Trump Breaths Life Into The First Amendment

[Ridgerunner]

Before you say another word, read my post:

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. What sort of Leftist would elevate a Fascist speech-denier to the Supreme Court????
In a constellation of wrong and unconstitutional actions, Obama put on the Supreme Court, an anti-free speech activist:



"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."




Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."
If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia






Which of these doctrines would endorse suppressing speech?

Liberalism….Fascism…..Communism….Conservatism




You know the answer.

 

[Penelope]

7. What sort of Leftist would elevate a Fascist speech-denier to the Supreme Court????
In a constellation of wrong and unconstitutional actions, Obama put on the Supreme Court, an anti-free speech activist:



"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."




Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."
If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia






Which of these doctrines would endorse suppressing speech?

Liberalism….Fascism…..Communism….Conservatism




You know the answer.

the Trump party.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. What sort of Leftist would elevate a Fascist speech-denier to the Supreme Court????
In a constellation of wrong and unconstitutional actions, Obama put on the Supreme Court, an anti-free speech activist:



"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."




Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."
If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia






Which of these doctrines would endorse suppressing speech?

Liberalism….Fascism…..Communism….Conservatism




You know the answer.

the Trump party.

Sooo....you get your news from HamasNBC???



Remember when I said you were as dumb as asphalt.


I have to remember to apologize to asphalt.

 

[midcan5]

Trump? You're not talking about our president are you? Over three thousand lies and counting is quite a record, imagine if you or your child lied that much? Would that make you proud? But mom, our president lies and cheats why can't I?

The Trump presidency has shown one thing clearly, the republican party has no moral base, the religious Evangelicals have no Christian values, the Trump snowflakes have no emotion except hatred for the other, the conservative scholars are as devoid of integrity as the snowflakes, and right wing media is a dishonest cesspool of apologetic nonsense. Sad.

“To abandon facts is to abandon freedom. If nothing is true, then no one can criticize power, because there is no basis upon which to do so. If nothing is true, then all is spectacle. The biggest wallet pays for the most blinding lights.” Timothy Snyder, On Tyranny

Stuff for the interested in the truth reader:

'I Know Why Poor Whites Chant Trump, Trump, Trump' Jonna Ivin

I Know Why Poor Whites Chant Trump, Trump, Trump

'Group instinct & the white tribals of America'

Group instinct & the white tribals of America | ORF

"We live in a society in which spurious realities are manufactured by the media, by governments, by big corporations, by religious groups, political groups. I ask, in my writing, 'What is real?' Because unceasingly we are bombarded with pseudo realities manufactured by very sophisticated people using very sophisticated electronic mechanisms." Philip K. Dick

 

[ptbw forever]

In the tale about to be illustrated here, one will immediately see the significance of the Trump election to America and Americans.

Had the troglodytes of the Left won the election, and maintained control of the Department of Justice…..this never…..never…..would have occurred.





1.“DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team

2. …a lawsuit brought by a new group called Speech First challenging U. Michigan’s Bias Response Teams, Lawsuit: U. Michigan speech code and Bias Response Team “profoundly chill free speech and open discourse”:…U. Michigan’s policies “are facially unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments….”

3. If you have not heard of Bias Response Teams, then you haven’t been around campus in the last decade.These teams, often referred to at BRTs, are the equivalent of SWAT teams standing by to enforce campus speech and conduct codes. … the teams enforce often vague standards highly dependent on how a complainant feels, there is an opaque process with little due process, and the results often track accepted campus political correctness rather than a search for the truth. Yet the punishments can cause lasting damage….




4. …amorphous prohibitions on “bullying,” “harassment,” and “bias-motivated misconduct” is to profoundly chill free speech and open discourse at the University. A student who voices a controversial or unpopular opinion—or who seeks to use humor, parody, or satire when discussing sensitive topics—could face severe punishment up to and including expulsion if even one other student perceives that speech to be “demeaning” or “bothersome.”

5. Many students will inevitably choose not to speak—or to speak less forcefully about controversial topics—rather than face the risk of disciplinary proceedings and punishment if another student takes offense at their words and files a complaint alleging violations of the Statement’s ban on “bullying,” “harassment,” and “bias-motivated misconduct.”

6. The Justice Department now has filed a Statement of Interest (pdf.)(full embed at bottom of post) supporting the request for a preliminary injunction.”
DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team





Would the Far Left Obama DoJ have ever done what this Trump DoJ has done??????

Never ever ever!!!!


The Obamunists were all about restricting free speech.
With Trump......the first amendment will be off 'life support'.....and healthy again.

Before you say another word, read my post:
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Trump is about restricting freedom of the press and well he sure has a dirty fowl mouth so yeah he is for nasty free speech. Anything goes with him it seems, except facts.

You don’t know what the “press” is, moron.

Hint: The printing press isn’t the only way to get news anymore.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Trump? You're not talking about our president are you? Over three thousand lies and counting is quite a record, imagine if you or your child lied that much? Would that make you proud? But mom, our president lies and cheats why can't I?

The Trump presidency has shown one thing clearly, the republican party has no moral base, the religious Evangelicals have no Christian values, the Trump snowflakes have no emotion except hatred for the other, the conservative scholars are as devoid of integrity as the snowflakes, and right wing media is a dishonest cesspool of apologetic nonsense. Sad.

“To abandon facts is to abandon freedom. If nothing is true, then no one can criticize power, because there is no basis upon which to do so. If nothing is true, then all is spectacle. The biggest wallet pays for the most blinding lights.” Timothy Snyder, On Tyranny

Stuff for the interested in the truth reader:

'I Know Why Poor Whites Chant Trump, Trump, Trump' Jonna Ivin

I Know Why Poor Whites Chant Trump, Trump, Trump

'Group instinct & the white tribals of America'

Group instinct & the white tribals of America | ORF

"We live in a society in which spurious realities are manufactured by the media, by governments, by big corporations, by religious groups, political groups. I ask, in my writing, 'What is real?' Because unceasingly we are bombarded with pseudo realities manufactured by very sophisticated people using very sophisticated electronic mechanisms." Philip K. Dick

"Trump? You're not talking about our president are you? Over three thousand lies and counting.."

Time to put you in your place again, middy.....let's see what lies look like:


Trump 'lies'….compared to

1. This is the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow

2. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor

3. ObamaCare will save the average family $2500

4. They did a good job in Libya

5. A video caused Benghazi?

6. Islam has been woven into the fabric of our history

7. Jobs are gone and they’re never coming back

8. Michael brown hands up don’t shoot

9. IRS not a smidgen of corruption

10. Shovel ready jobs.

11. There’s a Muslim travel ban?

12. Very little difference between capitalism and communism

13. Remember that ‘Red Line’ in Syria that we were gonna enforce?

14. “We have removed all of Syria’s poison gas reserves”

15. Will be the most transparent in history (worst at FOIA requests)

16. October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"

17. I do not talk to the Attorney General about pending investigations. I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line, and always have maintained it, previous president. Uh Oh: New Texts Suggest Obama WH, CIA, FBI, And Harry Reid Colluded At Outset Of Russia Probe

18. WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran access — albeit briefly — to the U.S. financial system by sidestepping sanctions kept in place after the 2015 nuclear deal, despite repeatedly telling Congress and the public it had no plans to do so. … under President Barack Obama, the Treasury Department issued a license in February 2016, never previously disclosed, that would have allowed Iran to convert $5.7 billion it held at a bank in Oman from Omani rials into euros by exchanging them first into U.S. dollars.
Secret Obama-era permit let Iran convert funds to dollars




Left you speechless, huh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

8.“ [Trump’s] DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team

…a lawsuit brought by a new group called Speech First challenging U. Michigan’s Bias Response Teams, Lawsuit: U. Michigan speech code and Bias Response Team “profoundly chill free speech and open discourse”:…U. Michigan’s policies “are facially unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments….”




”The Department of Justice today filed a Statement of Interest in Speech First, Inc., v. Schlissel in the Eastern District of Michigan. The plaintiff, Speech First, a nationwide organization dedicated to defending civil liberties, alleges that the University of Michigan has adopted policies prohibiting and punishing speech protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

Speech First alleges that the University of Michigan’s policies on “harassment,” “bullying,” and “bias” are so vague and overbroad as to prompt students to limit their speech out of fear that they might be subject to disciplinary sanction, including “individual education” or “restorative justice” at the hands of the University’s Bias Response Team.


[The Trump DoJ] argues that the University of Michigan’s Statement of Student Rights and Responsibilities, which prohibits “harassment,” “bullying,” and “bias,” is unconstitutional because it offers no clear, objective definitions of the violations. Instead, the Statement refers students to a wide array of “examples of various interpretations that exist for the terms,” many of which depend on a listener’s subjective reaction to speech.” DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team




What a wonderful day for America and the Constitution….


…as was November 8, 2016.

 

[PoliticalChic]

9. A wise wonk once posited: “For a Liberal, feeling passes for knowing.”

And the DoJ posited the same:

“The United States also argues that the University’s Bias Response Policy chills protected speech through its Bias Response Team.

The Bias Response Team, which consists of University administrators and law enforcement officers, has the authority to subject students to discipline and sanction. It encourages students to report any suspected instances of bias, advising them: “[t]he most important indication of bias is your own feelings.” According to the plaintiff, the Bias Response Team has responded to more than 150 alleged incidents of bias in the last year.”
DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team




“[t]he most important indication of bias is your own feelings.”

There it is.....under Liberal tutelage, being offended trumps (pun intended) free speech.

 

[Dragonlady]

In the tale about to be illustrated here, one will immediately see the significance of the Trump election to America and Americans.

Had the troglodytes of the Left won the election, and maintained control of the Department of Justice…..this never…..never…..would have occurred.





1.“DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team

2. …a lawsuit brought by a new group called Speech First challenging U. Michigan’s Bias Response Teams, Lawsuit: U. Michigan speech code and Bias Response Team “profoundly chill free speech and open discourse”:…U. Michigan’s policies “are facially unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments….”

3. If you have not heard of Bias Response Teams, then you haven’t been around campus in the last decade.These teams, often referred to at BRTs, are the equivalent of SWAT teams standing by to enforce campus speech and conduct codes. … the teams enforce often vague standards highly dependent on how a complainant feels, there is an opaque process with little due process, and the results often track accepted campus political correctness rather than a search for the truth. Yet the punishments can cause lasting damage….




4. …amorphous prohibitions on “bullying,” “harassment,” and “bias-motivated misconduct” is to profoundly chill free speech and open discourse at the University. A student who voices a controversial or unpopular opinion—or who seeks to use humor, parody, or satire when discussing sensitive topics—could face severe punishment up to and including expulsion if even one other student perceives that speech to be “demeaning” or “bothersome.”

5. Many students will inevitably choose not to speak—or to speak less forcefully about controversial topics—rather than face the risk of disciplinary proceedings and punishment if another student takes offense at their words and files a complaint alleging violations of the Statement’s ban on “bullying,” “harassment,” and “bias-motivated misconduct.”

6. The Justice Department now has filed a Statement of Interest (pdf.)(full embed at bottom of post) supporting the request for a preliminary injunction.”
DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team





Would the Far Left Obama DoJ have ever done what this Trump DoJ has done??????

Never ever ever!!!!


The Obamunists were all about restricting free speech.
With Trump......the first amendment will be off 'life support'.....and healthy again.

The President is not protecting First Amendment rights at all. Most of your examples aren’t even examples of “free speech” that the First Amendment is designed to protect. Most of your examples are those of “hate speech”. Thats not what the First is designed to protect.

The First Amendment particularly protects speech which criticizes the federal government. Anyone who criticizes the Trump Administration is attacked by President Trump and declared an “enemy of the people”.

Take the press for example. Trump has calls the MSM “fake news” and he attacks them daily. These attacks are in direct violation of the First Amendment and the Constitutional role of the press to inform the people and to criticize the government.

Trump is routinely attacking NFL players for “taking a knee” saying they should be fired or deported. First Amendment rights are writtten to protect the rights of citizens to criticize the government and to keep them free from government retaliation. Trump is doing the opposite.

The only rights Trump are protecting are the right to bully, harass and threaten minorities. Freedom to criticize the government, not so much.

 

[PoliticalChic]

In the tale about to be illustrated here, one will immediately see the significance of the Trump election to America and Americans.

Had the troglodytes of the Left won the election, and maintained control of the Department of Justice…..this never…..never…..would have occurred.





1.“DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team

2. …a lawsuit brought by a new group called Speech First challenging U. Michigan’s Bias Response Teams, Lawsuit: U. Michigan speech code and Bias Response Team “profoundly chill free speech and open discourse”:…U. Michigan’s policies “are facially unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments….”

3. If you have not heard of Bias Response Teams, then you haven’t been around campus in the last decade.These teams, often referred to at BRTs, are the equivalent of SWAT teams standing by to enforce campus speech and conduct codes. … the teams enforce often vague standards highly dependent on how a complainant feels, there is an opaque process with little due process, and the results often track accepted campus political correctness rather than a search for the truth. Yet the punishments can cause lasting damage….




4. …amorphous prohibitions on “bullying,” “harassment,” and “bias-motivated misconduct” is to profoundly chill free speech and open discourse at the University. A student who voices a controversial or unpopular opinion—or who seeks to use humor, parody, or satire when discussing sensitive topics—could face severe punishment up to and including expulsion if even one other student perceives that speech to be “demeaning” or “bothersome.”

5. Many students will inevitably choose not to speak—or to speak less forcefully about controversial topics—rather than face the risk of disciplinary proceedings and punishment if another student takes offense at their words and files a complaint alleging violations of the Statement’s ban on “bullying,” “harassment,” and “bias-motivated misconduct.”

6. The Justice Department now has filed a Statement of Interest (pdf.)(full embed at bottom of post) supporting the request for a preliminary injunction.”
DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team





Would the Far Left Obama DoJ have ever done what this Trump DoJ has done??????

Never ever ever!!!!


The Obamunists were all about restricting free speech.
With Trump......the first amendment will be off 'life support'.....and healthy again.

The President is not protecting First Amendment rights at all. Most of your examples aren’t even examples of “free speech” that the First Amendment is designed to protect. Most of your examples are those of “hate speech”. Thats not what the First is designed to protect.

The First Amendment particularly protects speech which criticizes the federal government. Anyone who criticizes the Trump Administration is attacked by President Trump and declared an “enemy of the people”.

Take the press for example. Trump has calls the MSM “fake news” and he attacks them daily. These attacks are in direct violation of the First Amendment and the Constitutional role of the press to inform the people and to criticize the government.

Trump is routinely attacking NFL players for “taking a knee” saying they should be fired or deported. First Amendment rights are writtten to protect the rights of citizens to criticize the government and to keep them free from government retaliation. Trump is doing the opposite.

The only rights Trump are protecting are the right to bully, harass and threaten minorities. Freedom to criticize the government, not so much.

1. "Most of your examples are those of “hate speech”. "

Hate speech????

There is no such thing....that's the term Fascists use for anything they disagree with.



2. "Thats not what the First is designed to protect."

If there was ever any doubt that you're an imbecile....and there never was any in this precinct....that sentence was the proof.


3. Now...about speech that is imagined to "to bully, harass and threaten minorities."

Perfectly acceptable under the Constitution....

For your edification...if that is even possible....here is the Litmus Test:

Brandenburg test
Standard established in Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 US 444 (1969), to determine when inflammatory speech intending to advocate illegal action can be restricted. The standard developed determined that speech advocating the use of force or crime could only be proscribed where two conditions were satisfied: (1) the advocacy is “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,” and (2) the advocacy is also “likely to incite or produce such action.”

Brandenburg test




That is the only basis for restricting speech.

Get it now, you moron???????

 

[PoliticalChic]

10. The Trump DoJ….very different from the Obama DoJ:

” The United States is resolutely committed to protecting First Amendment freedoms and to ensuring, as Congress has directed, that public “institution of higher education . . . facilitate the free and open exchange of ideas.” 20 U.S.C. § 1011a(a)(2). In the United States’ view, Plaintiff Speech First, Inc., has established that it is likely to succeed on the merits of its claim that the University of Michigan’s Statement of Student Rights and Responsibilities (“Statement”) and Bias Response Policy are facially unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments….

In particular, the University’s policies authorize University officials to dispense disciplinary consequences against a speaker who engages in constitutionally protected speech based on nothing more than a listener’s “feelings” that the speech was “hurtful” or “bothersome.” The University’s policies thus do precisely what the First Amendment forbids: they ban a broad swath of core protected speech based solely on “[l]isteners’ reaction,” Forsyth Cty. v. Nationalist Movement, 505 U.S. 123, 134 (1992), that the speech is somehow “offensive or disagreeable,” Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 414 (1989). https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1070601/download



…disciplinary consequences against a speaker who engages in constitutionally protected speech based on nothing more than a listener’s “feelings”….



Supported by the party that brought the KKK, concentration camps, and Iranian nukes to the world.
Amazing

 

[Dschrute3]

Sadly, the Communists/Democrats seized control of our Colleges a long time ago. And they destroy everything they touch. They've systematically tried to purge Conservative Students from their ranks. They're very bad people. It is what it is.

 

[PoliticalChic]

11. It is unimaginable that the Obama Attorney General, the racist Eric Holder, the only Cabinet Member in history held in Contempt of Congress, would ever pursue unconstitutional infractions such as the university opposing free speech.

Heck....the Democrats favored blocking speech.....the only thing they've done for black Americans is forbid the use of a particular word.




Holder is a racist for whom skin color was more important than criminality.

"For much of his life, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. carried around something peculiar…an old clipping of a quote from Harlem preacher Reverend Samuel D. Proctor. Holder put the clipping in his wallet in 1971, when he was studying history at Columbia University, and kept it in wallet after wallet over the ensuing decades. What were Proctor’s words that Holder found so compelling? “Blackness is another issue entirely apart from class in America. No matter how affluent, educated and mobile [a black person] becomes, his race defines him more particularly than anything else.”…

When asked to explain the passage, Holder replied, “It really says that… I am not the tall U.S. attorney, I am not the thin United States Attorney. I am the black United States attorney.

And he was saying that no matter how successful you are, there’s a common cause that bonds the black United States attorney with the black criminal or the black doctor with the black homeless person.”…It may seem shocking to hear these racialist views ascribed to America’s top law enforcement officer. But to people who have worked inside the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice, these attitudes are perfectly familiar."
DOJ Whistleblower J. Christian Adams Releases New Book | Video | TheBlaze.com
DOJ‘s ’Whistleblower’ in New Black Panther Case Releases Book




'Has anyone asked Holder what exactly is the “common cause” that binds the black attorney general and the black criminal?'
J. Christian Adams, “Injustice: Exposing The Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department,” p. 2.




Somehow.....the Left has made evil palatable for many voters.

 

[PoliticalChic]

12. “Nicole Neily, president of Speech First, praised the Trump administration for its interest in the lawsuit, lauding the DOJ for its effort in protecting the First Amendment rights of students.

“We’re delighted that the U.S. Department of Justice has filed a statement of interest in our case against the University of Michigan,” Neily told Campus Reform. “Over the past year, DOJ has shown that they place a high priority on the First Amendment rights of students across the country, and we look forward to the court ruling on the merits of Speech First v. Schlissel.”

University of Michigan officials, however, have reportedly disputed the accuracy of the DOJ’s statement, arguing that the school’s Bias Response Team does not have the power to discipline students.

“Contrary to the department’s statement, the university’s Bias Response Team does not ‘have the authority to subject students to discipline and sanction,’” said university spokesman Rick Fitzgerald, as reported by Michigan Radio. “It provides support to students on a voluntary basis; it does not investigate claims of bias or discipline students in any way.”

That DOJ now is intervening in support of free speech rights on campus is the big story here.” DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team




The bigger story....Americans threw the totalitarians out.

 

[The Original Tree]

Mrs. Irrelevant!

In the tale about to be illustrated here, one will immediately see the significance of the Trump election to America and Americans.

Had the troglodytes of the Left won the election, and maintained control of the Department of Justice…..this never…..never…..would have occurred.





1.“DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team

2. …a lawsuit brought by a new group called Speech First challenging U. Michigan’s Bias Response Teams, Lawsuit: U. Michigan speech code and Bias Response Team “profoundly chill free speech and open discourse”:…U. Michigan’s policies “are facially unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments….”

3. If you have not heard of Bias Response Teams, then you haven’t been around campus in the last decade.These teams, often referred to at BRTs, are the equivalent of SWAT teams standing by to enforce campus speech and conduct codes. … the teams enforce often vague standards highly dependent on how a complainant feels, there is an opaque process with little due process, and the results often track accepted campus political correctness rather than a search for the truth. Yet the punishments can cause lasting damage….




4. …amorphous prohibitions on “bullying,” “harassment,” and “bias-motivated misconduct” is to profoundly chill free speech and open discourse at the University. A student who voices a controversial or unpopular opinion—or who seeks to use humor, parody, or satire when discussing sensitive topics—could face severe punishment up to and including expulsion if even one other student perceives that speech to be “demeaning” or “bothersome.”

5. Many students will inevitably choose not to speak—or to speak less forcefully about controversial topics—rather than face the risk of disciplinary proceedings and punishment if another student takes offense at their words and files a complaint alleging violations of the Statement’s ban on “bullying,” “harassment,” and “bias-motivated misconduct.”

6. The Justice Department now has filed a Statement of Interest (pdf.)(full embed at bottom of post) supporting the request for a preliminary injunction.”
DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team





Would the Far Left Obama DoJ have ever done what this Trump DoJ has done??????

Never ever ever!!!!


The Obamunists were all about restricting free speech.
With Trump......the first amendment will be off 'life support'.....and healthy again.

Before you say another word, read my post:
Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Trump is about restricting freedom of the press and well he sure has a dirty fowl mouth so yeah he is for nasty free speech. Anything goes with him it seems, except facts.

 

[koshergrl]

In the tale about to be illustrated here, one will immediately see the significance of the Trump election to America and Americans.

Had the troglodytes of the Left won the election, and maintained control of the Department of Justice…..this never…..never…..would have occurred.





1.“DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team

2. …a lawsuit brought by a new group called Speech First challenging U. Michigan’s Bias Response Teams, Lawsuit: U. Michigan speech code and Bias Response Team “profoundly chill free speech and open discourse”:…U. Michigan’s policies “are facially unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments….”

3. If you have not heard of Bias Response Teams, then you haven’t been around campus in the last decade.These teams, often referred to at BRTs, are the equivalent of SWAT teams standing by to enforce campus speech and conduct codes. … the teams enforce often vague standards highly dependent on how a complainant feels, there is an opaque process with little due process, and the results often track accepted campus political correctness rather than a search for the truth. Yet the punishments can cause lasting damage….




4. …amorphous prohibitions on “bullying,” “harassment,” and “bias-motivated misconduct” is to profoundly chill free speech and open discourse at the University. A student who voices a controversial or unpopular opinion—or who seeks to use humor, parody, or satire when discussing sensitive topics—could face severe punishment up to and including expulsion if even one other student perceives that speech to be “demeaning” or “bothersome.”

5. Many students will inevitably choose not to speak—or to speak less forcefully about controversial topics—rather than face the risk of disciplinary proceedings and punishment if another student takes offense at their words and files a complaint alleging violations of the Statement’s ban on “bullying,” “harassment,” and “bias-motivated misconduct.”

6. The Justice Department now has filed a Statement of Interest (pdf.)(full embed at bottom of post) supporting the request for a preliminary injunction.”
DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team





Would the Far Left Obama DoJ have ever done what this Trump DoJ has done??????

Never ever ever!!!!


The Obamunists were all about restricting free speech.
With Trump......the first amendment will be off 'life support'.....and healthy again.

Schools are death traps. They pose a threat to the bodies and the minds of our children.

Children are penalized for being original, for being insightful, for telling the truth, and for daring to adhere to the values of their parents.

All that..and they aren't taught anything that might help them withstand such stupidity, or which might justify continued compulsory education.

 

[jc456]

Trump? You're not talking about our president are you? Over three thousand lies and counting is quite a record, imagine if you or your child lied that much? Would that make you proud? But mom, our president lies and cheats why can't I?

The Trump presidency has shown one thing clearly, the republican party has no moral base, the religious Evangelicals have no Christian values, the Trump snowflakes have no emotion except hatred for the other, the conservative scholars are as devoid of integrity as the snowflakes, and right wing media is a dishonest cesspool of apologetic nonsense. Sad.

“To abandon facts is to abandon freedom. If nothing is true, then no one can criticize power, because there is no basis upon which to do so. If nothing is true, then all is spectacle. The biggest wallet pays for the most blinding lights.” Timothy Snyder, On Tyranny

Stuff for the interested in the truth reader:

'I Know Why Poor Whites Chant Trump, Trump, Trump' Jonna Ivin

I Know Why Poor Whites Chant Trump, Trump, Trump

'Group instinct & the white tribals of America'

Group instinct & the white tribals of America | ORF

"We live in a society in which spurious realities are manufactured by the media, by governments, by big corporations, by religious groups, political groups. I ask, in my writing, 'What is real?' Because unceasingly we are bombarded with pseudo realities manufactured by very sophisticated people using very sophisticated electronic mechanisms." Philip K. Dick

you hate whites. wow.

 

[PoliticalChic]

In the tale about to be illustrated here, one will immediately see the significance of the Trump election to America and Americans.

Had the troglodytes of the Left won the election, and maintained control of the Department of Justice…..this never…..never…..would have occurred.





1.“DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team

2. …a lawsuit brought by a new group called Speech First challenging U. Michigan’s Bias Response Teams, Lawsuit: U. Michigan speech code and Bias Response Team “profoundly chill free speech and open discourse”:…U. Michigan’s policies “are facially unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments….”

3. If you have not heard of Bias Response Teams, then you haven’t been around campus in the last decade.These teams, often referred to at BRTs, are the equivalent of SWAT teams standing by to enforce campus speech and conduct codes. … the teams enforce often vague standards highly dependent on how a complainant feels, there is an opaque process with little due process, and the results often track accepted campus political correctness rather than a search for the truth. Yet the punishments can cause lasting damage….




4. …amorphous prohibitions on “bullying,” “harassment,” and “bias-motivated misconduct” is to profoundly chill free speech and open discourse at the University. A student who voices a controversial or unpopular opinion—or who seeks to use humor, parody, or satire when discussing sensitive topics—could face severe punishment up to and including expulsion if even one other student perceives that speech to be “demeaning” or “bothersome.”

5. Many students will inevitably choose not to speak—or to speak less forcefully about controversial topics—rather than face the risk of disciplinary proceedings and punishment if another student takes offense at their words and files a complaint alleging violations of the Statement’s ban on “bullying,” “harassment,” and “bias-motivated misconduct.”

6. The Justice Department now has filed a Statement of Interest (pdf.)(full embed at bottom of post) supporting the request for a preliminary injunction.”
DOJ files in support of lawsuit against U. Michigan over Bias Response Team





Would the Far Left Obama DoJ have ever done what this Trump DoJ has done??????

Never ever ever!!!!


The Obamunists were all about restricting free speech.
With Trump......the first amendment will be off 'life support'.....and healthy again.

Schools are death traps. They pose a threat to the bodies and the minds of our children.

Children are penalized for being original, for being insightful, for telling the truth, and for daring to adhere to the values of their parents.

All that..and they aren't taught anything that might help them withstand such stupidity, or which might justify continued compulsory education.

I must admit....one need be strong to resist the indoctrination.

Lots more each year are home schooling, and the success of a Trump presidency....as in the case of this lawsuit against the oppressors, may put a bit more backbone in folks.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Trump? You're not talking about our president are you? Over three thousand lies and counting is quite a record, imagine if you or your child lied that much? Would that make you proud? But mom, our president lies and cheats why can't I?

The Trump presidency has shown one thing clearly, the republican party has no moral base, the religious Evangelicals have no Christian values, the Trump snowflakes have no emotion except hatred for the other, the conservative scholars are as devoid of integrity as the snowflakes, and right wing media is a dishonest cesspool of apologetic nonsense. Sad.

“To abandon facts is to abandon freedom. If nothing is true, then no one can criticize power, because there is no basis upon which to do so. If nothing is true, then all is spectacle. The biggest wallet pays for the most blinding lights.” Timothy Snyder, On Tyranny

Stuff for the interested in the truth reader:

'I Know Why Poor Whites Chant Trump, Trump, Trump' Jonna Ivin

I Know Why Poor Whites Chant Trump, Trump, Trump

'Group instinct & the white tribals of America'

Group instinct & the white tribals of America | ORF

"We live in a society in which spurious realities are manufactured by the media, by governments, by big corporations, by religious groups, political groups. I ask, in my writing, 'What is real?' Because unceasingly we are bombarded with pseudo realities manufactured by very sophisticated people using very sophisticated electronic mechanisms." Philip K. Dick

you hate whites. wow.

May be obligatory for many Obama supporters.