Trayvon-Shooter Zimmerman Sues Buttigieg & Warren for $265 million

[Jitss617]

Never bring skittles to a gun fight motherfucker

 

[cwise76]

Uh oh. Better run. Looks like he's got a bigger gun and is going big game hunting now.

"In a lawsuit filed Tuesday in Florida, the man who killed Trayvon Martin in self-defense in 2012 accused Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of “maliciously defam[ing]” Mr. Zimmerman, using the killing “as a pretext to demagogue and falsely brand Zimmerman as a white supremacist and racist to their millions of Twitter followers.”

Mr. Zimmerman was acquitted of all charges on traditional self-defense grounds, because Martin attacked him and beat his head against the ground, supposedly for profiling the black teen while on a neighborhood-watch shift..."

George Zimmerman sues Pete Buttigieg, Elizabeth Warren for $265 million

Lol what a degenerate piece of shit

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

The fact that Zimmerman went after a black kid for no more than walking in his neighborhood, while not entirely conclusive, is enough reason to consider him a racist. He wouldn't have done that with a white kid.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Now we have BBQ Becky and Permit Patty, but back then, it was Gestapo George all by his lonesome.

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

The fact that Zimmerman went after a black kid for no more than walking in his neighborhood, while not entirely conclusive, is enough reason to consider him a racist. He wouldn't have done that with a white kid.

You do recall that Trayboom called Zimmie a "creepy assed cracker", don't you.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

The fact that Zimmerman went after a black kid for no more than walking in his neighborhood, while not entirely conclusive, is enough reason to consider him a racist. He wouldn't have done that with a white kid.

You do recall that Trayboom called Zimmie a "creepy assed cracker", don't you.

Yes, and that clears Zimmy? How?

 

[Correll]

You mean, he might have assumed an Hispanic was of Mexican ancestry?

I'm still not sure what that has to do with the subject, but if we're going that far out into the weeds, we know from what Trump has said about Hispanic judges and immigrants, he would say Hispanics can't be trusted.

Which is of course, not at all what Trump said. What kind of brain issue do you have?


Oh, wait, is this just more of you libs just saying shit,and not meaning nuthin by it?

Trump: Mexican American Judge Has an 'Absolute Conflict'
View attachment 307711
In an interview, Mr. Trump said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel had “an absolute conflict” in presiding over the litigation given that he was “of Mexican heritage” and a member of a Latino lawyers’ association. Mr. Trump said the background of the judge, who was born in Indiana to Mexican immigrants, was relevant because of his campaign stance against illegal immigration and his pledge to seal the southern U.S. border. “I’m building a wall. It’s an inherent conflict of interest,” Mr. Trump said.

Yep. As you libs loved to point out, leading up to the election, his immigration policy, spun by people like you as being terribly racist against Hispanics, led to him having strong opposition among the HIspanic community.


That that might led to one specific judge not being objective in judging Trump, is not the same as saying "all hispanics cannot be trusted".


Obviously.

The ONLY reason Trump accused the judge of having a conflict of interest was his ancestry. The idea that a judge is capable of making a fair determination is foreign to Trump because he couldn't do it himself..

Really? The ONLY reason?


What about simply face saving in case of losing?


Does that strike you as a possible reason for Trump to undermine the Judge's credibility?


When you libs say shit like that, all you do, is reveal that nothing you say, nor yourselves have any credibility.


You cry racism, when there are OBVIOUS OTHER ANSWERS, BECAUSE YOU ARE RACE BAITING ASSHOLES.

 

[BULLDOG]

I'm still not sure what that has to do with the subject, but if we're going that far out into the weeds, we know from what Trump has said about Hispanic judges and immigrants, he would say Hispanics can't be trusted.

Which is of course, not at all what Trump said. What kind of brain issue do you have?


Oh, wait, is this just more of you libs just saying shit,and not meaning nuthin by it?

Trump: Mexican American Judge Has an 'Absolute Conflict'
View attachment 307711
In an interview, Mr. Trump said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel had “an absolute conflict” in presiding over the litigation given that he was “of Mexican heritage” and a member of a Latino lawyers’ association. Mr. Trump said the background of the judge, who was born in Indiana to Mexican immigrants, was relevant because of his campaign stance against illegal immigration and his pledge to seal the southern U.S. border. “I’m building a wall. It’s an inherent conflict of interest,” Mr. Trump said.

Yep. As you libs loved to point out, leading up to the election, his immigration policy, spun by people like you as being terribly racist against Hispanics, led to him having strong opposition among the HIspanic community.


That that might led to one specific judge not being objective in judging Trump, is not the same as saying "all hispanics cannot be trusted".


Obviously.

The ONLY reason Trump accused the judge of having a conflict of interest was his ancestry. The idea that a judge is capable of making a fair determination is foreign to Trump because he couldn't do it himself..

Really? The ONLY reason?


What about simply face saving in case of losing?


Does that strike you as a possible reason for Trump to undermine the Judge's credibility?


When you libs say shit like that, all you do, is reveal that nothing you say, nor yourselves have any credibility.


You cry racism, when there are OBVIOUS OTHER ANSWERS, BECAUSE YOU ARE RACE BAITING ASSHOLES.

Of course he said to try to save face after losing, That is a dishonest scam, and something Trump would do. However, that is not the stated reason he gave,

 

[Correll]

Which is of course, not at all what Trump said. What kind of brain issue do you have?


Oh, wait, is this just more of you libs just saying shit,and not meaning nuthin by it?

Trump: Mexican American Judge Has an 'Absolute Conflict'
View attachment 307711
In an interview, Mr. Trump said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel had “an absolute conflict” in presiding over the litigation given that he was “of Mexican heritage” and a member of a Latino lawyers’ association. Mr. Trump said the background of the judge, who was born in Indiana to Mexican immigrants, was relevant because of his campaign stance against illegal immigration and his pledge to seal the southern U.S. border. “I’m building a wall. It’s an inherent conflict of interest,” Mr. Trump said.

Yep. As you libs loved to point out, leading up to the election, his immigration policy, spun by people like you as being terribly racist against Hispanics, led to him having strong opposition among the HIspanic community.


That that might led to one specific judge not being objective in judging Trump, is not the same as saying "all hispanics cannot be trusted".


Obviously.

The ONLY reason Trump accused the judge of having a conflict of interest was his ancestry. The idea that a judge is capable of making a fair determination is foreign to Trump because he couldn't do it himself..

It is not unreasonable to assume that someone with a strong Mexican heritage would have strong opinions about immigration. I would be skeptical of his ability to be impartial.

Of course you would be. Being a trump supporter, the concept of integrity is as foreign to you as it is to trump.

You libs spent over a year gloating how hispanics hate Trump, as a group, and that was one of the reasons he would lose.


Trump says ONE hispanic might hate him and you flip out.


YOu libs have no souls.

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump: Mexican American Judge Has an 'Absolute Conflict'
View attachment 307711
In an interview, Mr. Trump said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel had “an absolute conflict” in presiding over the litigation given that he was “of Mexican heritage” and a member of a Latino lawyers’ association. Mr. Trump said the background of the judge, who was born in Indiana to Mexican immigrants, was relevant because of his campaign stance against illegal immigration and his pledge to seal the southern U.S. border. “I’m building a wall. It’s an inherent conflict of interest,” Mr. Trump said.

Yep. As you libs loved to point out, leading up to the election, his immigration policy, spun by people like you as being terribly racist against Hispanics, led to him having strong opposition among the HIspanic community.


That that might led to one specific judge not being objective in judging Trump, is not the same as saying "all hispanics cannot be trusted".


Obviously.

The ONLY reason Trump accused the judge of having a conflict of interest was his ancestry. The idea that a judge is capable of making a fair determination is foreign to Trump because he couldn't do it himself..

It is not unreasonable to assume that someone with a strong Mexican heritage would have strong opinions about immigration. I would be skeptical of his ability to be impartial.

Of course you would be. Being a trump supporter, the concept of integrity is as foreign to you as it is to trump.

You libs spent over a year gloating how hispanics hate Trump, as a group, and that was one of the reasons he would lose.


Trump says ONE hispanic might hate him and you flip out.


YOu libs have no souls.

That wasn't Trump's claim. He said THAT judge couldn't give a fair ruling because of his heritage, even though that judge was born in the United States.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Yep. As you libs loved to point out, leading up to the election, his immigration policy, spun by people like you as being terribly racist against Hispanics, led to him having strong opposition among the HIspanic community.


That that might led to one specific judge not being objective in judging Trump, is not the same as saying "all hispanics cannot be trusted".


Obviously.

The ONLY reason Trump accused the judge of having a conflict of interest was his ancestry. The idea that a judge is capable of making a fair determination is foreign to Trump because he couldn't do it himself..

It is not unreasonable to assume that someone with a strong Mexican heritage would have strong opinions about immigration. I would be skeptical of his ability to be impartial.

Of course you would be. Being a trump supporter, the concept of integrity is as foreign to you as it is to trump.

You libs spent over a year gloating how hispanics hate Trump, as a group, and that was one of the reasons he would lose.


Trump says ONE hispanic might hate him and you flip out.


YOu libs have no souls.

That wasn't Trump's claim. He said THAT judge couldn't give a fair ruling because of his heritage, even though that judge was born in the United States.

He has a history of HISPANIC CENTRIC activism you ignorant lying female impersonator

 

[BULLDOG]

The ONLY reason Trump accused the judge of having a conflict of interest was his ancestry. The idea that a judge is capable of making a fair determination is foreign to Trump because he couldn't do it himself..

It is not unreasonable to assume that someone with a strong Mexican heritage would have strong opinions about immigration. I would be skeptical of his ability to be impartial.

Of course you would be. Being a trump supporter, the concept of integrity is as foreign to you as it is to trump.

You libs spent over a year gloating how hispanics hate Trump, as a group, and that was one of the reasons he would lose.


Trump says ONE hispanic might hate him and you flip out.


YOu libs have no souls.

That wasn't Trump's claim. He said THAT judge couldn't give a fair ruling because of his heritage, even though that judge was born in the United States.

He has a history of HISPANIC CENTRIC activism you ignorant lying female impersonator

You're just a silly little goober, aren't you?

 

[Correll]

Which is of course, not at all what Trump said. What kind of brain issue do you have?


Oh, wait, is this just more of you libs just saying shit,and not meaning nuthin by it?

Trump: Mexican American Judge Has an 'Absolute Conflict'
View attachment 307711
In an interview, Mr. Trump said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel had “an absolute conflict” in presiding over the litigation given that he was “of Mexican heritage” and a member of a Latino lawyers’ association. Mr. Trump said the background of the judge, who was born in Indiana to Mexican immigrants, was relevant because of his campaign stance against illegal immigration and his pledge to seal the southern U.S. border. “I’m building a wall. It’s an inherent conflict of interest,” Mr. Trump said.

Yep. As you libs loved to point out, leading up to the election, his immigration policy, spun by people like you as being terribly racist against Hispanics, led to him having strong opposition among the HIspanic community.


That that might led to one specific judge not being objective in judging Trump, is not the same as saying "all hispanics cannot be trusted".


Obviously.

The ONLY reason Trump accused the judge of having a conflict of interest was his ancestry. The idea that a judge is capable of making a fair determination is foreign to Trump because he couldn't do it himself..

Really? The ONLY reason?


What about simply face saving in case of losing?


Does that strike you as a possible reason for Trump to undermine the Judge's credibility?


When you libs say shit like that, all you do, is reveal that nothing you say, nor yourselves have any credibility.


You cry racism, when there are OBVIOUS OTHER ANSWERS, BECAUSE YOU ARE RACE BAITING ASSHOLES.

Of course he said to try to save face after losing, That is a dishonest scam, and something Trump would do. However, that is not the stated reason he gave,

STATED reason?


Nice attempt to move the goal post. Especially considering that you, the lefty here, is arguing that we should take what President Trump says at face value, and not consider that there might be additional or other or real reasons.



My point stands. When you claimed that "racism" is the only possible reason, and then I immediately get you to admit that there is another valid reason, you look like you were lying.


Because you were.


NONE OF LEFTY CLAIMS OF RACISM, SHOULD EVER BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, WITHOUT HARD EVIDENCE.

 

[Correll]

It is not unreasonable to assume that someone with a strong Mexican heritage would have strong opinions about immigration. I would be skeptical of his ability to be impartial.

Of course you would be. Being a trump supporter, the concept of integrity is as foreign to you as it is to trump.

You libs spent over a year gloating how hispanics hate Trump, as a group, and that was one of the reasons he would lose.


Trump says ONE hispanic might hate him and you flip out.


YOu libs have no souls.

That wasn't Trump's claim. He said THAT judge couldn't give a fair ruling because of his heritage, even though that judge was born in the United States.

He has a history of HISPANIC CENTRIC activism you ignorant lying female impersonator

You're just a silly little goober, aren't you?

You've lost. Try to do it with some grace.

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump: Mexican American Judge Has an 'Absolute Conflict'
View attachment 307711
In an interview, Mr. Trump said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel had “an absolute conflict” in presiding over the litigation given that he was “of Mexican heritage” and a member of a Latino lawyers’ association. Mr. Trump said the background of the judge, who was born in Indiana to Mexican immigrants, was relevant because of his campaign stance against illegal immigration and his pledge to seal the southern U.S. border. “I’m building a wall. It’s an inherent conflict of interest,” Mr. Trump said.

Yep. As you libs loved to point out, leading up to the election, his immigration policy, spun by people like you as being terribly racist against Hispanics, led to him having strong opposition among the HIspanic community.


That that might led to one specific judge not being objective in judging Trump, is not the same as saying "all hispanics cannot be trusted".


Obviously.

The ONLY reason Trump accused the judge of having a conflict of interest was his ancestry. The idea that a judge is capable of making a fair determination is foreign to Trump because he couldn't do it himself..

Really? The ONLY reason?


What about simply face saving in case of losing?


Does that strike you as a possible reason for Trump to undermine the Judge's credibility?


When you libs say shit like that, all you do, is reveal that nothing you say, nor yourselves have any credibility.


You cry racism, when there are OBVIOUS OTHER ANSWERS, BECAUSE YOU ARE RACE BAITING ASSHOLES.

Of course he said to try to save face after losing, That is a dishonest scam, and something Trump would do. However, that is not the stated reason he gave,

STATED reason?


Nice attempt to move the goal post. Especially considering that you, the lefty here, is arguing that we should take what President Trump says at face value, and not consider that there might be additional or other or real reasons.



My point stands. When you claimed that "racism" is the only possible reason, and then I immediately get you to admit that there is another valid reason, you look like you were lying.


Because you were.


NONE OF LEFTY CLAIMS OF RACISM, SHOULD EVER BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, WITHOUT HARD EVIDENCE.

That's quite a stretch there dumb ass. I would have to be as stupid as you to go for such a childish excuse.

 

[BULLDOG]

Of course you would be. Being a trump supporter, the concept of integrity is as foreign to you as it is to trump.

You libs spent over a year gloating how hispanics hate Trump, as a group, and that was one of the reasons he would lose.


Trump says ONE hispanic might hate him and you flip out.


YOu libs have no souls.

That wasn't Trump's claim. He said THAT judge couldn't give a fair ruling because of his heritage, even though that judge was born in the United States.

He has a history of HISPANIC CENTRIC activism you ignorant lying female impersonator

You're just a silly little goober, aren't you?

You've lost. Try to do it with some grace.

I'm not sure anybody has ever lost when it comes to you. Lost a little time may be.

 

[Correll]

Yep. As you libs loved to point out, leading up to the election, his immigration policy, spun by people like you as being terribly racist against Hispanics, led to him having strong opposition among the HIspanic community.


That that might led to one specific judge not being objective in judging Trump, is not the same as saying "all hispanics cannot be trusted".


Obviously.

The ONLY reason Trump accused the judge of having a conflict of interest was his ancestry. The idea that a judge is capable of making a fair determination is foreign to Trump because he couldn't do it himself..

Really? The ONLY reason?


What about simply face saving in case of losing?


Does that strike you as a possible reason for Trump to undermine the Judge's credibility?


When you libs say shit like that, all you do, is reveal that nothing you say, nor yourselves have any credibility.


You cry racism, when there are OBVIOUS OTHER ANSWERS, BECAUSE YOU ARE RACE BAITING ASSHOLES.

Of course he said to try to save face after losing, That is a dishonest scam, and something Trump would do. However, that is not the stated reason he gave,

STATED reason?


Nice attempt to move the goal post. Especially considering that you, the lefty here, is arguing that we should take what President Trump says at face value, and not consider that there might be additional or other or real reasons.



My point stands. When you claimed that "racism" is the only possible reason, and then I immediately get you to admit that there is another valid reason, you look like you were lying.


Because you were.


NONE OF LEFTY CLAIMS OF RACISM, SHOULD EVER BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, WITHOUT HARD EVIDENCE.

That's quite a stretch there dumb ass. I would have to be as stupid as you to go for such a childish excuse.

Oh, you think President Trump is above using a "childish excuse" ?


Well, I didn't mean to upset you by discussing your hero as though he was a regular person.


My point stands.


My point stands. When you claimed that "racism" is the only possible reason, and then I immediately get you to admit that there is another valid reason, you look like you were lying.


Because you were.


NONE OF LEFTY CLAIMS OF RACISM, SHOULD EVER BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, WITHOUT HARD EVIDENCE.

 

[Correll]

You libs spent over a year gloating how hispanics hate Trump, as a group, and that was one of the reasons he would lose.


Trump says ONE hispanic might hate him and you flip out.


YOu libs have no souls.

That wasn't Trump's claim. He said THAT judge couldn't give a fair ruling because of his heritage, even though that judge was born in the United States.

He has a history of HISPANIC CENTRIC activism you ignorant lying female impersonator

You're just a silly little goober, aren't you?

You've lost. Try to do it with some grace.

I'm not sure anybody has ever lost when it comes to you. Lost a little time may be.

Your stonewalling is noted. YOu lost. Deal with it.

 

[BULLDOG]

The ONLY reason Trump accused the judge of having a conflict of interest was his ancestry. The idea that a judge is capable of making a fair determination is foreign to Trump because he couldn't do it himself..

Really? The ONLY reason?


What about simply face saving in case of losing?


Does that strike you as a possible reason for Trump to undermine the Judge's credibility?


When you libs say shit like that, all you do, is reveal that nothing you say, nor yourselves have any credibility.


You cry racism, when there are OBVIOUS OTHER ANSWERS, BECAUSE YOU ARE RACE BAITING ASSHOLES.

Of course he said to try to save face after losing, That is a dishonest scam, and something Trump would do. However, that is not the stated reason he gave,

STATED reason?


Nice attempt to move the goal post. Especially considering that you, the lefty here, is arguing that we should take what President Trump says at face value, and not consider that there might be additional or other or real reasons.



My point stands. When you claimed that "racism" is the only possible reason, and then I immediately get you to admit that there is another valid reason, you look like you were lying.


Because you were.


NONE OF LEFTY CLAIMS OF RACISM, SHOULD EVER BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, WITHOUT HARD EVIDENCE.

That's quite a stretch there dumb ass. I would have to be as stupid as you to go for such a childish excuse.

Oh, you think President Trump is above using a "childish excuse" ?


Well, I didn't mean to upset you by discussing your hero as though he was a regular person.


My point stands.


My point stands. When you claimed that "racism" is the only possible reason, and then I immediately get you to admit that there is another valid reason, you look like you were lying.


Because you were.


NONE OF LEFTY CLAIMS OF RACISM, SHOULD EVER BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, WITHOUT HARD EVIDENCE.

Your post is what a dumb person thinks a smart person might sound like. I hate to be the one to tell you this, but your post is what a dumb person sounds like.

 

[Correll]

Really? The ONLY reason?


What about simply face saving in case of losing?


Does that strike you as a possible reason for Trump to undermine the Judge's credibility?


When you libs say shit like that, all you do, is reveal that nothing you say, nor yourselves have any credibility.


You cry racism, when there are OBVIOUS OTHER ANSWERS, BECAUSE YOU ARE RACE BAITING ASSHOLES.

Of course he said to try to save face after losing, That is a dishonest scam, and something Trump would do. However, that is not the stated reason he gave,

STATED reason?


Nice attempt to move the goal post. Especially considering that you, the lefty here, is arguing that we should take what President Trump says at face value, and not consider that there might be additional or other or real reasons.



My point stands. When you claimed that "racism" is the only possible reason, and then I immediately get you to admit that there is another valid reason, you look like you were lying.


Because you were.


NONE OF LEFTY CLAIMS OF RACISM, SHOULD EVER BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, WITHOUT HARD EVIDENCE.

That's quite a stretch there dumb ass. I would have to be as stupid as you to go for such a childish excuse.

Oh, you think President Trump is above using a "childish excuse" ?


Well, I didn't mean to upset you by discussing your hero as though he was a regular person.


My point stands.


My point stands. When you claimed that "racism" is the only possible reason, and then I immediately get you to admit that there is another valid reason, you look like you were lying.


Because you were.


NONE OF LEFTY CLAIMS OF RACISM, SHOULD EVER BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, WITHOUT HARD EVIDENCE.

Your post is what a dumb person thinks a smart person might sound like. I hate to be the one to tell you this, but your post is what a dumb person sounds like.

LOL!!! Excellent dodge!


Would you like ANOTHER possible reason for what TRump said, that was not racism, to even more show how silly you are?