Osiris-ODS
Diamond Member
- Jan 22, 2019
- 3,664
- 3,335
Way to go, Dipsticks.
Your hateful campaign of Fascist Coups has kicked you in the face.
View attachment 306206
Keep convincing yourself that Trump is going to win. [Trump] was basically the only person running in NH, and even then he only got 85% of all of the votes. Not to mention that Trump received 115,000 votes in NH. Democrats received 258,941 votes. More than twice what Trump received.
So, I'm curious to see how you're going to spin this ... Let's look at the 2012 NH primary, where the roles were reversed -- Obama was the incumbent and the Republican candidates were competing for the R nomination. With the relevant data from the 2012 and 2020 primaries swapped where emphasized in bold, here's the 2012 NH primary stated back to you in your own words:
Obama was basically the only person running in NH, and even then he only got 80% of all of the votes. Not to mention that Obama received 49,080 votes in NH. Republicans received 248,485 votes. More than five-times what Obama received
And Obama ultimately won NH in the general election.
In light of the above, do you maintain that your post makes a valid point? Or can you concede, just this once, that the point you were trying to make was flawed?