GaryDog
Gold Member
- Feb 10, 2016
- 4,369
- 530
- 195
- Thread starter
- #141
Churches aren't human beings.
There is no equal protection violation in telling an operator of an open-to-the-public business that they can't discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. How fucking stupid do you have to be to believe there is?
Their first amendment rights are not being violated. They're allowed to go to church, read their fucking bible, post bible verses at their business, preach about god and jesus to all customers, and enjoy a land where 99% of all of their leadership in Washington DC believes as they fucking do. For you to try and parlay that into some false narrative of "religious oppression" is beyond fucking hilarious and transversing into absurd false victimhood.
"Free exercise" does not confer a right to discrimination, and oppression.
There is a potential free exercise violation, which you just keep ignoring. And your "Churches aren't human beings" answer is a bush league dodge, poseur.
Yes, their 1st amendment rights are being violated, but you are too biased and bigoted to see it. The real issue is who's right is higher, the gay couple's "right" to a specific cake, or their right to free exercise.
Free exercise can confer a right to discrimination, or Churches and Pastors would be forced to hold and be celebrants for SSSM's already. They are not, so your statement is patently false.
This has been explained to you ad nauseum, and all of the courts agree with me. You can keep pissing uphill if you want, but your ridiculous logic, poor spelling, terrible grammar, and just plain obvious stupidity leads me to believe that you wouldn't agree that wet paint is wet.
Fuck off down the trail, pardner.
Appeal to authority doesn't work on me, so try harder. Was Plessey right at the time, just because the Court issued it?
So now you are adding Grammar and Spelling Nazi to the mix? Oh joy.
Wet paint is wet, except when you paint in hospitals, due to their dry atmosphere. There wet paint is wet for about 5 seconds.
I'll put my IQ against yours any day of the week.
And spare me the cutsey folksy attempt at middle-Americana lingo, we all know you are some fart sniffing coaster.
When the issue is constitutional law, and my "appeal to authority" is "just about every constitutional scholar and federal judge in the land", you bet your ass it holds water. I've already attempted to appeal to a proper understanding of the law, and even common sense, but your stubborn bigotry is impervious to both.
Yes, keep thinking grammar and spelling do not matter. They're a stark sign of intelligence, or lack thereof.
Again, why do you assume my position is due to Bigotry?
You are far more Bigoted, due to your masturbatory fantasies about fucking over Religious People.
A clean desk is a sign of an idle mind, a grammar/spell nazi is a sign of a anal-retentive fuckwit.
Fuckwit.
Right, not understanding how to use the only language you know is a sign of intelligence.