Trump guilty of battery and defamation of E Jean Carroll

[Skylar]

Its hilarious watching biden voters fawn over this
You guys are one in the same

Fawn....over accountability?

Why aren't you?

 

[toobfreak]

Trump guilty of battery and defamation of E Jean Carroll.
Five million dollars awarded E. Jean Carroll.
Firt time an ex-President has been found guilty of battery and defamation in a civil case

By another Manhattan court lead by a prosecutor who ran on "GETTING TRUMP."

You can't determine battery in a case decades old and no way this bitch suffered or deserves 5 million in damages.

Trump will appeal this and have it overturned so fast, it'll make your bald head spin!

 

[basquebromance]

 

[basquebromance]

Fawn....over accountability?

Why aren't you?

you're enjoying this

don't act like you're not. i'll call you out!

 

[Quasar44]

Ok for Bill Clinton to take trips to pedo island

 

[Lisa558]

And?

the rule is not to have duplicate threads.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Its hilarious watching biden voters fawn over this
You guys are one in the same

You are right.
No big deal that a former President has been found guilty of battery on a woman and defamation in a civil case. No big deal that a former President has been indicted him for allegedly falsifying business records in connection with a hush money payment made to a porn star, by a grand jury.
It is a big deal for people with morals.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll, must pay her $5 million, jury says

Donald Trump must pay $5 million in damages for sexually abusing magazine writer E. Jean Carroll in the 1990s and then defaming her by branding her a liar, a jury decided on Tuesday.

www.reuters.com

Makes ya proud, MAGA?

Turns out Mr. Trump is a rapist POS. Color me shocked.

 

[Hector12]

The New York Times

E. Jean Carroll, Who Accused Trump of Rape, Seeks His DNA in Lawsuit​

Ms. Carroll says that President Trump assaulted her in the 1990s, and that she has the dress she was wearing during the incident.

The writer E. Jean Carroll, who has accused Donald J. Trump of raping her in the 1990s and is suing him for defamation, asked on Thursday that he provide a DNA sample to determine whether his genetic material is on a dress she says she had on at the time of the incident.

E. Jean Carroll, Who Accused Trump of Rape, Seeks His DNA in Lawsuit (Published 2020)

Ms. Carroll says that President Trump assaulted her in the 1990s, and that she has the dress she was wearing during the incident.

www.nytimes.com

------------

I do not see why this did not come out at the trial. Trump should have been required to give a DNA sample.

 

[AMart]

What people should be ashamed of is that a case that has one side presenting evidence including.

- 2 people claiming under oath that Carroll told them about the incident at the time.
- 1 other person claiming the same happened to her.
- 1 psychiatrist stating Carroll shows signs of trauma from sexual abuse.
- 1 videotape in which Trump can be heard saying he does exactly what he's accused of.
- 1 videotape of a deposition where you can hear Trump stating that sexual assault being wrong is morally ambiguous when you're a "star"

At the same time no defense was presented.

And yet to Trump supporters the reason that Trump was found liable is bias.

You guys have given up all sense of logic in defense of this guy and you should be ashamed.

Yeah they are lying that's leftists do every single waking moment.

 

[BackAgain]

.

They really do NOT know the difference.

They are that stupid.

.

And worse. They are impervious to education.

So where are we so far with Trump?

Liable for rape

For an alleged battery.

Paid hush money to a Prostitute

More to come
Election interference, illegally taking secret documents

So where are we so far with Trump?

We’ll never know what a moron hack like you attempts to answer.

Liable for rape

False. Liable for battery and for alleged defamation. The fact that a jury in NY City under the misguided rulings of a partisan judge made that “determination” isn’t the same as saying it’s true.

Paid hush money to a Prostitute

False. It isn’t even yet established that he paid for the NDA. And paying for NDAs remains perfectly legal.

More to come

Maybe. But that’s not where we “stand.”

Election interference,

Alleged. Never established.

illegally taking secret documents

We don’t know either facet of that claim. He had physical possession of some documents but no evidence that he illegally took them. And there also is no proof that they were still secret when he obtained them.

Your grade is an F. As usual.

 

[easyt65]

'In determining Trump’s guilt, however, the jury doesn’t have to decide whether or not the rape, which Trump denies, ever took place. U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan has instructed the jury that all they have to do is conclude that Trump gave Carroll an “unwanted peck on the cheek” in order to find him guilty. Yes, really.'

Judge Says Trump Could Be Guilty in Civil Rape Case If He Gave Accuser an ‘Unwanted Peck on the Cheek’

pjmedia.com

 

[Stann]

He never defamed her. The verdict is absurd.

"Calling a person a liar when they're telling the truth is deformation. Saying " She's not my type ! " and later misidentifying her as one of his ex-wives is deformation of character. You are absurd if you can't see that. He attacked her and if the creep could have gotten his little Winnie hard he would have raped her. SHE did not attack him

 

[B. Kidd]

First off, he is not guilty of anything. This is a civil matter.

Most Ameri-cu*t's too stupid to understand the difference.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[MisterBeale]

Meet the 2024 repub nominee...convicted Sexial Assaulter, Donald J trump.

I'm aware, that hardly anyone reads the details of what is going on, so, they don't know this is a lie. You have no credibility here. Do you read your own links?



". . . Because this was a civil case, Trump faces no criminal consequences and, as such, there was never a threat of prison.

Trump's legal team opted not to present a defense, gambling that jurors would find that Carroll had failed to make a persuasive case.

Trump had said Carroll, a former Elle magazine columnist and a registered Democrat, made up the allegations to try to increase sales of her 2019 memoir and to hurt him politically.

Because the case was in civil court, Carroll was required to establish her rape claim by "a preponderance of the evidence" - meaning more likely than not - rather than the higher standard used in criminal cases of "proof beyond a reasonable doubt." Carroll had to show "clear and convincing evidence" to prove her defamation claim.

The trial featured testimony from two women who said Trump sexually assaulted them decades ago.

Former People magazine reporter Natasha Stoynoff told jurors that Trump cornered her at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida in 2005 and forcibly kissed her for a “few minutes” until a butler interrupted the alleged assault. Another woman, Jessica Leeds, testified that Trump kissed her, groped her and put his hand up her skirt on a flight in 1979.

Jurors also heard excerpts from a 2005 "Access Hollywood" video in which Trump says women let him "grab 'em by the pussy."

"Historically, that's true, with stars ... if you look over the last million years," Trump said in an October 2022 video deposition played in court. He has repeatedly denied allegations of sexual misconduct.. . . ."

US election: Full transcript of Donald Trump's obscene videotape

The full transcript of the conversation between Donald Trump and a TV host in 2005 in which the US presidential candidate made obscene comments about women.

www.bbc.com

Most non-partisan, critial thinkers, can see, from that exchange, he never moves on them, unless, "they let you do it."

But if they are married, too young, or other wise uninterested? "I couldn't get there, she was married."

Everything you need to know about his character, and about whether he forces himself upon unwilling women? Is right there in that Access Hollywood Tape, if you are non-partisan, and really honest with yourself. Yes, he is a dirtbag, and not loyal to his wife, but. . . OTH, he is no sex offender or rapist.

I know that this does not comport to your agenda, but this leaked tape shows us this truth.


It is a civil case, there is no conviction. His lawyers knew the whole thing was political.

We don't even know if alcohol is involved with these women.

So? Get lost.

The only thing we know for sure, but we have always known, is that Trump has no moral compass.

 

[HaShev]

Should he be on the National Register of Sexual Perverts?

You've seen hundreds of pictures of Joe, Hunter, and even Hillary innapropriately touching kissing and sniffing kids, your party had just fired your nuclear guy for stealing womans clothes - suitcases and you want to put your political opponent on the registry because he leads the polls?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

That’s funny considering your pig Oy grabs women by the genitals

.




Prove it or STFU.

Photograph.

Thanks for your thought provoking post.




.

 

[Meathead]

That’s funny considering your pig Oy grabs women by the genitals

Yeah, but not inferior poontang.

 

[Zincwarrior]

By another Manhattan court lead by a prosecutor who ran on "GETTING TRUMP."

You can't determine battery in a case decades old and no way this bitch suffered or deserves 5 million in damages.

Trump will appeal this and have it overturned so fast, it'll make your bald head spin!

Not a prosecutor. Its a civil plaintiff.
What has Trump ever won on appeal?