Trump has been EXONERATED of all charges.

[WEATHER53]

Romney made history, too....the 1st Senate politician who voted against his own party's President in favor of Impeachment...

...and now voters in his own state are trying to initiate a recall of him as their rep.

Romney did something a decided majority did not. Not sure where the victory is in that.

 

[bluzman61]

Just like after the Mueller thing, this is Case Closed and Over libs now how many post Morten “bombshells” you conjour up and throw our.

Unfortunately, Faun appears to be stuck on stupid.

 

[bripat9643]

What foreign national donated some "other thing of value"

You lose again, Fuckwit.

by any threatening letter or communication

Still waiting for the threatening letter or communitacion, Fuckwit.


DAYUM! Now you are losing multiple times in each post.

LOL

Dumbfuck, why do you insist on making a complete fool of yourself over and over and over again?

All the president’s privileges

President Trump has limited the information the House has had available for its impeachment and other investigations, by repeatedly instructing both current and past members of his administration to refuse to recognize the authority of congressional subpoenas.​

Yeah, we have been over this about a thousand times, Halfwit. The WH council challenged the validity of the subpoenas.

And your post still has on threat, Pea Brain.

They made no legal challenge and the Supreme Court has already ruled in the past that Congress has subpoena power.

Yes, they did. Team Trump submitted the letter they sent to the House challenging the subpoenas on the grounds they were invalid. That is a legal challenge.

That put the onus on the House to take them to court for a ruling. They didn't because they were in a hurry.

LOLOL

There is no such onus on the Congress, ya dumbfuck. They could have gone to court, or they could have withdrawn the subpoenas. They chose neither, nor did they have to.

If congress doesn't enforce its subpoenas, then no one has to obey them, shit for brains.

 

[jc456]

The 'fastest Impeachment in US history based on ' The weakest case to Impeach in US history' - based on no crime, no evidence, and no witness...after 3.5 years...has been rejected, dismissed....

With 9 more months before the election Democrats have to come up with another huge fake news accusation / attack / story to distract people from their disastrous socialist / communist nightmare platform that vows to reverse the Trump success and put Americans back under economic slavery...

Purely Partisan Impeachment

 

[Faun]

Of a fair criminal trial, fucking moron.

Lie

Imbecile, "nuh-uh" isn't a rebuttal.

Presumption of innocence is a bedrock principle of the American criminal justice system...

We’ll asswipe, it’s funny how for an impeachment, you are alleging high CRIMES OR MISDEMEANORS. See that word crime moron? Bitch slapped yet again.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck...

"There certainly doesn't have to be a crime." ~ Alan Dershowitz

Regardless, Impeached Trump was impeached on two crimes -- soliciting foreign aid for his re-election campaign and obstructing Congress.

Just keep showing how stupid you are you uneducated eunuch. Exonerated Trump by your claims was accused of a crime, thus making this a criminal proceeding you jackass. You are bitch slapped again little yellow coward. You claim this is not a criminal proceeding, then claim crimes were committed. Damn you are stupid. Slapping you is so easy.

LOLOL

It cracks me up to watch how eager you are to parade your ignorance.

Twinky... presidents, VP's and civil servants sometimes commit crimes. When they do, they can face impeachment for them. That doesn't make impeachment a criminal procedure. If it was a criminal procedure, they'd face prosecution; but they don't until the Justice Department gets involved. The worst that can happen from impeachment, being a non-criminal process to deal with crimes and/or malfeasance of office, is to get thrown out of that office.

This would be a good time for you to buzz the attending nurse to change your diaper.

 

[Faun]

Poor dumbfuck ^^^ can't post without lying. In reality, I actually said Impeached Trump was not guilty until proven innocent.

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.

LOL

Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.

Amen yet you still have to prove your charges as you continually claim this is a trial that needed witnesses. Thus yes, there is ALWAYS presumption of innocence you uneducated eunuch. Keep showing how totally stupid you are asshole. You are bitch slapped again.

LOL

Keep swingin', Twinky.

Keep showing how stupid and uneducated you are eunuch. No response, no education, and no balls. You’ve been getting butch slapped all over this thread and made to look like the fool you are BOY.

LOLOL

This is a response, ya moron. Posts like yours are the equivalent of you swinging your purse at me and I'm encouraging you to keep them coming because they're so hysterical.

Keep swingin', Twinky...

 

[Faun]

Sure, dumbfuck...

• §30121

• 
  
  
  • 18 U.S. Code § 1505

Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national.....

Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national.

This should be entertainng........

Hey Dumbfuck, here is what is required in your second link:

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas.

This should be entertaining.......

LOLOLOLOLOL

You must be the dumbest fucking poster on this site, dumbfuck...

"Hey Dumfuck, your first link requires a donation by a foreign national..... Show us where Trump received a donation from a foreign national."

Dumbfuck, how is it you couldn't understand the rest of that section of the law?? It doesn't have to be a donation, ya moron.

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value​

"Show us exactly where Trump threatened anyone when his legal team challenged the validity of the invalid subpoenas."

Yet again, your flaming ignorance causes you to bitchslap yourself. Imbecile, threats are not the only violation.

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress​

This provides yet another example for why I will never be a conservative. I would be embarrassed as hell to be on the same side of the aisle as ignorant schmucks like you.

So having your lawyer contradict the narrative of Adolph Shiffler is now a crime?

The only people you are fooling are the terminally gullible.

They weren't contradicting any narrative... they were ignoring subpoenas. That's a crime.

No it isn’t you dumbestfuck. Contesting subpoenas in Court is a LEGAL option that you assholes CHOSE not to pursue. You’re so stupid you don’t even remember your own name most of the time do you? Of course when you’re getting beaten down like this (as usual for you) you try to forget.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, Congress doesn't contest subpoenas, they issue them.

 

[Faun]

Lie

Imbecile, "nuh-uh" isn't a rebuttal.

Presumption of innocence is a bedrock principle of the American criminal justice system...

We’ll asswipe, it’s funny how for an impeachment, you are alleging high CRIMES OR MISDEMEANORS. See that word crime moron? Bitch slapped yet again.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck...

"There certainly doesn't have to be a crime." ~ Alan Dershowitz

Regardless, Impeached Trump was impeached on two crimes -- soliciting foreign aid for his re-election campaign and obstructing Congress.

Just keep showing how stupid you are you uneducated eunuch. Exonerated Trump by your claims was accused of a crime, thus making this a criminal proceeding you jackass. You are bitch slapped again little yellow coward. You claim this is not a criminal proceeding, then claim crimes were committed. Damn you are stupid. Slapping you is so easy.

It all depends on what he is currently getting his ass kicked on whether or not this was a criminal/court/political proceeding. He flip-flops to whatever he thinks makes his case.

His is a blithering idiot in the midst of an Epic Meltdown.

LOLOL

You poor, deranged fruitcake. I've never flip flopped on whether or not impeachment is a criminal process or not. I've said all along it's not. Sadly, you're hallucinating again.

But g'head, tell the thread again how Bill Clinton is innocent of lying under oath... that was fucking hysterical.

 

[Faun]

LOL

Dumbfuck, why do you insist on making a complete fool of yourself over and over and over again?

All the president’s privileges

President Trump has limited the information the House has had available for its impeachment and other investigations, by repeatedly instructing both current and past members of his administration to refuse to recognize the authority of congressional subpoenas.​

Yeah, we have been over this about a thousand times, Halfwit. The WH council challenged the validity of the subpoenas.

And your post still has on threat, Pea Brain.

They made no legal challenge and the Supreme Court has already ruled in the past that Congress has subpoena power.

Yes, they did. Team Trump submitted the letter they sent to the House challenging the subpoenas on the grounds they were invalid. That is a legal challenge.

That put the onus on the House to take them to court for a ruling. They didn't because they were in a hurry.

LOLOL

There is no such onus on the Congress, ya dumbfuck. They could have gone to court, or they could have withdrawn the subpoenas. They chose neither, nor did they have to.

If congress doesn't enforce its subpoenas, then no one has to obey them, shit for brains.

Fucking moron, I never said they have to enforce them. They still have the ability to have people arrested for ignoring them. Or in this case, impeaching s president who encourages others to ignore them.

 

[Nostra]

Faun Epic Meltdown: Day 5

 

[skookerasbil]

Watch the ratings at MSNBC and CNN this time next month!! OMG......make sure when you take a gander at the numbers you are not sipping your morning coffee because it'll be all over your monitor or phone from bursting out laughing.

 

[jc456]

Watch the ratings at MSNBC and CNN this time next month!! OMG......make sure when you take a gander at the numbers you are not sipping your morning coffee because it'll be all over your monitor or phone from bursting out laughing.

you mean like this?

 

[anynameyouwish]

Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.

sooooo........O J SImpson did NOT commit murder?

he was really innocent?

 

[Nostra]

Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.

sooooo........O J SImpson did NOT commit murder?

he was really innocent?

When was OJ impeached? This isn't a court trial, so why are you trying to compare the two?

 

[Faun]

Faun Epic Meltdown: Day 5

 

[Faun]

Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.

sooooo........O J SImpson did NOT commit murder?

he was really innocent?

When was OJ impeached? This isn't a court trial, so why are you trying to compare the two?

LOL

Bill Clinton was and you think he was innocent of lying under oath.

 

[Nostra]

Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.

sooooo........O J SImpson did NOT commit murder?

he was really innocent?

When was OJ impeached? This isn't a court trial, so why are you trying to compare the two?

LOL

Bill Clinton was and you think he was innocent of lying under oath.

Feel free to provide my quote saying such about Slick.

 

[Faun]

Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.

sooooo........O J SImpson did NOT commit murder?

he was really innocent?

When was OJ impeached? This isn't a court trial, so why are you trying to compare the two?

LOL

Bill Clinton was and you think he was innocent of lying under oath.

Feel free to provide my quote saying such about Slick.

Sure, like Impeached Trump, Clinton was found to be not guilty. And according to you...

Exonerated implies innocence, but regrettably, Impeached Trump was found "not guilty," not, "innocent."

"Not guilty"?

Innocent UNTIL PROVEN guilty.

INNOCENT!

 

[Nostra]

Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.

sooooo........O J SImpson did NOT commit murder?

he was really innocent?

When was OJ impeached? This isn't a court trial, so why are you trying to compare the two?

LOL

Bill Clinton was and you think he was innocent of lying under oath.

Feel free to provide my quote saying such about Slick.

Sure, like Impeached Trump, Clinton was found to be not guilty. And according to you...

Exonerated implies innocence, but regrettably, Impeached Trump was found "not guilty," not, "innocent."

"Not guilty"?

Innocent UNTIL PROVEN guilty.

INNOCENT!

I don't see "Clinton" anywhere in my post. This is a Trump thread, Fuckwit.

Wanna try again?

 

[bripat9643]

Lie

Imbecile, "nuh-uh" isn't a rebuttal.

Presumption of innocence is a bedrock principle of the American criminal justice system...

We’ll asswipe, it’s funny how for an impeachment, you are alleging high CRIMES OR MISDEMEANORS. See that word crime moron? Bitch slapped yet again.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck...

"There certainly doesn't have to be a crime." ~ Alan Dershowitz

Regardless, Impeached Trump was impeached on two crimes -- soliciting foreign aid for his re-election campaign and obstructing Congress.

Just keep showing how stupid you are you uneducated eunuch. Exonerated Trump by your claims was accused of a crime, thus making this a criminal proceeding you jackass. You are bitch slapped again little yellow coward. You claim this is not a criminal proceeding, then claim crimes were committed. Damn you are stupid. Slapping you is so easy.

LOLOL

It cracks me up to watch how eager you are to parade your ignorance.

Twinky... presidents, VP's and civil servants sometimes commit crimes. When they do, they can face impeachment for them. That doesn't make impeachment a criminal procedure. If it was a criminal procedure, they'd face prosecution; but they don't until the Justice Department gets involved. The worst that can happen from impeachment, being a non-criminal process to deal with crimes and/or malfeasance of office, is to get thrown out of that office.

This would be a good time for you to buzz the attending nurse to change your diaper.

Th problem is that you TDS morons keep saying Trump committed a crime, but no crimes were listed in the impeachment articles. He was impeached for nothing, and that will be recorded forever in the history of American Democrat scum.