Buckle up cons, a number of states are already working on declaring themselves sanctuary states to bolster the sanctuary cities that have already declared such.
Snowflake...they could "declare" themselves Liza Minnelli - it doesn't matter. The federal government is constitutionally responsible for immigration law enforcement so there isn't a damn thing they can do about it.

And....get this snowflake....Neil Gorsuch is about to be appointed to the Supreme Court. Which means the U.S. Constitution will be upheld.

:dance:
Immigration and tourism with work authorization are two different things. We have a Commerce Clause.
The blue monkey will carry the hammer because I like to play golf on Wednesdays.

Do you even read a post before responding to it? What you just posted has NOTHING to do with anything we were discussing.
 
I'm starting to think that ICE should monitor USMB. There appears to be a lot of illegals using this site. There is no other logical reason for why a group of people would completely and totally lose their shit over the thought of the U.S. properly enforcing laws again.
 
The IRS profiled. I thought conservatives were FOR profiling ? Or is that just for brown people only ?
The IRS wasn't "profiling" you nitwit. I would be 100% ok with that. The IRS targeted. There is a monumental difference. Profiling involves using common sense to verify the demographic most likely to commit a crime. If the IRS wanted to use that to place extra emphasis on Wall Street bankers (or some other demographic they found is most likely to cheat on their taxes) - great!

But when you target a political opposition to suppress them in order to win an election - that's not "profiling". It always amazes me how dumb Dumbocrats are. I know it shouldn't since it is in their name - but God Almighty they don't even know basic definitions like a "fence" or a "wall" or "profiling".

Lol! Love to see you bend reality in order to excuse profiling against others .

Is it "targeting " when the IRS looks twice at a group who's purpose is to avoid taxes !?
 
The IRS profiled. I thought conservatives were FOR profiling ? Or is that just for brown people only ?
The IRS wasn't "profiling" you nitwit. I would be 100% ok with that. The IRS targeted. There is a monumental difference. Profiling involves using common sense to verify the demographic most likely to commit a crime. If the IRS wanted to use that to place extra emphasis on Wall Street bankers (or some other demographic they found is most likely to cheat on their taxes) - great!

But when you target a political opposition to suppress them in order to win an election - that's not "profiling". It always amazes me how dumb Dumbocrats are. I know it shouldn't since it is in their name - but God Almighty they don't even know basic definitions like a "fence" or a "wall" or "profiling".

Lol! Love to see you bend reality in order to excuse profiling against others . Is it "targeting " when the IRS looks twice at a group who's purpose is to avoid taxes !?
Bend "reality"? I just gave the the clear difference between "profiling" and targeting in simple English. Is there an adult around that you could perhaps ask for help?
 
The IRS profiled. I thought conservatives were FOR profiling ? Or is that just for brown people only ?
The IRS wasn't "profiling" you nitwit. I would be 100% ok with that. The IRS targeted. There is a monumental difference. Profiling involves using common sense to verify the demographic most likely to commit a crime. If the IRS wanted to use that to place extra emphasis on Wall Street bankers (or some other demographic they found is most likely to cheat on their taxes) - great!

But when you target a political opposition to suppress them in order to win an election - that's not "profiling". It always amazes me how dumb Dumbocrats are. I know it shouldn't since it is in their name - but God Almighty they don't even know basic definitions like a "fence" or a "wall" or "profiling".

Lol! Love to see you bend reality in order to excuse profiling against others . Is it "targeting " when the IRS looks twice at a group who's purpose is to avoid taxes !?
Bend "reality"? I just gave the the clear difference between "profiling" and targeting in simple English. Is there an adult around that you could perhaps ask for help?

There was no difference! As I explained , the IRS was right to profile those groups . According to your definition.
 
There was no difference! As I explained , the IRS was right to profile those groups . According to your definition.
There was a monumental difference - which is why you ran like hell from it! Your inability to support your own position is killing you on this forum.
 
Buckle up cons, a number of states are already working on declaring themselves sanctuary states to bolster the sanctuary cities that have already declared such.
Snowflake...they could "declare" themselves Liza Minnelli - it doesn't matter. The federal government is constitutionally responsible for immigration law enforcement so there isn't a damn thing they can do about it.

And....get this snowflake....Neil Gorsuch is about to be appointed to the Supreme Court. Which means the U.S. Constitution will be upheld.

:dance:
Immigration and tourism with work authorization are two different things. We have a Commerce Clause.
The blue monkey will carry the hammer because I like to play golf on Wednesdays.

Do you even read a post before responding to it? What you just posted has NOTHING to do with anything we were discussing.
why should I take the right wing seriously about the law or economics?

it has everything to do with it. you are simply, clueless and Causeless.
 
I'm starting to think that ICE should monitor USMB. There appears to be a lot of illegals using this site. There is no other logical reason for why a group of people would completely and totally lose their shit over the thought of the U.S. properly enforcing laws again.
10USC311 is also, federal law. Let's start enforcing our Second Amendment by overturning DC v. Heller on federal supremacy grounds.
 
The IRS profiled. I thought conservatives were FOR profiling ? Or is that just for brown people only ?
The IRS wasn't "profiling" you nitwit. I would be 100% ok with that. The IRS targeted. There is a monumental difference. Profiling involves using common sense to verify the demographic most likely to commit a crime. If the IRS wanted to use that to place extra emphasis on Wall Street bankers (or some other demographic they found is most likely to cheat on their taxes) - great!

But when you target a political opposition to suppress them in order to win an election - that's not "profiling". It always amazes me how dumb Dumbocrats are. I know it shouldn't since it is in their name - but God Almighty they don't even know basic definitions like a "fence" or a "wall" or "profiling".

Lol! Love to see you bend reality in order to excuse profiling against others .

Is it "targeting " when the IRS looks twice at a group who's purpose is to avoid taxes !?
The right wing has no problem with socialism on a national basis, while alleging the, "gospel Truth" concerning their alleged subscription to Capitalism.
 
Do you even read a post before responding to it? What you just posted has NOTHING to do with anything we were discussing.
it has everything to do with it. you are simply, clueless and Causeless.
Me: "The federal government is constitutionally responsible for immigration law enforcement"

You: "We have a Commerce Clause"

Dude...you're clueless. You have no idea what thread you're in, what is being discussed, or what year it is.
 
It's tragic that people have to suffer atrocities such as this because the left knows they can't win clean, fair elections. I'm so thankful Republicans are in charge again throughout the nation and restoring law and order.

Illegal rapes 14-year old girl
 
Sorry Rahm....we all know you need illegals to stay in power....but the American people insist that the United States will remain a nation of laws. And we win.

Emanuel Says Chicago Will Stay a Sanctuary City

Oh yeah. What the F is Trump going to do about it?

Watch and wait. You'll see.

I have never seen a bigger collection of ignorant assholes than those who support sanctuary cities. I assume that includes you.

Yep. You meatheads don't see the big picture.

The only thing Trump can is withhold fed money to law enforcement. But he is MR LAW AND ORDER . Kind of paints him in a corner doesn't it ?

No, it puts the elected officials who thumb their nose at the rule of law in a corner

The decision to harbor criminals is a choice which will have consequences

Why should these illegal wetbacks get special treatment?

-Geaux
 
Do you even read a post before responding to it? What you just posted has NOTHING to do with anything we were discussing.
it has everything to do with it. you are simply, clueless and Causeless.
Me: "The federal government is constitutionally responsible for immigration law enforcement"

You: "We have a Commerce Clause"

Dude...you're clueless. You have no idea what thread you're in, what is being discussed, or what year it is.
Immigration into the Union is a form of Commerce. Immigration rules should be, market friendly".

Only the right wing likes to take clauses, out of clue and out of context.
 
Why should these illegal wetbacks get special treatment?
Because Timmy believes that the law does not apply to left-wingers.

I agree. To the left, entitlements have no bounds.

It started when they got trophies in their youth for being #6 on the bench warmers club

In mature terms today, they get ponies, balloons and cry rooms

-Geaux
Yes, promoting the general welfare, knows no bounds. We have a defense clause, not an offense clause nor a general warfare clause. Only the right wing, never gets it.
 
Sorry Rahm....we all know you need illegals to stay in power....but the American people insist that the United States will remain a nation of laws. And we win.

Emanuel Says Chicago Will Stay a Sanctuary City

Oh yeah. What the F is Trump going to do about it?
Do you even read a post before responding to it? What you just posted has NOTHING to do with anything we were discussing.
it has everything to do with it. you are simply, clueless and Causeless.
Me: "The federal government is constitutionally responsible for immigration law enforcement"

You: "We have a Commerce Clause"

Dude...you're clueless. You have no idea what thread you're in, what is being discussed, or what year it is.

You're encouraging a time-suck troll to keep posting. I encourage you to stop responding to him so he can reflect on how worthless his postings are.
 

Forum List

Back
Top