Trump Declares 'I Can Ban All Reporters From WH' - Snowflake Heads Explode

[busybee01]

Oh suck a dick with that "I didn't personally say he destroyed our economy"

But you will definitely agree with the millions of times you idiots claimed Obama destroyed not only the economy, but America -- you just pissed that facts aint on your side, and to that I say...and?

obammy's regulations stopped the US of A. stopped it. silenced the private sector and drove jobs into other economies. globalist!!! it's all he was. It's why I'm a nationalist!!! My patriotism is to the US of A not the globe.

What regulation stopped the USA??

I'll wait while you vomit up more incoherent non-sense

It doesn't matter. It's been proven a 1000 times that you scum don't accept facts when they prove you wrong.

and Trump has lied 8 times since you typed that bullshit comment

Got to love this tds

It causes Trump supporters to say the stupidest things.

 

[busybee01]

What many people, including Trump, don’t realize is there is a large swath of conservative voters that voted for him because he was the nominee, and not because they adore his message (or antics for that matter). We need to see if the Dems come up with a viable canidate, but if they can it could open the door for a Republican challenger to Trump. Do you hear me Dems? If you can’t produce a canidate who can win, it will be 4 more years of enduring Trump. BTW- Hellary, Sanders, Warren and Biden are not viable candidates.

Each candidate will automatically get app. 45% of the electorate, due to the issue you raise in your first sentence. Independents are always the demographic that puts a candidate over the top.

trump lied about virtually everything when addressing blue collar workers/unions. He's lost unions. He's lost the majority of women. He's lost everyone who was promised 'much better health insurance at a fraction of the cost...it will be so easy'.

trump will get the Conservatives you reference. He won't get the Bernie supporters who voted for him, nor will he be lucky enough to have millenials/non whites simply sit the next election out. See the midterms if you don't believe me.

Biden would win in a landslide, but I'd suggest a younger candidate that leans away from party politics.

Bernie wouldn’t beat Trump. Too many people don’t want an admitted commie as president. As for the non-whites sitting out the next election based on the mid terms, well that is just silly conjecture. Midterms and Presidential elections are completely different animals. 50% more people vote in presidential years compared to midterms. Black voter turnout was down in 2016 for obvious reasons (no BO).

Bernie would have beaten Trump. Polls showed that Biden and Sanders would have beaten Trump by double digits. Clinton was the weakest candidate Democrats could run and Trump was the weakest candidate Republicans could have run.

 

[busybee01]

A history less for the snowflake Trump supporters....

Back when we were Britain's 13 colonies -- there were great restrictions on the press -- the kind that would make you Trump lovers proud.

For example, if the press printed anything that the British rulers didn't approve of, that newspaper could be sued for libel and put out of business.

Then some radical revolutionary types decided to get all anti-colonial and declare independence...one of the first things they did was make sure the expression of information, ideas and opinions was practiced freely without interference, constraint or prosecution by the government. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights, maybe you heard about it.

The Acosta dust up has nothing to do with freedom of the press, moron. You snowflakes flatter yourselves if you believe you are supporting the Constitution.

You have no clue what the Constitution means. The Acosta dust-up has everything to do with the 1st Amendment.

 

[busybee01]

Previous case held Acosta's credentials can only be pulled for some "compelling cause" and he must have a fair and impartial (not Trump) hearing first.

Oh really? So who gets to decide?

You are making shit up as you go. So sad, and pathetic!

That is the opinion of JUDGE Andrew Napolitano who is a Trump supporter. He knows a lot more about the law than you do Comrade.

 

[busybee01]

In response to CNN's ridiculous law suit suing the WH for the 'right' of reporters to be rude, hijack Press Conferences, and throw a tantrum if they do not get their way, President Trump responded by declaring....


"I can ban ALL reporters from the WH, not
just CNN's rude a**hole Acosta!"


The Liberal / snowflake response was as expected:







The funny fact is the President is right - he can 'ban' every reporter from the WH. Doing so does not violate their Constitutional right of a 'free press' / to report any news they want...God knows banning Acosta has not stopped CNN from continuing to report Fake News!



'Banning' every reporter can be accomplished as easily and legally as simply declaring the President will no longer hold any Press Conferences until the media learns some respect, how to act and carry out their jobs professionally...

No Press Conference, no need for WH access....

The a Liberal Press has met its match in a President who won't take their fake news / shit laying down like every other Republican / Conservative President has. The corrupt press is being challenged, and they don't like it.

F* 'em! Bwuhahahahaha!



Trump seeks to land blow against media in court fight with CNN



"CNN argued in its lawsuit filed Tuesday that the White House infringed on Acosta's First Amendment rights by revoking his access in response to a dispute over a press conference last week."

No one is preventing CNN from reporting the news, as pointed out. CNN is pissed they don't get to run WH Press Conferences, that they can not impose their will on Trump and 'beat him into line', are not being allowed to call the President a 'racist' and 'white supremacist' during Press Conferences....

Stupid Russian. You know that even FOX News is siding with CNN on this one. Trump hasn't got a leg to stand on.

And another thing you should consider you piece of Russian shit: The fact that Trump is even TRYING to pull this bullshit after deliberately calling on Accosta to provoke an incident with him, and releasing faked video to try to discredit the reporter, is causing real Americans to stop and say "You can't do that". And it would certainly give a judge, whose job it is first and foremost to uphold the Constitution which protects reporters and news outlets from government harassment, would say, No, Mr. President, you can't do that".

Trump does not hold press conferences to actually say why he respond to an issue in a certain way. He holds them as media events, where he identifies an issue for his supporters to pay attention to. Acosta refuses to play along and actually ask questions. Rather he attacks Trump's position on an issue.

Unfortunately for Trump, he is playing a game differently than other presidents have, but he cannot change the rules so long as he pretends he's playing the same game as before. I've never understood why he tries to use "press conferences." He can have tame intereviewers like Hannity ask him the questions he wants to be asked. And then send out some sacrificial beast like Spicer or Sanders to face actual questions ... and they'll have to lie and disseminate and destroy whatever credibility they had before working for him.

I didn't vote Acosta into office and neither did anyone else.

Reporters are not elected dummy.

 

[bripat9643]

A history less for the snowflake Trump supporters....

Back when we were Britain's 13 colonies -- there were great restrictions on the press -- the kind that would make you Trump lovers proud.

For example, if the press printed anything that the British rulers didn't approve of, that newspaper could be sued for libel and put out of business.

Then some radical revolutionary types decided to get all anti-colonial and declare independence...one of the first things they did was make sure the expression of information, ideas and opinions was practiced freely without interference, constraint or prosecution by the government. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights, maybe you heard about it.

The Acosta dust up has nothing to do with freedom of the press, moron. You snowflakes flatter yourselves if you believe you are supporting the Constitution.

You have no clue what the Constitution means. The Acosta dust-up has everything to do with the 1st Amendment.

Notice that you didn't say that Trump violated the 1st Amendment. Apparently even you are not stupid enough to make that claim.

 

[Norman]

Trump should sue Acosta for assaulting the white house intern.

He would getting convicted for being the world's biggest asshole.

 

[hadit]

A history less for the snowflake Trump supporters....

Back when we were Britain's 13 colonies -- there were great restrictions on the press -- the kind that would make you Trump lovers proud.

For example, if the press printed anything that the British rulers didn't approve of, that newspaper could be sued for libel and put out of business.

Then some radical revolutionary types decided to get all anti-colonial and declare independence...one of the first things they did was make sure the expression of information, ideas and opinions was practiced freely without interference, constraint or prosecution by the government. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights, maybe you heard about it.

The Acosta dust up has nothing to do with freedom of the press, moron. You snowflakes flatter yourselves if you believe you are supporting the Constitution.

You have no clue what the Constitution means. The Acosta dust-up has everything to do with the 1st Amendment.

How was Acosta, or CNN for that matter, denied the right to publish anything they wanted to?

There is no constitutional guarantee for individual reporters or newspapers to have access to the president. If CNN successfully makes that case, the Squirrel Nest Auto Trader can demand a presence in presidential press conferences.

 

[Aldo Raine]

I do wish he would. That would be great!

He could stand there and talk to himself.

perfect solution.

He is never going to do that, we all know he likes the attention way to much.

Have you ever seen a Foul-Mouthed Bully turn into a Hermit in quick order? No? Don't be so sure.

There is no way he does not want the spotlight on him at all times.

 

[BS Filter]

CNN is suing the president because their rep had a meltdown on public TV and he's having a meltdown. too funny jack.

Trump was the one who had the meltdown. He's gone bananas since the mid-terms.

he smacked Acosta a new one. Let Acosta show the world the ass Acosta truly is. I loved the meltdown Acosta had, swatting at the young lady and using his body to hold the mic. too fking funny. what a dick.

The aide assaulted Acosta first. Trump had the meltdown.

suuure poindexter, suuuurrrrre. The year of the woman and Acosta acosted her. I love it.

She assaulted him. Why don't you try glasses.

Oh, for sure.....and um.....ah....Monica pulled Bill's zipper down right after she knocked him unconscious, huh.

 

[Howard Roark]

Obama's jobs were part-time jobs at McDonald's. Trumps jobs were full time jobs, with benefits, in assembly plants.

Really? How many?

 

[Howard Roark]

Bernie would have beaten Trump. Polls showed that Biden and Sanders would have beaten Trump by double digits. Clinton was the weakest candidate Democrats could run and Trump was the weakest candidate Republicans could have run.

In a landslide. And the entire Congress would have been Blue.
I think Comey deserves a lot of credit for trump's win, coupled with a nation that was ripe for change. Anyone who knew anything about trump, knew he is a pathological liar who would not deliver on any promises he made to workers.

At the time, very few knew a thing about trump, and here we are. This election showed that everyone knows him now.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

It must be a pathetic existence to think "making libs angry" is an accomplishment.

All he has to do is get out of bed for that to happen.

Not really, I am quite sure that once his term is over, there won't be much said about him -- not like how repubs still and will continue to obsess over Obama and Hillary

Many on the left will be writing about him for decades and it will be through their politically slanted view.

Personally I wish he would just hush and CNN admit Acosta was in the wrong but neither side see their stupidity in what happen.

God I wish Bush was President again...

 

[Kondor3]

... There is no way he does not want the spotlight on him at all times.

True. However, if that 'spotlight' becomes largely negative and laden with ridicule and scorn, well... one Hermit coming up...

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Bernie would have beaten Trump. Polls showed that Biden and Sanders would have beaten Trump by double digits. Clinton was the weakest candidate Democrats could run and Trump was the weakest candidate Republicans could have run.

In a landslide. And the entire Congress would have been Blue.
I think Comey deserves a lot of credit for trump's win, coupled with a nation that was ripe for change. Anyone who knew anything about trump, knew he is a pathological liar who would not deliver on any promises he made to workers.

At the time, very few knew a thing about trump, and here we are. This election showed that everyone knows him now.

Really?

I have threads about him and his Charlatan ways, so my retarded ass knew the rest of the damn Universe should know more!

Trump won because of how Wikileaks sunk the DNC with it reports of the DNC trying to prevent Bernie from winning the nomination.

Then add in Jill Stein strong showing in states like Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

Finally, the fact Hillary was no Obama and she has been hated for decades and now you understand why she lost.

Comey comments was Hillary excuse for losing the Electoral College by a wide margin but the reality is she lost because all that I have stated and more!

 

[BluesLegend]

It must be a pathetic existence to think "making libs angry" is an accomplishment.

Trump doesn't have to make liberals angry, liberals are always angry.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

It must be a pathetic existence to think "making libs angry" is an accomplishment.

Trump doesn't have to make liberals angry, liberals are always angry.

I am not angry, but then again I am not some progressive socialist millennial snow flake either...

I am liberal minded.

 

[BluesLegend]

It must be a pathetic existence to think "making libs angry" is an accomplishment.

Trump doesn't have to make liberals angry, liberals are always angry.

I am not angry, but then again I am not some progressive socialist millennial snow flake either...

I am liberal minded.

Sounds like you are a liberal collaborator, they are just as bad.

 

[dannyboys]

It must be a pathetic existence to think "making libs angry" is an accomplishment.

All he has to do is get out of bed for that to happen.

Not really, I am quite sure that once his term is over, there won't be much said about him -- not like how repubs still and will continue to obsess over Obama and Hillary

In the next six years Trump will very likely put one, maybe two more Constitutionalists on the SC.
Not a bad record as President.
And there's fuck all the LIBs/MSM can do about it.
THATS the real reason the LIBs are so beside themselves everyday.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

It must be a pathetic existence to think "making libs angry" is an accomplishment.

All he has to do is get out of bed for that to happen.

Not really, I am quite sure that once his term is over, there won't be much said about him -- not like how repubs still and will continue to obsess over Obama and Hillary

In the next six years Trump will very likely put one, maybe two more Constitutionalists on the SC.
Not a bad record as President.
And there's fuck all the LIBs/MSM can do about it.
THATS the real reason the LIBs are so beside themselves everyday.

Yea, and Iraq will erect statues praising George Bush

Remember when you then Bush worshippers were pushing that fantasy?