Trump guilty of battery and defamation of E Jean Carroll

Rape would be almost impossible to prove after this long a time. And that would be another case. Little wonder 9 out of 10 rape victims choose not to go to trial. The victims are treated like the criminals and are abused by the system.

Not really. She kept the dress. If it has Trump's DNA on it, you've got a solid chance on a criminal rape conviction.

But the statute of limitations makes it moot.
 
"Calling a person a liar when they're telling the truth is deformation. Saying " She's not my type ! " and later misidentifying her as one of his ex-wives is deformation of character. You are absurd if you can't see that. He attacked her and if the creep could have gotten his little Winnie hard he would have raped her. SHE did not attack him
Deformation, Karen? And no. Saying. I didn’t rape her” is free speech and not defamation.

You’re an idiot.
 
Not a prosecutor. Its a civil plaintiff.
What has Trump ever won on appeal?

What is the evidence that Trump battered this woman 30-40 years ago?

And how did he defame her by calling her charges absurd?

She'll never see a dime from Trump.
 
Yeah they are lying that's leftists do every single waking moment.
Videotapes are lying?

It's not a he said, she said. It's, he said, and she said, and then he denies it after the fact but not really convincingly.
 
My opinion on the Rittenhouse case remains unchanged. Today's conviction of trump is valid and long-overdue. I stand by that too. What else do you want to talk about the Roe vs Wade decision ? All the anti-transgender laws that republicans are pushing all over the country. Please go to the appropriate places to post your concerns.They don't belong here.
The point is, you disagreed with that jury yet told me I’m wrong for saying this one got it wrong. That’s hypocritical.

Are you a mod? Should you be telling me where to post off-topic concerns? If not, I don’t understand the purpose of your comment
 
You Dims are sooo stupid. Even your own ilk is catching up to all the lawbreaking schemes you use to penalize Trump.
You are the campaign manager for him to win in a landslide.
Ignorant peabrain.
Defend the avowed sexual predator...says a lot about you.
 
Not really. She kept the dress. If it has Trump's DNA on it,
Link? I don’t believe there is any evidence ever that the stain was ever linked back to Trump. Unlike the stain on Monica’s blue dress.
you've got a solid chance on a criminal rape conviction.
Zero chance. Not even charged. And can never be charged.
But the statute of limitations makes it moot.
Then why make your absurd claim?
 
Its not merely alleged anymore. A jury found Trump did rape Carroll.
No, dumb ass, it didn't. For starters, it was a Civil trial, not Criminal.
What they found: "liable for sexually abusing and forcibly touching the writer E. Jean Carroll.
Anything else you want to get wrong?
Did I mention dumb ass?
 
You are right.
No big deal that a former President has been found guilty of battery on a woman and defamation in a civil case. No big deal that a former President has been indicted him for allegedly falsifying business records in connection with a hush money payment made to a porn star, by a grand jury.
It is a big deal for people with morals.
Dude, we have a fucking congress fund that WE PAY FOR where they can do whatever in the hell they want.
We have a President now, that has been accused by several women of doing the same shit trump just lost for. He even had the SS ADMIT they threw away the records of when he assaulted one of his guys wives.
It is nice to see a pol actually go down for something but the level of disingenuous celebration is hilarious.
And your half off-topic post isnt going to change that :thup:
 
Trump could have probably won if he had shown up to testify. But he played it like a boss and said "fuck it, I'll just pay off the dumb whoowah. My time is too valuable waste on some fucked up, hillbilly George Conway concocted bullshit."

It still has to go to appeal.

For all we know, he might just have a plan to bankrupt the plaintiff (the woman making this claim,) instead.

Who knows? :dunno:

If, as he is claiming, that she is doing this as a promo for her book. . . ?? Then something is fishy.

If the books sales go through the roof because of this trial, but the lawyers take it all away? meh, what has she gained?
 

Forum List

Back
Top