Triggered leftists ask Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders to remove the cross her kids chalked on the driveway @ the Arkansas Governor's Mansion

For the thousandth time, Leftists: there IS no "separation of Church and State" for American citizens. That phrase just means that there is no State Church in America, as in the Church of England. It doesn't mean that expressing your faith in governmental places is illegal.

Why is this so difficult for so many?
Because you are wrong.

Ask Jeff Sessions.

The courts have determined that to allow one church to display symbols from one religion then they must allow the display of all.

That is separation of church and state.
 
You have to know that there is something very, very, very fucked up when this is considered offensive…

Sanders-Cross-Mansion.jpeg


…but faggots, trannies, pedophiles and related fucked-up sexual perverts flaunting their sick behavior in front of children is not.
 
For the thousandth time, Leftists: there IS no "separation of Church and State" for American citizens. That phrase just means that there is no State Church in America, as in the Church of England. It doesn't mean that expressing your faith in governmental places is illegal.

Why is this so difficult for so many?
Because they discriminate with only one graven image.
 
No. deal with it you wibble snowflake.

If I gotta deal with some green haired he/she walking down the street, you can deal with some chalk on a sidewalk.
You don't have to 'deal' with anything. :dunno: You just love to bitch about stuff you have no control over.
 
Sarah tells the Marxists to stick it. Best Governor in the country and a future POTUS!

The first settlers in New Mexico outside of the Native American population--most still call themselves Indians here--were the Spanish Conquistadors accompanied by priests who worked with the locals and Spaniards to establish communities. The Christian religion established here was 100% Roman Catholic at that time as Spain was strictly a Roman Catholic country. The Catholics still are the majority religion in New Mexico but allowed in a predominant Presbyterian presence that is still reflected in much of New Mexico health care, education, and other influences. And both have co-existed quite amicably and cooperatively with many other Christian and non-Christian presences that would follow.

That undeniable important aspect of New Mexico history was commemorated by a small cross on the Bernalillo County (Albuquerque is the County Seat) seal among many other historical symbols.

The ACLU filed suit against Bernalillo County claiming that small cross violated separation of Church and State. Bernalillo County just acquiesced rather than fight an expensive lawsuit and removed the cross from the seal.

Then in 2005 the ACLU went after the tiny Village of Tijeras, just east of Albuquerque, whose logo depicted a maize plant, a NM Zia (state symbol also with religious roots) a conquistador's helmet and sword and also a rosary depicting the historical influence of the Church.
ngbbs4319d05c4b465.gif


The people there stirred up such a protest and the ACLU was receiving so much bad publicity I think they must have dropped that suit because the Village still uses that seal.

Likewise when the ACLU tried to make the City of Belen NM remove a historical old manger scene from their city square, the city pushed back hard and started a new tradition of a manger scene competition in the Christian season.

Americans have as much right to their religious history which is powerfully significant as much as we have right to all our other history, the good, the bad, the ugly. And it's time we all push back on these people demanding that we remove or destroy it.

Hooray for Sarah Huckabee Sanders. She gets it.
 
Last edited:
The first settlers in New Mexico outside of the Native American population--most still call themselves Indians here--were the Spanish Conquistadors accompanied by priests who worked with the locals and Spaniards to establish communities. The Christian religion established here was 100% Roman Catholic at that time as Spain was strictly a Roman Catholic country. The Catholics still are the majority religion in New Mexico but allowed in a predominant Presbyterian presence that is still reflected in much of New Mexico health care, education, and other influences. And both have co-existed quite amicably and cooperatively with many other Christian and non-Christian presences that would follow.

That undeniable important aspect of New Mexico history was commemorated by a small cross on the Bernalillo County (Albuquerque is the County Seat) seal among many other historical symbols.

The ACLU filed suit against Bernalillo County claiming that small cross violated separation of Church and State. Bernalillo County just acquiesced rather than fight an expensive lawsuit and removed the cross from the seal.

Then in 2005 the ACLU went after the tiny Village of Tijeras, just east of Albuquerque, whose logo depicted a maize plant, a NM Zia (state symbol also with religious roots) a conquistador's helmet and sword and also a rosary depicting the historical influence of the Church.
ngbbs4319d05c4b465.gif


The people there stirred up such a protest and the ACLU was receiving so much bad publicity I think they must have dropped that suit because the Village still uses that seal.

Likewise when the ACLU tried to make the City of Belen NM remove a historical old manger scene from their city square, the city pushed back hard and started a new tradition of a manger scene competition in the Christian season.

Americans have as much right to their religious history which is powerfully significant as much as we have right to all our other history, the good, the bad, the ugly. And it's time we all push back on these people demanding that we remove or destroy it.

Hooray for Sarah Huckabee Sanders. She gets it.

When I was in elementary school, in Santa Barbara, in the early 1970s, I remember being taught some of the local history, about how the Spanish settlers founded the communities is in that area, centered around the Catholic Mission buildings that they built at the core of each community; of the role of Junipero Serra, a Catholic Friar, in building these early communities. The 237-year-old Mission building still stands, is still used as a Catholic church, and nearby, are the partially-preserved ruins of a village that use to exist there, probably dating back to about the same time the Mission itself was built.

All of that is an important part of the History of the Santa Barbara area, and of much of the rest of California coastal areas. They probably don't teach about this in public schools, any more, as it would trigger those who find religion to be offensive.
 
When I was in elementary school, in Santa Barbara, in the early 1970s, I remember being taught some of the local history, about how the Spanish settlers founded the communities is in that area, centered around the Catholic Mission buildings that they built at the core of each community; of the role of Junipero Serra, a Catholic Friar, in building these early communities. The 237-year-old Mission building still stands, is still used as a Catholic church, and nearby, are the partially-preserved ruins of a village that use to exist there, probably dating back to about the same time the Mission itself was built.

All of that is an important part of the History of the Santa Barbara area, and of much of the rest of California coastal areas. They probably don't teach about this in public schools, any more, as it would trigger those who find religion to be offensive.
Yes, California, Arizona, New Mexico, and a large part of Texas all share much of the same heritage in that regard.

It is important to understand our historical roots including those involving religion. It is pathetic that children no longer understand how theocratic some of the original colonies were with their almost tyrannical religious rules but all those little theocracies voluntarily dissolved themselves by the turn of the 18th Century and none ever started up again. Unless you count the one formed by the LDS in Utah, but that too has so modified nobody would describe it as a theocracy these days. It is important to teach because it so eloquently illustrates how a free people will exercise trial and error, adopt systems that don't work well for many, make mistakes, but eventually they will via social contract form societies that are comfortable and unoppressive for all. And they do that much more satisfactorily and without as many unintended bad consequences as will authoritarian government.

It happens but it is very rare that the federal government needs to step in and govern the people. Which was the whole idea of the Constitution in the first place. Our history informs us but it does not define us just as a person's experience can inform him/her but does not need to define who that person becomes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top