriousness of the crime
b. judges prediction that the arrestee will return for trial.


Liberal are both allies of the criminal, and certifiably insane.
True story.

Liberals stand up for justice. Conservatives stand up for imprisonment.

Imprisonment for criminals!!

Right you are!!



Too bad Liberals don't....and therefore increase the danger to innocent Americans.

Fascism, A form of government that seeks to control the masses = the same as Conservatism.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Just more of your fascism, criminals having no rights. In your world it's rights for you but not the other guy...

Hmmmm......you seem to be hedging your bet....my slapping you around has had an effect, Uncle Leftie.

So....you aren't really denying "It must be said that Obama is not the first Liberal/Progressive/Democrat to champion the criminal rather than the law-abiding citizen."

I'll put you in the 'could be' column.
Good enough.

Good thing none of the Liberals tried to deny that Liberals/Progressives/Democrats are champions of the criminals....


Today:

"NYC to Do Away With Bail for Non-Violent Suspects
The $18 million city plan, detailed to the AP ahead of the announcement today, allows judges beginning next year to replace bail for low-risk defendants with supervision options including daily check-ins, text-message reminders, and required drug or behavioral therapy. Bail has long been criticized by inmate advocates for unfairly targeting poor people. And reforms were recommended by a mayoral task force...."
NYC to Do Away With Bail for Non-Violent Suspects


The result of NYC electing a Communist/Liberal/Democrat mayor.

DUH, these people aren't judged yet and there is a little yet somewhat well know fact in America that you are innocent until proven guilty. Trying to change that small fact is pretty fascist of you PC.

Championing the criminal???

Gee....how unusual for a Liberal/Progressive/Democrat.

Carry on.

Championing the criminal???

Championing liberty and justice for all.

Now, now....don't obfuscate....the 'justice' you intend is to make certain that no punishment for criminality is assigned.


There are sooooo many examples of the tragic results of Liberal jurisprudence that one hardly knows where to begin.....
....I mean, if you require examples.

 

[PoliticalChic]

No justice for the victim?
No wonder you oppose it.

Locking the innocent until proven guilty up isn't justice for the victim, it's injustice for the still considered innocent. In your fascist world that is a bad thing.

Victim calls police.
Police discretion....decide to arrest.

Liberals nod to culprit...and say 'be sure to come back for a trial.'


Bail is based on two factors:
a. seriousness of the crime
b. judges prediction that the arrestee will return for trial.


Liberal are both allies of the criminal, and certifiably insane.
True story.

Liberals stand up for justice. Conservatives stand up for imprisonment.

Imprisonment for criminals!!

Right you are!!



Too bad Liberals don't....and therefore increase the danger to innocent Americans.

Fascism, A form of government that seeks to control the masses = the same as Conservatism.

In fact, just the opposite.

Do you know you're lying...or has it become second nature?

 

[nuhuh]

Locking the innocent until proven guilty up isn't justice for the victim, it's injustice for the still considered innocent. In your fascist world that is a bad thing.

Victim calls police.
Police discretion....decide to arrest.

Liberals nod to culprit...and say 'be sure to come back for a trial.'


Bail is based on two factors:
a. seriousness of the crime
b. judges prediction that the arrestee will return for trial.


Liberal are both allies of the criminal, and certifiably insane.
True story.

Liberals stand up for justice. Conservatives stand up for imprisonment.

Imprisonment for criminals!!

Right you are!!



Too bad Liberals don't....and therefore increase the danger to innocent Americans.

Fascism, A form of government that seeks to control the masses = the same as Conservatism.

In fact, just the opposite.

Do you know you're lying...or has it become second nature?

What did I say that was a lie? I think you are deflecting again to avoid talking about the truth.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Hmmmm......you seem to be hedging your bet....my slapping you around has had an effect, Uncle Leftie.

So....you aren't really denying "It must be said that Obama is not the first Liberal/Progressive/Democrat to champion the criminal rather than the law-abiding citizen."

I'll put you in the 'could be' column.
Good enough.

Good thing none of the Liberals tried to deny that Liberals/Progressives/Democrats are champions of the criminals....


Today:

"NYC to Do Away With Bail for Non-Violent Suspects
The $18 million city plan, detailed to the AP ahead of the announcement today, allows judges beginning next year to replace bail for low-risk defendants with supervision options including daily check-ins, text-message reminders, and required drug or behavioral therapy. Bail has long been criticized by inmate advocates for unfairly targeting poor people. And reforms were recommended by a mayoral task force...."
NYC to Do Away With Bail for Non-Violent Suspects


The result of NYC electing a Communist/Liberal/Democrat mayor.

The result of NYC electing a Communist/Liberal/Democrat mayor.

No. The result of serious systemic flaws that lead to the failure of the system for some involved in it.

Three Years on Rikers Without Trial - The New Yorker

"...flaws that lead to the failure of the system for some involved in it."

The criminals.

Just as I stated.

Would I be correct in guessing that you were an Obama voter?

You would be correct in responding to the point I made rather than attempting to deflect from the issue you brought to the forum.

So....you don't want to admit that you are a doctrinaire Liberal and Obama supporter?

Your reticence is fully understandable....it is certainly an embarrassment.

I am an unabashed liberal.
You are an unabashed moron hack.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Hmmmm......you seem to be hedging your bet....my slapping you around has had an effect, Uncle Leftie.

So....you aren't really denying "It must be said that Obama is not the first Liberal/Progressive/Democrat to champion the criminal rather than the law-abiding citizen."

I'll put you in the 'could be' column.
Good enough.

Good thing none of the Liberals tried to deny that Liberals/Progressives/Democrats are champions of the criminals....


Today:

"NYC to Do Away With Bail for Non-Violent Suspects
The $18 million city plan, detailed to the AP ahead of the announcement today, allows judges beginning next year to replace bail for low-risk defendants with supervision options including daily check-ins, text-message reminders, and required drug or behavioral therapy. Bail has long been criticized by inmate advocates for unfairly targeting poor people. And reforms were recommended by a mayoral task force...."
NYC to Do Away With Bail for Non-Violent Suspects


The result of NYC electing a Communist/Liberal/Democrat mayor.

DUH, these people aren't judged yet and there is a little yet somewhat well know fact in America that you are innocent until proven guilty. Trying to change that small fact is pretty fascist of you PC.

Championing the criminal???

Gee....how unusual for a Liberal/Progressive/Democrat.

Carry on.

Championing the criminal???

Championing liberty and justice for all.

Now, now....don't obfuscate....the 'justice' you intend is to make certain that no punishment for criminality is assigned.


There are sooooo many examples of the tragic results of Liberal jurisprudence that one hardly knows where to begin.....
....I mean, if you require examples.

I require an adult who is able to stay on topic rather than spamming nonsense.

 

[Dot Com]

Let's not forget that George Bush didn't even appoint a 9/11 Commission for more than a year after it happened. Endowned the investigation with just $3 million dollars and this was after the Challenger investigation cost $50 million and Whitewater cost $70 million. The Commission was only given 18 months to perform its job and was only allowed a 60 day extension. Finally Bush and Cheney met behind closed doors with no oath or transcript and notes were never to be published.

Let's not forget the spy they actually found in Cheney's office Leandro Aragocillo, who got ten years for selling classified material to the Philippines and France.

So despite your public slurs real things happened on Bush' watch and more answers are needed to find the real 9/11 truth.

I know right?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Victim calls police.
Police discretion....decide to arrest.

Liberals nod to culprit...and say 'be sure to come back for a trial.'


Bail is based on two factors:
a. seriousness of the crime
b. judges prediction that the arrestee will return for trial.


Liberal are both allies of the criminal, and certifiably insane.
True story.

Liberals stand up for justice. Conservatives stand up for imprisonment.

Imprisonment for criminals!!

Right you are!!



Too bad Liberals don't....and therefore increase the danger to innocent Americans.

Fascism, A form of government that seeks to control the masses = the same as Conservatism.

In fact, just the opposite.

Do you know you're lying...or has it become second nature?

What did I say that was a lie? I think you are deflecting again to avoid talking about the truth.

She's not interested in truth or debate at all. Only spamming the anti-liberal crap she hears.

 

[jillian]

1. Exactly how does this major polical power extant today, attempt to strangle liberty?

Politicizing thought.

Criminalizing speech.

This is done, directly, through the misnamed Department of Justice.




2. Michael B. Mukasey, who served as the Attorney General of the United States from 2007-2009, and as a U.S. district judge for the Southern District of New York from 1988-2006, and as an assistant U.S. attorney for that same district from 1972-1976, said this:

"The DOJ’s Civil Rights Division is the one we think of as having the main responsibility for protecting fairness.
Yet its recent record has indicated other priorities."



3. How has this Liberal/Democrat administration corrupted the Department of Justice, so as to keep their party in power?

" One lesson to draw from all this is that personnel is policy. If you examine the resumés of people hired into the DOJ beginning in 2009, you will find that the governing credential of new hires was a history of support for left-leaning causes or membership in leftist organizations. By the time of the 2012 election, it was considered unremarkable for DOJ lawyers to display political posters on their office walls, and even outside their offices—something inimical to the spirit and mission of the Department of Justice."
Justice and the Obama Justice Department - Imprimis | Hillsdale College



a. Let's see what the mission of the DoJ should be:

".... the attorney general is a member of the administration—but his principal responsibility is to provide neutral advice on what the law requires, not to fly in political formation."

Again?
"...provide neutral advice...."
That would be in the real America....not the Progressive corruption it has become.





""Principle is nothing to liberals. Winning is everything."
Coulter

no one is criminalizing thought or speech.

that is absurd.

what is a drain on liberty is radical religious zealots hating gubmint except when it legislates your religious dicta and interferes with people's most fundamental life decisions.

but you're for freedom?

that's hysterically funny.

 

[jillian]

Liberals stand up for justice. Conservatives stand up for imprisonment.

Imprisonment for criminals!!

Right you are!!



Too bad Liberals don't....and therefore increase the danger to innocent Americans.

Fascism, A form of government that seeks to control the masses = the same as Conservatism.

In fact, just the opposite.

Do you know you're lying...or has it become second nature?

What did I say that was a lie? I think you are deflecting again to avoid talking about the truth.

She's not interested in truth or debate at all. Only spamming the anti-liberal crap she hears.

you noticed, huh?

 

[Dot Com]

What Obama has done to the DoJ is proof that he never belonged as the leader of the American nation.


"John Christian Adams... is an American attorney and former United States Department of Justice official who has accused the department of racial bias in many affairs, ...."
J. Christian Adams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


8. J. Christian Adams, in his best seller, "Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department," wrote the following:
" I testified under oath that pervasive and open hostility exists within the Justice Department towards race-neutral enforcement of voting rights laws….the Justice Department’s unwillingness to enforce voting laws equally and in a racially fair way.


Patriots of all races gave their lives to enshrine racial equality in this country, via the 14th and 15th Amendments and then during the Civil Rights movement. The beneficiaries of these sacrifices should not be limited, either. The Department should undergo a searching examination as to why they are unwilling to enforce voting laws in a racially fair fashion and change course.


Inside and outside the DOJ, some will snicker at the notion that the provisions of Section 5 should be used to protect whites and Asians when they are in the minority in a covered jurisdiction. Please snicker so the rest of America can hear you. It’s time you engage the debate, or else you are about to lose it badly without ever having spoken up."
PJ Media

From someone who completely ignores what George Bush did to the DOJ you should change your name to Politically Clueless

Why don't you look into the U.S. Attorney firings to start, or the Military Commissions Act, or the attempted appointment of Harriet Meyers to the Supreme Court or NSA warrantless wiretapping or the Unilateral Executive doctrine, asserting the right to open U.S. Mail, the attempt to appoint U.S. Attorneys without Senate confirmation, Seriously, if you want to examine someone messing with our justice systems, start there.

Are you serious???

Clinton fired 93 US Attorneys to hire liberals.


"Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007"
Nets Ignored Clinton Firing 93 U.S. Attorneys, Fret Over Bush's 8 --3/14/2007

Yes, a president starts with his own U.S. Attorney's, Bush fired 93 in 2001. The point and difference was that Bush politicized the U.S. Attorney's office when he tried to fill the office with compliant hacks that would target Democrats.

yep. Monica Goodling anyone?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Liberals stand up for justice. Conservatives stand up for imprisonment.

Imprisonment for criminals!!

Right you are!!



Too bad Liberals don't....and therefore increase the danger to innocent Americans.

Fascism, A form of government that seeks to control the masses = the same as Conservatism.

In fact, just the opposite.

Do you know you're lying...or has it become second nature?

What did I say that was a lie? I think you are deflecting again to avoid talking about the truth.

She's not interested in truth or debate at all. Only spamming the anti-liberal crap she hears.

"...spamming the anti-liberal crap she hears."

Well....OK...you convinced me you need a lesson.

1. Carter-appointed judge Norma Shapiro “ is one of the worst offenders among that influential cadre of [Liberal] federal judges who have substituted the ACLU's prisoners' rights wish list for the Bill of Rights and have trifled with public safety concerns. …single-handedly decriminalized property and drug crimes in the City of Brotherly Love….And in the past 18 months alone, 9,732 arrestees, out on the streets on pre-trial release because of her prison cap, were arrested on second charges, including 79 murders, 90 rapes, 701 burglaries, 959 robberies, 1,113 assaults, 2,215 drug offenses and 2,748 thefts…
2. .Activist (read 'Liberal') judges such as Shapiro and Justice assert that prison crowding violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments. But there is no empirical evidence to substantiate this assertion. In every study of the subject, the widely believed negative effects of crowding - violence, program disruption, health problems and so on - are nowhere in evidence.” Activist Judges Earn Dunce Caps For Their Prison Caps
   1. In 1992, black youths were nine times more likely to be murdered than white youths. Liberals lied, black kids died.

3. "There is an activist (read 'Liberal') judge behind each of the most perverse failures of today's justice system: violent offenders serving barely 40 percent of their sentences; 3.5 million criminals, most of them repeat offenders, on the streets on probation and parole; 35 percent of all persons arrested forviolent crime on probation, parole or pretrial release at the time of their arrest." (Article cited.)



Now, what were you mumbling about "not interested in truth or debate at all."

Everything I post is true and accurate.

Everything.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Good thing none of the Liberals tried to deny that Liberals/Progressives/Democrats are champions of the criminals....


Today:

"NYC to Do Away With Bail for Non-Violent Suspects
The $18 million city plan, detailed to the AP ahead of the announcement today, allows judges beginning next year to replace bail for low-risk defendants with supervision options including daily check-ins, text-message reminders, and required drug or behavioral therapy. Bail has long been criticized by inmate advocates for unfairly targeting poor people. And reforms were recommended by a mayoral task force...."
NYC to Do Away With Bail for Non-Violent Suspects


The result of NYC electing a Communist/Liberal/Democrat mayor.

The result of NYC electing a Communist/Liberal/Democrat mayor.

No. The result of serious systemic flaws that lead to the failure of the system for some involved in it.

Three Years on Rikers Without Trial - The New Yorker

"...flaws that lead to the failure of the system for some involved in it."

The criminals.

Just as I stated.

Would I be correct in guessing that you were an Obama voter?

You would be correct in responding to the point I made rather than attempting to deflect from the issue you brought to the forum.

So....you don't want to admit that you are a doctrinaire Liberal and Obama supporter?

Your reticence is fully understandable....it is certainly an embarrassment.

I am an unabashed liberal.
You are an unabashed moron hack.

So....are you admitting that you voted for the unmitigated failure, Barack Hussein Obama (peace be on him)?

Twice????

 

[ScienceRocks]

So giving all the power to the 2% is somehow going to increase our liberty? LIberty to be thrown on the cold street, liberty to eat poison food and liberty to own slave.

Your idea of liberty really sucks.