Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1. Exactly how does this major polical power extant today, attempt to strangle liberty?
Politicizing thought.
Criminalizing speech.
This is done, directly, through the misnamed Department of Justice.
2. Michael B. Mukasey, who served as the Attorney General of the United States from 2007-2009, and as a U.S. district judge for the Southern District of New York from 1988-2006, and as an assistant U.S. attorney for that same district from 1972-1976, said this:
"The DOJ’s Civil Rights Division is the one we think of as having the main responsibility for protecting fairness.
Yet its recent record has indicated other priorities."
3. How has this Liberal/Democrat administration corrupted the Department of Justice, so as to keep their party in power?
" One lesson to draw from all this is that personnel is policy. If you examine the resumés of people hired into the DOJ beginning in 2009, you will find that the governing credential of new hires was a history of support for left-leaning causes or membership in leftist organizations. By the time of the 2012 election, it was considered unremarkable for DOJ lawyers to display political posters on their office walls, and even outside their offices—something inimical to the spirit and mission of the Department of Justice."
Justice and the Obama Justice Department - Imprimis | Hillsdale College
a. Let's see what the mission of the DoJ should be:
".... the attorney general is a member of the administration—but his principal responsibility is to provide neutral advice on what the law requires, not to fly in political formation."
Again?
"...provide neutral advice...."
That would be in the real America....not the Progressive corruption it has become.
""Principle is nothing to liberals. Winning is everything."
Coulter
LMAO and spit my coffee on the screen; phew, imagine how the hack who posted this thread would have reacted if she were honest and forthright?
Sense she is not, honest or forthright, (think of Winston's employers at the Ministry of Truth); had she an ounce of integrity she would have directed her ire at Alberto Gonzales and his far right hand religious zealot, Monica Goodling.
Failing to do so gives insight into the character flaws of a narcissist and an egotistical hack.
6. The Kinston decision was made " by the same Justice official who ordered the dismissal of a voting rights case against members of the New Black Panther Party in Philadelphia, ..."
"During the 2008 election, two members of the New Black Panther Party showed up at a polling place in Philadelphia dressed in black battle fatigues, one of them brandishing a nightstick and the other yelling at white voters that they would soon be ruled by a black man. The scene was described in an affidavit by a poll watcher—a veteran civil rights activist who had often supported Democratic candidates—as something he had never seen or heard of in his 40 years of political involvement.
.... the Bush administration, the DOJ’s Voting Section filed a lawsuit and won a default judgment. But in the spring of 2009, after the Obama administration took over, those handling the case were directed to drop it. .... And when the Office of Professional Responsibility looked into the matter, their finding criticized the bringing of the case more than the dropping of it.
Contrast that response with the [Obama] DOJ’s treatment of a 79-year-old protestor outside an abortion clinic who was sued by the Civil Rights Division’s Criminal Section for praying outside the clinic and urging entrants to reconsider abortion. When that protestor was pepper sprayed by an abortion supporter for exercising his First Amendment rights, the Criminal Section did nothing." Justice and the Obama Justice Department - Imprimis | Hillsdale College
"Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from being harmed by others; but they also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty. As the revolutionary American pamphleteer Thomas Paine expressed it in “Common Sense” (1776), government is at best “a necessary evil.” Laws, judges, and police are needed to secure the individual’s life and liberty, but their coercive power may also be turned against him. The problem, then, is to devise a system that gives government the power necessary to protect individual liberty but also prevents those who govern from abusing that power."I'm being entirely accurate. You are a fascist, and not even an American in name only.Try to be more accurate.
Fascism, like communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, and Progressivism, are all permutations of the same worldview.
Yours.
As to the above, total nonsense, as usual.
Quite the pattern we are setting.....
You attempt to lie, I reveal same.
OK....let's do that:
...let's smack you in the kisser one more time:
I stated, correctly, that communism, socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Progressivism...are all 'fruit of the same poison tree.'
Deny it?
Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:
Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....
1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life
9. Which restricts free speech and thought?
10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”
And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.
Nazism
Communism
Socialism
Fascism
Progressivism
Liberalism
How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.
In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.
Don't ever change.
liberalism | politics
PC thinks winning elections is an exercise of tyranny. It's common amongst the conservative minority that cannot accept the fact that when the People decide,
conservatism loses.
OK...I see you have another glaring misunderstanding of reality, and the political realm:
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.
This is the explanation of 65 million Americans voting for the failure currently in the White House.
- The National Socialists, the Nazis, understood this, and hailed Roosevelt's ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
Well it's easier of course, but hardly necessary since we win in the end anyway.But consider this, why would Liberals care about having dictatorial powers when Liberals already have the People on their side?
"Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from being harmed by others; but they also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty. As the revolutionary American pamphleteer Thomas Paine expressed it in “Common Sense” (1776), government is at best “a necessary evil.” Laws, judges, and police are needed to secure the individual’s life and liberty, but their coercive power may also be turned against him. The problem, then, is to devise a system that gives government the power necessary to protect individual liberty but also prevents those who govern from abusing that power."I'm being entirely accurate. You are a fascist, and not even an American in name only.
As to the above, total nonsense, as usual.
Quite the pattern we are setting.....
You attempt to lie, I reveal same.
OK....let's do that:
...let's smack you in the kisser one more time:
I stated, correctly, that communism, socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Progressivism...are all 'fruit of the same poison tree.'
Deny it?
Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:
Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....
1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life
9. Which restricts free speech and thought?
10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”
And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.
Nazism
Communism
Socialism
Fascism
Progressivism
Liberalism
How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.
In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.
Don't ever change.
liberalism | politics
PC thinks winning elections is an exercise of tyranny. It's common amongst the conservative minority that cannot accept the fact that when the People decide,
conservatism loses.
OK...I see you have another glaring misunderstanding of reality, and the political realm:
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.
This is the explanation of 65 million Americans voting for the failure currently in the White House.
- The National Socialists, the Nazis, understood this, and hailed Roosevelt's ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
There were no 'dictatorial' recovery measures.
Davis is the poster child, for stupid right-wingers who can't keep their legs crossed. Only Bristol Palin is a better example of extreme hypocrisy...Well it's easier of course, but hardly necessary since we win in the end anyway.But consider this, why would Liberals care about having dictatorial powers when Liberals already have the People on their side?
Planned Parenthood is alive; Kim Davis is dead (well, you know...)
You don't have views, that's why you must cut and paste the views of others, which you do not understand.Of course, you are wrong about my views, but your vulgarity gives you away.
And only children worry about adults swearing. Grow up.
As soon as you default to the method I choose to provide facts, cut and paste, you reveal you cannot confront the truth.
It's amusing that you put your foot in your mouth again.....if I have no views, are you contending that I choose the quoted and examples that I post at random?
Pretty funny, huh?
Davis is the poster child, for stupid right-wingers who can't keep their legs crossed. Only Bristol Palin is a better example of extreme hypocrisy...Well it's easier of course, but hardly necessary since we win in the end anyway.But consider this, why would Liberals care about having dictatorial powers when Liberals already have the People on their side?
Planned Parenthood is alive; Kim Davis is dead (well, you know...)
"Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from being harmed by others; but they also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty. As the revolutionary American pamphleteer Thomas Paine expressed it in “Common Sense” (1776), government is at best “a necessary evil.” Laws, judges, and police are needed to secure the individual’s life and liberty, but their coercive power may also be turned against him. The problem, then, is to devise a system that gives government the power necessary to protect individual liberty but also prevents those who govern from abusing that power."Quite the pattern we are setting.....
You attempt to lie, I reveal same.
OK....let's do that:
...let's smack you in the kisser one more time:
I stated, correctly, that communism, socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Progressivism...are all 'fruit of the same poison tree.'
Deny it?
Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:
Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....
1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life
9. Which restricts free speech and thought?
10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”
And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.
Nazism
Communism
Socialism
Fascism
Progressivism
Liberalism
How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.
In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.
Don't ever change.
liberalism | politics
PC thinks winning elections is an exercise of tyranny. It's common amongst the conservative minority that cannot accept the fact that when the People decide,
conservatism loses.
OK...I see you have another glaring misunderstanding of reality, and the political realm:
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.
This is the explanation of 65 million Americans voting for the failure currently in the White House.
- The National Socialists, the Nazis, understood this, and hailed Roosevelt's ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
There were no 'dictatorial' recovery measures.
So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!!!
"In 1934, it was a tailoring and cleaning establishment owned and run by Jacob Maged, 49.
With his responsibilities as a father of four, Maged should have shunned a life of crime. Instead, he advertised his criminal activity with a placard in his shop window, promising to press men's suits for 35 cents. This he did, even though President Franklin Roosevelt's New Dealers, who knew an amazing number of things -- his economic aides were not called a "Brains Trust" for nothing -- knew that the proper price for pressing a man's suit was 40 cents.
Maged trifled by his 5-cent violation of New Jersey's "tailors' code," written in conjunction with the NRA. On April 20, 1934, he was fined $100 -- serious money when the average family income was about $1,500 -- and sentenced to 30 days in jail."
George F. Will - Trifle with the government? Just ask Jacob Maged
Sieg Heil, Franklin!!!
"Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from being harmed by others; but they also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty. As the revolutionary American pamphleteer Thomas Paine expressed it in “Common Sense” (1776), government is at best “a necessary evil.” Laws, judges, and police are needed to secure the individual’s life and liberty, but their coercive power may also be turned against him. The problem, then, is to devise a system that gives government the power necessary to protect individual liberty but also prevents those who govern from abusing that power."Quite the pattern we are setting.....
You attempt to lie, I reveal same.
OK....let's do that:
...let's smack you in the kisser one more time:
I stated, correctly, that communism, socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Progressivism...are all 'fruit of the same poison tree.'
Deny it?
Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:
Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....
1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life
9. Which restricts free speech and thought?
10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”
And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.
Nazism
Communism
Socialism
Fascism
Progressivism
Liberalism
How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.
In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.
Don't ever change.
liberalism | politics
PC thinks winning elections is an exercise of tyranny. It's common amongst the conservative minority that cannot accept the fact that when the People decide,
conservatism loses.
OK...I see you have another glaring misunderstanding of reality, and the political realm:
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.
This is the explanation of 65 million Americans voting for the failure currently in the White House.
- The National Socialists, the Nazis, understood this, and hailed Roosevelt's ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
There were no 'dictatorial' recovery measures.
So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!!!
"In 1934, it was a tailoring and cleaning establishment owned and run by Jacob Maged, 49.
With his responsibilities as a father of four, Maged should have shunned a life of crime. Instead, he advertised his criminal activity with a placard in his shop window, promising to press men's suits for 35 cents. This he did, even though President Franklin Roosevelt's New Dealers, who knew an amazing number of things -- his economic aides were not called a "Brains Trust" for nothing -- knew that the proper price for pressing a man's suit was 40 cents.
Maged trifled by his 5-cent violation of New Jersey's "tailors' code," written in conjunction with the NRA. On April 20, 1934, he was fined $100 -- serious money when the average family income was about $1,500 -- and sentenced to 30 days in jail."
George F. Will - Trifle with the government? Just ask Jacob Maged
Sieg Heil, Franklin!!!
"Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from being harmed by others; but they also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty. As the revolutionary American pamphleteer Thomas Paine expressed it in “Common Sense” (1776), government is at best “a necessary evil.” Laws, judges, and police are needed to secure the individual’s life and liberty, but their coercive power may also be turned against him. The problem, then, is to devise a system that gives government the power necessary to protect individual liberty but also prevents those who govern from abusing that power."Quite the pattern we are setting.....
You attempt to lie, I reveal same.
OK....let's do that:
...let's smack you in the kisser one more time:
I stated, correctly, that communism, socialism, Nazism, Liberalism, Progressivism...are all 'fruit of the same poison tree.'
Deny it?
Here is a little quiz that will show just how wrong you are:
Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....
1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life
9. Which restricts free speech and thought?
10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”
And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.
Nazism
Communism
Socialism
Fascism
Progressivism
Liberalism
How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.
In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.
Don't ever change.
liberalism | politics
PC thinks winning elections is an exercise of tyranny. It's common amongst the conservative minority that cannot accept the fact that when the People decide,
conservatism loses.
OK...I see you have another glaring misunderstanding of reality, and the political realm:
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.
This is the explanation of 65 million Americans voting for the failure currently in the White House.
- The National Socialists, the Nazis, understood this, and hailed Roosevelt's ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
There were no 'dictatorial' recovery measures.
So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!!!
"In 1934, it was a tailoring and cleaning establishment owned and run by Jacob Maged, 49.
With his responsibilities as a father of four, Maged should have shunned a life of crime. Instead, he advertised his criminal activity with a placard in his shop window, promising to press men's suits for 35 cents. This he did, even though President Franklin Roosevelt's New Dealers, who knew an amazing number of things -- his economic aides were not called a "Brains Trust" for nothing -- knew that the proper price for pressing a man's suit was 40 cents.
Maged trifled by his 5-cent violation of New Jersey's "tailors' code," written in conjunction with the NRA. On April 20, 1934, he was fined $100 -- serious money when the average family income was about $1,500 -- and sentenced to 30 days in jail."
George F. Will - Trifle with the government? Just ask Jacob Maged
Sieg Heil, Franklin!!!
"Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from being harmed by others; but they also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty. As the revolutionary American pamphleteer Thomas Paine expressed it in “Common Sense” (1776), government is at best “a necessary evil.” Laws, judges, and police are needed to secure the individual’s life and liberty, but their coercive power may also be turned against him. The problem, then, is to devise a system that gives government the power necessary to protect individual liberty but also prevents those who govern from abusing that power."
liberalism | politics
PC thinks winning elections is an exercise of tyranny. It's common amongst the conservative minority that cannot accept the fact that when the People decide,
conservatism loses.
OK...I see you have another glaring misunderstanding of reality, and the political realm:
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.
This is the explanation of 65 million Americans voting for the failure currently in the White House.
- The National Socialists, the Nazis, understood this, and hailed Roosevelt's ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
There were no 'dictatorial' recovery measures.
So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!!!
"In 1934, it was a tailoring and cleaning establishment owned and run by Jacob Maged, 49.
With his responsibilities as a father of four, Maged should have shunned a life of crime. Instead, he advertised his criminal activity with a placard in his shop window, promising to press men's suits for 35 cents. This he did, even though President Franklin Roosevelt's New Dealers, who knew an amazing number of things -- his economic aides were not called a "Brains Trust" for nothing -- knew that the proper price for pressing a man's suit was 40 cents.
Maged trifled by his 5-cent violation of New Jersey's "tailors' code," written in conjunction with the NRA. On April 20, 1934, he was fined $100 -- serious money when the average family income was about $1,500 -- and sentenced to 30 days in jail."
George F. Will - Trifle with the government? Just ask Jacob Maged
Sieg Heil, Franklin!!!
You left out the part where he only spent 3 days in jail and didn't have to pay the fine.
You also left out that the price controls were legislatively enacted.
Next you'll be telling us that Truman's campaign against war profiteering mirrored the Gestapo.
"Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from being harmed by others; but they also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty. As the revolutionary American pamphleteer Thomas Paine expressed it in “Common Sense” (1776), government is at best “a necessary evil.” Laws, judges, and police are needed to secure the individual’s life and liberty, but their coercive power may also be turned against him. The problem, then, is to devise a system that gives government the power necessary to protect individual liberty but also prevents those who govern from abusing that power."
liberalism | politics
PC thinks winning elections is an exercise of tyranny. It's common amongst the conservative minority that cannot accept the fact that when the People decide,
conservatism loses.
OK...I see you have another glaring misunderstanding of reality, and the political realm:
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.
This is the explanation of 65 million Americans voting for the failure currently in the White House.
- The National Socialists, the Nazis, understood this, and hailed Roosevelt's ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
There were no 'dictatorial' recovery measures.
So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!!!
"In 1934, it was a tailoring and cleaning establishment owned and run by Jacob Maged, 49.
With his responsibilities as a father of four, Maged should have shunned a life of crime. Instead, he advertised his criminal activity with a placard in his shop window, promising to press men's suits for 35 cents. This he did, even though President Franklin Roosevelt's New Dealers, who knew an amazing number of things -- his economic aides were not called a "Brains Trust" for nothing -- knew that the proper price for pressing a man's suit was 40 cents.
Maged trifled by his 5-cent violation of New Jersey's "tailors' code," written in conjunction with the NRA. On April 20, 1934, he was fined $100 -- serious money when the average family income was about $1,500 -- and sentenced to 30 days in jail."
George F. Will - Trifle with the government? Just ask Jacob Maged
Sieg Heil, Franklin!!!
Yet he only served three days in jail and then sent a telegram to Washington pleading that the code he violated was good for business and should be retained. He also said that his conviction was very good for his business. The minute I saw George Will in your headline I just knew there would be more to this LOL
JAILED TAILOR WIRES PLEA FOR CODE RETENTION (May 15, 1934)
PC thinks winning elections is an exercise of tyranny. It's common amongst the conservative minority that cannot accept the fact that when the People decide,
conservatism loses.
OK...I see you have another glaring misunderstanding of reality, and the political realm:
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.
This is the explanation of 65 million Americans voting for the failure currently in the White House.
- The National Socialists, the Nazis, understood this, and hailed Roosevelt's ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
There were no 'dictatorial' recovery measures.
So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!!!
"In 1934, it was a tailoring and cleaning establishment owned and run by Jacob Maged, 49.
With his responsibilities as a father of four, Maged should have shunned a life of crime. Instead, he advertised his criminal activity with a placard in his shop window, promising to press men's suits for 35 cents. This he did, even though President Franklin Roosevelt's New Dealers, who knew an amazing number of things -- his economic aides were not called a "Brains Trust" for nothing -- knew that the proper price for pressing a man's suit was 40 cents.
Maged trifled by his 5-cent violation of New Jersey's "tailors' code," written in conjunction with the NRA. On April 20, 1934, he was fined $100 -- serious money when the average family income was about $1,500 -- and sentenced to 30 days in jail."
George F. Will - Trifle with the government? Just ask Jacob Maged
Sieg Heil, Franklin!!!
You left out the part where he only spent 3 days in jail and didn't have to pay the fine.
You also left out that the price controls were legislatively enacted.
Next you'll be telling us that Truman's campaign against war profiteering mirrored the Gestapo.
But included the significant portions....the dictatorial methods of the totalitarian New Deal.
Don't you get tired of the beatings?
PC thinks winning elections is an exercise of tyranny. It's common amongst the conservative minority that cannot accept the fact that when the People decide,
conservatism loses.
OK...I see you have another glaring misunderstanding of reality, and the political realm:
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.
This is the explanation of 65 million Americans voting for the failure currently in the White House.
- The National Socialists, the Nazis, understood this, and hailed Roosevelt's ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
There were no 'dictatorial' recovery measures.
So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!!!
"In 1934, it was a tailoring and cleaning establishment owned and run by Jacob Maged, 49.
With his responsibilities as a father of four, Maged should have shunned a life of crime. Instead, he advertised his criminal activity with a placard in his shop window, promising to press men's suits for 35 cents. This he did, even though President Franklin Roosevelt's New Dealers, who knew an amazing number of things -- his economic aides were not called a "Brains Trust" for nothing -- knew that the proper price for pressing a man's suit was 40 cents.
Maged trifled by his 5-cent violation of New Jersey's "tailors' code," written in conjunction with the NRA. On April 20, 1934, he was fined $100 -- serious money when the average family income was about $1,500 -- and sentenced to 30 days in jail."
George F. Will - Trifle with the government? Just ask Jacob Maged
Sieg Heil, Franklin!!!
Yet he only served three days in jail and then sent a telegram to Washington pleading that the code he violated was good for business and should be retained. He also said that his conviction was very good for his business. The minute I saw George Will in your headline I just knew there would be more to this LOL
JAILED TAILOR WIRES PLEA FOR CODE RETENTION (May 15, 1934)
What????
You demand further education about the fascist, unconstitutional New Deal????
Well....OK
"NATIONAL RECOVERY ADMINISTRATION (NRA). The National Recovery Administration was the most ambitious effort ever to enact federal planning of the economy during peacetime.
The Supreme Court then delivered the death blow in the case of Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States (1935), which ruled that NRA codes were an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power and further violated the Constitution by regulating commerce within sovereign states."
National Recovery Administration Facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia.com articles about National Recovery Administration
As I stated, the Nazis correctly identified Roosevelt's affinity with themselves...
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
See the difference between you and I?
I actually have an education....you, a mind-numbed ideology.
OK...I see you have another glaring misunderstanding of reality, and the political realm:
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.
This is the explanation of 65 million Americans voting for the failure currently in the White House.
- The National Socialists, the Nazis, understood this, and hailed Roosevelt's ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
There were no 'dictatorial' recovery measures.
So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!!!
"In 1934, it was a tailoring and cleaning establishment owned and run by Jacob Maged, 49.
With his responsibilities as a father of four, Maged should have shunned a life of crime. Instead, he advertised his criminal activity with a placard in his shop window, promising to press men's suits for 35 cents. This he did, even though President Franklin Roosevelt's New Dealers, who knew an amazing number of things -- his economic aides were not called a "Brains Trust" for nothing -- knew that the proper price for pressing a man's suit was 40 cents.
Maged trifled by his 5-cent violation of New Jersey's "tailors' code," written in conjunction with the NRA. On April 20, 1934, he was fined $100 -- serious money when the average family income was about $1,500 -- and sentenced to 30 days in jail."
George F. Will - Trifle with the government? Just ask Jacob Maged
Sieg Heil, Franklin!!!
You left out the part where he only spent 3 days in jail and didn't have to pay the fine.
You also left out that the price controls were legislatively enacted.
Next you'll be telling us that Truman's campaign against war profiteering mirrored the Gestapo.
But included the significant portions....the dictatorial methods of the totalitarian New Deal.
Don't you get tired of the beatings?
It wasn't dictatorial. Dictators don't have legislatures and courts retaining power to contest their will.
OK...I see you have another glaring misunderstanding of reality, and the political realm:
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.
This is the explanation of 65 million Americans voting for the failure currently in the White House.
- The National Socialists, the Nazis, understood this, and hailed Roosevelt's ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
There were no 'dictatorial' recovery measures.
So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!!!
"In 1934, it was a tailoring and cleaning establishment owned and run by Jacob Maged, 49.
With his responsibilities as a father of four, Maged should have shunned a life of crime. Instead, he advertised his criminal activity with a placard in his shop window, promising to press men's suits for 35 cents. This he did, even though President Franklin Roosevelt's New Dealers, who knew an amazing number of things -- his economic aides were not called a "Brains Trust" for nothing -- knew that the proper price for pressing a man's suit was 40 cents.
Maged trifled by his 5-cent violation of New Jersey's "tailors' code," written in conjunction with the NRA. On April 20, 1934, he was fined $100 -- serious money when the average family income was about $1,500 -- and sentenced to 30 days in jail."
George F. Will - Trifle with the government? Just ask Jacob Maged
Sieg Heil, Franklin!!!
Yet he only served three days in jail and then sent a telegram to Washington pleading that the code he violated was good for business and should be retained. He also said that his conviction was very good for his business. The minute I saw George Will in your headline I just knew there would be more to this LOL
JAILED TAILOR WIRES PLEA FOR CODE RETENTION (May 15, 1934)
What????
You demand further education about the fascist, unconstitutional New Deal????
Well....OK
"NATIONAL RECOVERY ADMINISTRATION (NRA). The National Recovery Administration was the most ambitious effort ever to enact federal planning of the economy during peacetime.
The Supreme Court then delivered the death blow in the case of Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States (1935), which ruled that NRA codes were an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power and further violated the Constitution by regulating commerce within sovereign states."
National Recovery Administration Facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia.com articles about National Recovery Administration
As I stated, the Nazis correctly identified Roosevelt's affinity with themselves...
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
See the difference between you and I?
I actually have an education....you, a mind-numbed ideology.
So the Courts held sway over Roosevelt's policies. lol, you've admitted he couldn't possibly have been a dictator,
because dictatorships do not yield to any such checks and balances.
You have a good quote from propagandists and think it is truth! Talk about mind being numb!!!PC thinks winning elections is an exercise of tyranny. It's common amongst the conservative minority that cannot accept the fact that when the People decide,
conservatism loses.
OK...I see you have another glaring misunderstanding of reality, and the political realm:
No democracy is possible without an unbiased press. That is the reason for the first amendment.
This is the explanation of 65 million Americans voting for the failure currently in the White House.
- The National Socialists, the Nazis, understood this, and hailed Roosevelt's ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
There were no 'dictatorial' recovery measures.
So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!!!
"In 1934, it was a tailoring and cleaning establishment owned and run by Jacob Maged, 49.
With his responsibilities as a father of four, Maged should have shunned a life of crime. Instead, he advertised his criminal activity with a placard in his shop window, promising to press men's suits for 35 cents. This he did, even though President Franklin Roosevelt's New Dealers, who knew an amazing number of things -- his economic aides were not called a "Brains Trust" for nothing -- knew that the proper price for pressing a man's suit was 40 cents.
Maged trifled by his 5-cent violation of New Jersey's "tailors' code," written in conjunction with the NRA. On April 20, 1934, he was fined $100 -- serious money when the average family income was about $1,500 -- and sentenced to 30 days in jail."
George F. Will - Trifle with the government? Just ask Jacob Maged
Sieg Heil, Franklin!!!
Yet he only served three days in jail and then sent a telegram to Washington pleading that the code he violated was good for business and should be retained. He also said that his conviction was very good for his business. The minute I saw George Will in your headline I just knew there would be more to this LOL
JAILED TAILOR WIRES PLEA FOR CODE RETENTION (May 15, 1934)
What????
You demand further education about the fascist, unconstitutional New Deal????
Well....OK
"NATIONAL RECOVERY ADMINISTRATION (NRA). The National Recovery Administration was the most ambitious effort ever to enact federal planning of the economy during peacetime.
The Supreme Court then delivered the death blow in the case of Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States (1935), which ruled that NRA codes were an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power and further violated the Constitution by regulating commerce within sovereign states."
National Recovery Administration Facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia.com articles about National Recovery Administration
As I stated, the Nazis correctly identified Roosevelt's affinity with themselves...
- May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
- And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
- And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
- The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”
See the difference between you and I?
I actually have an education....you, a mind-numbed ideology.
1. Exactly how does this major polical power extant today, attempt to strangle liberty?
Politicizing thought.
Criminalizing speech.
This is done, directly, through the misnamed Department of Justice.
There were no 'dictatorial' recovery measures.
So THAT'S why you're known as the NYLiar!!!
"In 1934, it was a tailoring and cleaning establishment owned and run by Jacob Maged, 49.
With his responsibilities as a father of four, Maged should have shunned a life of crime. Instead, he advertised his criminal activity with a placard in his shop window, promising to press men's suits for 35 cents. This he did, even though President Franklin Roosevelt's New Dealers, who knew an amazing number of things -- his economic aides were not called a "Brains Trust" for nothing -- knew that the proper price for pressing a man's suit was 40 cents.
Maged trifled by his 5-cent violation of New Jersey's "tailors' code," written in conjunction with the NRA. On April 20, 1934, he was fined $100 -- serious money when the average family income was about $1,500 -- and sentenced to 30 days in jail."
George F. Will - Trifle with the government? Just ask Jacob Maged
Sieg Heil, Franklin!!!
You left out the part where he only spent 3 days in jail and didn't have to pay the fine.
You also left out that the price controls were legislatively enacted.
Next you'll be telling us that Truman's campaign against war profiteering mirrored the Gestapo.
But included the significant portions....the dictatorial methods of the totalitarian New Deal.
Don't you get tired of the beatings?
It wasn't dictatorial. Dictators don't have legislatures and courts retaining power to contest their will.
So...you don't get tired of the beatings?
There is a term for folks who suffer from the disability that you have....and it was the topic that Leopold Ritter von Sacher-Masoch wrote about.
Your disability is known as masochism.
