Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People currently sue all the time. See Brady vs the NFL. Twitter subjectively picks and chooses what to ban and what to allow. In my view it makes them a publisher. And they should be regulated as such. You don’t get to decide if the suit is frivolous or an issue of law is involved.That's nonsense. You're asking the courts to step into every controversy between two parties, even if no issue of law is involved, or remedy available.
You want everybody to be able to sue anybody for any reason. Judicial anarchy.
One last time, they aren’t regulated like ATT or Verizon.But they cannot then state they are a neutral platform and be regulated like AT&T or Verizon.
I'm sure Twitter would boot the Taliban if they advocated their supporters storm the US Capitol.
The 4 star restaurant doesn’t pick and choose who to let in based on political ideology
They didn't ban Trump based on political ideology. They banned him because he inspired violence, and the attempted over throw of the US government.The 4 star restaurant doesn’t pick and choose who to let in based on political ideology
Twitter tells everybody what their terms of service are. You have to check the box saying that you agree to be bound by them. And simply put, Trump violated their terms of service, and was denied service. No different than what any other business can do.People currently sue all the time. See Brady vs the NFL. Twitter subjectively picks and chooses what to ban and what to allow. In my view it makes them a publisher. And they should be regulated as such. You don’t get to decide if the suit is frivolous or an issue of law is involved.
You're forgiven.
Because you're a Nazi, it's expected that you're dumb as dogshit - which you are.
Regulated. Auto correct. You don’t get to decide how social media is regulated and neither do I. Legislative Branch of the US Govt does. Courts then interpret the law. They may ban Trump all day. And they may let Hamas post all day. They may also ban the IDF and anyone who supports Israel. They are a private company. But they cannot then state they are a neutral platform and be regulated like AT&T or Verizon.
www.nsf.gov
One last time they are. They aren’t regulated like the NYT or the WSJ but IMO should beOne last time, they aren’t regulated like ATT or Verizon.
Maybe if the Taliban wasn't 1,000 miles away they could storm the capitol.
Some of it was built by taxpayer funds but the internet is not a public resource. Many companies have spent many billions laying fiber across the country and those countries charge companies like Twitter large sums of money for access to their network.Unlike frequencies and the airwaves, which exist naturally - the internet was built by the government using taxpayer funds. After Algore invented the internet, that is......
Good grief. No. Do you even know what a common carrier is?One last time they are. They aren’t regulated like the NYT or the WSJ but IMO should be
Who said they were, Stupid?Twitter is under no legal obligation to apply their TOS fairly.
Good grief, do you? Laws are pretty complex even legal scholars cannot agree how social media platforms should be regulated. But you a male nurse know more than they do?Good grief. No. Do you even know what a common carrier is?
www.google.com
Some of it was built by taxpayer funds but the internet is not a public resource. Many companies have spent many billions laying fiber across the country and those countries charge companies like Twitter large sums of money for access to their network.
Good. Then you should agree that if they’re under no legal obligation to be fair, then this is irrelevant for the legal case Trump is making against Twitter.Who said they were, Stupid?
Twitter is under no legal obligation to apply their TOS fairly.
You’re asking how it should be regulated. I’m saying how it is regulated.Good grief, do you? Laws are pretty complex even legal scholars cannot agree how social media platforms should be regulated. But you a male nurse know more than they do?
Social media: How might it be regulated?
A report puts forward a tranche of ideas that could help reduce the spread of misinformation.
Don’t care about Trump. Twitter may ban the IDF but allow Hamas to post and there would be nothing anyone could do about it. Twitter once banned the Star of David. So they are publishing content but excluding certain content and allowing other content. They should be regulated as a content publisher IMO. But I am not a legal expert so the courts should decide. Why do you have an issue with courts deciding?Twitter tells everybody what their terms of service are. You have to check the box saying that you agree to be bound by them. And simply put, Trump violated their terms of service, and was denied service. No different than what any other business can do.
Nope. There is no law or regulation that requires it.As a public forum, they are.
