Trump cries when called out for attacking women

[Faun]

And still, more women have accused Trump of rape than have accused Clinton.

Your entire argument hinges on the explicit use of the "rape" word by the victim.

Only the gullible are fooled.

Moron... it's not my argument -- it's the English language. Someone who claims they were groped and says nothing about being raped -- is not claiming they were raped.

But to conservative imbeciles like you, that's still rape.

Yes, that is your argument, douche bag. You harp on the use of the word "rape" every time you post on this subject.

Allow me to quote:

"And still, more women have accused Trump of RAPE than have accused Clinton."

Who do you think you're fooling?

It's really not my problem that you're so demented, you actually think women who are not claiming to have been raped, were raped.

So yes, it comes down to understanding English, which you obviously don't.

How is that "demented?" It's a well known phenomenon, especially when you're dealing with a couple of treacherous reptiles like the Clintons.

Holyfuckingshit!

No, you flaming conservative neanderthal ... it is not a well known phenomenon that groping a woman is rape.

 

[Faun]

More silliness. This issue isn't going away until after the November elections no matter what position the left takes. The right really is devoid of issues to stand on that they need dirt like this about someone not running for president.

Hardly. What issues is Hillary running on, her record at the Department of State?

Hillary is hoping to get elected by playing the woman card, by claiming that she cares about women and Trump doesn't. However, every time she opens her mouth, Trump will lambaste her with her record of persecuting and harassing Bill's sexual assault victims. It's a no win situation for her. Trump will beat her like a baby seal.

Hillary Clinton on the issues

Those issue are all ones that

1. Are low on the majority's list or priorities.
2. Hillary is losing the issue, like the economy. No one believes Hillary would be better than Trump at improving the economy
3. No one believes government can solve the issue.

Hillary is on the wrong side of major issues like immigration and international trade.

She has a weak hand and a weak record.

It's cute how you think your opinion of those issues means anything. Meanwhile, I answered your query of what issues she is running on.

It's all moonshine and abracadabra. She's promising everything to everyone . . . and she won't increase the deficit!

Neither will Trump nor will he build a wall along the Mexican border. No candidate ever delivers everything they promise.

 

[boedicca]

Trump was never "called out for attacking women" but there are great photos, some turned into post cards, of Bill Clinton crying when he was caught with his pants down sexually abusing a young woman barely older than his daughter in the freaking Oval Office. The current presumed democrat nominee blamed the "vast right wing conspiracy" for the DNA on Monica's freaking dress.

Speaking of sucking ...

Right on cue.

Speaking of sexually abusing women young enough to be his daughter -

Besides rape, why do you think Ivana dumped Duh Donuld??

But since so many pedos are heros to RWNJs, they reallly don't care.

Yeah....name some.....how about the one bill clinton went to the Island with...without his Secret Service detail...how about that one...moron.

Trump is going to make sure everyone knows that Bill raped Juanita. Finally, a bit of karmic justice for The Big Creep.

 

[bripat9643]

Your entire argument hinges on the explicit use of the "rape" word by the victim.

Only the gullible are fooled.

Moron... it's not my argument -- it's the English language. Someone who claims they were groped and says nothing about being raped -- is not claiming they were raped.

But to conservative imbeciles like you, that's still rape.

Yes, that is your argument, douche bag. You harp on the use of the word "rape" every time you post on this subject.

Allow me to quote:

"And still, more women have accused Trump of RAPE than have accused Clinton."

Who do you think you're fooling?

It's really not my problem that you're so demented, you actually think women who are not claiming to have been raped, were raped.

So yes, it comes down to understanding English, which you obviously don't.

How is that "demented?" It's a well known phenomenon, especially when you're dealing with a couple of treacherous reptiles like the Clintons.

Holyfuckingshit!

No, you flaming conservative neanderthal ... it is not a well known phenomenon that groping a woman is rape.

He also put his hand up her dress. It may not be rape, but it's definitely sexual assault - a felony, and you're defending it.

 

[Faun]

Trump was never "called out for attacking women" but there are great photos, some turned into post cards, of Bill Clinton crying when he was caught with his pants down sexually abusing a young woman barely older than his daughter in the freaking Oval Office. The current presumed democrat nominee blamed the "vast right wing conspiracy" for the DNA on Monica's freaking dress.

Speaking of sucking ...

Right on cue.

Speaking of sexually abusing women young enough to be his daughter -

Besides rape, why do you think Ivana dumped Duh Donuld??

But since so many pedos are heros to RWNJs, they reallly don't care.

Yeah....name some.....how about the one bill clinton went to the Island with...without his Secret Service detail...how about that one...moron.

Trump is going to make sure everyone knows that Bill raped Juanita. Finally, a bit of karmic justice for The Big Creep.

So? The Clinton's will make sure everyone knows she swore under oath it didn't happen.

 

[boedicca]

Trump was never "called out for attacking women" but there are great photos, some turned into post cards, of Bill Clinton crying when he was caught with his pants down sexually abusing a young woman barely older than his daughter in the freaking Oval Office. The current presumed democrat nominee blamed the "vast right wing conspiracy" for the DNA on Monica's freaking dress.

Speaking of sucking ...

Right on cue.

Speaking of sexually abusing women young enough to be his daughter -

Besides rape, why do you think Ivana dumped Duh Donuld??

But since so many pedos are heros to RWNJs, they reallly don't care.

Yeah....name some.....how about the one bill clinton went to the Island with...without his Secret Service detail...how about that one...moron.

Trump is going to make sure everyone knows that Bill raped Juanita. Finally, a bit of karmic justice for The Big Creep.

So? The Clinton's will make sure everyone knows she swore under oath it didn't happen.

That'll go over really well with the millennials who think Every Women Should Be Believed.

 

[Faun]

Moron... it's not my argument -- it's the English language. Someone who claims they were groped and says nothing about being raped -- is not claiming they were raped.

But to conservative imbeciles like you, that's still rape.

Yes, that is your argument, douche bag. You harp on the use of the word "rape" every time you post on this subject.

Allow me to quote:

"And still, more women have accused Trump of RAPE than have accused Clinton."

Who do you think you're fooling?

It's really not my problem that you're so demented, you actually think women who are not claiming to have been raped, were raped.

So yes, it comes down to understanding English, which you obviously don't.

How is that "demented?" It's a well known phenomenon, especially when you're dealing with a couple of treacherous reptiles like the Clintons.

Holyfuckingshit!

No, you flaming conservative neanderthal ... it is not a well known phenomenon that groping a woman is rape.

He also put his hand up her dress. It may not be rape, but it's definitely sexual assault - a felony, and you're defending it.

I didn't defend it. You're just too fucking deranged to comprehend that. Clarifying it's not rape is not defending it.

Meanwhile, you're so fucking deranged, you really did call it rape.

 

[Faun]

Trump was never "called out for attacking women" but there are great photos, some turned into post cards, of Bill Clinton crying when he was caught with his pants down sexually abusing a young woman barely older than his daughter in the freaking Oval Office. The current presumed democrat nominee blamed the "vast right wing conspiracy" for the DNA on Monica's freaking dress.

Speaking of sucking ...

Right on cue.

Speaking of sexually abusing women young enough to be his daughter -

Besides rape, why do you think Ivana dumped Duh Donuld??

But since so many pedos are heros to RWNJs, they reallly don't care.

Yeah....name some.....how about the one bill clinton went to the Island with...without his Secret Service detail...how about that one...moron.

Trump is going to make sure everyone knows that Bill raped Juanita. Finally, a bit of karmic justice for The Big Creep.

So? The Clinton's will make sure everyone knows she swore under oath it didn't happen.

That'll go over really well with the millennials who think Every Women Should Be Believed.

Who says they won't believe her when she swore under oath that Clinton didn't rape her?

 

[bripat9643]

Yes, that is your argument, douche bag. You harp on the use of the word "rape" every time you post on this subject.

Allow me to quote:

"And still, more women have accused Trump of RAPE than have accused Clinton."

Who do you think you're fooling?

It's really not my problem that you're so demented, you actually think women who are not claiming to have been raped, were raped.

So yes, it comes down to understanding English, which you obviously don't.

How is that "demented?" It's a well known phenomenon, especially when you're dealing with a couple of treacherous reptiles like the Clintons.

Holyfuckingshit!

No, you flaming conservative neanderthal ... it is not a well known phenomenon that groping a woman is rape.

He also put his hand up her dress. It may not be rape, but it's definitely sexual assault - a felony, and you're defending it.

I didn't defend it. You're just too fucking deranged to comprehend that. Clarifying it's not rape is not defending it.

Meanwhile, you're so fucking deranged, you really did call it rape.

Of course you're defending it. You're trying to claim that Clinton's record is better than Trump's because his victims didn't use the word "rape" to describe his behavior.

 

[boedicca]

Speaking of sucking ...

Right on cue.

Speaking of sexually abusing women young enough to be his daughter -

Besides rape, why do you think Ivana dumped Duh Donuld??

But since so many pedos are heros to RWNJs, they reallly don't care.

Yeah....name some.....how about the one bill clinton went to the Island with...without his Secret Service detail...how about that one...moron.

Trump is going to make sure everyone knows that Bill raped Juanita. Finally, a bit of karmic justice for The Big Creep.

So? The Clinton's will make sure everyone knows she swore under oath it didn't happen.

That'll go over really well with the millennials who think Every Women Should Be Believed.

Who says they won't believe her when she swore under oath that Clinton didn't rape her?

Think whatever gives you comfort. Juanita told several people about the rape back when it happened, and has spoken out about it. She didn't want to be dragged into the Paula Jones/Monica Lewinski fracas when Bubbah was President...and for good reason. She knew how the Clintons attacked women's reputations.

 

[bripat9643]

Trump was never "called out for attacking women" but there are great photos, some turned into post cards, of Bill Clinton crying when he was caught with his pants down sexually abusing a young woman barely older than his daughter in the freaking Oval Office. The current presumed democrat nominee blamed the "vast right wing conspiracy" for the DNA on Monica's freaking dress.

Speaking of sucking ...

Right on cue.

Speaking of sexually abusing women young enough to be his daughter -

Besides rape, why do you think Ivana dumped Duh Donuld??

But since so many pedos are heros to RWNJs, they reallly don't care.

Yeah....name some.....how about the one bill clinton went to the Island with...without his Secret Service detail...how about that one...moron.

Trump is going to make sure everyone knows that Bill raped Juanita. Finally, a bit of karmic justice for The Big Creep.

So? The Clinton's will make sure everyone knows she swore under oath it didn't happen.

That's not going to be very convincing:

Juanita Broaddrick - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia​

In the fall of 1997, Paula Jones’s private investigators tried to talk to Broaddrick at her home, also secretly taping the conversation.[9] Broaddrick refused to discuss the incident, saying “it was just a horrible horrible thing,” and that she “wouldn’t relive it for anything.”[11] The investigators told her she would likely be subpoenaed if she would not talk to them. Broaddrick said she would deny everything, saying “you can’t get to him, and I’m not going to ruin my good name to do it… there’s just absolutely no way anyone can get to him, he’s just too vicious.”[11] Broaddrick was subpoenaed in the Jones suit soon after and submitted an affidavit denying that Clinton had made “any sexual advances”.[1][2] The recording of Broaddrick’s conversation with the investigators was leaked to the press, but Broaddrick continued to refuse to speak to reporters.[9]

Despite Broaddrick’s denial in her affidavit, Jones’ lawyers included Yoakum’s letter and Broaddrick's name in a 1998 filing.[9] The letter suggested that the Clintons had bought Broaddrick’s silence, describing a phone call where Broaddrick’s husband asked Yoakum to say the incident never happened and said that he intended to ask Clinton “for a couple of big favors.”[12] This, along with the discrepancy between the letter and Broaddrick’s affidavit, attracted the attention of independent counsel Kenneth Starr, who was investigating Clinton for obstruction of justice. After being approached by the FBI, Broaddrick consulted her son, a lawyer, who told her she could not lie to federal investigators.[4]After they promised her she would not be prosecuted for perjury regarding her affidavit in the Jones case, Broaddrick recanted the affidavit. However, she insisted that Clinton had not pressured or bribed her in any way, and so Starr concluded that the story was not relevant to his investigation and his report only mentioned the recanting in a footnote.[10]​

 

[Faun]

It's really not my problem that you're so demented, you actually think women who are not claiming to have been raped, were raped.

So yes, it comes down to understanding English, which you obviously don't.

How is that "demented?" It's a well known phenomenon, especially when you're dealing with a couple of treacherous reptiles like the Clintons.

Holyfuckingshit!

No, you flaming conservative neanderthal ... it is not a well known phenomenon that groping a woman is rape.

He also put his hand up her dress. It may not be rape, but it's definitely sexual assault - a felony, and you're defending it.

I didn't defend it. You're just too fucking deranged to comprehend that. Clarifying it's not rape is not defending it.

Meanwhile, you're so fucking deranged, you really did call it rape.

Of course you're defending it. You're trying to claim that Clinton's record is better than Trump's because his victims didn't use the word "rape" to describe his behavior.

Again, for those like you who don't understand English -- pointing out that groping a woman is not raping her; is not defending the groping.

Your inability to grasp both English and common sense is your problem, no one else's.

 

[Faun]

Yeah....name some.....how about the one bill clinton went to the Island with...without his Secret Service detail...how about that one...moron.

Trump is going to make sure everyone knows that Bill raped Juanita. Finally, a bit of karmic justice for The Big Creep.

So? The Clinton's will make sure everyone knows she swore under oath it didn't happen.

That'll go over really well with the millennials who think Every Women Should Be Believed.

Who says they won't believe her when she swore under oath that Clinton didn't rape her?

Think whatever gives you comfort. Juanita told several people about the rape back when it happened, and has spoken out about it. She didn't want to be dragged into the Paula Jones/Monica Lewinski fracas when Bubbah was President...and for good reason. She knew how the Clintons attacked women's reputations.

And facing the penalty of perjury, swore it never happened. And if she's so afraid of the Clinton's, why has she recanted her recant? Sounds like you're full of shit.

 

[Faun]

Trump was never "called out for attacking women" but there are great photos, some turned into post cards, of Bill Clinton crying when he was caught with his pants down sexually abusing a young woman barely older than his daughter in the freaking Oval Office. The current presumed democrat nominee blamed the "vast right wing conspiracy" for the DNA on Monica's freaking dress.

Speaking of sucking ...

Right on cue.

Speaking of sexually abusing women young enough to be his daughter -

Besides rape, why do you think Ivana dumped Duh Donuld??

But since so many pedos are heros to RWNJs, they reallly don't care.

Yeah....name some.....how about the one bill clinton went to the Island with...without his Secret Service detail...how about that one...moron.

Trump is going to make sure everyone knows that Bill raped Juanita. Finally, a bit of karmic justice for The Big Creep.

So? The Clinton's will make sure everyone knows she swore under oath it didn't happen.

That's not going to be very convincing:

Juanita Broaddrick - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia​

In the fall of 1997, Paula Jones’s private investigators tried to talk to Broaddrick at her home, also secretly taping the conversation.[9] Broaddrick refused to discuss the incident, saying “it was just a horrible horrible thing,” and that she “wouldn’t relive it for anything.”[11] The investigators told her she would likely be subpoenaed if she would not talk to them. Broaddrick said she would deny everything, saying “you can’t get to him, and I’m not going to ruin my good name to do it… there’s just absolutely no way anyone can get to him, he’s just too vicious.”[11] Broaddrick was subpoenaed in the Jones suit soon after and submitted an affidavit denying that Clinton had made “any sexual advances”.[1][2] The recording of Broaddrick’s conversation with the investigators was leaked to the press, but Broaddrick continued to refuse to speak to reporters.[9]

Despite Broaddrick’s denial in her affidavit, Jones’ lawyers included Yoakum’s letter and Broaddrick's name in a 1998 filing.[9] The letter suggested that the Clintons had bought Broaddrick’s silence, describing a phone call where Broaddrick’s husband asked Yoakum to say the incident never happened and said that he intended to ask Clinton “for a couple of big favors.”[12] This, along with the discrepancy between the letter and Broaddrick’s affidavit, attracted the attention of independent counsel Kenneth Starr, who was investigating Clinton for obstruction of justice. After being approached by the FBI, Broaddrick consulted her son, a lawyer, who told her she could not lie to federal investigators.[4]After they promised her she would not be prosecuted for perjury regarding her affidavit in the Jones case, Broaddrick recanted the affidavit. However, she insisted that Clinton had not pressured or bribed her in any way, and so Starr concluded that the story was not relevant to his investigation and his report only mentioned the recanting in a footnote.[10]​

And then in the face of a wikipedia link is Broaddrick's actual sworn testimony.

During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. Newspaper and tabloid reporters hounded me and my family, seeking corroboration of these tales. I repeatedly denied the allegations and requested that my family's privacy be respected. These allegations are untrue and I had hoped that they would no longer haunt me, or cause further disruption to my family.​

 

[boedicca]

Speaking of sucking ...

Right on cue.

Speaking of sexually abusing women young enough to be his daughter -

Besides rape, why do you think Ivana dumped Duh Donuld??

But since so many pedos are heros to RWNJs, they reallly don't care.

Yeah....name some.....how about the one bill clinton went to the Island with...without his Secret Service detail...how about that one...moron.

Trump is going to make sure everyone knows that Bill raped Juanita. Finally, a bit of karmic justice for The Big Creep.

So? The Clinton's will make sure everyone knows she swore under oath it didn't happen.

That's not going to be very convincing:

Juanita Broaddrick - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia​

In the fall of 1997, Paula Jones’s private investigators tried to talk to Broaddrick at her home, also secretly taping the conversation.[9] Broaddrick refused to discuss the incident, saying “it was just a horrible horrible thing,” and that she “wouldn’t relive it for anything.”[11] The investigators told her she would likely be subpoenaed if she would not talk to them. Broaddrick said she would deny everything, saying “you can’t get to him, and I’m not going to ruin my good name to do it… there’s just absolutely no way anyone can get to him, he’s just too vicious.”[11] Broaddrick was subpoenaed in the Jones suit soon after and submitted an affidavit denying that Clinton had made “any sexual advances”.[1][2] The recording of Broaddrick’s conversation with the investigators was leaked to the press, but Broaddrick continued to refuse to speak to reporters.[9]

Despite Broaddrick’s denial in her affidavit, Jones’ lawyers included Yoakum’s letter and Broaddrick's name in a 1998 filing.[9] The letter suggested that the Clintons had bought Broaddrick’s silence, describing a phone call where Broaddrick’s husband asked Yoakum to say the incident never happened and said that he intended to ask Clinton “for a couple of big favors.”[12] This, along with the discrepancy between the letter and Broaddrick’s affidavit, attracted the attention of independent counsel Kenneth Starr, who was investigating Clinton for obstruction of justice. After being approached by the FBI, Broaddrick consulted her son, a lawyer, who told her she could not lie to federal investigators.[4]After they promised her she would not be prosecuted for perjury regarding her affidavit in the Jones case, Broaddrick recanted the affidavit. However, she insisted that Clinton had not pressured or bribed her in any way, and so Starr concluded that the story was not relevant to his investigation and his report only mentioned the recanting in a footnote.[10]​

And then in the face of a wikipedia link is Broaddrick's actual sworn testimony.

During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. Newspaper and tabloid reporters hounded me and my family, seeking corroboration of these tales. I repeatedly denied the allegations and requested that my family's privacy be respected. These allegations are untrue and I had hoped that they would no longer haunt me, or cause further disruption to my family.​

And Juanita in 1999.

 

[bripat9643]

Trump is going to make sure everyone knows that Bill raped Juanita. Finally, a bit of karmic justice for The Big Creep.

So? The Clinton's will make sure everyone knows she swore under oath it didn't happen.

That'll go over really well with the millennials who think Every Women Should Be Believed.

Who says they won't believe her when she swore under oath that Clinton didn't rape her?

Think whatever gives you comfort. Juanita told several people about the rape back when it happened, and has spoken out about it. She didn't want to be dragged into the Paula Jones/Monica Lewinski fracas when Bubbah was President...and for good reason. She knew how the Clintons attacked women's reputations.

And facing the penalty of perjury, swore it never happened. And if she's so afraid of the Clinton's, why has she recanted her recant? Sounds like you're full of shit.

Your logic chopping has extended beyond the absurd. She's credible when she doesn't want to testify, for reasons that are obvious to anyone else, but she isn't credible when she does accuse Bill of rape. She would commit perjury, but Bill, the president of the United States, committed perjury before the entire country.

Why would anyone swallow your ridiculous excuses?

 

[Faun]

Yeah....name some.....how about the one bill clinton went to the Island with...without his Secret Service detail...how about that one...moron.

Trump is going to make sure everyone knows that Bill raped Juanita. Finally, a bit of karmic justice for The Big Creep.

So? The Clinton's will make sure everyone knows she swore under oath it didn't happen.

That's not going to be very convincing:

Juanita Broaddrick - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia​

In the fall of 1997, Paula Jones’s private investigators tried to talk to Broaddrick at her home, also secretly taping the conversation.[9] Broaddrick refused to discuss the incident, saying “it was just a horrible horrible thing,” and that she “wouldn’t relive it for anything.”[11] The investigators told her she would likely be subpoenaed if she would not talk to them. Broaddrick said she would deny everything, saying “you can’t get to him, and I’m not going to ruin my good name to do it… there’s just absolutely no way anyone can get to him, he’s just too vicious.”[11] Broaddrick was subpoenaed in the Jones suit soon after and submitted an affidavit denying that Clinton had made “any sexual advances”.[1][2] The recording of Broaddrick’s conversation with the investigators was leaked to the press, but Broaddrick continued to refuse to speak to reporters.[9]

Despite Broaddrick’s denial in her affidavit, Jones’ lawyers included Yoakum’s letter and Broaddrick's name in a 1998 filing.[9] The letter suggested that the Clintons had bought Broaddrick’s silence, describing a phone call where Broaddrick’s husband asked Yoakum to say the incident never happened and said that he intended to ask Clinton “for a couple of big favors.”[12] This, along with the discrepancy between the letter and Broaddrick’s affidavit, attracted the attention of independent counsel Kenneth Starr, who was investigating Clinton for obstruction of justice. After being approached by the FBI, Broaddrick consulted her son, a lawyer, who told her she could not lie to federal investigators.[4]After they promised her she would not be prosecuted for perjury regarding her affidavit in the Jones case, Broaddrick recanted the affidavit. However, she insisted that Clinton had not pressured or bribed her in any way, and so Starr concluded that the story was not relevant to his investigation and his report only mentioned the recanting in a footnote.[10]​

And then in the face of a wikipedia link is Broaddrick's actual sworn testimony.

During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. Newspaper and tabloid reporters hounded me and my family, seeking corroboration of these tales. I repeatedly denied the allegations and requested that my family's privacy be respected. These allegations are untrue and I had hoped that they would no longer haunt me, or cause further disruption to my family.​

And Juanita in 1999.

And rational people are going to believe she was raped when she swore under oath she wasn't, because....?

Or maybe her attending a fundraiser for Clinton not long after will convince them?

Oh, I know, it's Juanita recently adding "new details" to an incident she claimed occurred almost 4 decades ago that will convince them.

 

[bripat9643]

Speaking of sucking ...

Right on cue.

Speaking of sexually abusing women young enough to be his daughter -

Besides rape, why do you think Ivana dumped Duh Donuld??

But since so many pedos are heros to RWNJs, they reallly don't care.

Yeah....name some.....how about the one bill clinton went to the Island with...without his Secret Service detail...how about that one...moron.

Trump is going to make sure everyone knows that Bill raped Juanita. Finally, a bit of karmic justice for The Big Creep.

So? The Clinton's will make sure everyone knows she swore under oath it didn't happen.

That's not going to be very convincing:

Juanita Broaddrick - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia​

In the fall of 1997, Paula Jones’s private investigators tried to talk to Broaddrick at her home, also secretly taping the conversation.[9] Broaddrick refused to discuss the incident, saying “it was just a horrible horrible thing,” and that she “wouldn’t relive it for anything.”[11] The investigators told her she would likely be subpoenaed if she would not talk to them. Broaddrick said she would deny everything, saying “you can’t get to him, and I’m not going to ruin my good name to do it… there’s just absolutely no way anyone can get to him, he’s just too vicious.”[11] Broaddrick was subpoenaed in the Jones suit soon after and submitted an affidavit denying that Clinton had made “any sexual advances”.[1][2] The recording of Broaddrick’s conversation with the investigators was leaked to the press, but Broaddrick continued to refuse to speak to reporters.[9]

Despite Broaddrick’s denial in her affidavit, Jones’ lawyers included Yoakum’s letter and Broaddrick's name in a 1998 filing.[9] The letter suggested that the Clintons had bought Broaddrick’s silence, describing a phone call where Broaddrick’s husband asked Yoakum to say the incident never happened and said that he intended to ask Clinton “for a couple of big favors.”[12] This, along with the discrepancy between the letter and Broaddrick’s affidavit, attracted the attention of independent counsel Kenneth Starr, who was investigating Clinton for obstruction of justice. After being approached by the FBI, Broaddrick consulted her son, a lawyer, who told her she could not lie to federal investigators.[4]After they promised her she would not be prosecuted for perjury regarding her affidavit in the Jones case, Broaddrick recanted the affidavit. However, she insisted that Clinton had not pressured or bribed her in any way, and so Starr concluded that the story was not relevant to his investigation and his report only mentioned the recanting in a footnote.[10]​

And then in the face of a wikipedia link is Broaddrick's actual sworn testimony.

During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. Newspaper and tabloid reporters hounded me and my family, seeking corroboration of these tales. I repeatedly denied the allegations and requested that my family's privacy be respected. These allegations are untrue and I had hoped that they would no longer haunt me, or cause further disruption to my family.​

It appears that everyone but you understands why she wouldn't want to be the center of a media circus, especially when it comes to testifying against a couple of political thugs as powerful and ruthless as the Clintons.

Are you serious?

 

[boedicca]

Trump is going to make sure everyone knows that Bill raped Juanita. Finally, a bit of karmic justice for The Big Creep.

So? The Clinton's will make sure everyone knows she swore under oath it didn't happen.

That's not going to be very convincing:

Juanita Broaddrick - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia​

In the fall of 1997, Paula Jones’s private investigators tried to talk to Broaddrick at her home, also secretly taping the conversation.[9] Broaddrick refused to discuss the incident, saying “it was just a horrible horrible thing,” and that she “wouldn’t relive it for anything.”[11] The investigators told her she would likely be subpoenaed if she would not talk to them. Broaddrick said she would deny everything, saying “you can’t get to him, and I’m not going to ruin my good name to do it… there’s just absolutely no way anyone can get to him, he’s just too vicious.”[11] Broaddrick was subpoenaed in the Jones suit soon after and submitted an affidavit denying that Clinton had made “any sexual advances”.[1][2] The recording of Broaddrick’s conversation with the investigators was leaked to the press, but Broaddrick continued to refuse to speak to reporters.[9]

Despite Broaddrick’s denial in her affidavit, Jones’ lawyers included Yoakum’s letter and Broaddrick's name in a 1998 filing.[9] The letter suggested that the Clintons had bought Broaddrick’s silence, describing a phone call where Broaddrick’s husband asked Yoakum to say the incident never happened and said that he intended to ask Clinton “for a couple of big favors.”[12] This, along with the discrepancy between the letter and Broaddrick’s affidavit, attracted the attention of independent counsel Kenneth Starr, who was investigating Clinton for obstruction of justice. After being approached by the FBI, Broaddrick consulted her son, a lawyer, who told her she could not lie to federal investigators.[4]After they promised her she would not be prosecuted for perjury regarding her affidavit in the Jones case, Broaddrick recanted the affidavit. However, she insisted that Clinton had not pressured or bribed her in any way, and so Starr concluded that the story was not relevant to his investigation and his report only mentioned the recanting in a footnote.[10]​

And then in the face of a wikipedia link is Broaddrick's actual sworn testimony.

During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. Newspaper and tabloid reporters hounded me and my family, seeking corroboration of these tales. I repeatedly denied the allegations and requested that my family's privacy be respected. These allegations are untrue and I had hoped that they would no longer haunt me, or cause further disruption to my family.​

And Juanita in 1999.

And rational people are going to believe she was raped when she swore under oath she wasn't, because....?

Or maybe her attending a fundraiser for Clinton not long after will convince them?

Oh, I know, it's Juanita recently adding "new details" to an incident she claimed occurred almost 4 decades ago that will convince them.

There is no upside for Juanita to make herself a victim of the Clinton Attack Machine, bub. She's taking a big risk going public with the truth.

hiLIARy, on the other hand, refuses to talk to the IG about her email server. You can choose who you think is more credible, but I believe Juanita.

 

[Faun]

So? The Clinton's will make sure everyone knows she swore under oath it didn't happen.

That'll go over really well with the millennials who think Every Women Should Be Believed.

Who says they won't believe her when she swore under oath that Clinton didn't rape her?

Think whatever gives you comfort. Juanita told several people about the rape back when it happened, and has spoken out about it. She didn't want to be dragged into the Paula Jones/Monica Lewinski fracas when Bubbah was President...and for good reason. She knew how the Clintons attacked women's reputations.

And facing the penalty of perjury, swore it never happened. And if she's so afraid of the Clinton's, why has she recanted her recant? Sounds like you're full of shit.

Your logic chopping has extended beyond the absurd. She's credible when she doesn't want to testify, for reasons that are obvious to anyone else, but she isn't credible when she does accuse Bill of rape. She would commit perjury, but Bill, the president of the United States, committed perjury before the entire country.

Why would anyone swallow your ridiculous excuses?

Whether or not she wanted to testify -- she did. And she swore Clinton never raped her. And if she committed such blatant perjury, why was she never charged?