Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think he means we already talked about this, and everyone decided you are an idiot.
and yet, he's not wrong about this. the "fiscally responsible" rightwingnuts are paying $500 an hour to defend the unconstitutional defense of marriage act.
gee... there's priorities for ya.
but feel free to cut WIC.
As I pointed out in the other thread about this, and rdean actually posted, the plan is to take the $500,000 from DOJ funds.
Since you are suddenly so fiscally conservative though, I am sure you support defunding NPR, the NEA, and all the other groups, left wing and right wing, that should survive on their own.
and yet, he's not wrong about this. the "fiscally responsible" rightwingnuts are paying $500 an hour to defend the unconstitutional defense of marriage act.
gee... there's priorities for ya.
but feel free to cut WIC.
As I pointed out in the other thread about this, and rdean actually posted, the plan is to take the $500,000 from DOJ funds.
Since you are suddenly so fiscally conservative though, I am sure you support defunding NPR, the NEA, and all the other groups, left wing and right wing, that should survive on their own.
why would i support money being sucked out of DOJ for an unconstitutional purpose?
(and yes, this really IS unconstitutional, unlike the rest of what you CLAIM is unconstitutional).
and why would i support your right wing social agenda?
The thing is the Republitards retained his services BEFORE submitting any request. NEWSFLASH!!! The DOJ is part of the Executive NOT the Legislative branch. Why would the Executive defend a Repub piece of legislation that was proposed & passed by a former Repub admin?
and yet, he's not wrong about this. the "fiscally responsible" rightwingnuts are paying $500 an hour to defend the unconstitutional defense of marriage act.
gee... there's priorities for ya.
but feel free to cut WIC.
As I pointed out in the other thread about this, and rdean actually posted, the plan is to take the $500,000 from DOJ funds.
Since you are suddenly so fiscally conservative though, I am sure you support defunding NPR, the NEA, and all the other groups, left wing and right wing, that should survive on their own.
There are areas of the country that are so poor and rural, government funded, non partisan stations is the only way those people have to get the news.
Of course, Republicans, anti gay, anti education, anti middle class, anti poor want to keep it that way. An educated public is more likely to vote Democrat. That goes without saying. Not something that can be denied.
As I pointed out in the other thread about this, and rdean actually posted, the plan is to take the $500,000 from DOJ funds.
Since you are suddenly so fiscally conservative though, I am sure you support defunding NPR, the NEA, and all the other groups, left wing and right wing, that should survive on their own.
There are areas of the country that are so poor and rural, government funded, non partisan stations is the only way those people have to get the news.
Of course, Republicans, anti gay, anti education, anti middle class, anti poor want to keep it that way. An educated public is more likely to vote Democrat. That goes without saying. Not something that can be denied.
Really?
What part of the country doesn't get broadcast TV, cable, or internet?
There are areas of the country that are so poor and rural, government funded, non partisan stations is the only way those people have to get the news.
Of course, Republicans, anti gay, anti education, anti middle class, anti poor want to keep it that way. An educated public is more likely to vote Democrat. That goes without saying. Not something that can be denied.
Really?
What part of the country doesn't get broadcast TV, cable, or internet?
This was back in 2009:
Study: 8.5 Million Households Face Poor DTV Reception
Converting Analog Television to Digital TV Not Working for Millions of Americans
Since America went "digital", there are many people who simply can't afford the converters or a new TV. There are people who live in areas where the digital range simply isn't "far enough". There are people who live in Alaska, the desert in Nevada, in Appalachia who don't have access to cable and the new digital signal is too poor to allow them much TV.
For all these people, the radio is there best source of reliable news, information and even entertainment.
I visited relatives outside of Gabbs, Nevada and was surprised they were without TV for exactly those reasons. I've always taken it for granted.
Democrats are perverts
Of course, Republicans, anti gay, anti education, anti middle class, anti poor want to keep it that way. An educated public is more likely to vote Democrat. That goes without saying. Not something that can be denied.
The thing is the Republitards retained his services BEFORE submitting any request. NEWSFLASH!!! The DOJ is part of the Executive NOT the Legislative branch. Why would the Executive defend a Repub piece of legislation that was proposed & passed by a former Repub admin?
Newsflash.
DOMA was proposed and signed by Clinton.
Told ya.
Muslims, Hispanics, gays, nurses, teachers, women's rights.
Wanna bet it's because the "War on the Elderly" isn't going well?
Just want to point something out.
If smaller governement, and personal freedom is what conservatives are after, how does a federal law like DOMA make sense?
What part of the country doesn't get broadcast TV, cable, or internet?
Just want to point something out.
If smaller governement, and personal freedom is what conservatives are after, how does a federal law like DOMA make sense?
Because the majority of the people and the majority of the States say so?
And that's without going into any moral feelings that people may or may not have.
Besides all it really does is define a word. Marriage, a legal union between one man and one woman for purposes of all federal laws. That a very small minority doesn't like it and wants catered to is simply too bad for them.
