Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So when are Dems going to the right thing wrt Menendez?Republicans did the right thing
About half voted to expel Santos. Almost every Democrat voted against him
GOP Rep. George Santos expelled from House
The House voted Friday to expel New York GOP Rep. George Santos over ethics violations, making him only the sixth lawmaker ever to be kicked out of the chamber.www.cnn.com
My question still stands. Is it the purview of Maxime Waters,.Pelosi or Harris (at the time a senator) to encourage "getting in ther face", encouraging people to protest for change etc? That isn't thier role is it?He can be sued for actions not related to his Presidential function. The court determined this was not a Presidential function.
Should've had his day in court and a conviction.Good to see that guy gone but when we did we get standards in congress?
Shouldnt we be having another 530 or so votes?
The Constitution says you don’t have to convict first. Is the Constitution a travesty?Absolute travesty, ignoring anything resembling due process.
Convict, then remove.
One of your other Commie cousins already started a thread.
I get it.
You have to grasp at any straw of good news you can.
But, sheesh.
Being hated by right-wing racists and bigots isn't cause to step down.I didn't realize Santos was arrested, if that's your implication.
An other one who's going to get his day in court first.So when are Dems going to the right thing wrt Menendez?
200+ years of precedent says you do.The Constitution says you don’t have to convict first. Is the Constitution a travesty?
prove me wrong SkippyDo you really need to lie?
Nonsense.Absolute travesty, ignoring anything resembling due process.
Convict, then remove.
TRUMP! You Bidenfluffers are a hoot.
Santos is one of a kind200+ years of precedent says you do.
As many a Taz allows.How many duplicate threads are you going to make today?
Very good.Donald Trump can be sued over claims that he incited violence on Jan. 6, 2021, an appeals court ruled Friday, rejecting the former president’s argument that he is entirely immune from being held liable for incendiary remarks that preceded the attack on the Capitol.
Trump may be sued over Jan. 6 incitement claims, appeals court panel rules
The three-judge panel turned aside Trump’s sweeping argument that nearly all speech and conduct by an incumbent president should be shielded from lawsuits.www.politico.com
The three-judge panel concluded that Trump’s actions as a candidate for president would not automatically be protected by “presidential immunity,” turning aside Trump’s sweeping argument that nearly all speech and conduct by an incumbent president should be shielded from lawsuits, including several brought by members of Congress and injured police officers.
“When a first-term President opts to seek a second term, his campaign to win re-election is not an official presidential act,” Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan wrote. “The Office of the Presidency as an institution is agnostic about who will occupy it next. And campaigning to gain that office is not an official act of the office.”
Sue them and find out.My question still stands. Is it the purview of Maxime Waters,.Pelosi or Harris (at the time a senator) to encourage "getting in ther face", encouraging people to protest for change etc? That isn't thier role is it?
An other one who's going to get his day in court first.
If the neo-fascist shitlibs didn't have double standards.....
