- Dec 5, 2010
- 99,077
- 35,353
- 2,290
She's just out looking for another handler but no one at the DNC wants her.OT Harris drops out
Or the RNC either. Or, even Willie Brown for that matter.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She's just out looking for another handler but no one at the DNC wants her.OT Harris drops out
Yeah, Apple moved an assembly factory to Texas or someplace, and Trump gave them something to offset the china tariff hit.You sure he did ? I thought it was still in doubt and if so why is AAPL off 6 bucks todayStrangely, Trump's latest outrage is over European states (not the EU itself) taxing the US big four tech companies. Trump doesn't like Amazon because Bezos is "mean" to him with the Wash Post, and he's got concerns with the other three too, lol. But the Euro states want to tax to get start up money for their own tech companies. I'd like to think we all find something wrong there. I mean if they want to tax for general welfare, ok. But really what they're up to is not totally dissimilar to China and IP theft.
But of course, Trump's trade war victims won't have any connection to tech. Aside from using it, and paying more for other stuff.
Trump gave Apple a waiver from tariffs. He is a fraud
He's a libertarian, asshole.Seth Rich is an American Hero and Martyr and Assange is a True Whistleblower!Man, it's fucking weird how you all parrot the exact same talking points fed to you by your propagandists.I know, I know, I know!!!!Waiting on an answer, chickenshit.Tell me something, tard. Did Putin interfere in the 2016 election and help Trump get elected?
1. The Russian FaceBook ads didn't change any votes
2. The $1,300 spent on google ads didn't change any votes
So no, Putin had no effect on the 2016 presidential election.
(Comey had a much bigger effect on voters than Putin, just research the polling data)
Have you no self-respect at all?
Now look here:
New poll: 34 percent 'less likely' to vote for Clinton after new email revelations
All during the summer and fall of 2016, the pseudocons were celebrating the effect the meddling was having on the election.
Suck on it libs. Hillary is done for. She just can't win if one third of her voters are considering voting for someone else.
The Clintonites of the forum live in denial.
And how many are much more likely to vote for Trump as result? Many, many...
That means 1/3 of them were going to vote for HIllary. You can't win an election when 1/3 of your supports jump ship.
Hillary is done. Stick a fork in her.
Now that the tards know Russia was behind those leaks which affected the outcome, they are trying to pretend it had NO impact.
Sorry, but I"m not as stupid or as forgetful as you tards are.
Assange is a marxist. So thank you for your input, comrade.
He's an anti-American marxist tool of Putin.He's a libertarian, asshole.Seth Rich is an American Hero and Martyr and Assange is a True Whistleblower!Man, it's fucking weird how you all parrot the exact same talking points fed to you by your propagandists.I know, I know, I know!!!!Waiting on an answer, chickenshit.
1. The Russian FaceBook ads didn't change any votes
2. The $1,300 spent on google ads didn't change any votes
So no, Putin had no effect on the 2016 presidential election.
(Comey had a much bigger effect on voters than Putin, just research the polling data)
Have you no self-respect at all?
Now look here:
New poll: 34 percent 'less likely' to vote for Clinton after new email revelations
All during the summer and fall of 2016, the pseudocons were celebrating the effect the meddling was having on the election.
Suck on it libs. Hillary is done for. She just can't win if one third of her voters are considering voting for someone else.
The Clintonites of the forum live in denial.
And how many are much more likely to vote for Trump as result? Many, many...
That means 1/3 of them were going to vote for HIllary. You can't win an election when 1/3 of your supports jump ship.
Hillary is done. Stick a fork in her.
Now that the tards know Russia was behind those leaks which affected the outcome, they are trying to pretend it had NO impact.
Sorry, but I"m not as stupid or as forgetful as you tards are.
Assange is a marxist. So thank you for your input, comrade.
Yes, I have come to understand the willful blindness of Trumptards is impenetrable.No need.See post 105.
The left have lost the narrative game long ago. They just don't know it yet, because they're running on fumes.
View attachment 292984
Even Hong Kong knows the score.
You know why Trump has you tards wearing red hats?Yes, I have come to understand the willful blindness of Trumptards is impenetrable.No need.See post 105.
The left have lost the narrative game long ago. They just don't know it yet, because they're running on fumes.
View attachment 292984
Even Hong Kong knows the score.
In the next year, you're going to get even more cray if RBG and ROE goes away.
Anarchist. Although if you think Randian Paul is actually a libertarian, the mistake would be understandable.He's a libertarian, asshole.Seth Rich is an American Hero and Martyr and Assange is a True Whistleblower!Man, it's fucking weird how you all parrot the exact same talking points fed to you by your propagandists.I know, I know, I know!!!!Waiting on an answer, chickenshit.
1. The Russian FaceBook ads didn't change any votes
2. The $1,300 spent on google ads didn't change any votes
So no, Putin had no effect on the 2016 presidential election.
(Comey had a much bigger effect on voters than Putin, just research the polling data)
Have you no self-respect at all?
Now look here:
New poll: 34 percent 'less likely' to vote for Clinton after new email revelations
All during the summer and fall of 2016, the pseudocons were celebrating the effect the meddling was having on the election.
Suck on it libs. Hillary is done for. She just can't win if one third of her voters are considering voting for someone else.
The Clintonites of the forum live in denial.
And how many are much more likely to vote for Trump as result? Many, many...
That means 1/3 of them were going to vote for HIllary. You can't win an election when 1/3 of your supports jump ship.
Hillary is done. Stick a fork in her.
Now that the tards know Russia was behind those leaks which affected the outcome, they are trying to pretend it had NO impact.
Sorry, but I"m not as stupid or as forgetful as you tards are.
Assange is a marxist. So thank you for your input, comrade.
You know why Trump has you tards wearing red hats?Yes, I have come to understand the willful blindness of Trumptards is impenetrable.No need.See post 105.
The left have lost the narrative game long ago. They just don't know it yet, because they're running on fumes.
View attachment 292984
Even Hong Kong knows the score.
In the next year, you're going to get even more cray if RBG and ROE goes away.
If you look at the photos of Trump whenever he was outdoors golfing, long before he was a candidate, he was always wearing a red hat. This was to protect his vanity so his bald head wouldn't be exposed by any stray puffs of wind.
So he had to come up with a way to excuse the wearing of a hat while campaigning. And thus the MAGA hat was born. Suckers.
Conservapedia says he's an anarchist. They tend to view libertarians that way.Anarchist. Although if you think Randian Paul is actually a libertarian, the mistake would be understandable.He's a libertarian, asshole.Seth Rich is an American Hero and Martyr and Assange is a True Whistleblower!Man, it's fucking weird how you all parrot the exact same talking points fed to you by your propagandists.I know, I know, I know!!!!
1. The Russian FaceBook ads didn't change any votes
2. The $1,300 spent on google ads didn't change any votes
So no, Putin had no effect on the 2016 presidential election.
(Comey had a much bigger effect on voters than Putin, just research the polling data)
Have you no self-respect at all?
Now look here:
New poll: 34 percent 'less likely' to vote for Clinton after new email revelations
All during the summer and fall of 2016, the pseudocons were celebrating the effect the meddling was having on the election.
Suck on it libs. Hillary is done for. She just can't win if one third of her voters are considering voting for someone else.
The Clintonites of the forum live in denial.
And how many are much more likely to vote for Trump as result? Many, many...
That means 1/3 of them were going to vote for HIllary. You can't win an election when 1/3 of your supports jump ship.
Hillary is done. Stick a fork in her.
Now that the tards know Russia was behind those leaks which affected the outcome, they are trying to pretend it had NO impact.
Sorry, but I"m not as stupid or as forgetful as you tards are.
Assange is a marxist. So thank you for your input, comrade.
He's a libertarian, asshole.Seth Rich is an American Hero and Martyr and Assange is a True Whistleblower!Man, it's fucking weird how you all parrot the exact same talking points fed to you by your propagandists.I know, I know, I know!!!!Waiting on an answer, chickenshit.
1. The Russian FaceBook ads didn't change any votes
2. The $1,300 spent on google ads didn't change any votes
So no, Putin had no effect on the 2016 presidential election.
(Comey had a much bigger effect on voters than Putin, just research the polling data)
Have you no self-respect at all?
Now look here:
New poll: 34 percent 'less likely' to vote for Clinton after new email revelations
All during the summer and fall of 2016, the pseudocons were celebrating the effect the meddling was having on the election.
Suck on it libs. Hillary is done for. She just can't win if one third of her voters are considering voting for someone else.
The Clintonites of the forum live in denial.
And how many are much more likely to vote for Trump as result? Many, many...
That means 1/3 of them were going to vote for HIllary. You can't win an election when 1/3 of your supports jump ship.
Hillary is done. Stick a fork in her.
Now that the tards know Russia was behind those leaks which affected the outcome, they are trying to pretend it had NO impact.
Sorry, but I"m not as stupid or as forgetful as you tards are.
Assange is a marxist. So thank you for your input, comrade.
See post 134, useful idiot.Conservapedia says he's an anarchist. They tend to view libertarians that way.Anarchist. Although if you think Randian Paul is actually a libertarian, the mistake would be understandable.He's a libertarian, asshole.Seth Rich is an American Hero and Martyr and Assange is a True Whistleblower!Man, it's fucking weird how you all parrot the exact same talking points fed to you by your propagandists.
Have you no self-respect at all?
Now look here:
New poll: 34 percent 'less likely' to vote for Clinton after new email revelations
All during the summer and fall of 2016, the pseudocons were celebrating the effect the meddling was having on the election.
Now that the tards know Russia was behind those leaks which affected the outcome, they are trying to pretend it had NO impact.
Sorry, but I"m not as stupid or as forgetful as you tards are.
Assange is a marxist. So thank you for your input, comrade.
Says Conservapedia. When you can quote him saying that, then perhaps I might bother paying attention.See post 134, useful idiot.Conservapedia says he's an anarchist. They tend to view libertarians that way.Anarchist. Although if you think Randian Paul is actually a libertarian, the mistake would be understandable.He's a libertarian, asshole.Seth Rich is an American Hero and Martyr and Assange is a True Whistleblower!
Assange is a marxist. So thank you for your input, comrade.
"He also makes clear he does his leaking specifically to denounce America as a world power, adhering to more anti-American views and explicitly desiring to humiliate America in front of its allies"
He's a what?He's a libertarian, asshole.Seth Rich is an American Hero and Martyr and Assange is a True Whistleblower!Man, it's fucking weird how you all parrot the exact same talking points fed to you by your propagandists.I know, I know, I know!!!!
1. The Russian FaceBook ads didn't change any votes
2. The $1,300 spent on google ads didn't change any votes
So no, Putin had no effect on the 2016 presidential election.
(Comey had a much bigger effect on voters than Putin, just research the polling data)
Have you no self-respect at all?
Now look here:
New poll: 34 percent 'less likely' to vote for Clinton after new email revelations
All during the summer and fall of 2016, the pseudocons were celebrating the effect the meddling was having on the election.
Suck on it libs. Hillary is done for. She just can't win if one third of her voters are considering voting for someone else.
The Clintonites of the forum live in denial.
And how many are much more likely to vote for Trump as result? Many, many...
That means 1/3 of them were going to vote for HIllary. You can't win an election when 1/3 of your supports jump ship.
Hillary is done. Stick a fork in her.
Now that the tards know Russia was behind those leaks which affected the outcome, they are trying to pretend it had NO impact.
Sorry, but I"m not as stupid or as forgetful as you tards are.
Assange is a marxist. So thank you for your input, comrade.
He is a glorified fence.
They will need a Russian to English translator, comrade.Actually, you know who would be fun to hear from in The Senate?
Guccifer!