Tim Walz' Worst Policy > Infanticide

protectionist

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2013
57,325
18,453
2,250
With the litany of horrendous policies that Tim Walz espouses, it would take an incredibly evil one to be the worst. Nevertheless, despite going against even Democrat public opinion, Walz signed a bill a year ago, SF2995, legalizing the killing of already born babies, who survive abortions, by denying them lifesaving care, thereby committing infanticide.

Harris/Walz supporters can read the 2 links I've posted here, and they can go through the details, but no matter what they say, or may try to spin it, the bottom line is Walz OKd this bill in which infants born alive & healthy, could be denied lifesaving care and allowed to die.

Cold-blooded murder, and nothing less.

And what is Walz' record on this issue ? It's criminal. Before this despicable law was passed, in Walz’s state and on his watch, five infants were "born alive" in 2021 during failed abortions, and none was provided life-saving care though two got “comfort care,” the Minnesota Department of Health reported on July 1, 2022. and the 3 who did not receive even "comfort care" ? > got no blankets, no cuddling, and died of hypothermia in cold hospital operating rooms - they froze to death.

File
MNAbortionReportJuly2022.pdf
Three other infants were "born alive" during abortions in 2019, Walz’s first year as governor, and they too perished without life-saving care, according to a July 1, 2020 report from the same state agency.



Just to show how deliberate was this heinous act by Walz, and his fellow Democrats in the Minnesota legislature, SF2995 revoked, a 2015 legislation > the “Born Alive Infants Protection Act” (section145.423)" recognizing a born alive infant resulting from an induced abortion as a human person (section 145.423, subdivision 1) and requiring that “reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to preserve the life and health of the born alive infant.”
 
Last edited:
But let's stay on topic (especially for those who might foolishly want to out-gross you)
 
With the litany of horrendous policies that Tim Walz espouses, it would take an incredibly evil one to be the worst. Nevertheless, despite going against even Democrat public opinion, Walz signed a bill a year ago, SF2995, legalizing the killing of already born babies, who survive abortions, by denying them lifesaving care, thereby committing infanticide.

Harris/Walz supporters can read the 2 links I've posted here, and they can go through the details, but no matter what they say, or may try to spin it, the bottom line is Walz OKd this bill in which infants born alive & healthy, could be denied lifesaving care and allowed to die.

Cold-blooded murder, and nothing less.

And what is Walz' record on this issue ? It's criminal. Before this despicable law was passed, in Walz’s state and on his watch, five infants were "born alive" in 2021 during failed abortions, and none was provided life-saving care though two got “comfort care,” the Minnesota Department of Health reported on July 1, 2022. and the 3 who did not receive even "comfort care" ? > got no blankets, no cuddling, and died of hypothermia in cold hospital operating rooms - they froze to death.

File
MNAbortionReportJuly2022.pdf
Three other infants were "born alive" during abortions in 2019, Walz’s first year as governor, and they too perished without life-saving care, according to a July 1, 2020 report from the same state agency.



Just to show how deliberate was this heinous act by Walz, and his fellow Democrats in the Minnesota legislature, SF2995 revoked, a 2015 legislation > the “Born Alive Infants Protection Act” (section145.423)" recognizing a born alive infant resulting from an induced abortion as a human person (section 145.423, subdivision 1) and requiring that “reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to preserve the life and health of the born alive infant.”
Nothing in the report indicates these were third trimester "infants". In fact, it states clearly that at least two were "pre-viable". A fetus is not considered viable before 24 weeks.

Before that, the fetus does not have the lungs or vital organs to survive.

Assumptions cannot be made:

  • In one instance, fetal anomalies were reported resulting in death shortly after delivery. No measures taken to preserve life were reported and the infant did not survive.

  • In two instance, comfort care measures were provided as planned and the infant did not survive

  • In two instances, the infant was previable. No measures taken to preserve life were reported and the infant did not survive.
 

Forum List

Back
Top