Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He could have been a jaywalker and it wouldn't change the issue here. He's a prisoner, period.^^^ Obviously it does or the person would not be in jail for it.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
We do a lot more than just feed them, like medical care eh?When we locked him up, we got stuck with the bill. That's how it works and even criminals and prisoners have rights here. It's a liberal thing.Nope. He's an asshole, same as you.You make excuses for a child molester.
Yet you're willing to give IT something at the expense of the taxpayers.
IT caused ITSELF to be locked up. Sad thing is you think the bill includes providing to IT what IT chose to do. That's not the case. Feed IT but that's it.
Apparently it's a Liberal thing to give a prison something that has nothing to do with why they are in prison.
Still when you are in jail, don't go thinking that whatever it is that you are wanting is going to be handed to you while you are in there.He could have been a jaywalker and it wouldn't change the issue here. He's a prisoner, period.^^^ Obviously it does or the person would not be in jail for it.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
We do that as well. Books, education, job training, religious services, family visits, medical care, mental health care, drug programs, sexual abuse programs, you name it, and all on our bill. Sorry, that's the reality, start dealing with it.That means the taxpayers, while having to feed IT, aren't obliged to fund the choices unrelated to the reason for incarceration.
And to me that right there is how it should be. If the person didn't want to lose access to whatever it is that they are wanting now, they shouldn't have done what got them thrown in jail.He could have been a jaywalker and it wouldn't change the issue here. He's a prisoner, period.^^^ Obviously it does or the person would not be in jail for it.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
The choice the IT made to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. That means the taxpayers, while having to feed IT, aren't obliged to fund the choices unrelated to the reason for incarceration.
If they want access to Jesus, or Shakespeare, that's also on our tab eh? That's how it works.And to me that right there is how it should be. If the person didn't want to lose access to whatever it is that they are wanting now, they shouldn't have done what got them thrown in jail.He could have been a jaywalker and it wouldn't change the issue here. He's a prisoner, period.^^^ Obviously it does or the person would not be in jail for it.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
The choice the IT made to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. That means the taxpayers, while having to feed IT, aren't obliged to fund the choices unrelated to the reason for incarceration.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
If they want access to Jesus, or Shakespeare, that's also on our tab eh? That's how it works.And to me that right there is how it should be. If the person didn't want to lose access to whatever it is that they are wanting now, they shouldn't have done what got them thrown in jail.He could have been a jaywalker and it wouldn't change the issue here. He's a prisoner, period.^^^ Obviously it does or the person would not be in jail for it.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
The choice the IT made to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. That means the taxpayers, while having to feed IT, aren't obliged to fund the choices unrelated to the reason for incarceration.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
And to me that right there is how it should be. If the person didn't want to lose access to whatever it is that they are wanting now, they shouldn't have done what got them thrown in jail.He could have been a jaywalker and it wouldn't change the issue here. He's a prisoner, period.^^^ Obviously it does or the person would not be in jail for it.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
The choice the IT made to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. That means the taxpayers, while having to feed IT, aren't obliged to fund the choices unrelated to the reason for incarceration.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
We cater to lots of their wants. Get over it. Kept in chains with a meal of bread and water is not our system. North Korea you'd like, try there.And to me that right there is how it should be. If the person didn't want to lose access to whatever it is that they are wanting now, they shouldn't have done what got them thrown in jail.He could have been a jaywalker and it wouldn't change the issue here. He's a prisoner, period.^^^ Obviously it does or the person would not be in jail for it.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
The choice the IT made to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. That means the taxpayers, while having to feed IT, aren't obliged to fund the choices unrelated to the reason for incarceration.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
While we may have to feed them, we don't have to cater to their wants especially those that have nothing to do with why they are in prison.
Sorry, that's also not our system. How long before you start dealing with what is, never?If they want access to Jesus, or Shakespeare, that's also on our tab eh? That's how it works.And to me that right there is how it should be. If the person didn't want to lose access to whatever it is that they are wanting now, they shouldn't have done what got them thrown in jail.He could have been a jaywalker and it wouldn't change the issue here. He's a prisoner, period.^^^ Obviously it does or the person would not be in jail for it.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
The choice the IT made to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. That means the taxpayers, while having to feed IT, aren't obliged to fund the choices unrelated to the reason for incarceration.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
That's how you want it to work. All that we owe them by holding them is food, clothing, and shelter not their wants.
Amen.And to me that right there is how it should be. If the person didn't want to lose access to whatever it is that they are wanting now, they shouldn't have done what got them thrown in jail.He could have been a jaywalker and it wouldn't change the issue here. He's a prisoner, period.^^^ Obviously it does or the person would not be in jail for it.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
The choice the IT made to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. That means the taxpayers, while having to feed IT, aren't obliged to fund the choices unrelated to the reason for incarceration.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
While we may have to feed them, we don't have to cater to their wants especially those that have nothing to do with why they are in prison.
Sorry, that's also not our system. How long before you start dealing with what is, never?If they want access to Jesus, or Shakespeare, that's also on our tab eh? That's how it works.And to me that right there is how it should be. If the person didn't want to lose access to whatever it is that they are wanting now, they shouldn't have done what got them thrown in jail.He could have been a jaywalker and it wouldn't change the issue here. He's a prisoner, period.
The choice the IT made to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. That means the taxpayers, while having to feed IT, aren't obliged to fund the choices unrelated to the reason for incarceration.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
That's how you want it to work. All that we owe them by holding them is food, clothing, and shelter not their wants.
You point is utterly invalid, so just drop. What his crime was matters not a damn, just what medical and mental health care is appropiateSorry, that's also not our system. How long before you start dealing with what is, never?If they want access to Jesus, or Shakespeare, that's also on our tab eh? That's how it works.And to me that right there is how it should be. If the person didn't want to lose access to whatever it is that they are wanting now, they shouldn't have done what got them thrown in jail.The choice the IT made to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. That means the taxpayers, while having to feed IT, aren't obliged to fund the choices unrelated to the reason for incarceration.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
That's how you want it to work. All that we owe them by holding them is food, clothing, and shelter not their wants.
How long before you stop catering to someone's wants. Never? We don't owe that freak a thing. IT'S choice to be a freak has nothing to do with ITS crime.
Yes. You and Keys should put together a formal thought crimes thread so we can properly discuss your sick agenda to enact precrime laws.ER...justice was done when he had his sick transgender ass thrown in prison. It's where all freaks belong. And the only special treatment pedophile trans need is the treatment they get in prison. It's poetic justice. They'll do to him a thousand times what he did to that poor kid, and that's fitting. If you are sorry for him I urge you to get homosexuality and transgender disorder listed as MENTAL ILLNESSES so that these loons can be locked up BEFORE they abuse children and BEFORE they get thrown in with some Very Bad Men.Ah, more of your vigilante justice at work. Terrific...His fellow inmates will calm him down just fine, freak.
We cater to lots of their wants. Get over it. Kept in chains with a meal of bread and water is not our system. North Korea you'd like, try there.And to me that right there is how it should be. If the person didn't want to lose access to whatever it is that they are wanting now, they shouldn't have done what got them thrown in jail.He could have been a jaywalker and it wouldn't change the issue here. He's a prisoner, period.^^^ Obviously it does or the person would not be in jail for it.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
The choice the IT made to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. That means the taxpayers, while having to feed IT, aren't obliged to fund the choices unrelated to the reason for incarceration.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
While we may have to feed them, we don't have to cater to their wants especially those that have nothing to do with why they are in prison.
We could, if she came to the prison. Isn't Sunday family day?We cater to lots of their wants. Get over it. Kept in chains with a meal of bread and water is not our system. North Korea you'd like, try there.And to me that right there is how it should be. If the person didn't want to lose access to whatever it is that they are wanting now, they shouldn't have done what got them thrown in jail.He could have been a jaywalker and it wouldn't change the issue here. He's a prisoner, period.
The choice the IT made to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. That means the taxpayers, while having to feed IT, aren't obliged to fund the choices unrelated to the reason for incarceration.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
While we may have to feed them, we don't have to cater to their wants especially those that have nothing to do with why they are in prison.
What if someone, prior to committing a crime, at lunch with his mother every Sunday and wants to do it after being put in prison. Do we meet that want, too?
You point is utterly invalid, so just drop. What his crime was matters not a damn, just what medical and mental health care is appropiateSorry, that's also not our system. How long before you start dealing with what is, never?If they want access to Jesus, or Shakespeare, that's also on our tab eh? That's how it works.And to me that right there is how it should be. If the person didn't want to lose access to whatever it is that they are wanting now, they shouldn't have done what got them thrown in jail.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
That's how you want it to work. All that we owe them by holding them is food, clothing, and shelter not their wants.
How long before you stop catering to someone's wants. Never? We don't owe that freak a thing. IT'S choice to be a freak has nothing to do with ITS crime.
We could, if she came to the prison. Isn't Sunday family day?We cater to lots of their wants. Get over it. Kept in chains with a meal of bread and water is not our system. North Korea you'd like, try there.And to me that right there is how it should be. If the person didn't want to lose access to whatever it is that they are wanting now, they shouldn't have done what got them thrown in jail.The choice the IT made to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. That means the taxpayers, while having to feed IT, aren't obliged to fund the choices unrelated to the reason for incarceration.
God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!
Holly
While we may have to feed them, we don't have to cater to their wants especially those that have nothing to do with why they are in prison.
What if someone, prior to committing a crime, at lunch with his mother every Sunday and wants to do it after being put in prison. Do we meet that want, too?
