Tim Walz's Stolen Valor Gets Worse, Posed as Afghanistan War Veteran

[AZrailwhale]

Tim Walz never served a day in the Regular Army. His total enlistment was in National Guard units.

 

[Mac-7]

Over 500 of all ranks have supported him.

Not members of his actual NG unit

The Command Sm’s served with him signed a letter critical of Walz

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Most veterans will be the first to attack a false record. They value the service rendered by their fellows.

The veterans and their orgs are overwhelminly supporting Walz.

 

[Hector12]

This is like having been in the Army in 1968 and never gotten farther than San Diego during Vietnam, and calling yourself a Vietnam Veteran. 100% Stolen Valor.

Picture of Walz Holding 'Enduring Freedom Veteran' Protest Sign During 2004 Anti-George Bush Rally Resurfaces Amid Accusations of Stolen Valor | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

A bombshell revelation has surfaced this week that could mark the end of Tim Walz’s political career.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

"A bombshell revelation has surfaced this week that could mark the end of Tim Walz’s political career. A photo, recently unearthed, shows Walz holding a protest sign reading “Enduring Freedom Veterans for Kerry” during a 2004 anti-George Bush rally in Mankato, Minnesota.

The photograph, taken by Michael B. Brodkorb, was captured on August 4, 2004, as Walz protested outside a campaign rally for President Bush in Mankato, Minnesota.

John Kerry fought in Vietnam, unlike chicken hawks like George W. Bush. When Kerry came back from Vietnam, he condemned the War in Vietnam and helped found Vietnam Veterans against the War.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

I’m not doing anything

Its vets who knew Walz and served in his unit who are exposing his actions

Of course you are, that is exactly what you are doing, trying to discredit this man's service. Go get you a couple of years and then try criticizing his record.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

His actual service was about the same number of days as a three-year enlistment. I've served in both active duty and reserve units, Reserve and National Guard are vacations compared with active duty.

Irrelevant, the man served. I don't give a damn if he was playing paper football everyday. If he didn't have to serve in a combat theater good for him.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

How many years did you serve? I served five years on active duty and four in the active reserves.

8yrs Army.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

That’s not the point.

The point is lying about what you did.

Just saying 24 years over and over refutes nothing. Address the actual point

As compared to someone who didn't serve a day.

 

[Mac-7]

Of course you are, that is exactly what you are doing, trying to discredit this man's service. Go get you a couple of years and then try criticizing his record.

So its ok for you to bash e-9s who knew him but not ok for them to criticize Walz?

Thats the usual lib rules of heads you win, and tails we lose

But thats not gonna fly

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Most veterans will be the first to attack a false record. They value the service rendered by their fellows.

Unless you can see his DD214, you don't know what he did or didn't do.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

So its ok for you to bash e-9s who knew him but not ok for them to criticize Walz?

I haven't bashed anyone, that is what you MAWA cowards are trying to do.

Thats the usual lib rules of heads you win, and tails we lose

But thats not gonna fly

Stick that lib BS up your candy ass, I will defend any man who has served over a coward trying to attack his record.

 

[Mac-7]

I haven't bashed anyone, that is what you MAWA cowards are trying to do.

Stick that lib BS up your candy ass, I will defend any man who has served over a coward trying to attack his record.

But you are attacking the e-9s by suggesting that no one should take take their criticism of Walz seriously

 

[Superbadbrutha]

But you are attacking the e-9s by suggesting that no one should take take their criticism of Walz seriously

How is that attacking them, fool. I said most veterans don't attack another veterans service record, if you were a veteran you would know that.

 

[Mac-7]

How is that attacking them, fool. I said most veterans don't attack another veterans service record, if you were a veteran you would know that.

They will attack soldiers who deserve it

And that means Walz who the vets say shirked his duty

 

[jotathought]

Of course you are, that is exactly what you are doing, trying to discredit this man's service. Go get you a couple of years and then try criticizing his record.

Walz discredited his own service, by embellishing his credentials, and people are just responding to those embellishments.

 

[jotathought]

How is that attacking them, fool. I said most veterans don't attack another veterans service record, if you were a veteran you would know that.

Veterans attack fellow veterans who embellish their credentials, and Walz discredited himself by embellishing his career with disinformation. Hell, even the harris campaign updated his bio after calling him a retired CSM .. and embellishment he communicated after retirement.

Unfortunately for him, he bailed, didn't finish the eligibility requirements for his provisional rank, and was demoted after retirement -- now he's playing the victim card for his own actions.