Trump Accuser Demands Release Of Documents On All His Sexual Assault Allegations

[EvilCat Breath]

Trump didn't do anything. The worst they have on Trump is that in 2005 he said that if you're a star, women will let you grab them by the pussy. It is 2017 and we know from Harvey Weinstein that women will do exactly that.

you're a demented liar... he admitted to sexually assaulting women.

loon

Never. If he did, you have no trouble proving it.

 

[OKTexas]

Well since I hear you claim to be a lawyer, what was the missing element in the OP that would be required to sustain a defamation claim? No hurry, I'll wait.


.

Whether or not the accuser was a public figure rendering Trump's comments no more than fair comment.

Of course by interjecting herself in the public square she made herself a public figure.

What other complaints there might be against Trump are meaningless since there is no issue of prior bad acts.

Not what I'm looking for. There is one element of a defamation claim that must be demonstrated to sustain the claim. I want to see if our resident "attorney" is smart enough to come up with it.


.

if you want your dumb ass educated, you might want to take the quotes away. or you can look at what I posted to the tipsy imbecile

So the missing element is not obvious to you, figures.


.

like I said... remove the quotes and ask an actual question. because going back and re-reading any conversation with the tipsy idiot isn't something I care to do.

but thanks for playing

See post #67. You seem to have skipped right over it.


.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

you forgot to put bill clinton up there.....

He was already impeached! Trump seems to be able to get away with what he does.

he wasnt impeached for his sexual deeds...bill was the same kind of dirt bag as these two....

He was impeached for lying about it and obstruction of justice.

he was not convicted of obstruction of justice, little boy. in fact, he was found not guily of the partisan hatchet job in the senate. you do know that, right?

he was found guilty of lying in a civil deposition which they had no business forcing him to participate in during the course of his presidency. (no other presidency in history was forced to participate in civil action while president).

you're welcome

Did I say he was convicted? No, I didn't! This is just another example of why you libs are stupid.

I think we need Congress to pass an emergency bill to fund reading comprehension remedial education for all of you liberals who failed to learn it the first time. We can call it "Literacy for Libtards"!

 

[jillian]

Whether or not the accuser was a public figure rendering Trump's comments no more than fair comment.

Of course by interjecting herself in the public square she made herself a public figure.

What other complaints there might be against Trump are meaningless since there is no issue of prior bad acts.

Not what I'm looking for. There is one element of a defamation claim that must be demonstrated to sustain the claim. I want to see if our resident "attorney" is smart enough to come up with it.


.

if you want your dumb ass educated, you might want to take the quotes away. or you can look at what I posted to the tipsy imbecile

So the missing element is not obvious to you, figures.


.

like I said... remove the quotes and ask an actual question. because going back and re-reading any conversation with the tipsy idiot isn't something I care to do.

but thanks for playing

See post #67. You seem to have skipped right over it.


.

post 67 directs me to post 1... silly child.

is your little mind talking about how the allegations have to be false for them to be defamatory?

I'd say that won't be very difficult for her to prove. her credibility... his credibility...

he's never told the truth about anything in his life.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Winning!

when did Harvey Weinstein become president?

and who, unlike the trumptards, is defending Harvey.;

does lying and false equivalency make you feel better about defending the orange piece of garbage?

Nobody is defending Harvey, but your librtards friends are making false claims of equivalency with Trump. If you knew how to read, you would see that.

 

[jillian]

you forgot to put bill clinton up there.....

He was already impeached! Trump seems to be able to get away with what he does.

he wasnt impeached for his sexual deeds...bill was the same kind of dirt bag as these two....

He was impeached for lying about it and obstruction of justice.

he was not convicted of obstruction of justice, little boy. in fact, he was found not guily of the partisan hatchet job in the senate. you do know that, right?

he was found guilty of lying in a civil deposition which they had no business forcing him to participate in during the course of his presidency. (no other presidency in history was forced to participate in civil action while president).

you're welcome

Did I say he was convicted? No, I didn't! This is just another example of why you libs are stupid.

I think we need Congress to pass an emergency bill to fund reading comprehension remedial education for all of you liberals who failed to learn it the first time. We can call it "Literacy for Libtards"!

no dum, dum... trumptards are stupid. your words... that he was impeached for something.

he was not found guilty.

therefore the charge is irrelevant.

see how that works in the USA, snookums.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

He was already impeached! Trump seems to be able to get away with what he does.

he wasnt impeached for his sexual deeds...bill was the same kind of dirt bag as these two....

He was impeached for lying about it and obstruction of justice.

he was not convicted of obstruction of justice, little boy. in fact, he was found not guily of the partisan hatchet job in the senate. you do know that, right?

he was found guilty of lying in a civil deposition which they had no business forcing him to participate in during the course of his presidency. (no other presidency in history was forced to participate in civil action while president).

you're welcome

Did I say he was convicted? No, I didn't! This is just another example of why you libs are stupid.

I think we need Congress to pass an emergency bill to fund reading comprehension remedial education for all of you liberals who failed to learn it the first time. We can call it "Literacy for Libtards"!

no dum, dum... trumptards are stupid. your words... that he was impeached for something.

he was not found guilty.

therefore the charge is irrelevant.

see how that works in the USA, snookums.

Ok, then why did you accuse me of saying something I did not? Your incompetence is now somehow my fault?

 

[Crixus]

View attachment 154568

he moron, when was bill Clinton ever found to have assaulted someone.

lying pondscum

He was never "found", but unlike Trumps accusers ole Bills haven't gone away after twenty years.

oh.. .so "accusers" matter in bill Clinton's case (which has been investigated up the yin yang)... but not in the orange sociopath's case?

you wingers are hysterical

Meh, like Russia it’s been investigated. All this ho wants are the details of the complaint released. It’s not to answer any questions it to make trouble.

 

[OKTexas]

Not what I'm looking for. There is one element of a defamation claim that must be demonstrated to sustain the claim. I want to see if our resident "attorney" is smart enough to come up with it.


.

if you want your dumb ass educated, you might want to take the quotes away. or you can look at what I posted to the tipsy imbecile

So the missing element is not obvious to you, figures.


.

like I said... remove the quotes and ask an actual question. because going back and re-reading any conversation with the tipsy idiot isn't something I care to do.

but thanks for playing

See post #67. You seem to have skipped right over it.


.

post 67 directs me to post 1... silly child.

is your little mind talking about how the allegations have to be false for them to be defamatory?

I'd say that won't be very difficult for her to prove. her credibility... his credibility...

he's never told the truth about anything in his life.

I guess your law school didn't teach or you slept through the class where the requirement for demonstrable harm, as in a financial loss, must be present to sustain a case for defamation. According to what's been posted, the plaintiff is a successful restaurant owner, where's the harm. Just hurt feelings won't cut it.


.

 

[miketx]

Jillian cannot comprehend what it means for accusers to come out and accuse before an election and then never be heard from again, VS accusers who accuse and KEEP ACCUSING 20 years later!

 

[bripat9643]

Trump didn't do anything. The worst they have on Trump is that in 2005 he said that if you're a star, women will let you grab them by the pussy. It is 2017 and we know from Harvey Weinstein that women will do exactly that.

you're a demented liar... he admitted to sexually assaulting women.

loon

No he didn't, dingbat.

If it wasn't for lying, how would douche bags like you attack Trump?

 

[bripat9643]

Gloria Allred. That's all you need to know.

Is it? Really?

You dig the histrionic attention whore?

like paula jones? linda tripp? like that?

You want to know my opinion when it comes to serving anyone in politics or the entertainment world?
Don't...unless you're very willing to sell your soul.
Then one day when the political winds allow you a brief moment of empowerment and greed...sue everyone.

what do you mean by "serving"? working in a film? in government?

is someone "asking for it" if they associate with a sexual predator like trump? is nikki haley in danger?

the onus is not on women... the onus is on scum like Donald who think they can touch women without their consent.

He said he had their consent, so you're obviously full of shit.

 

[easyt65]

Summer Zervos, a former contestant on “The Apprentice,” is suing President Donald Trump for defamation after he denied groping her without consent.

Summer Zervos, who claims Trump groped her without consent, is suing the president for defamation.

A woman who accused President Donald Trump of unwanted groping has subpoenaed all documents held by his presidential campaign about any harassment and assault allegations against him, BuzzFeed News reported Saturday.

Summer Zervos, a former contestant on “The Apprentice” and one of many women who came forward during the campaign to accuse Trump of harassment or assault, initiated the subpoena as part of her lawsuit against the president for defamation. Zervos decided to sue Trump in January months after the then-presidential candidate denied the allegation and dismissed all of his accusers as liars.

In her bid to establish that Trump “defamed” her, Zervos’s subpoena aims to prove how Trump deliberately tried to discredit her and the other accusers.

The subpoena, which is liable to renew public attention on the numerous allegations against Trump, sets the stage for another legal and political headache for the president.

Zervos’ subpoena requires him to turn over all documents “concerning any accusations that were made during Donald J. Trump’s election campaign for president, that he subjected any woman to unwanted sexual touching and/or sexually inappropriate behavior.” The order would cover documents about Zervos, as well as other women who accused Trump of groping, including, but not limited to, Jessica Leeds, Mindy McGillivray, Rachel Crooks, Natasha Stoynoff, Temple Taggart, Kristin Anderson, Cathy Heller, Jill Harth, and Jessica Drake.

Zervos’ legal team, which includes nationally renowned women’s rights attorney Gloria Allred, issued the subpoena in March, but it only entered the court record in September.

Trump’s attorneys tried to get the suit dismissed in March on the grounds that thepresident is immune from being sued while in office. They also tried to dismiss the subpoena in July, arguing that it “seeks wholly irrelevant information intended solely to harass the president.”

During Trump’s campaign, he vowed to sue the women who accused him of assault and harassment, but he has not followed through on the promise.

More: Trump Accuser Demands Release Of Documents On All His Sexual Assault Allegations

Good luck, Summer. Hopefully your courage will prompt all the other women victims to come forward.

Those records will be released just as soon as liberals and snowflakes present evidence of collusion...

 

[ClosedCaption]

Is it? Really?

You dig the histrionic attention whore?

like paula jones? linda tripp? like that?

You want to know my opinion when it comes to serving anyone in politics or the entertainment world?
Don't...unless you're very willing to sell your soul.
Then one day when the political winds allow you a brief moment of empowerment and greed...sue everyone.

what do you mean by "serving"? working in a film? in government?

is someone "asking for it" if they associate with a sexual predator like trump? is nikki haley in danger?

the onus is not on women... the onus is on scum like Donald who think they can touch women without their consent.

He said he had their consent, so you're obviously full of shit.

Oh well, thats that then huh? He said so! Awesome! He also said he had investigators he hired found info about Obama being a foreigner too! There you go!

 

[bripat9643]

You dig the histrionic attention whore?

like paula jones? linda tripp? like that?

You want to know my opinion when it comes to serving anyone in politics or the entertainment world?
Don't...unless you're very willing to sell your soul.
Then one day when the political winds allow you a brief moment of empowerment and greed...sue everyone.

what do you mean by "serving"? working in a film? in government?

is someone "asking for it" if they associate with a sexual predator like trump? is nikki haley in danger?

the onus is not on women... the onus is on scum like Donald who think they can touch women without their consent.

He said he had their consent, so you're obviously full of shit.

Oh well, thats that then huh? He said so! Awesome! He also said he had investigators he hired found info about Obama being a foreigner too! There you go!

You and the rest of the douche bags have claimed he admitted to sexual assault based on that same statement, moron.

 

[ClosedCaption]

like paula jones? linda tripp? like that?

You want to know my opinion when it comes to serving anyone in politics or the entertainment world?
Don't...unless you're very willing to sell your soul.
Then one day when the political winds allow you a brief moment of empowerment and greed...sue everyone.

what do you mean by "serving"? working in a film? in government?

is someone "asking for it" if they associate with a sexual predator like trump? is nikki haley in danger?

the onus is not on women... the onus is on scum like Donald who think they can touch women without their consent.

He said he had their consent, so you're obviously full of shit.

Oh well, thats that then huh? He said so! Awesome! He also said he had investigators he hired found info about Obama being a foreigner too! There you go!

You and the rest of the douche bags have claimed he admitted to sexual assault based on that same statement, moron.

Yes, he can speak for himself but hes not allowed to speak for others. Again, Trump said he has investigators on Obama. Either you believe him or reality but it cant be both

 

[Lakhota]

Summer Zervos, a former contestant on “The Apprentice,” is suing President Donald Trump for defamation after he denied groping her without consent.

Summer Zervos, who claims Trump groped her without consent, is suing the president for defamation.

A woman who accused President Donald Trump of unwanted groping has subpoenaed all documents held by his presidential campaign about any harassment and assault allegations against him, BuzzFeed News reported Saturday.

Summer Zervos, a former contestant on “The Apprentice” and one of many women who came forward during the campaign to accuse Trump of harassment or assault, initiated the subpoena as part of her lawsuit against the president for defamation. Zervos decided to sue Trump in January months after the then-presidential candidate denied the allegation and dismissed all of his accusers as liars.

In her bid to establish that Trump “defamed” her, Zervos’s subpoena aims to prove how Trump deliberately tried to discredit her and the other accusers.

The subpoena, which is liable to renew public attention on the numerous allegations against Trump, sets the stage for another legal and political headache for the president.

Zervos’ subpoena requires him to turn over all documents “concerning any accusations that were made during Donald J. Trump’s election campaign for president, that he subjected any woman to unwanted sexual touching and/or sexually inappropriate behavior.” The order would cover documents about Zervos, as well as other women who accused Trump of groping, including, but not limited to, Jessica Leeds, Mindy McGillivray, Rachel Crooks, Natasha Stoynoff, Temple Taggart, Kristin Anderson, Cathy Heller, Jill Harth, and Jessica Drake.

Zervos’ legal team, which includes nationally renowned women’s rights attorney Gloria Allred, issued the subpoena in March, but it only entered the court record in September.

Trump’s attorneys tried to get the suit dismissed in March on the grounds that thepresident is immune from being sued while in office. They also tried to dismiss the subpoena in July, arguing that it “seeks wholly irrelevant information intended solely to harass the president.”

During Trump’s campaign, he vowed to sue the women who accused him of assault and harassment, but he has not followed through on the promise.

More: Trump Accuser Demands Release Of Documents On All His Sexual Assault Allegations

Good luck, Summer. Hopefully your courage will prompt all the other women victims to come forward.

Those records will be released just as soon as liberals and snowflakes present evidence of collusion...

Criminal collusion is in the hands of Congress and Mueller. Stay tuned...

 

[Lakhota]

Is it? Really?

You dig the histrionic attention whore?

like paula jones? linda tripp? like that?

You want to know my opinion when it comes to serving anyone in politics or the entertainment world?
Don't...unless you're very willing to sell your soul.
Then one day when the political winds allow you a brief moment of empowerment and greed...sue everyone.

what do you mean by "serving"? working in a film? in government?

is someone "asking for it" if they associate with a sexual predator like trump? is nikki haley in danger?

the onus is not on women... the onus is on scum like Donald who think they can touch women without their consent.

He said he had their consent, so you're obviously full of shit.

And you believed Bill Clinton?

 

[bripat9643]

You want to know my opinion when it comes to serving anyone in politics or the entertainment world?
Don't...unless you're very willing to sell your soul.
Then one day when the political winds allow you a brief moment of empowerment and greed...sue everyone.

what do you mean by "serving"? working in a film? in government?

is someone "asking for it" if they associate with a sexual predator like trump? is nikki haley in danger?

the onus is not on women... the onus is on scum like Donald who think they can touch women without their consent.

He said he had their consent, so you're obviously full of shit.

Oh well, thats that then huh? He said so! Awesome! He also said he had investigators he hired found info about Obama being a foreigner too! There you go!

You and the rest of the douche bags have claimed he admitted to sexual assault based on that same statement, moron.

Yes, he can speak for himself but hes not allowed to speak for others. Again, Trump said he has investigators on Obama. Either you believe him or reality but it cant be both

What does that have to do with your douche bag claim that he admitted to sexual assault?

 

[bripat9643]

You dig the histrionic attention whore?

like paula jones? linda tripp? like that?

You want to know my opinion when it comes to serving anyone in politics or the entertainment world?
Don't...unless you're very willing to sell your soul.
Then one day when the political winds allow you a brief moment of empowerment and greed...sue everyone.

what do you mean by "serving"? working in a film? in government?

is someone "asking for it" if they associate with a sexual predator like trump? is nikki haley in danger?

the onus is not on women... the onus is on scum like Donald who think they can touch women without their consent.

He said he had their consent, so you're obviously full of shit.

And you believed Bill Clinton?

Why do you believe one part of Trump's statement and not the other? Either the statement is credible, or it's not.