Papawx3
Active Member
I have no faith in people's ability to determine innocence or guilt and therefore no faith in the jury system.
For that reason alone the death penalty should be abandoned. Life in prison without the possibility of parole suffices. I personally think prisons should be punishment. No TVs no weight rooms etc just a regimented existence until you either serve your sentence or die.
There are lots of practical reasons why the death penalty should be abolished. Takes too long to implement. Too expensive. Innocent people being executed. I think all of these arguments beg the question. The death penalty should be abolished because it is morally wrong. All of the practical reasons for abolishing the death penalty could, theoretically, be remedied. The appeal process could be made to be much swifter. That would go a long way toward solving the expense problem. The jury system could be improved. You could solve ALL of the practical problems that go along with the death penalty and then what?
It should still be abolished because it is morally wrong.
That is the ultimate argument against it.
I might disagree with you, but I'll defend your right to speak out against it. But if you are so dead set against it, and feel so deeply that it needs to be changed, then you should start a campaign against it. But the only way to get a law repealed is to go the same route as those who got it enbacted in the first place. I suggest you start with your local legislators..