Tomorrow marks the 100-year anniversary of The Tulsa Race Massacre

[candycorn]

The recent obsession of the Tulsa Massacre by the media is an indication of something, in fact, it is an indication of many, many things. Why, after 100 years, is the media finally getting round to talking about it? But a more disturbing question is, why were they afraid to tell the citizens of the US about it when it happened as they buried the story and refused to tell America that an entire town had been murdered and wiped off the face of the earth?

To break this down, we must first understand why they are telling us about this now. One reason is that the event happened around Memorial day in 1921, and it is about that time once again. But more to the point, the event has been hyperinflated recently because the press has an agenda, and that agenda is to make Americans think ill of themselves having come from such a racist country. It is an attempt to transform America into a nation that hates itself, and feels as though they must destroy themselves and start over, or forever be guilty and culpable of all of the sins done to Black people. Then political figures will enter the scene to radically transform everything to "atone" for the sins of the past. At least, that is the message they are selling.

But why tell us now and not back then? Was the media afraid to tell the US public because they thought that they would disapprove? This would indicate that the general public was not as racist as the media would have us believe and government that covered up the event. Of course, you could argue that the media was afraid of arousing black anger and violence by revealing the incident, but then, how is that any different now? If so, why are they not afraid to reveal this now because it could triggo\er the same reaction today?

Naturally, the media had no intention of this story being used to focus on the themselves. For example, just how much control over the press does the government have? Or just how more sinister and racist has the media of the past been compared to the average public to be complicit in this evil act? You can't get me to believe that the media and government leaders were not afraid of the white condemnation about the event, especially since the nation had fought a bloody Civil war over slavery some 100 years prior to the massacre as white fought against white to free Black slaves.

The media would have you believe that they are no longer the same, they are no longer the racist thugs they once used to be, but the average white person is. But this event would say otherwise. This event shows us just how dark and sinister the media has been, and probably still is. If not, what changed them that did not change the society at large like they would have us all believe?

More than ever, I believe the media to be the enemy of the people.

It highlights the violent past of white America on black America. Its nothing to be proud of. Its something that we should never forget. Ditto for the native Americans. Ditto for the Irish for a while. Ditto for the Asian populations.... do you see a trend here. Hispanics are just the most recent class to be focused on by some segments of the White community who'd rather have a homogeneous nation.

Are you going to beat the crowd this year and post how offended you are about Juneteenth. Beat the crowds and post your faux outrage today!

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

But a more disturbing question is, why were they afraid to tell the citizens of the US about it when it happened as they buried the story and refused to tell America that an entire town had been murdered and wiped off the face of the earth?

It's interesting that you're trying to frame this as a condemnation of the media's reporting or lack thereof instead of the people who actually committed the acts.

From a legal perspective, it could have been that the people who did this were being protected and now perhaps they are all dead. I still don't understand how the insurance companies got away with denying every single claim that was filed for losses AND no one was held accountable but that too is part of why was there no one screaming from the rooftops about the injustices that went on in Tulsa during the massacre.

Someone needs to pay for what happened and if they people who actually committed the offenses were allowed to escape punishment then next in line are their collaborators, right on down the line.

All of the principals of the Tulsa Riot achieved room temperature a long ass time ago.

There is no one left "to pay".

That's why reparations are needed

 

[Augustine_]

The recent obsession of the Tulsa Massacre by the media is an indication of something, in fact, it is an indication of many, many things. Why, after 100 years, is the media finally getting round to talking about it? But a more disturbing question is, why were they afraid to tell the citizens of the US about it when it happened as they buried the story and refused to tell America that an entire town had been murdered and wiped off the face of the earth?

To break this down, we must first understand why they are telling us about this now. One reason is that the event happened around Memorial day in 1921, and it is about that time once again. But more to the point, the event has been hyperinflated recently because the press has an agenda, and that agenda is to make Americans think ill of themselves having come from such a racist country. It is an attempt to transform America into a nation that hates itself, and feels as though they must destroy themselves and start over, or forever be guilty and culpable of all of the sins done to Black people. Then political figures will enter the scene to radically transform everything to "atone" for the sins of the past. At least, that is the message they are selling.

But why tell us now and not back then? Was the media afraid to tell the US public because they thought that they would disapprove? This would indicate that the general public was not as racist as the media would have us believe and government that covered up the event. Of course, you could argue that the media was afraid of arousing black anger and violence by revealing the incident, but then, how is that any different now? If so, why are they not afraid to reveal this now because it could triggo\er the same reaction today?

Naturally, the media had no intention of this story being used to focus on the themselves. For example, just how much control over the press does the government have? Or just how more sinister and racist has the media of the past been compared to the average public to be complicit in this evil act? You can't get me to believe that the media and government leaders were not afraid of the white condemnation about the event, especially since the nation had fought a bloody Civil war over slavery some 100 years prior to the massacre as white fought against white to free Black slaves.

The media would have you believe that they are no longer the same, they are no longer the racist thugs they once used to be, but the average white person is. But this event would say otherwise. This event shows us just how dark and sinister the media has been, and probably still is. If not, what changed them that did not change the society at large like they would have us all believe?

More than ever, I believe the media to be the enemy of the people.

^ Did this motherfucker just now find out about the Tulsa massacre? Wtf? Did Fox or Breitbart or somebody just do a story on it or something?

 

[Augustine_]

There was not an entire town wiped off the face of the earth, it was a neighborhood, what they called colored town back then. There is no justification for what happened but at least get your facts straight.

.

Lol go fuck yourself, dude

 

[Polishprince]

But a more disturbing question is, why were they afraid to tell the citizens of the US about it when it happened as they buried the story and refused to tell America that an entire town had been murdered and wiped off the face of the earth?

It's interesting that you're trying to frame this as a condemnation of the media's reporting or lack thereof instead of the people who actually committed the acts.

From a legal perspective, it could have been that the people who did this were being protected and now perhaps they are all dead. I still don't understand how the insurance companies got away with denying every single claim that was filed for losses AND no one was held accountable but that too is part of why was there no one screaming from the rooftops about the injustices that went on in Tulsa during the massacre.

Someone needs to pay for what happened and if they people who actually committed the offenses were allowed to escape punishment then next in line are their collaborators, right on down the line.

All of the principals of the Tulsa Riot achieved room temperature a long ass time ago.

There is no one left "to pay".

That's why reparations are needed

There is no one left to pay reparations.

 

[bodecea]

The recent obsession of the Tulsa Massacre by the media is an indication of something, in fact, it is an indication of many, many things. Why, after 100 years, is the media finally getting round to talking about it? But a more disturbing question is, why were they afraid to tell the citizens of the US about it when it happened as they buried the story and refused to tell America that an entire town had been murdered and wiped off the face of the earth?

To break this down, we must first understand why they are telling us about this now. One reason is that the event happened around Memorial day in 1921, and it is about that time once again. But more to the point, the event has been hyperinflated recently because the press has an agenda, and that agenda is to make Americans think ill of themselves having come from such a racist country. It is an attempt to transform America into a nation that hates itself, and feels as though they must destroy themselves and start over, or forever be guilty and culpable of all of the sins done to Black people. Then political figures will enter the scene to radically transform everything to "atone" for the sins of the past. At least, that is the message they are selling.

But why tell us now and not back then? Was the media afraid to tell the US public because they thought that they would disapprove? This would indicate that the general public was not as racist as the media would have us believe and government that covered up the event. Of course, you could argue that the media was afraid of arousing black anger and violence by revealing the incident, but then, how is that any different now? If so, why are they not afraid to reveal this now because it could triggo\er the same reaction today?

Naturally, the media had no intention of this story being used to focus on the themselves. For example, just how much control over the press does the government have? Or just how more sinister and racist has the media of the past been compared to the average public to be complicit in this evil act? You can't get me to believe that the media and government leaders were not afraid of the white condemnation about the event, especially since the nation had fought a bloody Civil war over slavery some 100 years prior to the massacre as white fought against white to free Black slaves.

The media would have you believe that they are no longer the same, they are no longer the racist thugs they once used to be, but the average white person is. But this event would say otherwise. This event shows us just how dark and sinister the media has been, and probably still is. If not, what changed them that did not change the society at large like they would have us all believe?

More than ever, I believe the media to be the enemy of the people.

The whole event, the Tulsa Riots of 1921, keeps growing in importance and scope.

I read the story about it in the newspaper of record, the Youngstown Vindicator.

The media at that point in time reported that 15 people were unfortunately killed, but that the governor was sending a unit of machine gunners to Tulsa to achieve peace.

Now, a hundred years later, libs are claiming thousands of victims, all black killed because of their race alone.

In another hundred years, the Tulsa riots will be compared to the Holocaust.

Thousands? Where did you read that it was thousands? Link that please.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

This topic has been beaten to death already....again.........Tomorrow marks the 100-year anniversary of The Tulsa Race Massacre

 

[TheGreenHornet]

The recent obsession of the Tulsa Massacre by the media is an indication of something, in fact, it is an indication of many, many things. Why, after 100 years, is the media finally getting round to talking about it? But a more disturbing question is, why were they afraid to tell the citizens of the US about it when it happened as they buried the story and refused to tell America that an entire town had been murdered and wiped off the face of the earth?

To break this down, we must first understand why they are telling us about this now. One reason is that the event happened around Memorial day in 1921, and it is about that time once again. But more to the point, the event has been hyperinflated recently because the press has an agenda, and that agenda is to make Americans think ill of themselves having come from such a racist country. It is an attempt to transform America into a nation that hates itself, and feels as though they must destroy themselves and start over, or forever be guilty and culpable of all of the sins done to Black people. Then political figures will enter the scene to radically transform everything to "atone" for the sins of the past. At least, that is the message they are selling.

But why tell us now and not back then? Was the media afraid to tell the US public because they thought that they would disapprove? This would indicate that the general public was not as racist as the media would have us believe and government that covered up the event. Of course, you could argue that the media was afraid of arousing black anger and violence by revealing the incident, but then, how is that any different now? If so, why are they not afraid to reveal this now because it could triggo\er the same reaction today?

Naturally, the media had no intention of this story being used to focus on the themselves. For example, just how much control over the press does the government have? Or just how more sinister and racist has the media of the past been compared to the average public to be complicit in this evil act? You can't get me to believe that the media and government leaders were not afraid of the white condemnation about the event, especially since the nation had fought a bloody Civil war over slavery some 100 years prior to the massacre as white fought against white to free Black slaves.

The media would have you believe that they are no longer the same, they are no longer the racist thugs they once used to be, but the average white person is. But this event would say otherwise. This event shows us just how dark and sinister the media has been, and probably still is. If not, what changed them that did not change the society at large like they would have us all believe?

More than ever, I believe the media to be the enemy of the people.

^ Did this motherfucker just now find out about the Tulsa massacre? Wtf? Did Fox or Breitbart or somebody just do a story on it or something?

hehheh CBS

 

[Chillicothe]

In the event that these two recent threads over the Tulsa Massacre do not get merged, well, I'm gonna do a sequel, a v.2.0.

I posted the following in that first Tulsa thread. Did it just moments ago, and don't have the energy to try to do a new one....or make the first one better.
----------------------------------------------------

"Indeed, the Tulsa Massacre is much in the news lately.

Deservedly so. Long time coming.

As I've read and watched various accounts of that deplorable day two things have stuck with me:

1. The astonishing revelation that students of the Tulsa school system ...be they now in their 50's or 30's or today's teenagers.....had never been taught about that day. Reported interviews stated that most had never ever heard of it. And they lived in Tulsa!!
That absolutely amazes me.

2. And then second, that some news outlets are devoting airtime, or page space brings to mind today's Jewish mantra about the Holocaust-----"Never forget".

I am persuaded that the focus on those events, their costs and ramifications must be revealed, spoken about. and taught. And not forgotten.

It is right and just to do so. And it is time.

IMHO

 

[Muhammed]

The recent obsession of the Tulsa Massacre by the media is an indication of something, in fact, it is an indication of many, many things. Why, after 100 years, is the media finally getting round to talking about it? But a more disturbing question is, why were they afraid to tell the citizens of the US about it when it happened as they buried the story and refused to tell America that an entire town had been murdered and wiped off the face of the earth?

To break this down, we must first understand why they are telling us about this now. One reason is that the event happened around Memorial day in 1921, and it is about that time once again. But more to the point, the event has been hyperinflated recently because the press has an agenda, and that agenda is to make Americans think ill of themselves having come from such a racist country. It is an attempt to transform America into a nation that hates itself, and feels as though they must destroy themselves and start over, or forever be guilty and culpable of all of the sins done to Black people. Then political figures will enter the scene to radically transform everything to "atone" for the sins of the past. At least, that is the message they are selling.

But why tell us now and not back then? Was the media afraid to tell the US public because they thought that they would disapprove? This would indicate that the general public was not as racist as the media would have us believe and government that covered up the event. Of course, you could argue that the media was afraid of arousing black anger and violence by revealing the incident, but then, how is that any different now? If so, why are they not afraid to reveal this now because it could triggo\er the same reaction today?

Naturally, the media had no intention of this story being used to focus on the themselves. For example, just how much control over the press does the government have? Or just how more sinister and racist has the media of the past been compared to the average public to be complicit in this evil act? You can't get me to believe that the media and government leaders were not afraid of the white condemnation about the event, especially since the nation had fought a bloody Civil war over slavery some 100 years prior to the massacre as white fought against white to free Black slaves.

The media would have you believe that they are no longer the same, they are no longer the racist thugs they once used to be, but the average white person is. But this event would say otherwise. This event shows us just how dark and sinister the media has been, and probably still is. If not, what changed them that did not change the society at large like they would have us all believe?

More than ever, I believe the media to be the enemy of the people.

The fake news media cause the riot in the first place.

A black guy sexually assaulted an elevator operator and was arrested. The black owned newspapers then spread a rumor that the townsfolk were going to break into the jail and lynch him. So a bunch of blacks gathered around the jail and started shooting at white people. And whites shot back.

Next thing you know it's a race riot. All caused by the fake news media spreading rumors to sell newspapers.

 

[Polishprince]

The recent obsession of the Tulsa Massacre by the media is an indication of something, in fact, it is an indication of many, many things. Why, after 100 years, is the media finally getting round to talking about it? But a more disturbing question is, why were they afraid to tell the citizens of the US about it when it happened as they buried the story and refused to tell America that an entire town had been murdered and wiped off the face of the earth?

To break this down, we must first understand why they are telling us about this now. One reason is that the event happened around Memorial day in 1921, and it is about that time once again. But more to the point, the event has been hyperinflated recently because the press has an agenda, and that agenda is to make Americans think ill of themselves having come from such a racist country. It is an attempt to transform America into a nation that hates itself, and feels as though they must destroy themselves and start over, or forever be guilty and culpable of all of the sins done to Black people. Then political figures will enter the scene to radically transform everything to "atone" for the sins of the past. At least, that is the message they are selling.

But why tell us now and not back then? Was the media afraid to tell the US public because they thought that they would disapprove? This would indicate that the general public was not as racist as the media would have us believe and government that covered up the event. Of course, you could argue that the media was afraid of arousing black anger and violence by revealing the incident, but then, how is that any different now? If so, why are they not afraid to reveal this now because it could triggo\er the same reaction today?

Naturally, the media had no intention of this story being used to focus on the themselves. For example, just how much control over the press does the government have? Or just how more sinister and racist has the media of the past been compared to the average public to be complicit in this evil act? You can't get me to believe that the media and government leaders were not afraid of the white condemnation about the event, especially since the nation had fought a bloody Civil war over slavery some 100 years prior to the massacre as white fought against white to free Black slaves.

The media would have you believe that they are no longer the same, they are no longer the racist thugs they once used to be, but the average white person is. But this event would say otherwise. This event shows us just how dark and sinister the media has been, and probably still is. If not, what changed them that did not change the society at large like they would have us all believe?

More than ever, I believe the media to be the enemy of the people.

The whole event, the Tulsa Riots of 1921, keeps growing in importance and scope.

I read the story about it in the newspaper of record, the Youngstown Vindicator.

The media at that point in time reported that 15 people were unfortunately killed, but that the governor was sending a unit of machine gunners to Tulsa to achieve peace.

Now, a hundred years later, libs are claiming thousands of victims, all black killed because of their race alone.

In another hundred years, the Tulsa riots will be compared to the Holocaust.

Thousands? Where did you read that it was thousands? Link that please.

The current reports hint that the number in the hundreds is likely understated.

But newspapers AT THE TIME reported 15 dead of all racial backgrounds.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

There was not an entire town wiped off the face of the earth, it was a neighborhood, what they called colored town back then. There is no justification for what happened but at least get your facts straight.

.

It was 35 blocks including a hospital, movie theatre, doctor and attorney offices, etc.

There was not an entire town wiped off the face of the earth, it was a neighborhood, what they called colored town back then. There is no justification for what happened but at least get your facts straight.

.

It was 35 blocks including a hospital, movie theatre, doctor and attorney offices, etc.

I have never seen you be right about anything from the Trayvon Martin case forwards.....you just 'parrot like' repeat the propaganda......anyhow no hospital was destroyed.

What was destroyed was a small part of the town.....referred to back then as Niggah Town.

Some in a jocular sarcastic fashion called it the Black Wall Street.

 

[John T. Ford]

That's why reparations are needed

Fuckin Leftist psycho ....

Who is Left alive from that century ago massacre ...

Asshole psycho Leftist ....

Why should people today pay for that.

Fvcking psycho Leftist.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

The recent obsession of the Tulsa Massacre by the media is an indication of something, in fact, it is an indication of many, many things. Why, after 100 years, is the media finally getting round to talking about it? But a more disturbing question is, why were they afraid to tell the citizens of the US about it when it happened as they buried the story and refused to tell America that an entire town had been murdered and wiped off the face of the earth?

To break this down, we must first understand why they are telling us about this now. One reason is that the event happened around Memorial day in 1921, and it is about that time once again. But more to the point, the event has been hyperinflated recently because the press has an agenda, and that agenda is to make Americans think ill of themselves having come from such a racist country. It is an attempt to transform America into a nation that hates itself, and feels as though they must destroy themselves and start over, or forever be guilty and culpable of all of the sins done to Black people. Then political figures will enter the scene to radically transform everything to "atone" for the sins of the past. At least, that is the message they are selling.

But why tell us now and not back then? Was the media afraid to tell the US public because they thought that they would disapprove? This would indicate that the general public was not as racist as the media would have us believe and government that covered up the event. Of course, you could argue that the media was afraid of arousing black anger and violence by revealing the incident, but then, how is that any different now? If so, why are they not afraid to reveal this now because it could triggo\er the same reaction today?

Naturally, the media had no intention of this story being used to focus on the themselves. For example, just how much control over the press does the government have? Or just how more sinister and racist has the media of the past been compared to the average public to be complicit in this evil act? You can't get me to believe that the media and government leaders were not afraid of the white condemnation about the event, especially since the nation had fought a bloody Civil war over slavery some 100 years prior to the massacre as white fought against white to free Black slaves.

The media would have you believe that they are no longer the same, they are no longer the racist thugs they once used to be, but the average white person is. But this event would say otherwise. This event shows us just how dark and sinister the media has been, and probably still is. If not, what changed them that did not change the society at large like they would have us all believe?

More than ever, I believe the media to be the enemy of the people.

The whole event, the Tulsa Riots of 1921, keeps growing in importance and scope.

I read the story about it in the newspaper of record, the Youngstown Vindicator.

The media at that point in time reported that 15 people were unfortunately killed, but that the governor was sending a unit of machine gunners to Tulsa to achieve peace.

Now, a hundred years later, libs are claiming thousands of victims, all black killed because of their race alone.

In another hundred years, the Tulsa riots will be compared to the Holocaust.

Thousands? Where did you read that it was thousands? Link that please.

The current reports hint that the number in the hundreds is likely understated.

But newspapers AT THE TIME reported 15 dead of all racial backgrounds.

I think the official count at that time was 36 blacks and 11 whites were killed.

The propagandists claim 300 but there was not 300 dead people found....in later years the propagandists claimed they were buried in secret graves just more b.s.

Thus no evidence to support their hyperbole.....always trying to magnify the significance and circumstances of the event....there have been riots far worse that did far more damage than was done in Tulsa......anyone interested can google the N.Y. draft riots.

The New York City Draft Riots of 1863

press.uchicago.edu

 

[Chillicothe]

".. black guy sexually assaulted an elevator operator ...was arrested. The black owned newspapers .... spread a rumor that the townsfolk were going to ..... lynch him........ bunch of blacks gathered around the jail and started shooting at white people."

That is an account that has an interpretation I had not seen before.

Will the poster 'Muhammed' share with us if he has sourcing for that account? ....... or, is it just his opinion that that is how it must have begun?

 

[TheGreenHornet]

".. black guy sexually assaulted an elevator operator ...was arrested. The black owned newspapers .... spread a rumor that the townsfolk were going to ..... lynch him........ bunch of blacks gathered around the jail and started shooting at white people."

That is an account that has an interpretation I had not seen before.

Will the poster 'Muhammed' share with us if he has sourcing for that account? ....... or, is it just his opinion that that is how it must have begun?

It is all presented here.....that and much more.......Tomorrow marks the 100-year anniversary of The Tulsa Race Massacre

 

[TheGreenHornet]

That's why reparations are needed

Fuckin Leftist psycho ....

Who is Left alive from that century ago massacre ...

Asshole psycho Leftist ....

Why should people today pay for that.

Fvcking psycho Leftist.

It is all propaganda aimed at putting pressure on Congress to pay blacks reperations for all that they supposedly suffered.......like they are the only ones in history to ever suffer....anyhow anyone that thinks the blacks deserve reperations should open their checkbooks and send them all a check. hehheh

Whilst you are at it you can donate your house and any land you own to the Native Americans since we stole their land....aka put your money where your mouth is.

 

[$ecular#eckler]

More than ever, I believe the media to be the enemy of the people.

Oh come on, they're not that bad.

 

[John T. Ford]

See what these fuckers are doing?

Coulter retweets: "A Warning to America from Yugoslavia - Don't do what We Did. Communists in your country with Help of the Elite want to Destroy you"

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/economics/a-warning-from-yugoslavia-dont-follow-what-we-did/ you have been warned, my friends!

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[John T. Ford]

That's why reparations are needed

Fuckin Leftist psycho ....

Who is Left alive from that century ago massacre ...

Asshole psycho Leftist ....

Why should people today pay for that.

Fvcking psycho Leftist.

It is all propaganda aimed at putting pressure on Congress to pay blacks reperations for all that they supposedly suffered.......like they are the only ones in history to ever suffer....anyhow anyone that thinks the blacks deserve reperations should open their checkbooks and send them all a check. hehheh

Whilst you are at it you can donate your house and any land you own to the Native Americans since we stole their land....aka put your money where your mouth is.

It's worse than that my friend.