Of course that would be false. Rump isn't about to send the money himself, now is he?
Always notice wording.
We're in Court and you say "Anonymous sources say"
I say "I have a signed statement saying it didn't happen".
The judge throws you out.
Nope, not those words. You just wrote that.
No I mean the words about "receiving hush money from Donald Trump".
The key word is "from".
Lemme know if you need another clue.
Nope, I'd win in court.
Sigh..............
She says she didn't receive hush money FROM RUMP.
She does not say somebody else didn't pay it on his behalf. That's how she can say that the idea she got money "FROM RUMP" is false. Because technically it would be. Rump would direct a third party to do it.
Simple as that.
She categorically denied everything, sorry.
Hey, I quoted what you quoted. It doesn't cover "everything"; it's one statement. I just explained what it means, and what it doesn't mean.